"Doris Night" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 16:18:41 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>
>>Yes. I hadn't even seen lamb available in a store until we moved back
>>here.
>>Not that I looked for it. Central Market sells very expensive lamb
>>kebabs.
>>And one or two restaurants have lamb chops on the menu but they are very
>>expensive.
>
> I'm surprized that you can't get lamb in a regular grocery store where
> you are.
>
> Loin lamb chops are one of our favourite meals. If they are on
> special, I can buy 4 (that will feed the two of us) for around $9.00,
> which I don't have a problem paying, as they are *so* good.
>
> But I get most of my lamb fix from shoulder, which I do Moroccan
> style, kind of like this:
>
> http://www.foodnetwork.com/recipes/e...ts-recipe.html
>
> And then there's lamb shanks, which rank up there with the nectar of
> the gods.

We might be able to get it but it is *very* expensive. Let me see if it is
available for Safeway deliver.

Lamb Loin Chops are $9.89 per pound.

3.5 LB Boneless Leg is $26.92

Lamb Shoulder Blade Chops are $5.49 per pound

1 LB Shoulder Neck Slices are $3.89

Ground Brick $8.79 per pound

By comparison you can get 3 pounds of beef chuck or cross rib roast for
$18.27.

4.5 pounds of beef chuck pot roast for $22.46.

And yes, there are other, better cuts of beef that are more expensive.

Ground beef is $6.99 per pound for lean and for fattier, $5.19 per pound.

So as you can see, beef is the less expensive meat.

I also remember a coworker being upset because she couldn't get lamb at the
military commissary. And when she said that, our boss gave her a puzzled
look and asked her why in the hell she would want that? She was from
Louisiana so perhaps lamb is more commonly eaten there, but I kind of don't
think so. I don't know too many people who eat it although my one nephew
did have chops from some place that used to be here. I think that was the
same place I mentioned where I had the salad incident. That place is no
longer there.

"Doris Night" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 17:11:06 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>I do need to work the bugs out of the muslin produce bags that I bought
>>though. The celery that I got last week was very limp. It wouldn't have
>>been so had I put it in a plastic bag. I did read that at least with
>>greens
>>you are supposed to wet the bag first but that just seemed like it would
>>make a wet mess of the fridge, especially since the celery was so long it
>>wouldn't have fit well into my drawer. Mayhaps when I get it again I will
>>have to clean and cut it up right away. I just hope that Safeway sells it
>>by the rib. I had planned to go today but since my husband left and it is
>>peaceful here, I opted to push that off till tomorrow. I do want a little
>>celery for my soup.
>
> I buy celery by the whole head. I trim off the bottom and the top, and
> store the stalks in a ziploc bag. They keep quite well for at least 10
> days.
>
I used to do that but when I got the Romaine that was far too large for any
of the bags I had, I ordered the muslin bags.

> DH cuts up celery and carrots to eat with hummus, and I make a lot of
> mirepoix, so it usually gets used up within a week.

I started buying the baby carrots because they are what my husband prefers.
But he won't eat raw celery. Not sure why.

"Julie Bove" > wrote:
> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote:
>>> "sf" > wrote in message >>
>>> ...
>>>> On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 04:27:35 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> On 10/5/2014 5:16 PM, Jeßus wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'd wager the Bove household eats in front of each of their own TVs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm amazed at the speculation of scenarios that people here come up
>>>>>>> >>>>>> >> >> with
>>>>>>> about the Bove family. The Royal family of Great Britain and >> >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kardashians
>>>>>>> don't get that much attention.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess they need something to focus their spiteful tiny minds on. >> >>>>> > They
>>>>>> are like sheep and all trying to out do each other.
>>>>>
>>>>> It might be comical if I were not the butt of their jokes.
>>>>
>>>> As an outsider looking in, it's not funny. What's truly funny is
>>>> those people rarely put their own cooking on the line... mainly
>>>> because they know it will be ripped to shreds by the rest of their
>>>> gang.
>>>
>>> They're probably either eating Hamburger Helper and Velveeta or maybe
>>> they don't even cook. Maybe they eat other people's cooking.
>>
>> Says the woman who just ordered casseroles online. LOL
>
> And what's wrong with ordering online? I can't find what I want in a store here so...

