The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right. Not sure
why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains modified
food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...

On Sunday, January 4, 2015 12:21:37 AM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote:
> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right. Not sure
> why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains modified
> food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...

Not sure why you couldn't scroll over to the right to begin with. It's always someone else's fault, right?

"Miss Kitty" > wrote in message
...
> On Sunday, January 4, 2015 12:21:37 AM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote:
>> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right. Not
>> sure
>> why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains modified
>> food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
>
> Not sure why you couldn't scroll over to the right to begin with. It's
> always someone else's fault, right?

Because I didn't notice that I had to do that.

On Sunday, January 4, 2015 2:01:08 AM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote:
> "Miss Kitty" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Sunday, January 4, 2015 12:21:37 AM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote:
> >> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right. Not
> >> sure
> >> why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains modified
> >> food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
> >
> > Not sure why you couldn't scroll over to the right to begin with. It's
> > always someone else's fault, right?
>
> Because I didn't notice that I had to do that.

Again, I ask, why is that anyone else's problem?

"Miss Kitty" > wrote in message
...
> On Sunday, January 4, 2015 2:01:08 AM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote:
>> "Miss Kitty" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On Sunday, January 4, 2015 12:21:37 AM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote:
>> >> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right. Not
>> >> sure
>> >> why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
>> >> modified
>> >> food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
>> >
>> > Not sure why you couldn't scroll over to the right to begin with. It's
>> > always someone else's fault, right?
>>
>> Because I didn't notice that I had to do that.
>
> Again, I ask, why is that anyone else's problem?

Did I say that it was? I made a mistake and I am apologizing for it.

On Sunday, January 4, 2015 12:21:37 AM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote:
> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right. Not sure
> why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains modified
> food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...

MY GOD YOU ARE STUPID! WHAT THE **** is wrong with modified food starch?

You are truly a turd in the gene pool.

--Bryan

On 1/4/2015 1:21 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right. Not
> sure why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
> modified food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...

I didn't have to scroll over to the right to be able to read the
ingredients in the soup base. Sounds like a problem with your screen
resolution settings.

Jill

On Sunday, January 4, 2015 10:09:44 AM UTC-5, jmcquown wrote:
> On 1/4/2015 1:21 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
> > The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right. Not
> > sure why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
> > modified food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
>
> I didn't have to scroll over to the right to be able to read the
> ingredients in the soup base. Sounds like a problem with your screen
> resolution settings.

Sounds like more minutiae about which to post more useless drivel. No one with any degree of sanity would bother to mention having to scroll over - ye gods.

On 1/4/2015 10:48 AM, Kalmia wrote:
> On Sunday, January 4, 2015 10:09:44 AM UTC-5, jmcquown wrote:
>> On 1/4/2015 1:21 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right. Not
>>> sure why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
>>> modified food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
>>
>> I didn't have to scroll over to the right to be able to read the
>> ingredients in the soup base. Sounds like a problem with your screen
>> resolution settings.
>
> Sounds like more minutiae about which to post more useless drivel. No one with any degree of sanity would bother to mention having to scroll over - ye gods.
>
It's certainly a senseless thing to start a new thread about. Similar
to pinging me about the can of Pik Nik fried onions saying "snack" right
on the label. Despite the marketing departments' best efforts, she
didn't like eating them as a snack. But she sure showed me I was wrong! LOL

Jill

On 1/4/2015 10:09 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 1/4/2015 1:21 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right. Not
>> sure why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
>> modified food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
>
> I didn't have to scroll over to the right to be able to read the
> ingredients in the soup base. Sounds like a problem with your screen
> resolution settings.

When in doubt, hit control and roll the wheelie thing on your
mouse, if you have one. No idea how you do that on a laptop
as I use that as seldom as possible.

nancy

"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Miss Kitty" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sunday, January 4, 2015 2:01:08 AM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote:
>>> "Miss Kitty" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>> > On Sunday, January 4, 2015 12:21:37 AM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote:
>>> >> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right.
>>> >> Not
>>> >> sure
>>> >> why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
>>> >> modified
>>> >> food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
>>> >
>>> > Not sure why you couldn't scroll over to the right to begin with.
>>> > It's
>>> > always someone else's fault, right?
>>>
>>> Because I didn't notice that I had to do that.
>>
>> Again, I ask, why is that anyone else's problem?
>
> Did I say that it was? I made a mistake and I am apologizing for it.

