http://my.chicagotribune.com/#sectio.../p2p-82969616/


I love it. Goes to show that all the filthy things said about *underage
girls* can have consequences, whether on Twitter or in Newsgroups, it's
illegal to do so and you just have to have the connections that Curt has.
One was a ticket taker for the Yankees, fired. One was a radio host for a
school, suspended. More to come. Go Curt! :-)

Cheri

On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:33:55 -0800, "Cheri" >
wrote:

> http://my.chicagotribune.com/#sectio.../p2p-82969616/
>
>
> I love it. Goes to show that all the filthy things said about *underage
> girls* can have consequences, whether on Twitter or in Newsgroups, it's
> illegal to do so and you just have to have the connections that Curt has.
> One was a ticket taker for the Yankees, fired. One was a radio host for a
> school, suspended. More to come. Go Curt! :-)
>

Good!


--
A kitchen without a cook is just a room

On Friday, March 6, 2015 at 4:34:37 PM UTC-6, Cheri wrote:
>
> More to come. Go Curt! :-)
>
> Cheri
>
>
Who is Curt Shilling?

On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 15:57:22 -0800 (PST), "
> wrote:

>On Friday, March 6, 2015 at 4:34:37 PM UTC-6, Cheri wrote:
>>
>> More to come. Go Curt! :-)
>>
>> Cheri
>>
>>
>Who is Curt Shilling?

A major Major League pitcher. He's been on the winning side of 3 or
4 World Series and holds some records. Now retired.

In article >,
Sqwertz > wrote:

> On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 15:02:42 -0800, sf wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:33:55 -0800, "Cheri" >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> http://my.chicagotribune.com/#sectio.../p2p-82969616/
> >>
> >> I love it. Goes to show that all the filthy things said about *underage
> >> girls* can have consequences, whether on Twitter or in Newsgroups, it's
> >> illegal to do so and you just have to have the connections that Curt has.
> >> One was a ticket taker for the Yankees, fired. One was a radio host for a
> >> school, suspended. More to come. Go Curt! :-)
> >
> > Good!
>
> Not good. The OP doesn't have her facts straight, and probably on
> purpose to try and make a point here. According to her Facebook page
> his daughter 19 years old - almost 20. So she is NOT underaged.

strangely enough, the link that allowed you to be fascinated by her
boobs, lists her age as 17


>
> https://www.facebook.com/gabby.schillingg
>
> And the two people who were identified as making lewd comments are in
> her same age group. This just sounds like a case of sour grapes.
>
> Check her out Sheldon. Scroll down 3 pictures.
>
> http://www.people.com/article/curt-s...cial-media-cyb
> erbullying
>
> How do you feel about that? To me it looks like she's very proud of
> her boobs. Can we lift those things up any higher for the camera?
>
> -sw

Sqwertz wrote:

> On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 15:02:42 -0800, sf wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:33:55 -0800, "Cheri" >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> http://my.chicagotribune.com/#sectio.../p2p-82969616/
> >>
> >> I love it. Goes to show that all the filthy things said about *underage
> >> girls* can have consequences, whether on Twitter or in Newsgroups, it's
> >> illegal to do so and you just have to have the connections that Curt has.
> >> One was a ticket taker for the Yankees, fired. One was a radio host for a
> >> school, suspended. More to come. Go Curt! :-)
> >
> > Good!
>
> Not good. The OP doesn't have her facts straight, and probably on
> purpose to try and make a point here. According to her Facebook page
> his daughter 19 years old - almost 20. So she is NOT underaged.
>
> https://www.facebook.com/gabby.schillingg
>
> And the two people who were identified as making lewd comments are in
> her same age group. This just sounds like a case of sour grapes.
>
> Check her out Sheldon. Scroll down 3 pictures.
>
> http://www.people.com/article/curt-s...-cyberbullying
>
> How do you feel about that? To me it looks like she's very proud of
> her boobs. Can we lift those things up any higher for the camera?


"Ba da - BING" as they used to say in vaudeville...!!!


--
Best
Greg

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...

> Not good. The OP doesn't have her facts straight, and probably on
> purpose to try and make a point here. According to her Facebook page
> his daughter 19 years old - almost 20. So she is NOT underaged.

I saw Curt's interview on TV on Tuesday, so you're the one who doesn't have
your facts straight, but that's not a huge surprise. Not trying to make a
point here, trying to make a point on all the newsgroups I subscribe to,
this isn't the only cesspool with a couple of vile posters.