So...make it yourself? You can't really cast stones at people who eat
Hamburger Helper and Velveeta when you're buying premade frozen
casseroles.
--
jinx the minx

"jinx the minx" > wrote in message
...
> "Julie Bove" > wrote:
>> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote:
>>>> "sf" > wrote in message >>
>>>> ...
>>>>> On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 04:27:35 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> On 10/5/2014 5:16 PM, Jeßus wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'd wager the Bove household eats in front of each of their own
>>>>>>>>> TVs.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm amazed at the speculation of scenarios that people here come up
>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >> >> with
>>>>>>>> about the Bove family. The Royal family of Great Britain and >> >>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kardashians
>>>>>>>> don't get that much attention.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I guess they need something to focus their spiteful tiny minds on.
>>>>>>> >> >>>>> > They
>>>>>>> are like sheep and all trying to out do each other.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It might be comical if I were not the butt of their jokes.
>>>>>
>>>>> As an outsider looking in, it's not funny. What's truly funny is
>>>>> those people rarely put their own cooking on the line... mainly
>>>>> because they know it will be ripped to shreds by the rest of their
>>>>> gang.
>>>>
>>>> They're probably either eating Hamburger Helper and Velveeta or maybe
>>>> they don't even cook. Maybe they eat other people's cooking.
>>>
>>> Says the woman who just ordered casseroles online. LOL
>>
>> And what's wrong with ordering online? I can't find what I want in a
>> store here so...
>
> So...make it yourself? You can't really cast stones at people who eat
> Hamburger Helper and Velveeta when you're buying premade frozen
> casseroles.

You want me to make a Corningware casserole myself? That is a bit of a
stretch! I wouldn't even know where to begin doing that. And where did I
say that I was buying a premade frozen food? I didn't. I was replacing the
blue flower Corningware dish that had gotten decrepit. I ordered a set in
red and white with a 2 qt. with lid, a large flat one, two small ramekins
and something or other else that are larger than the ramekins but still
fairly small as casseroles go.

Do keep up. I would never order a premade frozen food casserole from
anyone! Do they even make such things? I guess perhaps if your idea of a
casserole is lasagna but I couldn't even eat such a thing if I wanted to.
Almost all frozen food has either dairy or egg in it if not both. I can eat
a few of the Amy's frozen vegan foods and once in a while I will buy a
single serve item but they are for sure not any sort of favorite of mine.

On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 22:22:46 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:

>On 10/6/2014 7:35 PM, sf wrote:
>
>>
>> And the word barbecue. A BBQ is an object to cook on and people use
>> high heat when they BBQ. The other speed is slow cooking or smoking,
>> they can call it barbecue if they want to, but they can't hijack word.
>>
>>
>
>You have it backwards. Barbecue has been cooked for a couple of hundred
>years before the equipment called a BBQ (a grill) was invented and the
>word hijacked.

From the word barbacoa
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbacoa
Janet US

On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 22:50:53 -0400, Doris Night
> wrote:

>On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 16:18:41 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:
>
>
>>Yes. I hadn't even seen lamb available in a store until we moved back here.
>>Not that I looked for it. Central Market sells very expensive lamb kebabs.
>>And one or two restaurants have lamb chops on the menu but they are very
>>expensive.
>
>I'm surprized that you can't get lamb in a regular grocery store where
>you are.
snip
>Doris
She can. Costco, Winco, Fred Meyer, Whole Foods, TJ's and Albertsons
for sure carry it.
Janet US

"Janet Bostwick" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 22:50:53 -0400, Doris Night
> > wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 16:18:41 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Yes. I hadn't even seen lamb available in a store until we moved back
>>>here.
>>>Not that I looked for it. Central Market sells very expensive lamb
>>>kebabs.
>>>And one or two restaurants have lamb chops on the menu but they are very
>>>expensive.
>>
>>I'm surprized that you can't get lamb in a regular grocery store where
>>you are.
> snip
>>Doris
> She can. Costco, Winco, Fred Meyer, Whole Foods, TJ's and Albertsons
> for sure carry it.
> Janet US

But I have no desire to as nobody here really likes it and it's expensive.
Daughter did like it until she realized what it was.

"Doris Night" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 16:18:41 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>
>>Yes. I hadn't even seen lamb available in a store until we moved back
>>here.
>>Not that I looked for it. Central Market sells very expensive lamb
>>kebabs.
>>And one or two restaurants have lamb chops on the menu but they are very
>>expensive.
>
> I'm surprized that you can't get lamb in a regular grocery store where
> you are.
>
> Loin lamb chops are one of our favourite meals. If they are on
> special, I can buy 4 (that will feed the two of us) for around $9.00,
> which I don't have a problem paying, as they are *so* good.
>
> But I get most of my lamb fix from shoulder, which I do Moroccan
> style, kind of like this:
>
> http://www.foodnetwork.com/recipes/e...ts-recipe.html
>
> And then there's lamb shanks, which rank up there with the nectar of
> the gods.
>
> Doris

I find it reasonably priced most times at S-Mart Foods, Safeway has a good
selection, but price wise kind of high right now. I love lamb.

Cheri

On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 16:16:40 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>"Janet" > wrote in message
et...
>> In article >, says...
>>> > Do you really believe that? People don't follow her around. Why would
>>> > anyone bother?
>>>
>>> Oh but they are Jill. Pico Rico and Todd/Tony who may use another name
>>> here
>>> because he certainly has been reading here were on the alt.home.repair
>>> group
>>> telling people not to help me because I was crazy.
>>
>> For them to have "followed you there", you would have to be there
>> before they were. You weren't. So quit lying and smearing.
>>
>By following, I meant following my posts which clearly he is doing.

