Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Janet Wilder > wrote in
web.com: >> I never worked there so I have no idea what their policies >> are. But reverse the situation, Canadian going into the US is >> stopped and "terrorized" for two hours. What would be your >> excuse for that? >> > > There would be no excuse for an unwarranted stop on *either* > side of the border. I even suggested to your fellow > countryman that she write to the US State Department. > > Unlike you I am not a Xenophobe and I do not condone my own > government when they do something wrong. Xenophobe...didn't he write the Anabasis? :-) Wow...you do like to make things up. It's the second time in two days you have purposely misrepresented what I say. Too bad I'm not thin-skinned. I certainly never condone any government for anything they do that causes any measure of harm but you must realize that it wasn't the government that treated you badly, it was one employee or maybe a few. You had the opportunity to make the matter known to the proper authorities but you failed to do that, approaching an improper authority instead. If you wanted to know who to contact, your path is simple: call the Canadian Embassy, say you wish to report unacceptable behaviour by customs employees and ask who to contact for that. You would not have been sent to the "Ministry of Immigration" (tm applied for). Sheesh. Ask yourself (and I'm sure you already know the answer) how likely is it that a Canadian encountering such a situation would get satisfaction from US Customs. Sort of in the order of zip to none, beyond a pro-forma letter. What is the name of the person who sent you the letter, if I may ask? Did you ever check to see if this was who you thought it was? I bet not. -- Socialism never took root in America because the poor there see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarassed millionaires. - John Steinbeck |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/19/2014 8:59 AM, Michel Boucher wrote:
> Janet Wilder > wrote in > web.com: > >>> I never worked there so I have no idea what their policies >>> are. But reverse the situation, Canadian going into the US is >>> stopped and "terrorized" for two hours. What would be your >>> excuse for that? >>> >> >> There would be no excuse for an unwarranted stop on *either* >> side of the border. I even suggested to your fellow >> countryman that she write to the US State Department. >> >> Unlike you I am not a Xenophobe and I do not condone my own >> government when they do something wrong. > > Xenophobe...didn't he write the Anabasis? :-) > > Wow...you do like to make things up. It's the second time in two > days you have purposely misrepresented what I say. Too bad I'm > not thin-skinned. > > I certainly never condone any government for anything they do > that causes any measure of harm but you must realize that it > wasn't the government that treated you badly, it was one employee > or maybe a few. > > You had the opportunity to make the matter known to the proper > authorities but you failed to do that, approaching an improper > authority instead. If you wanted to know who to contact, your > path is simple: call the Canadian Embassy, say you wish to report > unacceptable behaviour by customs employees and ask who to > contact for that. You would not have been sent to the "Ministry > of Immigration" (tm applied for). > > Sheesh. > > Ask yourself (and I'm sure you already know the answer) how > likely is it that a Canadian encountering such a situation would > get satisfaction from US Customs. Sort of in the order of zip to > none, beyond a pro-forma letter. > > What is the name of the person who sent you the letter, if I may > ask? Did you ever check to see if this was who you thought it > was? I bet not. > Since your command of the English language is so poor, I'm not bothering with you any more. Defend your **** ant Napoleon wannabe border official to the stars if you want. I really don't care. -- From somewhere very deep in the heart of Texas |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Janet Wilder > wrote in
eb.com: > Since your command of the English language is so poor, I'm not > bothering with you any more. Defend your **** ant Napoleon > wannabe border official to the stars if you want. I really > don't care. Oh, **** you. -- Socialism never took root in America because the poor there see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarassed millionaires. - John Steinbeck |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/19/2014 11:06 AM, Michel Boucher wrote:
> Janet Wilder > wrote in > eb.com: > >> Since your command of the English language is so poor, I'm not >> bothering with you any more. Defend your **** ant Napoleon >> wannabe border official to the stars if you want. I really >> don't care. > > Oh, **** you. > Plonk you, Michel... No one appointed you the authority of all things Quebecan. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jmcquown" > wrote in message ... > On 10/19/2014 11:06 AM, Michel Boucher wrote: >> Janet Wilder > wrote in >> eb.com: >> >>> Since your command of the English language is so poor, I'm not >>> bothering with you any more. Defend your **** ant Napoleon >>> wannabe border official to the stars if you want. I really >>> don't care. >> >> Oh, **** you. >> > Plonk you, Michel... No one appointed you the authority of all things > Quebecan. > > Jill Quebecan? This is getting rather funny. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/19/2014 10:06 AM, Michel Boucher wrote:
> Janet Wilder > wrote in > eb.com: > >> Since your command of the English language is so poor, I'm not >> bothering with you any more. Defend your **** ant Napoleon >> wannabe border official to the stars if you want. I really >> don't care. > > Oh, **** you. > The signature statement of someone who can't defend his position. -- From somewhere very deep in the heart of Texas |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Thanksgiving | Diabetic | |||
Thanksgiving | General Cooking | |||
Thanksgiving Day | General Cooking | |||
Thanksgiving | General Cooking | |||
A Thanksgiving wish | General Cooking |