Cheri

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 18:18:21 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:
>
>> Not good. The OP doesn't have her facts straight, and probably on
>> purpose to try and make a point here.
>
> I'll take part of that back and issue most of an apology to Cheri
> since several articles out there state that she is 17 years old.

No need for anyone to apologize to me, I was just stating what Curt said. If
you went to Curt's blog and saw what those cretins posted, I wouldn't care
how old she was if I was her parent, but it illustrates that there really is
no anonymity and things like those tweets can actually ruin their sad little
lives, especially when you mess with someone who has the money, the forum
etc., to pursue it. I imagine a lot of people took notice.

Cheri

On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 18:18:21 -0600, Sqwertz >
wrote:



>Not good. The OP doesn't have her facts straight, and probably on
>purpose to try and make a point here. According to her Facebook page
>his daughter 19 years old - almost 20. So she is NOT underaged.
>
>https://www.facebook.com/gabby.schillingg
>
>And the two people who were identified as making lewd comments are in
>her same age group. This just sounds like a case of sour grapes.
>
>Check her out Sheldon. Scroll down 3 pictures.
>
>http://www.people.com/article/curt-s...-cyberbullying
>

The web page above says she is 17, twice.

But then the 17-year-old saw some of the vulgar, sexually explicit
Tweets about her and, she tells PEOPLE, "I realized this was
different."

"No one deserves this! It's never okay to speak to anybody like that,
especially a 17-year-old girl."

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
> http://my.chicagotribune.com/#sectio.../p2p-82969616/
>
>
> I love it. Goes to show that all the filthy things said about *underage
> girls* can have consequences, whether on Twitter or in Newsgroups, it's
> illegal to do so and you just have to have the connections that Curt has.
> One was a ticket taker for the Yankees, fired. One was a radio host for a
> school, suspended. More to come. Go Curt! :-)

Excellent!
--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 18:18:21 -0600, Sqwertz >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Not good. The OP doesn't have her facts straight, and probably on
>>purpose to try and make a point here. According to her Facebook page
>>his daughter 19 years old - almost 20. So she is NOT underaged.
>>
>>https://www.facebook.com/gabby.schillingg
>>
>>And the two people who were identified as making lewd comments are in
>>her same age group. This just sounds like a case of sour grapes.
>>
>>Check her out Sheldon. Scroll down 3 pictures.
>>
>>http://www.people.com/article/curt-s...-cyberbullying
>>
>
> The web page above says she is 17, twice.
>
> But then the 17-year-old saw some of the vulgar, sexually explicit
> Tweets about her and, she tells PEOPLE, "I realized this was
> different."
>
> "No one deserves this! It's never okay to speak to anybody like that,
> especially a 17-year-old girl."

Indeed! No one (whatever age) should have to put up with that and I hope
all those who do those things, are hunted down. They seem to think
newsgroups are private places where they can do whatever they like! Well,
guess what... ???


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On Friday, March 6, 2015 at 11:00:21 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
>
> So how old is she? <shrug> Is she just lying about her age since her
> boyfriend appears much older than she is and could be arrested for
> statuary rape? Or is her father lying about her age just so he can
> make the situation more dramatic?>

>

Statuary rape? Laugh of the day.

On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 00:21:56 -0600, Sqwertz >
wrote:



>> But then the 17-year-old saw some of the vulgar, sexually explicit
>> Tweets about her and, she tells PEOPLE, "I realized this was
>> different."
>>
>> "No one deserves this! It's never okay to speak to anybody like that,
>> especially a 17-year-old girl."
>
>Creative snipping of the article. That's her mother being quoted in
>the last paragraph, not Gabby.

Just point in out that there are two references to her age being 17,
correct or not.


> Gabby says she's almost 20 years old.
>IOW, she wants to fool people into believing she's much older than she
>probably is (I suspect she probably is almost 18 rather than going on
>20), but still wants to play the "underage" card when it suits her.
>
>Regardless of her age of 17 or 19, the age of consent for females in
>Massachusetts is 16 so she is most definitely NOT underage.
>Morally though, a 17 year-old doesn't need to be hiking up her boobs
>that far just for the sake of cleavage. All while posing for national
>magazine article lamenting the fact that she's "underage". This
>whole story is just too ironic.
>
>-sw

Seems to be a case of wanting it both ways. I'm a kid and you are
disrespecting me, but yes, I'm proud of my boobs and don't mind
pointing it out.