Another blatant lie. You have said on RFC more than once that they
followed you from RFC to AHR.

>I don't really care where he is a regular.

No, not now you don't. Wow, you're a real piece of work.

"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
> On 10/6/2014 7:12 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>
>
>
>> I just get tired of people in other countries or
>> even other parts of *this* insisting that their way is the right way or
>> the only way.
>
>
> I get tired of people changing things and using different ingredients and
> insisting it is the same thing. It isn't.
>
> I made a great cherry pie last week, but I used apples instead of
> cherries.

lol

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
> On 10/6/2014 7:35 PM, sf wrote:
>
>>
>> And the word barbecue. A BBQ is an object to cook on and people use
>> high heat when they BBQ. The other speed is slow cooking or smoking,
>> they can call it barbecue if they want to, but they can't hijack word.
>>
>>
>
> You have it backwards. Barbecue has been cooked for a couple of hundred
> years before the equipment called a BBQ (a grill) was invented and the
> word hijacked.

Yep!

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On 10/7/2014 5:53 AM, wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 22:50:53 -0400, Doris Night
> > wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 16:18:41 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Yes. I hadn't even seen lamb available in a store until we moved back here.
>>> Not that I looked for it. Central Market sells very expensive lamb kebabs.
>>> And one or two restaurants have lamb chops on the menu but they are very
>>> expensive.
>>
>> I'm surprized that you can't get lamb in a regular grocery store where
>> you are.
>>
>> Loin lamb chops are one of our favourite meals. If they are on
>> special, I can buy 4 (that will feed the two of us) for around $9.00,
>> which I don't have a problem paying, as they are *so* good.
>>
>> But I get most of my lamb fix from shoulder, which I do Moroccan
>> style, kind of like this:
>>
>> http://www.foodnetwork.com/recipes/e...ts-recipe.html
>>
>> And then there's lamb shanks, which rank up there with the nectar of
>> the gods.
>>
>> Doris
>
> Love lamb shanks too, make an ideal roast for one. Winter is coming,
> here's another lamb recipe that might appeal to you.
>
> Afghani Lamb With Spinach
>
> Serving Size: 4
>
> 2 1/2 pounds lamb stew meat
> 1/3 cup olive oil
> 3/4 pound onions, diced large
> 4 teaspoons chopped garlic
> 2 teaspoons tumeric
> 1/4 teaspoon nutmeg
> 1/4 teaspoon ground cardamom
> 1 teaspoon crushed red pepper, or to taste
> 1/2 teaspoon cinnamon
> 1 (32) ounce can tomatoes, drain & chop
> 1 cup rich brown veal stock or 1 cup rich beef stock
> 1/3 pound fresh spinach, wash & drain
> 1/2 cup yogurt
> 1 tablespoon grated lemon peel
> salt, to taste
> 1/4 cup pine nuts, roasted at 350 F for about 3 minutes.
>
> Sear lamb in the olive oil in a cast-iron skillet or Dutch oven. Add
> the onions; saute them for 2 minutes; then add the garlic and sauté it
> for 1 minute. Put in the turmeric, nutmeg, cardamom, crushed red
> pepper and cinnamon and sauté the mixture for 1 to 2 minutes more,
> being careful not to burn the onions or garlic. Add the tomatoes and
> veal stock and stir.
>
> Cover the dish and bake at 350 F for about 1 hour, until the meat is
> tender and begins to break up. Remove the dish from the oven and add
> the spinach, stirring until the spinach is wilted and blended in.
> \
> Allow the stew to cool slightly. Add the yogurt, lemon peel and salt
> to taste. Sprinkle with roasted pine nuts.
>
> Yield: 4 to 6 servings. Serve over rice pilaf.
>
</lurk>
Someone else posted this recipe here a few years ago and I made it once.
It was delicious. I need to make it again - thanks for the reminder.
<lurk>

Sky, and others: my mistake, because I think items advertised (no coupon) as multiples at a special price
are a different situation than when there is a coupon required. When there is a coupon required and it says
that purchase of the multiple is required, I doubt the store would make an exception, since it is plainly
printed on the coupon. But when it is a no-coupon special, yes, one can purchase just one at the equivalent
sale price. I didn't mean to confuse the issue and, in fact, did say my first comment was related to coupon use.

N.