You should know by now that nothing you post, apology or not will go
unchallenged. It keeps some of them going for the day, even to the point of
changing nyms to get an extra dig or two in. LOL

Cheri

On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 11:53:55 -0500, Nancy Young
> wrote:

> On 1/4/2015 10:09 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> > On 1/4/2015 1:21 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
> >> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right. Not
> >> sure why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
> >> modified food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
> >
> > I didn't have to scroll over to the right to be able to read the
> > ingredients in the soup base. Sounds like a problem with your screen
> > resolution settings.
>
> When in doubt, hit control and roll the wheelie thing on your
> mouse, if you have one. No idea how you do that on a laptop
> as I use that as seldom as possible.
>
Ctrl + to enlarge and Ctrl - to make it smaller.

--
A kitchen without a cook is just a room

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Miss Kitty" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Sunday, January 4, 2015 2:01:08 AM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>> "Miss Kitty" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>> > On Sunday, January 4, 2015 12:21:37 AM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>> >> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right.
>>>> >> Not
>>>> >> sure
>>>> >> why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
>>>> >> modified
>>>> >> food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
>>>> >
>>>> > Not sure why you couldn't scroll over to the right to begin with.
>>>> > It's
>>>> > always someone else's fault, right?
>>>>
>>>> Because I didn't notice that I had to do that.
>>>
>>> Again, I ask, why is that anyone else's problem?
>>
>> Did I say that it was? I made a mistake and I am apologizing for it.
>
> You should know by now that nothing you post, apology or not will go
> unchallenged. It keeps some of them going for the day, even to the point
> of changing nyms to get an extra dig or two in. LOL

Yeah. It's sad and pathetic.

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 1/4/2015 1:21 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right. Not
>> sure why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
>> modified food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
>
> I didn't have to scroll over to the right to be able to read the
> ingredients in the soup base. Sounds like a problem with your screen
> resolution settings.

No. More likely due to the browser I am using which is Chrome. No clue
what you're using. When I had a website, I made sure that it displayed
properly and the music worked on all browsers. I only ever had the one
browser on my computer at the time and that was IE. So I would ask others
to check on theirs. My bro has many computers and can easily check every
browser.

"Kalmia" > wrote in message
...
> On Sunday, January 4, 2015 10:09:44 AM UTC-5, jmcquown wrote:
>> On 1/4/2015 1:21 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>> > The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right. Not
>> > sure why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
>> > modified food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
>>
>> I didn't have to scroll over to the right to be able to read the
>> ingredients in the soup base. Sounds like a problem with your screen
>> resolution settings.
>
> Sounds like more minutiae about which to post more useless drivel. No one
> with any degree of sanity would bother to mention having to scroll over -
> ye gods.

I mentioned it because I did not see the ingredients when I first checked
the website. And the scroll bar at the bottom of the screen wasn't obvious
to me the first few times that I checked. And I did check several times!

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 1/4/2015 10:48 AM, Kalmia wrote:
>> On Sunday, January 4, 2015 10:09:44 AM UTC-5, jmcquown wrote:
>>> On 1/4/2015 1:21 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right. Not
>>>> sure why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
>>>> modified food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
>>>
>>> I didn't have to scroll over to the right to be able to read the
>>> ingredients in the soup base. Sounds like a problem with your screen
>>> resolution settings.
>>
>> Sounds like more minutiae about which to post more useless drivel. No
>> one with any degree of sanity would bother to mention having to scroll
>> over - ye gods.
>>
> It's certainly a senseless thing to start a new thread about. Similar to
> pinging me about the can of Pik Nik fried onions saying "snack" right on
> the label. Despite the marketing departments' best efforts, she didn't
> like eating them as a snack. But she sure showed me I was wrong! LOL
>
> Jill

Well, it saves me time. I have my newsreader set to delete all read posts.
It's a PITA to have to go back and find the thread to reply to.

On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 16:14:08 -0800, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On 1/4/2015 1:21 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
> >> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right. Not
> >> sure why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
> >> modified food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
> >
> > I didn't have to scroll over to the right to be able to read the
> > ingredients in the soup base. Sounds like a problem with your screen
> > resolution settings.
>
> No. More likely due to the browser I am using which is Chrome. No clue
> what you're using. When I had a website, I made sure that it displayed
> properly and the music worked on all browsers. I only ever had the one
> browser on my computer at the time and that was IE. So I would ask others
> to check on theirs.

Whaaat? You were not a website developer and had absolutely no
control over which browser worked better than another.

> My bro has many computers and can easily check every browser.

He doesn't know how to use multiple browsers on one computer?