Putting all that aside, we live in a time where nasty comments are the
norm and very public. Many of us have made comments to each other in
the schoolyard, the locker room, at work, but we would never think to
post what was backroom humor in a public place. Used to be some
ethical or moral guidelines that a private joke was just that and not
published for the world to see. Add to that, a sense of humor has
been lost if the comment is at all ethnic, racial or sexist. Careers
have been lost over minor comments.

On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 08:05:01 -0800 (PST), Kalmia
> wrote:

> On Friday, March 6, 2015 at 11:00:21 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
> >
> > So how old is she? <shrug> Is she just lying about her age since her
> > boyfriend appears much older than she is and could be arrested for
> > statuary rape? Or is her father lying about her age just so he can
> > make the situation more dramatic?>
>
> >
>
> Statuary rape? Laugh of the day.

So, Mr. Maturity thinks lewd remarks are just fine if she's "of age"?
And so what about her boobs? She is not dressed inappropriately in
the photos I saw. He needs to grow up.

--
A kitchen without a cook is just a room

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 08:05:01 -0800 (PST), Kalmia wrote:
>
>> On Friday, March 6, 2015 at 11:00:21 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>
>>> So how old is she? <shrug> Is she just lying about her age since her
>>> boyfriend appears much older than she is and could be arrested for
>>> statuary rape? Or is her father lying about her age just so he can
>>> make the situation more dramatic?>
>>
>> Statuary rape? Laugh of the day.
>
> It's a fetish similar to necrophilia. It's the act of having
> non-consensual sex with inanimate objects. It's even been reported in
> the news:
>
> http://rt.com/usa/184872-arizona-olivas-child-support/
> http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/m...er-700-4435804
>
> -sw <ducking>

There are a lot of odd ducks out there. We used to get customers that I
think liked to do unusual things with shower curtains. They seemed to like
the ones that smelled like rubber the best. Then there are the men who want
to think that the women are minors even when they're not. They're often the
same ones who are into women wearing white socks.

On Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 10:52:32 PM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote:
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 08:05:01 -0800 (PST), Kalmia wrote:
> >
> >> On Friday, March 6, 2015 at 11:00:21 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
> >>>
> >>> So how old is she? <shrug> Is she just lying about her age since her
> >>> boyfriend appears much older than she is and could be arrested for
> >>> statuary rape? Or is her father lying about her age just so he can
> >>> make the situation more dramatic?>
> >>
> >> Statuary rape? Laugh of the day.
> >
> > It's a fetish similar to necrophilia. It's the act of having
> > non-consensual sex with inanimate objects. It's even been reported in
> > the news:
> >
> > http://rt.com/usa/184872-arizona-olivas-child-support/
> > http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/m...er-700-4435804
> >
> > -sw <ducking>
>
> There are a lot of odd ducks out there. We used to get customers that I
> think liked to do unusual things with shower curtains. They seemed to like
> the ones that smelled like rubber the best.

And you assumed this based on what?

> Then there are the men who want to think that the women are minors even
> when they're not. They're often the same ones who are into women wearing
> white socks.
>
I'll have to remember not to buy my wife white socks at K-Mart, because the
employees would assume that I'm a pervert. I guess that I should also avoid
shower curtain liners that smell like rubber if I don't want to be the subject
of speculation in the K-Mart break room.

How do you come up with this shit?

--Bryan

On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 19:28:20 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
> wrote:

>There is a huge difference between *Betty and Veronica*, and *Ginger and
>MaryAnn*. Here is an excerpt from my novel:

http://procrasti-nation.eu/wp-conten...e-my-money.jpg

On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 11:43:27 PM UTC-5, Je�us wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 19:28:20 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
> > wrote:
>
> >There is a huge difference between *Betty and Veronica*, and *Ginger and
> >MaryAnn*. Here is an excerpt from my novel:
>
> http://procrasti-nation.eu/wp-conten...e-my-money.jpg

I asked folks to download it on the days that it was free.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Winters-Pres.../dp/B00QJPEI6M

--Bryan

On Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 7:17:09 PM UTC-6, Cheri wrote:
>
>
> Don't you have something better to do, like stalking Tin@?
>
Whereas you could busy yourself with hand washing Julie Bove's diabetic
support pantyhose. C'mon, you know you want to. She has white socks too.
>
>
> Cheri

--Bryan

On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 04:51:35 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
> wrote:

>On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 11:43:27 PM UTC-5, Je?us wrote:
>> On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 19:28:20 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >There is a huge difference between *Betty and Veronica*, and *Ginger and
>> >MaryAnn*. Here is an excerpt from my novel:
>>
>> http://procrasti-nation.eu/wp-conten...e-my-money.jpg
>
>I asked folks to download it on the days that it was free.
>http://www.amazon.co.uk/Winter-Prese.../dp/B163JPEI6N

**** off, idiot.

On 3/10/2015 3:56 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 04:51:35 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
> > wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 11:43:27 PM UTC-5, Je?us wrote:
>>> On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 19:28:20 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> There is a huge difference between *Betty and Veronica*, and *Ginger and
>>>> MaryAnn*. Here is an excerpt from my novel:
>>>
>>> http://procrasti-nation.eu/wp-conten...e-my-money.jpg
>>
>> I asked folks to download it on the days that it was free.
>> http://www.amazon.co.uk/Winter-Prese.../dp/B163JPEI6N
>
> **** off, idiot.
>
Yep, I'm getting a little tired of him shilling his book. He thinks
what he wrote is "literature". I did read the first few chapters. No
wonder no one would pay for it. As for writing style, as the late Janet
Wilder might have said, more commas, anyone?

Jill

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:11:39 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 3/10/2015 3:56 PM, Jeßus wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 04:51:35 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 11:43:27 PM UTC-5, Je?us wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 19:28:20 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> There is a huge difference between *Betty and Veronica*, and *Ginger and
>>>>> MaryAnn*. Here is an excerpt from my novel:
>>>>
>>>> http://procrasti-nation.eu/wp-conten...e-my-money.jpg
>>>
>>> I asked folks to download it on the days that it was free.
>>> http://www.amazon.co.uk/Winter-Prese.../dp/B16666EI6N
>>
>> **** off, idiot.
>>
>Yep, I'm getting a little tired of him shilling his book.

I don't mind most of his posts (when he's not in creepy pervert mode),
but not when he tries to segue his book into any and every thread that
has not the slightest relevant to it. He already knows how I feel
about this, so my response shouldn't come as a surprise to him.

Never mind that the last thing I want to see on Usenet is spam of any
sort...

>He thinks
>what he wrote is "literature". I did read the first few chapters. No
>wonder no one would pay for it. As for writing style, as the late Janet
>Wilder might have said, more commas, anyone?

I haven't read any part of the actual book, but I /have/ read some of
what he has posted here. I hope for his sake that he isn't depending
on financial success from it, is all I can say.

On 3/12/2015 5:34 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:11:39 -0400, jmcquown >
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/10/2015 3:56 PM, Jeßus wrote:
>>> On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 04:51:35 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 11:43:27 PM UTC-5, Je?us wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 19:28:20 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> There is a huge difference between *Betty and Veronica*, and *Ginger and
>>>>>> MaryAnn*. Here is an excerpt from my novel:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://procrasti-nation.eu/wp-conten...e-my-money.jpg
>>>>
>>>> I asked folks to download it on the days that it was free.
>>>
>>> **** off, idiot.
>>>
>> Yep, I'm getting a little tired of him shilling his book.
>
> I don't mind most of his posts (when he's not in creepy pervert mode),

Oh, when is that?

> but not when he tries to segue his book into any and every thread that
> has not the slightest relevant to it. He already knows how I feel
> about this, so my response shouldn't come as a surprise to him.
>
> Never mind that the last thing I want to see on Usenet is spam of any
> sort...
>
>> He thinks
>> what he wrote is "literature". I did read the first few chapters. No
>> wonder no one would pay for it. As for writing style, as the late Janet
>> Wilder might have said, more commas, anyone?
>
> I haven't read any part of the actual book, but I /have/ read some of
> what he has posted here. I hope for his sake that he isn't depending
> on financial success from it, is all I can say.
>
I guess there's a reason it was free on Amazon. I read the "preview"
and all I can say is... yawn. A boring fantasy from a tubby guy sitting
behind a computer. Heh.