On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 07:53:18 -0300, wrote:

>Love lamb shanks too, make an ideal roast for one. Winter is coming,
>here's another lamb recipe that might appeal to you.
>
>Afghani Lamb With Spinach
>
>Serving Size: 4
>
>2 1/2 pounds lamb stew meat
>1/3 cup olive oil
>3/4 pound onions, diced large
>4 teaspoons chopped garlic
>2 teaspoons tumeric
>1/4 teaspoon nutmeg
>1/4 teaspoon ground cardamom
>1 teaspoon crushed red pepper, or to taste
>1/2 teaspoon cinnamon
>1 (32) ounce can tomatoes, drain & chop
>1 cup rich brown veal stock or 1 cup rich beef stock
>1/3 pound fresh spinach, wash & drain
>1/2 cup yogurt
>1 tablespoon grated lemon peel
>salt, to taste
>1/4 cup pine nuts, roasted at 350 F for about 3 minutes.
>
>Sear lamb in the olive oil in a cast-iron skillet or Dutch oven. Add
>the onions; saute them for 2 minutes; then add the garlic and sauté it
>for 1 minute. Put in the turmeric, nutmeg, cardamom, crushed red
>pepper and cinnamon and sauté the mixture for 1 to 2 minutes more,
>being careful not to burn the onions or garlic. Add the tomatoes and
>veal stock and stir.
>
>Cover the dish and bake at 350 F for about 1 hour, until the meat is
>tender and begins to break up. Remove the dish from the oven and add
>the spinach, stirring until the spinach is wilted and blended in.
>\
>Allow the stew to cool slightly. Add the yogurt, lemon peel and salt
>to taste. Sprinkle with roasted pine nuts.
>
>Yield: 4 to 6 servings. Serve over rice pilaf.

That looks absolutely lovely. I will try it the next time I have some
shoulder meat.

Doris

On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 13:22:16 -0400, Doris Night
> wrote:

> I will try it the next time I have some shoulder meat.

I don't know why grocery stores don't stock lamb shoulder meat here.
I've looked in the stores I shop at on a regular basis and asked too.


--
Avoid cutting yourself when slicing vegetables by getting someone else to hold them.

Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>
> On 10/6/2014 9:05 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>
> >
> > But this is just another stupid argument.
> > Apparently ya'll who are not in the US have specific names for specific
> > kinds of this dish. We do not.
>
> The more precise the language, the easier it is to communicate. Less
> confusion, less errors.

I've always known the beef version as "Shepherd's pie." Once I learned
the difference here a year or so ago, I have no problem now calling
that cottage pie. Shepherd's pie uses lamb. I can respect that. :-D

In article >,
says...
>
> On 10/6/2014 10:03 AM, Janet wrote:
>
> >
> > The archived history of that group proves Pico was a longterm regular
> > poster to it since at least 2011, and Todd since 2012, Tony since 2009,
> > LONG BEFORE you arrived in 2013 to annoy its established community in
> > exactly the way you do here, by whining for help, rejecting every good
> > advice they offered, and insulting your helpers
> >
> >
> >
> > Janet. UK
> >
> >
> So?

So Julie lied when she claimed that he followed her there.

Janet UK

"Janet" > wrote in message
t...
> In article >,
> says...
>>
>> On 10/6/2014 10:03 AM, Janet wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > The archived history of that group proves Pico was a longterm
>> > regular
>> > poster to it since at least 2011, and Todd since 2012, Tony since
>> > 2009,
>> > LONG BEFORE you arrived in 2013 to annoy its established community in
>> > exactly the way you do here, by whining for help, rejecting every good
>> > advice they offered, and insulting your helpers
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Janet. UK
>> >
>> >
>> So?
>
> So Julie lied when she claimed that he followed her there.
>
> Janet UK

What? I never said that anyone followed me *here*. I said they were people
from *here* who followed me over *there*. The one has never posted here, at
least not using either name that he has used there. I first encountered him
on the diabetes food newsgroup but he has clearly been here based on what he
has said. And now he is spouting his same lies over the home repair group.
Also said more lies about me. Something about how I said I would meet him
in a dark alley. Then he launched into something about guns to drive me
off, which it did. He's not only messed up but a frightening person. And
now... He is back to spouting his lies about diabetes over there.

Whatever. It's all there for you to see if you want to. Whatever.

"Nancy2" > wrote in message
...
>
> Sky, and others: my mistake, because I think items advertised (no coupon)
> as multiples at a special price
> are a different situation than when there is a coupon required. When
> there is a coupon required and it says
> that purchase of the multiple is required, I doubt the store would make an
> exception, since it is plainly
> printed on the coupon. But when it is a no-coupon special, yes, one can
> purchase just one at the equivalent
> sale price. I didn't mean to confuse the issue and, in fact, did say my
> first comment was related to coupon use.
>
> N.

That might be true where you are but it isn't always here. The soda pop I
am going to get specifies that you can't get the sale price unless you buy
at least 4. And Albertsons often runs mix and match ads where the items are
say, 10/$10 as opposed to $1 each. You can buy any assortment that you like
but you must buy 10 to get the sale price. If I do need one or two of those
things, that is usually the time I will buy more and donate to the food
bank. But normally I don't bother with sales that require me to buy a lot.

The only reason I am getting the soda is that I only ever see such a low
price perhaps 3-4 times a year and it will keep for at least a couple of
months. Plus I drink a lot of it. Now fingers crossed that they will have
enough of the lime.