--
A kitchen without a cook is just a room

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 16:14:08 -0800, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On 1/4/2015 1:21 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>> >> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right. Not
>> >> sure why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
>> >> modified food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
>> >
>> > I didn't have to scroll over to the right to be able to read the
>> > ingredients in the soup base. Sounds like a problem with your screen
>> > resolution settings.
>>
>> No. More likely due to the browser I am using which is Chrome. No clue
>> what you're using. When I had a website, I made sure that it displayed
>> properly and the music worked on all browsers. I only ever had the one
>> browser on my computer at the time and that was IE. So I would ask
>> others
>> to check on theirs.
>
> Whaaat? You were not a website developer and had absolutely no
> control over which browser worked better than another.
>
That's not what I said. If you have a website, you would be wise to make
sure that it displays properly on all commonly used browsers. I don't know
if they are still out there but their used to be websites you could use and
they would also check your HTML codes for errors.

>> My bro has many computers and can easily check every browser.
>
> He doesn't know how to use multiple browsers on one computer?

Of course he does! Dur. But if you put the computers side by side you can
easily check for differences in the way things are displayed.

Also, I had music on my website and the way it looped or didn't loop could
be different on different browsers. I can't give you details on that as it
has been years since I've had a website and I can't remember what I did to
fix it.

On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 21:21:27 -0800, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
> "sf" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 16:14:08 -0800, "Julie Bove"
> > > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> > On 1/4/2015 1:21 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
> >> >> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right. Not
> >> >> sure why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
> >> >> modified food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
> >> >
> >> > I didn't have to scroll over to the right to be able to read the
> >> > ingredients in the soup base. Sounds like a problem with your screen
> >> > resolution settings.
> >>
> >> No. More likely due to the browser I am using which is Chrome. No clue
> >> what you're using. When I had a website, I made sure that it displayed
> >> properly and the music worked on all browsers. I only ever had the one
> >> browser on my computer at the time and that was IE. So I would ask
> >> others
> >> to check on theirs.
> >
> > Whaaat? You were not a website developer and had absolutely no
> > control over which browser worked better than another.
> >
> That's not what I said. If you have a website, you would be wise to make
> sure that it displays properly on all commonly used browsers. I don't know
> if they are still out there but their used to be websites you could use and
> they would also check your HTML codes for errors.
>
> >> My bro has many computers and can easily check every browser.
> >
> > He doesn't know how to use multiple browsers on one computer?
>
> Of course he does! Dur. But if you put the computers side by side you can
> easily check for differences in the way things are displayed.

Do you ever think about what you said before you hit send?
>
> Also, I had music on my website and the way it looped or didn't loop could
> be different on different browsers. I can't give you details on that as it
> has been years since I've had a website and I can't remember what I did to
> fix it.


--
A kitchen without a cook is just a room

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 21:21:27 -0800, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> "sf" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 16:14:08 -0800, "Julie Bove"
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> > On 1/4/2015 1:21 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>> >> >> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right.
>> >> >> Not
>> >> >> sure why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
>> >> >> modified food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
>> >> >
>> >> > I didn't have to scroll over to the right to be able to read the
>> >> > ingredients in the soup base. Sounds like a problem with your
>> >> > screen
>> >> > resolution settings.
>> >>
>> >> No. More likely due to the browser I am using which is Chrome. No
>> >> clue
>> >> what you're using. When I had a website, I made sure that it
>> >> displayed
>> >> properly and the music worked on all browsers. I only ever had the
>> >> one
>> >> browser on my computer at the time and that was IE. So I would ask
>> >> others
>> >> to check on theirs.
>> >
>> > Whaaat? You were not a website developer and had absolutely no
>> > control over which browser worked better than another.
>> >
>> That's not what I said. If you have a website, you would be wise to make
>> sure that it displays properly on all commonly used browsers. I don't
>> know
>> if they are still out there but their used to be websites you could use
>> and
>> they would also check your HTML codes for errors.
>>
>> >> My bro has many computers and can easily check every browser.
>> >
>> > He doesn't know how to use multiple browsers on one computer?
>>
>> Of course he does! Dur. But if you put the computers side by side you
>> can
>> easily check for differences in the way things are displayed.
>
> Do you ever think about what you said before you hit send?

I don't see the problem here. ???

"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
...
>
> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 1/4/2015 1:21 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right. Not
>>> sure why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
>>> modified food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
>>
>> I didn't have to scroll over to the right to be able to read the
>> ingredients in the soup base. Sounds like a problem with your screen
>> resolution settings.
>
> No. More likely due to the browser I am using which is Chrome. No clue
> what you're using. When I had a website, I made sure that it displayed
> properly and the music worked on all browsers. I only ever had the one
> browser on my computer at the time and that was IE. So I would ask others
> to check on theirs. My bro has many computers and can easily check every
> browser.

