On Sat, 27 Dec 2014 14:45:08 -0800 (PST), Miss Kitty
> wrote:

>On Saturday, December 27, 2014 1:29:00 PM UTC-6, Je�us wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:49:57 -0800, "Julie Bove"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >"jmcquown" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >> Yeah, but Chicago was a city. There were and still are plenty of people
>> >> who didn't live in a city with stores on every block within walking
>> >> distance.
>> >
>> >And I *said* that was in the city!!!! I would also venture to guess that in
>> >the old days more people lived in cities than not but I could be wrong on
>> >that. Why do I say this? That would be where most of the jobs were.
>>
>> Wow. Just wow.
>
>To the third power: Wow.
>
>>
>> >Sure
>> >when they put in railroads and things like that, that created jobs.
>> >Sometimes only the men went along. Sometimes families. But in the case of
>> >the railroad, I think they made sure that food was available. Might have
>> >been from the company store. Not sure.
>>
>> The implication here being that humans never existed before
>> industrialisation... brilliant.
>
>Yes that was the point I was trying to bring home. Isn't this nutbag just priceless? Honestly, in years of reading Usenet I have NEVER seen anything like it.

I can't say I've ever come across anyone else like her *anywhere*,
never mind Usenet.