On 10/7/2014 7:55 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
>
> Sky, and others: my mistake, because I think items advertised (no coupon) as multiples at a special price
> are a different situation than when there is a coupon required. When there is a coupon required and it says
> that purchase of the multiple is required, I doubt the store would make an exception, since it is plainly
> printed on the coupon. But when it is a no-coupon special, yes, one can purchase just one at the equivalent
> sale price. I didn't mean to confuse the issue and, in fact, did say my first comment was related to coupon use.
>
> N.
>

Ah, that makes sense about coupon vs. no-coupon sales prices. Thanks.
If a coupon is for multiples of an item, I usually won't use them - but
that depends on the particular item. Since most grocery coupons ["dry
goods" coupons being an exception] are for highly processed foods, those
are food items I don't purchase. Oh well . . so much for coupon usage
at my house <vbg>.

Sky

In article >, says...
>
> "Janet" > wrote in message
> t...
> > In article >,
> > says...
> >>
> >> On 10/6/2014 10:03 AM, Janet wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > The archived history of that group proves Pico was a longterm
> >> > regular
> >> > poster to it since at least 2011, and Todd since 2012, Tony since
> >> > 2009,
> >> > LONG BEFORE you arrived in 2013 to annoy its established community in
> >> > exactly the way you do here, by whining for help, rejecting every good
> >> > advice they offered, and insulting your helpers
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Janet. UK
> >> >
> >> >
> >> So?
> >
> > So Julie lied when she claimed that he followed her there.
> >
> > Janet UK
>
> What? I never said that anyone followed me *here*.

Neither did I, you zombie

I said they were people
> from *here* who followed me over *there*.

Yes, and it was a lie. See above.

Janet

"Janet" > wrote in message
t...
> In article >, says...
>>
>> "Janet" > wrote in message
>> t...
>> > In article >,
>> >
>> > says...
>> >>
>> >> On 10/6/2014 10:03 AM, Janet wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > The archived history of that group proves Pico was a longterm
>> >> > regular
>> >> > poster to it since at least 2011, and Todd since 2012, Tony since
>> >> > 2009,
>> >> > LONG BEFORE you arrived in 2013 to annoy its established community
>> >> > in
>> >> > exactly the way you do here, by whining for help, rejecting every
>> >> > good
>> >> > advice they offered, and insulting your helpers
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Janet. UK
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> So?
>> >
>> > So Julie lied when she claimed that he followed her there.
>> >
>> > Janet UK
>>
>> What? I never said that anyone followed me *here*.
>
> Neither did I, you zombie
>
> I said they were people
>> from *here* who followed me over *there*.
>
> Yes, and it was a lie. See above.
>
> Janet

Wrong Janet. Ed can back me up on this. They only went into my post to
attack me and try to prevent me from getting help. Now sh'up.

On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 19:59:22 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
>"Janet" > wrote in message
et...
>> In article >, says...
>>>
>>> "Janet" > wrote in message
>>> t...
>>> > In article >,
>>> >
>>> > says...
>>> >>
>>> >> On 10/6/2014 10:03 AM, Janet wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> > The archived history of that group proves Pico was a longterm
>>> >> > regular
>>> >> > poster to it since at least 2011, and Todd since 2012, Tony since
>>> >> > 2009,
>>> >> > LONG BEFORE you arrived in 2013 to annoy its established community
>>> >> > in
>>> >> > exactly the way you do here, by whining for help, rejecting every
>>> >> > good
>>> >> > advice they offered, and insulting your helpers
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Janet. UK
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> So?
>>> >
>>> > So Julie lied when she claimed that he followed her there.
>>> >
>>> > Janet UK
>>>
>>> What? I never said that anyone followed me *here*.
>>
>> Neither did I, you zombie
>>
>> I said they were people
>>> from *here* who followed me over *there*.
>>
>> Yes, and it was a lie. See above.
>>
>> Janet
>
>Wrong Janet. Ed can back me up on this. They only went into my post to
>attack me and try to prevent me from getting help. Now sh'up.

You really are a piece of work. I hope Karma is particularly nasty
towards you, you truly deserve it.

On 10/8/2014 1:17 AM, Jeßus wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 19:59:22 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> "Janet" > wrote in message
>> t...
>>> In article >, says...
>>>>
>>>> "Janet" > wrote in message
>>>> t...
>>>>> In article >,
>>>>>
>>>>> says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/6/2014 10:03 AM, Janet wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The archived history of that group proves Pico was a longterm
>>>>>>> regular
>>>>>>> poster to it since at least 2011, and Todd since 2012, Tony since
>>>>>>> 2009,
>>>>>>> LONG BEFORE you arrived in 2013 to annoy its established community
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> exactly the way you do here, by whining for help, rejecting every
>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>> advice they offered, and insulting your helpers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Janet. UK
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> So?
>>>>>
>>>>> So Julie lied when she claimed that he followed her there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Janet UK
>>>>
>>>> What? I never said that anyone followed me *here*.
>>>
>>> Neither did I, you zombie
>>>
>>> I said they were people
>>>> from *here* who followed me over *there*.
>>>
>>> Yes, and it was a lie. See above.
>>>
>>> Janet
>>
>> Wrong Janet. Ed can back me up on this. They only went into my post to
>> attack me and try to prevent me from getting help. Now sh'up.
>
> You really are a piece of work. I hope Karma is particularly nasty
> towards you, you truly deserve it.