It has everything to do with your screen width, numb nuts. If you geta
horizontal scroll bar it means you are not using the optimum resolution.
There is only so much one can do to accommodate screen and text size when
designing Web sites. You can also scroll in or out, too. And I looked at
your Web site and I see nothing in the source that shows where you did any
optimization at all except to check for IE or Navigator - which BTW no
longer exists. So you, not some troll, put that site up probably back in
2000 or so. HTML doesn't get more basic than what you put up, BTW. You'd
have done better using Word.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

"Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 1/4/2015 1:21 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right. Not
>>>> sure why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
>>>> modified food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
>>>
>>> I didn't have to scroll over to the right to be able to read the
>>> ingredients in the soup base. Sounds like a problem with your screen
>>> resolution settings.
>>
>> No. More likely due to the browser I am using which is Chrome. No clue
>> what you're using. When I had a website, I made sure that it displayed
>> properly and the music worked on all browsers. I only ever had the one
>> browser on my computer at the time and that was IE. So I would ask
>> others to check on theirs. My bro has many computers and can easily
>> check every browser.
>
> It has everything to do with your screen width, numb nuts. If you geta
> horizontal scroll bar it means you are not using the optimum resolution.
> There is only so much one can do to accommodate screen and text size when
> designing Web sites. You can also scroll in or out, too. And I looked at
> your Web site and I see nothing in the source that shows where you did any
> optimization at all except to check for IE or Navigator - which BTW no
> longer exists. So you, not some troll, put that site up probably back in
> 2000 or so. HTML doesn't get more basic than what you put up, BTW.
> You'd have done better using Word.

Again...

I am not running a website. I haven't maintained that for years! And I did
use Word to create it. The site was built many years ago before there were
many bells and whistles available on the Internet. It wasn't long after
that there were a lot of fancier things. Was I interested? No. I am not a
website designer nor did I claim to be one. I put that up before my
daughter was born. I was a writer seeking publication in those days. But
then I had my daughter and certainly didn't have the time to maintain a
website. I did go onto it and update the pics and info. from time to time.
And then I got Myspace, Twitter and Facebook which work for me. Well,
Facebook anyway. I never use the other two. I let the website go. And
when Frontier took over, I didn't put it back up. Apparently they did at
some point. They didn't inform me as such and even they don't seem to know
that it is there because it isn't listed in my account info.

"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On 1/4/2015 1:21 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right. Not
>>>>> sure why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
>>>>> modified food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
>>>>
>>>> I didn't have to scroll over to the right to be able to read the
>>>> ingredients in the soup base. Sounds like a problem with your screen
>>>> resolution settings.
>>>
>>> No. More likely due to the browser I am using which is Chrome. No clue
>>> what you're using. When I had a website, I made sure that it displayed
>>> properly and the music worked on all browsers. I only ever had the one
>>> browser on my computer at the time and that was IE. So I would ask
>>> others to check on theirs. My bro has many computers and can easily
>>> check every browser.
>>
>> It has everything to do with your screen width, numb nuts. If you geta
>> horizontal scroll bar it means you are not using the optimum resolution.
>> There is only so much one can do to accommodate screen and text size when
>> designing Web sites. You can also scroll in or out, too. And I looked
>> at your Web site and I see nothing in the source that shows where you did
>> any optimization at all except to check for IE or Navigator - which BTW
>> no longer exists. So you, not some troll, put that site up probably back
>> in 2000 or so. HTML doesn't get more basic than what you put up, BTW.
>> You'd have done better using Word.
>
> Again...
>
> I am not running a website. I haven't maintained that for years! And I
> did use Word to create it. The site was built many years ago before there
> were many bells and whistles available on the Internet. It wasn't long
> after that there were a lot of fancier things. Was I interested? No. I
> am not a website designer nor did I claim to be one. I put that up before
> my daughter was born. I was a writer seeking publication in those days.
> But then I had my daughter and certainly didn't have the time to maintain
> a website. I did go onto it and update the pics and info. from time to
> time. And then I got Myspace, Twitter and Facebook which work for me.
> Well, Facebook anyway. I never use the other two. I let the website go.
> And when Frontier took over, I didn't put it back up. Apparently they did
> at some point. They didn't inform me as such and even they don't seem to
> know that it is there because it isn't listed in my account info.