Jill

On Thursday, March 12, 2015 at 4:35:10 PM UTC-5, Je�us wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:11:39 -0400, jmcquown >
> wrote:
>
> >On 3/10/2015 3:56 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> >> On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 04:51:35 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 11:43:27 PM UTC-5, Je?us wrote:
> >>>> On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 19:28:20 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
> >>>> > wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> There is a huge difference between *Betty and Veronica*, and *Ginger and
> >>>>> MaryAnn*. Here is an excerpt from my novel:
> >>>>
> >>>> http://procrasti-nation.eu/wp-conten...e-my-money.jpg
> >>>
> >>> I asked folks to download it on the days that it was free.
> >>> http://www.amazon.co.uk/Winter-Prese.../dp/B16666EI6N
> >>
> >> **** off, idiot.
> >>
> >Yep, I'm getting a little tired of him shilling his book.
>
See the other thread about "shilling."
>
> I don't mind most of his posts (when he's not in creepy pervert mode),
> but not when he tries to segue his book into any and every thread that
> has not the slightest relevant to it. He already knows how I feel
> about this, so my response shouldn't come as a surprise to him.
>
I "feel" that the tangents that I go off on, most of which do not involve
the book, do have *relevance*.
>
> Never mind that the last thing I want to see on Usenet is spam of any
> sort...
>
> >He thinks
> >what he wrote is "literature". I did read the first few chapters. No
> >wonder no one would pay for it. As for writing style, as the late Janet
> >Wilder might have said, more commas, anyone?
>
> I haven't read any part of the actual book, but I /have/ read some of
> what he has posted here. I hope for his sake that he isn't depending
> on financial success from it, is all I can say.

Jesus, Jesus. How many times have I stated that I don't engage in *art*
with the expectation of earning money, and that I am content to lose money,
as was certainly the case with The Bonobos?

My *artistic* endeavors may indeed seem "crazy," but I am not delusional
about their likelihood of producing "financial success." Whatever posting excerpts from the book (or lyrics from The Bonobos for that matter) is, it
doesn't fit the definition of SPAM.

Expect more Winter excerpts, as I don't respond well to being told what *not
to write* on Usenet.

--Bryan

On Thursday, March 12, 2015 at 6:17:50 PM UTC-5, jmcquown wrote:
> On 3/12/2015 5:34 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:11:39 -0400, jmcquown >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/10/2015 3:56 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 04:51:35 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
> >>> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 11:43:27 PM UTC-5, Je?us wrote:
> >>>>> On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 19:28:20 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
> >>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> There is a huge difference between *Betty and Veronica*, and *Ginger and
> >>>>>> MaryAnn*. Here is an excerpt from my novel:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://procrasti-nation.eu/wp-conten...e-my-money.jpg
> >>>>
> >>>> I asked folks to download it on the days that it was free.
> >>>
> >>> **** off, idiot.
> >>>
> >> Yep, I'm getting a little tired of him shilling his book.
> >
> > I don't mind most of his posts (when he's not in creepy pervert mode),
>
> Oh, when is that?
>
> > but not when he tries to segue his book into any and every thread that
> > has not the slightest relevant to it. He already knows how I feel
> > about this, so my response shouldn't come as a surprise to him.
> >
> > Never mind that the last thing I want to see on Usenet is spam of any
> > sort...
> >
> >> He thinks
> >> what he wrote is "literature". I did read the first few chapters. No
> >> wonder no one would pay for it. As for writing style, as the late Janet
> >> Wilder might have said, more commas, anyone?
> >
> > I haven't read any part of the actual book, but I /have/ read some of
> > what he has posted here. I hope for his sake that he isn't depending
> > on financial success from it, is all I can say.
> >
> I guess there's a reason it was free on Amazon. I read the "preview"
> and all I can say is... yawn. A boring fantasy from a tubby guy sitting
> behind a computer. Heh.
>
Formerly "tubby guy" would be more accurate. These days I hover around 172#.
With my rather drastic reduction in alcohol consumption (thank you Dr.
Sinclair), and the physicality of my current job, I am only about 10-12% above
my ideal weight. You just set me up for another Winter quote:
______________________________________________

Ian wasn't one to ignore opportunities, and his approach was thought out. After their first night together, she asked him about the Cinnamon Buns scented body wash she'd showered with, and he'd told her that it served several purposes. "Above all, it cleans, and it also works well as a shampoo. Also, it reminds me of Lauren, which is bittersweet, but mostly sweet. It was her favorite. Then there's the fact that it smells great, and I can afford it. Finally, and this is important Winter, it reminds me to live my life in a certain way. See, I used to be overweight, and when I decided that I'd rather be hungry than fat, I had to give up many things, mostly carbohydrates. Of course, that meant that cinnamon buns were pretty much out of the question. One day, in the shower, where so many profound epiphanies are reached, I thought about my desire for the cinnamon rolls, which had been brought to mind by the fragrance, and something clicked. There were two ways one could feel. One was that the scent was frustrating, because it reminded me of what I couldn't have, but on the other hand, if I gave up the soap, then I'd not only be losing the pleasure of tasting, but also the pleasure of smelling. My mind flooded with the knowledge that so much in life was that way, and so often the choice made was, 'all or nothing'. I promised myself to always go for the smell of cinnamon buns, and as a symbol, to never take another bite of one."
__________________________________________________ ______
>
> Jill