Yep, it's all about "it" (er, her!)! In its mind, "every single thing"
and all comments revolve around its fragmented and augmented worlds of
fantasies. The chorus lines are "me, me, me-me-me" and "I this, I
this-that, I more-more-more", etc.! Shades of Munchhausen-by-proxy &
then some .....!

Bless its wee little pee-pickin' heart, nearly every one on RFC (and
other newsgroups!) is out to get it/her! It just doesn't know any
better or how to cope, poor thing . . . . where's that violin music when
its needed to make those sympathetic tunes . . . !!

Sky

On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 10:03:57 -0500, Sky >
wrote:



>Bovine doesn't have a family - it has a herd.
>
>Most 'normal' folks do not mention their family members because they
>consider their privacy as priviliged information. Somehow, it seems
>this concept is beyond bovine's comprehension. The cow doesn't value
>its herd's personal intimancies, so it broadcasts TMI no matter the topic.
>
>Sky
>

You actually took the time to start a new thread for this? What makes
you such a nasty and cruel person? You may think it is funny, but it
is a rather pathetic way of demeaning yourself. Stop and look at what
you have become. . Really, you are showing yourself as a mean person
with little regard for others. I think you are better than that.

The only person you should try to be better than is yourself.

On 2014-10-08 9:30 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 10:03:57 -0500, Sky >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Bovine doesn't have a family - it has a herd.
>>
>> Most 'normal' folks do not mention their family members because they
>> consider their privacy as priviliged information. Somehow, it seems
>> this concept is beyond bovine's comprehension. The cow doesn't value
>> its herd's personal intimancies, so it broadcasts TMI no matter the topic.
>>
>> Sky
>>
>
> You actually took the time to start a new thread for this? What makes
> you such a nasty and cruel person? You may think it is funny, but it
> is a rather pathetic way of demeaning yourself. Stop and look at what
> you have become. . Really, you are showing yourself as a mean person
> with little regard for others. I think you are better than that.
>
> The only person you should try to be better than is yourself.
>

Maybe she is just fed up with Julie's bullshit and all the attention it
gets.

On 10/8/2014 9:11 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2014-10-08 9:30 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 10:03:57 -0500, Sky >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Bovine doesn't have a family - it has a herd.
>>>
>>> Most 'normal' folks do not mention their family members because they
>>> consider their privacy as priviliged information. Somehow, it seems
>>> this concept is beyond bovine's comprehension. The cow doesn't value
>>> its herd's personal intimancies, so it broadcasts TMI no matter the
>>> topic.
>>>
>> You actually took the time to start a new thread for this? What makes
>> you such a nasty and cruel person? You may think it is funny, but it
>> is a rather pathetic way of demeaning yourself. Stop and look at what
>> you have become. . Really, you are showing yourself as a mean person
>> with little regard for others. I think you are better than that.
>>
>> The only person you should try to be better than is yourself.
>>
> Maybe she is just fed up with Julie's bullshit and all the attention it
> gets.

The bovine's crap/BS is nearly always unbelievable and then some!! Dang,
where are my 'wellies'!

No new thread topic was started by me; I 'changed' the topic-line to
better designate how the context had drifted, that's all.

Quite often the context of RFC threads drift and rarely do folks alter
the topic line to better designate those changes of topic ;> That
concept shouldn't be too hard to understand, hopefully! Knock on wood!

Sky, who's yet to win that "big" lottery <vbg>

"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 10:03:57 -0500, Sky >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Bovine doesn't have a family - it has a herd.
>>
>>Most 'normal' folks do not mention their family members because they
>>consider their privacy as priviliged information. Somehow, it seems
>>this concept is beyond bovine's comprehension. The cow doesn't value
>>its herd's personal intimancies, so it broadcasts TMI no matter the topic.
>>
>>Sky
>>
>
> You actually took the time to start a new thread for this? What makes
> you such a nasty and cruel person? You may think it is funny, but it
> is a rather pathetic way of demeaning yourself. Stop and look at what
> you have become. . Really, you are showing yourself as a mean person
> with little regard for others. I think you are better than that.
>
> The only person you should try to be better than is yourself.

I can only suppose that she thinks this makes her popular.

I have her filtered because although there are some really vicious posters
here, she leaves really a nasty taste ...



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 10:03:57 -0500, Sky >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Bovine doesn't have a family - it has a herd.
>>
>>Most 'normal' folks do not mention their family members because they
>>consider their privacy as priviliged information. Somehow, it seems
>>this concept is beyond bovine's comprehension. The cow doesn't value
>>its herd's personal intimancies, so it broadcasts TMI no matter the topic.
>>
>>Sky
>>
>
> You actually took the time to start a new thread for this? What makes
> you such a nasty and cruel person? You may think it is funny, but it
> is a rather pathetic way of demeaning yourself. Stop and look at what
> you have become. . Really, you are showing yourself as a mean person
> with little regard for others. I think you are better than that.
>
> The only person you should try to be better than is yourself.