You did not use Word to create it. Keep digging.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On 1/4/2015 1:21 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right. Not
>>>>> sure why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
>>>>> modified food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
>>>>
>>>> I didn't have to scroll over to the right to be able to read the
>>>> ingredients in the soup base. Sounds like a problem with your screen
>>>> resolution settings.
>>>
>>> No. More likely due to the browser I am using which is Chrome. No clue
>>> what you're using. When I had a website, I made sure that it displayed
>>> properly and the music worked on all browsers. I only ever had the one
>>> browser on my computer at the time and that was IE. So I would ask
>>> others to check on theirs. My bro has many computers and can easily
>>> check every browser.
>>
>> It has everything to do with your screen width, numb nuts. If you geta
>> horizontal scroll bar it means you are not using the optimum resolution.
>> There is only so much one can do to accommodate screen and text size when
>> designing Web sites. You can also scroll in or out, too. And I looked
>> at your Web site and I see nothing in the source that shows where you did
>> any optimization at all except to check for IE or Navigator - which BTW
>> no longer exists. So you, not some troll, put that site up probably back
>> in 2000 or so. HTML doesn't get more basic than what you put up, BTW.
>> You'd have done better using Word.
>
> Again...
>
> I am not running a website. I haven't maintained that for years! And I
> did use Word to create it. The site was built many years ago before there
> were many bells and whistles available on the Internet. It wasn't long
> after that there were a lot of fancier things. Was I interested? No. I
> am not a website designer nor did I claim to be one. I put that up before
> my daughter was born. I was a writer seeking publication in those days.
> But then I had my daughter and certainly didn't have the time to maintain
> a website. I did go onto it and update the pics and info. from time to
> time. And then I got Myspace, Twitter and Facebook which work for me.
> Well, Facebook anyway. I never use the other two. I let the website go.
> And when Frontier took over, I didn't put it back up. Apparently they did
> at some point. They didn't inform me as such and even they don't seem to
> know that it is there because it isn't listed in my account info.

Let me explain something about Word, ok?

When you create an HTML page using Word it inserts a great many of its own
formatting tags as well as comments and other garbage. If you then use Word
to delete all the crud, Word puts it right back. So you then need to get a
third party HTML editor, or using a text editor to remove all the Word junk.
The thing is, you do not know what is junk and what is not unless you have
acquired HTML skills you have not confessed to having. Which it is clear by
the source code you lack completely.

All this I am doing is hoping to get you shut down so we can discuss food
again.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

"Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On 1/4/2015 1:21 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>>> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right.
>>>>>> Not
>>>>>> sure why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
>>>>>> modified food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
>>>>>
>>>>> I didn't have to scroll over to the right to be able to read the
>>>>> ingredients in the soup base. Sounds like a problem with your screen
>>>>> resolution settings.
>>>>
>>>> No. More likely due to the browser I am using which is Chrome. No
>>>> clue what you're using. When I had a website, I made sure that it
>>>> displayed properly and the music worked on all browsers. I only ever
>>>> had the one browser on my computer at the time and that was IE. So I
>>>> would ask others to check on theirs. My bro has many computers and can
>>>> easily check every browser.
>>>
>>> It has everything to do with your screen width, numb nuts. If you geta
>>> horizontal scroll bar it means you are not using the optimum resolution.
>>> There is only so much one can do to accommodate screen and text size
>>> when designing Web sites. You can also scroll in or out, too. And I
>>> looked at your Web site and I see nothing in the source that shows where
>>> you did any optimization at all except to check for IE or Navigator -
>>> which BTW no longer exists. So you, not some troll, put that site up
>>> probably back in 2000 or so. HTML doesn't get more basic than what you
>>> put up, BTW. You'd have done better using Word.
>>
>> Again...
>>
>> I am not running a website. I haven't maintained that for years! And I
>> did use Word to create it. The site was built many years ago before
>> there were many bells and whistles available on the Internet. It wasn't
>> long after that there were a lot of fancier things. Was I interested?
>> No. I am not a website designer nor did I claim to be one. I put that
>> up before my daughter was born. I was a writer seeking publication in
>> those days. But then I had my daughter and certainly didn't have the time
>> to maintain a website. I did go onto it and update the pics and info.
>> from time to time. And then I got Myspace, Twitter and Facebook which
>> work for me. Well, Facebook anyway. I never use the other two. I let
>> the website go. And when Frontier took over, I didn't put it back up.
>> Apparently they did at some point. They didn't inform me as such and
>> even they don't seem to know that it is there because it isn't listed in
>> my account info.
>
> You did not use Word to create it. Keep digging.

Oh yes I did! Whatever version of it that I had in those days.

"Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On 1/4/2015 1:21 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>>> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right.
>>>>>> Not
>>>>>> sure why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
>>>>>> modified food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
>>>>>
>>>>> I didn't have to scroll over to the right to be able to read the
>>>>> ingredients in the soup base. Sounds like a problem with your screen
>>>>> resolution settings.
>>>>
>>>> No. More likely due to the browser I am using which is Chrome. No
>>>> clue what you're using. When I had a website, I made sure that it
>>>> displayed properly and the music worked on all browsers. I only ever
>>>> had the one browser on my computer at the time and that was IE. So I
>>>> would ask others to check on theirs. My bro has many computers and can
>>>> easily check every browser.
>>>
>>> It has everything to do with your screen width, numb nuts. If you geta
>>> horizontal scroll bar it means you are not using the optimum resolution.
>>> There is only so much one can do to accommodate screen and text size
>>> when designing Web sites. You can also scroll in or out, too. And I
>>> looked at your Web site and I see nothing in the source that shows where
>>> you did any optimization at all except to check for IE or Navigator -
>>> which BTW no longer exists. So you, not some troll, put that site up
>>> probably back in 2000 or so. HTML doesn't get more basic than what you
>>> put up, BTW. You'd have done better using Word.
>>
>> Again...
>>
>> I am not running a website. I haven't maintained that for years! And I
>> did use Word to create it. The site was built many years ago before
>> there were many bells and whistles available on the Internet. It wasn't
>> long after that there were a lot of fancier things. Was I interested?
>> No. I am not a website designer nor did I claim to be one. I put that
>> up before my daughter was born. I was a writer seeking publication in
>> those days. But then I had my daughter and certainly didn't have the time
>> to maintain a website. I did go onto it and update the pics and info.
>> from time to time. And then I got Myspace, Twitter and Facebook which
>> work for me. Well, Facebook anyway. I never use the other two. I let
>> the website go. And when Frontier took over, I didn't put it back up.
>> Apparently they did at some point. They didn't inform me as such and
>> even they don't seem to know that it is there because it isn't listed in
>> my account info.
>
> Let me explain something about Word, ok?
>
> When you create an HTML page using Word it inserts a great many of its own
> formatting tags as well as comments and other garbage. If you then use
> Word to delete all the crud, Word puts it right back. So you then need to
> get a third party HTML editor, or using a text editor to remove all the
> Word junk. The thing is, you do not know what is junk and what is not
> unless you have acquired HTML skills you have not confessed to having.
> Which it is clear by the source code you lack completely.

I have no clue what you're talking about. I put all of the codes in using a
book on HTML. After I did it, I was told that I did it the hard way. I do
not profess to be an expert on any kind of thing. But I do know what I did.
I also once did some programming in Basic on a Timex computer, using a book.
I can read from a book and follow directions.
>
> All this I am doing is hoping to get you shut down so we can discuss food
> again.

Get *me* shut down? You're the one going on about it.

"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> On 1/4/2015 1:21 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>>>> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right.
>>>>>>> Not
>>>>>>> sure why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
>>>>>>> modified food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I didn't have to scroll over to the right to be able to read the
>>>>>> ingredients in the soup base. Sounds like a problem with your screen
>>>>>> resolution settings.
>>>>>
>>>>> No. More likely due to the browser I am using which is Chrome. No
>>>>> clue what you're using. When I had a website, I made sure that it
>>>>> displayed properly and the music worked on all browsers. I only ever
>>>>> had the one browser on my computer at the time and that was IE. So I
>>>>> would ask others to check on theirs. My bro has many computers and
>>>>> can easily check every browser.
>>>>
>>>> It has everything to do with your screen width, numb nuts. If you geta
>>>> horizontal scroll bar it means you are not using the optimum
>>>> resolution. There is only so much one can do to accommodate screen and
>>>> text size when designing Web sites. You can also scroll in or out,
>>>> too. And I looked at your Web site and I see nothing in the source
>>>> that shows where you did any optimization at all except to check for IE
>>>> or Navigator - which BTW no longer exists. So you, not some troll, put
>>>> that site up probably back in 2000 or so. HTML doesn't get more basic
>>>> than what you put up, BTW. You'd have done better using Word.
>>>
>>> Again...
>>>
>>> I am not running a website. I haven't maintained that for years! And I
>>> did use Word to create it. The site was built many years ago before
>>> there were many bells and whistles available on the Internet. It wasn't
>>> long after that there were a lot of fancier things. Was I interested?
>>> No. I am not a website designer nor did I claim to be one. I put that
>>> up before my daughter was born. I was a writer seeking publication in
>>> those days. But then I had my daughter and certainly didn't have the
>>> time to maintain a website. I did go onto it and update the pics and
>>> info. from time to time. And then I got Myspace, Twitter and Facebook
>>> which work for me. Well, Facebook anyway. I never use the other two. I
>>> let the website go. And when Frontier took over, I didn't put it back
>>> up. Apparently they did at some point. They didn't inform me as such
>>> and even they don't seem to know that it is there because it isn't
>>> listed in my account info.
>>
>> You did not use Word to create it. Keep digging.
>
> Oh yes I did! Whatever version of it that I had in those days.

Would have been Word 2000. And you didn't use it.