--Bryan

"Bryan-TGWWW" > wrote in message
news:fd6d9b88-6d95-4298-a698-

Expect more Winter excerpts, as I don't respond well to being told what *not
to write* on Usenet.

--Bryan

Expect more killfiling from the 4 or 5 people that actually read your posts.

Cheri

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 19:17:45 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 3/12/2015 5:34 PM, Jeßus wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:11:39 -0400, jmcquown >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/10/2015 3:56 PM, Jeßus wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 04:51:35 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 11:43:27 PM UTC-5, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 19:28:20 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is a huge difference between *Betty and Veronica*, and *Ginger and
>>>>>>> MaryAnn*. Here is an excerpt from my novel:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://procrasti-nation.eu/wp-conten...e-my-money.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> I asked folks to download it on the days that it was free.
>>>>
>>>> **** off, idiot.
>>>>
>>> Yep, I'm getting a little tired of him shilling his book.
>>
>> I don't mind most of his posts (when he's not in creepy pervert mode),
>
>Oh, when is that?

Surely you jest! He hasn't lately, but I suspect that's about to
change as he's gone back into shill mode with this book of his, so he
may as well go on and on and on again how he is sexually liberated,
not having any 'hang ups' etc... to me they read as euphemisms for
having sexual fixations a little beyond the norm. Well, anyone who
bring it up out of nowhere like he does so frequently must have some
issues.

<snip>

>I guess there's a reason it was free on Amazon. I read the "preview"
>and all I can say is... yawn. A boring fantasy from a tubby guy sitting
>behind a computer. Heh.

One example of how computers/Internet are a double-edged sword...
anyone can claim to be a musician, or writer, journalist, or whatever.

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 22:33:11 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote:

>
>"Bryan-TGWWW" > wrote in message
>news:fd6d9b88-6d95-4298-a698-
>
>Expect more Winter excerpts, as I don't respond well to being told what *not
>to write* on Usenet.

OH NO!! LOL.

>Expect more killfiling from the 4 or 5 people that actually read your posts.

I already have. Shame really, he was going so well there for the past
month or so.

"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 22:33:11 -0700, "Cheri" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Bryan-TGWWW" > wrote in message
>>news:fd6d9b88-6d95-4298-a698-
>>
>>Expect more Winter excerpts, as I don't respond well to being told what
>>*not
>>to write* on Usenet.
>
> OH NO!! LOL.
>
>>Expect more killfiling from the 4 or 5 people that actually read your
>>posts.
>
> I already have. Shame really, he was going so well there for the past
> month or so.

Yeah, he takes streaks. heh

Cheri

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 22:59:18 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote:

>
>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 22:33:11 -0700, "Cheri" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Bryan-TGWWW" > wrote in message
>>>news:fd6d9b88-6d95-4298-a698-
>>>
>>>Expect more Winter excerpts, as I don't respond well to being told what
>>>*not
>>>to write* on Usenet.
>>
>> OH NO!! LOL.
>>
>>>Expect more killfiling from the 4 or 5 people that actually read your
>>>posts.
>>
>> I already have. Shame really, he was going so well there for the past
>> month or so.
>
>Yeah, he takes streaks. heh

*Sigh*...

On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 12:50:26 AM UTC-5, Je�us wrote:
>
> he's gone back into shill mode with this book of his

Does "shill" have a different meaning in Australian English?

You may learn to despise Winter as much as you do Julie. That amuses me.