+1

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
> On 2014-10-08 9:30 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 10:03:57 -0500, Sky >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Bovine doesn't have a family - it has a herd.
>>>
>>> Most 'normal' folks do not mention their family members because they
>>> consider their privacy as priviliged information. Somehow, it seems
>>> this concept is beyond bovine's comprehension. The cow doesn't value
>>> its herd's personal intimancies, so it broadcasts TMI no matter the
>>> topic.
>>>
>>> Sky
>>>
>>
>> You actually took the time to start a new thread for this? What makes
>> you such a nasty and cruel person? You may think it is funny, but it
>> is a rather pathetic way of demeaning yourself. Stop and look at what
>> you have become. . Really, you are showing yourself as a mean person
>> with little regard for others. I think you are better than that.
>>
>> The only person you should try to be better than is yourself.
>>
>
> Maybe she is just fed up with Julie's bullshit and all the attention it
> gets.

Then maybe the "Julie followers" should stop adding to the attention by
responding to/about all of her posts.

Cheri

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 2014-10-08 9:30 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>> On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 10:03:57 -0500, Sky >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Bovine doesn't have a family - it has a herd.
>>>>
>>>> Most 'normal' folks do not mention their family members because they
>>>> consider their privacy as priviliged information. Somehow, it seems
>>>> this concept is beyond bovine's comprehension. The cow doesn't value
>>>> its herd's personal intimancies, so it broadcasts TMI no matter the
>>>> topic.
>>>>
>>>> Sky
>>>>
>>>
>>> You actually took the time to start a new thread for this? What makes
>>> you such a nasty and cruel person? You may think it is funny, but it
>>> is a rather pathetic way of demeaning yourself. Stop and look at what
>>> you have become. . Really, you are showing yourself as a mean person
>>> with little regard for others. I think you are better than that.
>>>
>>> The only person you should try to be better than is yourself.
>>>
>>
>> Maybe she is just fed up with Julie's bullshit and all the attention it
>> gets.
>
> Then maybe the "Julie followers" should stop adding to the attention by
> responding to/about all of her posts.

They are too thick to work out how to use a filter.

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 09:52:03 -0500, Sky >
wrote:



>
>The bovine's crap/BS is nearly always unbelievable and then some!! Dang,
>where are my 'wellies'!
>
>No new thread topic was started by me; I 'changed' the topic-line to
>better designate how the context had drifted, that's all.
>
>Quite often the context of RFC threads drift and rarely do folks alter
>the topic line to better designate those changes of topic ;> That
>concept shouldn't be too hard to understand, hopefully! Knock on wood!
>
>Sky, who's yet to win that "big" lottery <vbg>

But yet you insist on reading and you try to demean her while only
demean yourself. Kill file her and the threads she starts and keep
your dignity intact.

OK so you changed the topic line but on many readers is shows up as
new. But it was still just to throw another low blow. The fact that
you refer to another human as "it" and a "bovine" does not show your
sharp wit, it shows your ignorance. As I said once before, I thought
you were a mature intelligent person, but you keep bringing up a
different character. How do YOU want to be thought of?

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> "Cheri" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 2014-10-08 9:30 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 10:03:57 -0500, Sky >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Bovine doesn't have a family - it has a herd.
>>>>>
>>>>> Most 'normal' folks do not mention their family members because they
>>>>> consider their privacy as priviliged information. Somehow, it seems
>>>>> this concept is beyond bovine's comprehension. The cow doesn't value
>>>>> its herd's personal intimancies, so it broadcasts TMI no matter the
>>>>> topic.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sky
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You actually took the time to start a new thread for this? What makes
>>>> you such a nasty and cruel person? You may think it is funny, but it
>>>> is a rather pathetic way of demeaning yourself. Stop and look at what
>>>> you have become. . Really, you are showing yourself as a mean person
>>>> with little regard for others. I think you are better than that.
>>>>
>>>> The only person you should try to be better than is yourself.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Maybe she is just fed up with Julie's bullshit and all the attention it
>>> gets.
>>
>> Then maybe the "Julie followers" should stop adding to the attention by
>> responding to/about all of her posts.
>
> They are too thick to work out how to use a filter.