>



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> On 1/4/2015 1:21 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>>>> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right.
>>>>>>> Not
>>>>>>> sure why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
>>>>>>> modified food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I didn't have to scroll over to the right to be able to read the
>>>>>> ingredients in the soup base. Sounds like a problem with your screen
>>>>>> resolution settings.
>>>>>
>>>>> No. More likely due to the browser I am using which is Chrome. No
>>>>> clue what you're using. When I had a website, I made sure that it
>>>>> displayed properly and the music worked on all browsers. I only ever
>>>>> had the one browser on my computer at the time and that was IE. So I
>>>>> would ask others to check on theirs. My bro has many computers and
>>>>> can easily check every browser.
>>>>
>>>> It has everything to do with your screen width, numb nuts. If you geta
>>>> horizontal scroll bar it means you are not using the optimum
>>>> resolution. There is only so much one can do to accommodate screen and
>>>> text size when designing Web sites. You can also scroll in or out,
>>>> too. And I looked at your Web site and I see nothing in the source
>>>> that shows where you did any optimization at all except to check for IE
>>>> or Navigator - which BTW no longer exists. So you, not some troll, put
>>>> that site up probably back in 2000 or so. HTML doesn't get more basic
>>>> than what you put up, BTW. You'd have done better using Word.
>>>
>>> Again...
>>>
>>> I am not running a website. I haven't maintained that for years! And I
>>> did use Word to create it. The site was built many years ago before
>>> there were many bells and whistles available on the Internet. It wasn't
>>> long after that there were a lot of fancier things. Was I interested?
>>> No. I am not a website designer nor did I claim to be one. I put that
>>> up before my daughter was born. I was a writer seeking publication in
>>> those days. But then I had my daughter and certainly didn't have the
>>> time to maintain a website. I did go onto it and update the pics and
>>> info. from time to time. And then I got Myspace, Twitter and Facebook
>>> which work for me. Well, Facebook anyway. I never use the other two. I
>>> let the website go. And when Frontier took over, I didn't put it back
>>> up. Apparently they did at some point. They didn't inform me as such
>>> and even they don't seem to know that it is there because it isn't
>>> listed in my account info.
>>
>> Let me explain something about Word, ok?
>>
>> When you create an HTML page using Word it inserts a great many of its
>> own formatting tags as well as comments and other garbage. If you then
>> use Word to delete all the crud, Word puts it right back. So you then
>> need to get a third party HTML editor, or using a text editor to remove
>> all the Word junk. The thing is, you do not know what is junk and what is
>> not unless you have acquired HTML skills you have not confessed to
>> having. Which it is clear by the source code you lack completely.
>
> I have no clue what you're talking about. I put all of the codes in using
> a book on HTML. After I did it, I was told that I did it the hard way. I
> do not profess to be an expert on any kind of thing. But I do know what I
> did. I also once did some programming in Basic on a Timex computer, using
> a book. I can read from a book and follow directions.

Word does all that for you. So why manually enter the tags as if you used
Notepad? Word would have formatted that page completely differently. And
every time you removed Word's formatting it would put it back on the next
save.

>>
>> All this I am doing is hoping to get you shut down so we can discuss food
>> again.
>
> Get *me* shut down? You're the one going on about it.

Right.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 5 Jan 2015 15:34:28 -0800, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>
>> You did not use Word to create it. Keep digging.
>
> It's possible she used Word to create the web page. Word has had the
> ability to Save As ... HTML for quite some time. I created a Thai
> Cookbook in MS-Word and saved it as an HTML file...
>
> Here, I'll even publish it. Lets see - where can I put it.... Ah,
> here's some free space on my mail server (never even knew I had
> webspace there)
>
> Free Thai Cookbook available at:
> http://swertz.cluemail.com/ThaiCookbook/JunThai.htm
>
> Of course the HTML code is obnoxiously bloated and obviously from
> Word, unlike Julie's page which is bare-bones stuff. I still suspect
> Julie created hers with the ISP-provided web builder. Hers is what
> web pages look like using the generic co-branded web builder software
> that every ISP used to provide.

No I did not! I don't even know what an ISP-provided web builder is. I did
exactly what I said that I did. I bought a book from a book store in Dennis
MA. And I used it and Word to make the site. And so what if it was bare
bones? I wasn't out to impress anyone with a website. I wanted something
to put pics on, mainly.

"Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> On 1/4/2015 1:21 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>>>>> The information is there but you have to scroll over to the right.
>>>>>>>> Not
>>>>>>>> sure why they couldn't make it fit the page. The soup base contains
>>>>>>>> modified food starch and that is a no go. For me anyway...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I didn't have to scroll over to the right to be able to read the
>>>>>>> ingredients in the soup base. Sounds like a problem with your
>>>>>>> screen resolution settings.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No. More likely due to the browser I am using which is Chrome. No
>>>>>> clue what you're using. When I had a website, I made sure that it
>>>>>> displayed properly and the music worked on all browsers. I only ever
>>>>>> had the one browser on my computer at the time and that was IE. So I
>>>>>> would ask others to check on theirs. My bro has many computers and
>>>>>> can easily check every browser.
>>>>>
>>>>> It has everything to do with your screen width, numb nuts. If you
>>>>> geta horizontal scroll bar it means you are not using the optimum
>>>>> resolution. There is only so much one can do to accommodate screen and
>>>>> text size when designing Web sites. You can also scroll in or out,
>>>>> too. And I looked at your Web site and I see nothing in the source
>>>>> that shows where you did any optimization at all except to check for
>>>>> IE or Navigator - which BTW no longer exists. So you, not some troll,
>>>>> put that site up probably back in 2000 or so. HTML doesn't get more
>>>>> basic than what you put up, BTW. You'd have done better using Word.
>>>>
>>>> Again...
>>>>
>>>> I am not running a website. I haven't maintained that for years! And
>>>> I did use Word to create it. The site was built many years ago before
>>>> there were many bells and whistles available on the Internet. It
>>>> wasn't long after that there were a lot of fancier things. Was I
>>>> interested? No. I am not a website designer nor did I claim to be one.
>>>> I put that up before my daughter was born. I was a writer seeking
>>>> publication in those days. But then I had my daughter and certainly
>>>> didn't have the time to maintain a website. I did go onto it and
>>>> update the pics and info. from time to time. And then I got Myspace,
>>>> Twitter and Facebook which work for me. Well, Facebook anyway. I never
>>>> use the other two. I let the website go. And when Frontier took over,
>>>> I didn't put it back up. Apparently they did at some point. They
>>>> didn't inform me as such and even they don't seem to know that it is
>>>> there because it isn't listed in my account info.
>>>
>>> You did not use Word to create it. Keep digging.
>>
>> Oh yes I did! Whatever version of it that I had in those days.
>
> Would have been Word 2000. And you didn't use it.

I'm not going to sit and argue with you. I know what I did!!!! And how
could it have been 2000? Since it was only 1995 or 1996? I don't even
think that I had Word2000. I think that I had Word Perfect but I could be
wrong on that.

"Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
...

> Right.

Hey, Paul! What are you cooking today?


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> Right.
>
> Hey, Paul! What are you cooking today?

I'm not Paul but I'll be making a pot of chili. I already cut up the
veggies and will be using canned beans. I was going to cook some dried
beans but my friend was having phone issues (combination of squirrels and
too much rain) and asked me to try calling her today to see if the drier
weather might make the lines better. So... I opted to use canned. We're
having unseasonably warm weather right now so I don't foresee a chance of
getting snowed in for the next 10 days at least. Normally I try to keep a
good stock of canned goods for the winter.

I have leftover chicken, roasted potatoes and coleslaw for those who do not
want the chili. Then the next day I will make those good New York Steaks
that I got at Central Market. Normally they would have cost me about $45
but with the sale price it was around $28 for 4 steaks. Not sure what I'll
make for sides. I have plenty of salad type items, a few potatoes and
plenty of pasta and rice.

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> Right.
>
> Hey, Paul! What are you cooking today?

He'll have to check with Paula. ;-)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edQW6RYQklo

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>>
>> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>> Right.
>>
>> Hey, Paul! What are you cooking today?
>
> He'll have to check with Paula. ;-)
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edQW6RYQklo

Now that was a real blast from the past))))



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> Right.
>
> Hey, Paul! What are you cooking today?

Julie's lies.




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

"Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>>
>> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>> Right.
>>
>> Hey, Paul! What are you cooking today?
>
> Julie's lies.

Ok but you are not doing anything for yourself.

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> Right.
>>>
>>> Hey, Paul! What are you cooking today?
>>
>> Julie's lies.
>
> Ok but you are not doing anything for yourself.

If he keeps going on like he is, he might be cooking his own goose!

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> Right.
>>>
>>> Hey, Paul! What are you cooking today?
>>
>> Julie's lies.
>
> Ok but you are not doing anything for yourself.

I was mulling over a Navy bean soup, possibly.
>
> --
> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>>
>> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>> Right.
>>>>
>>>> Hey, Paul! What are you cooking today?
>>>
>>> Julie's lies.
>>
>> Ok but you are not doing anything for yourself.
>
> If he keeps going on like he is, he might be cooking his own goose!

LOL! You are comic relief. Let's put it that way.

>



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

"Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
...

>> Ok but you are not doing anything for yourself.
>
> I was mulling over a Navy bean soup, possibly.

Unknown to me. Share the recipe, please?


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/