--Bryan

On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 12:50:26 AM UTC-5, Je�us wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 19:17:45 -0400, jmcquown >
> wrote:
>
> >On 3/12/2015 5:34 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> >> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:11:39 -0400, jmcquown >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 3/10/2015 3:56 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 04:51:35 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
> >>>> > wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 11:43:27 PM UTC-5, Je?us wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 19:28:20 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
> >>>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> There is a huge difference between *Betty and Veronica*, and *Ginger and
> >>>>>>> MaryAnn*. Here is an excerpt from my novel:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://procrasti-nation.eu/wp-conten...e-my-money.jpg
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I asked folks to download it on the days that it was free.
> >>>>
> >>>> **** off, idiot.
> >>>>
> >>> Yep, I'm getting a little tired of him shilling his book.
> >>
> >> I don't mind most of his posts (when he's not in creepy pervert mode),
> >
> >Oh, when is that?
>
> Surely you jest! He hasn't lately, but I suspect that's about to
> change as he's gone back into shill mode with this book of his, so he
> may as well go on and on and on again how he is sexually liberated,
> not having any 'hang ups' etc... to me they read as euphemisms for
> having sexual fixations a little beyond the norm. Well, anyone who
> bring it up out of nowhere like he does so frequently must have some
> issues.
>
> <snip>
>
> >I guess there's a reason it was free on Amazon. I read the "preview"
> >and all I can say is... yawn. A boring fantasy from a tubby guy sitting
> >behind a computer. Heh.
>
> One example of how computers/Internet are a double-edged sword...
> anyone can claim to be a musician, or writer, journalist, or whatever.
>
After all of the times that I suggested that you might enjoy hand washing
Julie Bove's diabetic support pantyhose, I thought that you might KF me.
>
--Bryan

On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 12:34:19 AM UTC-5, Cheri wrote:
> "Bryan-TGWWW" > wrote in message
> news:fd6d9b88-6d95-4298-a698-
>
> Expect more Winter excerpts, as I don't respond well to being told what *not
> to write* on Usenet.
>
> --Bryan
>
> Expect more killfiling from the 4 or 5 people that actually read your posts.
>
After all the times I suggested that you might enjoy hand washing Julie
Bove's diabetic support pantyhose, I thought you might have already KF'd me.
>
> Cheri

--Bryan

"Bryan-TGWWW" > wrote in message
...
> On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 12:34:19 AM UTC-5, Cheri wrote:
>> "Bryan-TGWWW" > wrote in message
>> news:fd6d9b88-6d95-4298-a698-
>>
>> Expect more Winter excerpts, as I don't respond well to being told what
>> *not
>> to write* on Usenet.
>>
>> --Bryan
>>
>> Expect more killfiling from the 4 or 5 people that actually read your
>> posts.
>>
> After all the times I suggested that you might enjoy hand washing Julie
> Bove's diabetic support pantyhose, I thought you might have already KF'd
> me.
>>
>> Cheri
>
> --Bryan

I don't killfile people because sometimes they have something worthwhile to
contribute, even you. I do killfile threads that involve Nazi's, religions,
most politics, and anything that has WalMart, Paula Deen, or Sandra Lee in
the subject line.

Cheri

"Jeßus" wrote:
>
> jmcquown wrote:
> >I guess there's a reason it was free on Amazon. I read the "preview"
> >and all I can say is... yawn. A boring fantasy from a tubby guy sitting
> >behind a computer. Heh.
>
> One example of how computers/Internet are a double-edged sword...
> anyone can claim to be a musician, or writer, journalist, or whatever.

I've only read bits and pieces of his book so I won't even critisize
the entire book until someday I might actually go for it to read.

His excerpts give you no idea of the plot. I love to read but so far I
have to really *plow* through the bits that I've read. They seem to be
going nowhere. I always seem to have to fight just to finish what's
written. The bits that he posts do nothing to entice a reader to want
more.

And to Bryan....I'm saying this as an honest review - not cutting down
what you wrote. This is what I feel about it without reading it all.
Take this constructive critisizm. Whether it turns out success or
failure, kudos to you for putting all that effort into a project.
Writing a book length thing takes a lot of time and dedication and you
did it.

IMO, rather than keep posting boring excerpts why don't you post a
quick general summary of the book and it's plot or purpose. Whenever
you pick up a real/paper book, most people go right to the back cover
to read that quick summary. That is what I always go for to decide
whether to read or not.