They're not fooling anyone, they'd be lost without Julie to harrass. Witty
and wonderful they are not! :-)

Cheri

"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 09:52:03 -0500, Sky >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>>The bovine's crap/BS is nearly always unbelievable and then some!! Dang,
>>where are my 'wellies'!
>>
>>No new thread topic was started by me; I 'changed' the topic-line to
>>better designate how the context had drifted, that's all.
>>
>>Quite often the context of RFC threads drift and rarely do folks alter
>>the topic line to better designate those changes of topic ;> That
>>concept shouldn't be too hard to understand, hopefully! Knock on wood!
>>
>>Sky, who's yet to win that "big" lottery <vbg>
>
> But yet you insist on reading and you try to demean her while only
> demean yourself. Kill file her and the threads she starts and keep
> your dignity intact.
>
> OK so you changed the topic line but on many readers is shows up as
> new. But it was still just to throw another low blow. The fact that
> you refer to another human as "it" and a "bovine" does not show your
> sharp wit, it shows your ignorance. As I said once before, I thought
> you were a mature intelligent person, but you keep bringing up a
> different character. How do YOU want to be thought of?

She is now beneath contempt.



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>>
>> "Cheri" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On 2014-10-08 9:30 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 10:03:57 -0500, Sky >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Bovine doesn't have a family - it has a herd.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Most 'normal' folks do not mention their family members because they
>>>>>> consider their privacy as priviliged information. Somehow, it seems
>>>>>> this concept is beyond bovine's comprehension. The cow doesn't value
>>>>>> its herd's personal intimancies, so it broadcasts TMI no matter the
>>>>>> topic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sky
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You actually took the time to start a new thread for this? What makes
>>>>> you such a nasty and cruel person? You may think it is funny, but it
>>>>> is a rather pathetic way of demeaning yourself. Stop and look at what
>>>>> you have become. . Really, you are showing yourself as a mean person
>>>>> with little regard for others. I think you are better than that.
>>>>>
>>>>> The only person you should try to be better than is yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Maybe she is just fed up with Julie's bullshit and all the attention it
>>>> gets.
>>>
>>> Then maybe the "Julie followers" should stop adding to the attention by
>>> responding to/about all of her posts.
>>
>> They are too thick to work out how to use a filter.
>
> They're not fooling anyone, they'd be lost without Julie to harrass. Witty
> and wonderful they are not! :-)

> Cheri

LOL true))



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On 2014-10-08 10:52 AM, Sky wrote:
> On 10/8/2014 9:11 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2014-10-08 9:30 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>> On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 10:03:57 -0500, Sky >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bovine doesn't have a family - it has a herd.
>>>>
>>>> Most 'normal' folks do not mention their family members because they
>>>> consider their privacy as priviliged information. Somehow, it seems
>>>> this concept is beyond bovine's comprehension. The cow doesn't value
>>>> its herd's personal intimancies, so it broadcasts TMI no matter the
>>>> topic.
>>>>
>>> You actually took the time to start a new thread for this? What makes
>>> you such a nasty and cruel person? You may think it is funny, but it
>>> is a rather pathetic way of demeaning yourself. Stop and look at what
>>> you have become. . Really, you are showing yourself as a mean person
>>> with little regard for others. I think you are better than that.
>>>
>>> The only person you should try to be better than is yourself.
>>>
>> Maybe she is just fed up with Julie's bullshit and all the attention it
>> gets.
>
> The bovine's crap/BS is nearly always unbelievable and then some!! Dang,
> where are my 'wellies'!
>
> No new thread topic was started by me; I 'changed' the topic-line to
> better designate how the context had drifted, that's all.
>
> Quite often the context of RFC threads drift and rarely do folks alter
> the topic line to better designate those changes of topic ;> That
> concept shouldn't be too hard to understand, hopefully! Knock on wood!

Well, what the heck. Julie tends to make every thread about her and
thrives on the mixture of naive sympathy and the abuse it generates for
her enjoyment. Heaven forbid anyone else rename a thread that has
drifter to the her oddities.

> Sky, who's yet to win that "big" lottery <vbg>


Add up the amount of money you have spent on lottery tickets that did
not win and that is how far ahead I am in the game by not buying any. ;-)

"JohnJohn" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 18:14:37 +0100, "Ophelia"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 09:52:03 -0500, Sky >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>The bovine's crap/BS is nearly always unbelievable and then some!! Dang,
>>>>where are my 'wellies'!
>>>>
>>>>No new thread topic was started by me; I 'changed' the topic-line to
>>>>better designate how the context had drifted, that's all.
>>>>
>>>>Quite often the context of RFC threads drift and rarely do folks alter
>>>>the topic line to better designate those changes of topic ;> That
>>>>concept shouldn't be too hard to understand, hopefully! Knock on wood!
>>>>
>>>>Sky, who's yet to win that "big" lottery <vbg>
>>>
>>> But yet you insist on reading and you try to demean her while only
>>> demean yourself. Kill file her and the threads she starts and keep
>>> your dignity intact.
>>>
>>> OK so you changed the topic line but on many readers is shows up as
>>> new. But it was still just to throw another low blow. The fact that
>>> you refer to another human as "it" and a "bovine" does not show your
>>> sharp wit, it shows your ignorance. As I said once before, I thought
>>> you were a mature intelligent person, but you keep bringing up a
>>> different character. How do YOU want to be thought of?
>>
>> She is now beneath contempt.
>
> She probably thinks she's really sharp and witty.

I know)


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/