HTH

"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> "Jeßus" wrote:
>>
>> jmcquown wrote:
>> >I guess there's a reason it was free on Amazon. I read the "preview"
>> >and all I can say is... yawn. A boring fantasy from a tubby guy sitting
>> >behind a computer. Heh.
>>
>> One example of how computers/Internet are a double-edged sword...
>> anyone can claim to be a musician, or writer, journalist, or whatever.
>
> I've only read bits and pieces of his book so I won't even critisize
> the entire book until someday I might actually go for it to read.
>
> His excerpts give you no idea of the plot. I love to read but so far I
> have to really *plow* through the bits that I've read. They seem to be
> going nowhere. I always seem to have to fight just to finish what's
> written. The bits that he posts do nothing to entice a reader to want
> more.
>
> And to Bryan....I'm saying this as an honest review - not cutting down
> what you wrote. This is what I feel about it without reading it all.
> Take this constructive critisizm. Whether it turns out success or
> failure, kudos to you for putting all that effort into a project.
> Writing a book length thing takes a lot of time and dedication and you
> did it.
>
> IMO, rather than keep posting boring excerpts why don't you post a
> quick general summary of the book and it's plot or purpose. Whenever
> you pick up a real/paper book, most people go right to the back cover
> to read that quick summary. That is what I always go for to decide
> whether to read or not.
>
> HTH

Not me. I open the book to a random page and read a bit. If the book read
anything like his, I for sure would not buy it. Not my style.

"Bryan-TGWWW" > wrote in message
...
On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 12:50:26 AM UTC-5, Je�us wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 19:17:45 -0400, jmcquown >
> wrote:
>
> >On 3/12/2015 5:34 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> >> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:11:39 -0400, jmcquown >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 3/10/2015 3:56 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 04:51:35 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
> >>>> > wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 11:43:27 PM UTC-5, Je?us wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 19:28:20 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
> >>>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> There is a huge difference between *Betty and Veronica*, and
> >>>>>>> *Ginger and
> >>>>>>> MaryAnn*. Here is an excerpt from my novel:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://procrasti-nation.eu/wp-conten...e-my-money.jpg
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I asked folks to download it on the days that it was free.
> >>>>
> >>>> **** off, idiot.
> >>>>
> >>> Yep, I'm getting a little tired of him shilling his book.
> >>
> >> I don't mind most of his posts (when he's not in creepy pervert mode),
> >
> >Oh, when is that?
>
> Surely you jest! He hasn't lately, but I suspect that's about to
> change as he's gone back into shill mode with this book of his, so he
> may as well go on and on and on again how he is sexually liberated,
> not having any 'hang ups' etc... to me they read as euphemisms for
> having sexual fixations a little beyond the norm. Well, anyone who
> bring it up out of nowhere like he does so frequently must have some
> issues.
>
> <snip>
>
> >I guess there's a reason it was free on Amazon. I read the "preview"
> >and all I can say is... yawn. A boring fantasy from a tubby guy sitting
> >behind a computer. Heh.
>
> One example of how computers/Internet are a double-edged sword...
> anyone can claim to be a musician, or writer, journalist, or whatever.
>
After all of the times that I suggested that you might enjoy hand washing
Julie Bove's diabetic support pantyhose, I thought that you might KF me.

What is diabetic support pantyhose? Not only have I never heard of it but I
haven't worn pantyhose since the 80's.

On 3/13/2015 1:50 AM, wrote:

>
> One example of how computers/Internet are a double-edged sword...
> anyone can claim to be a musician, or writer, journalist, or whatever.
>


Don't be silly, I don't have time to pretend to be a writer or musician.
As a NASA test pilot I barely have time to wash and wax my Lamborghini.

On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 6:18:09 PM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 3/13/2015 1:50 AM, wrote:
>
> >
> > One example of how computers/Internet are a double-edged sword...
> > anyone can claim to be a musician, or writer, journalist, or whatever.
> >
>
>
> Don't be silly, I don't have time to pretend to be a writer or musician.
> As a NASA test pilot I barely have time to wash and wax my Lamborghini.

NASA reminded me of I Dream of Jeannie. When I was maybe 9, 10, 11 years
old, I used to watch that and I always thought that given a choice between
Jeannie and being an astronaut, they could keep that astronaut nonsense.
Barbara Eden had the most astoundingly beautiful face I'd ever seen.
Re-watching it earlier this week, I haven't changed much in that regard.

--Bryan

On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 19:18:09 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:

>On 3/13/2015 1:50 AM, wrote:
>
>> One example of how computers/Internet are a double-edged sword...
>> anyone can claim to be a musician, or writer, journalist, or whatever.
>
>Don't be silly, I don't have time to pretend to be a writer or musician.
> As a NASA test pilot I barely have time to wash and wax my Lamborghini.

Shirley a test pilot can afford to have it done by someone else...
say, an unemployable 'writer', for example?