|
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
"Dave Smith" > wrote in message ... > On 2014-04-22 5:22 PM, dsi1 wrote: > >> This country loves waffles. Unfortunately, you have to eat the things >> within minutes after it leaves the iron. Most waffles served in the US >> are just so-so. We order waffles in hopes of getting a great one. Most >> of the time, it's a disappointment. A lot of people just give up >> ordering waffles. > > > That is why I almost never order them. I have been disappointed too many > times. I think my wife and I are two of the few people who make our own. > We make them about once a month on the average. Personally, I would just > as well make pancakes because they are the same basic ingredients and a > lot less work, but my wife loves waffles. It is probably because she likes > butter so much and she can get more butter using a waffle as the > ingredient than she cane with pancakes. > > The only restaurant in the area that serves decent pancakes had a serious > fire last week and is closed for a while. There is nowhere that I would > bother to order waffles. > > It is a major pet peeve of mine that the restaurants that specialize in > waffles and pancakes are among the worst places to get them. > Corporate chain restaurants can't do anything well. If you want awesome waffles start looking into your local diners. They probably have a waffle iron made in 1950 and is so seasoned they don't even use oil on it. And the waffles will be to die for. |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
"dsi1" > wrote in message ... > On 4/22/2014 5:06 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote: >> "dsi1" > wrote in message >> ... >>> On 4/21/2014 6:17 PM, wrote: >>>> YOU'RE the one going all orgasmic over this mess. It appears it >>>> belongs >>>> in YOUR feeding trough as everyone else here is turned off by this slop >>>> other than you, hog. And now you're ****ed off because everyone thinks >>>> your choice 'sandwich' looks like garbage. >>>> >>> "Everyone" would be incorrect. I bought a jar of raspberry preserves >>> yesterday. Thank god they had seedless. I can't say if I'll actually >>> make >>> the sandwich but I sure as hell am going to make a Portuguese sweet >>> bread, >>> P&J, dipped in egg wash and grilled sandwich. I expect it will be >>> awesome. >> >> I actually thought these people knew what a Montecristo was. Scoffing at >> sweet and savory combined is like saying you never heard of a turkey >> sandwich with cranberry sauce. For alleged foodies many here are >> completely >> ignorant. >> >> > I tend to be pretty open minded about most things - especially stuff like > raspberry preserves with no seeds. There's a good chap. Life is too short to limit oneself. |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
On 2014-04-22 11:22 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>> It is a major pet peeve of mine that the restaurants that specialize in >> waffles and pancakes are among the worst places to get them. >> > > Corporate chain restaurants can't do anything well. If you want awesome > waffles start looking into your local diners. They probably have a waffle > iron made in 1950 and is so seasoned they don't even use oil on it. And the > waffles will be to die for. Perhaps our own laziness is part of the problem. Waffles seem to be too much work and too much mess for most people to bother with. Somewhere along the line frozen waffles hit the market and dropped the standards for waffles. People like waffles enough that they are willing to take the substandard version that can be kept in the freezer and then heated up in a toaster. They are no more work than a piece of toast. Now people have an impression of waffles as something easy to do in a toaster but not good enough to go to the work to make them. |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 1:59:56 PM UTC-5, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> > > wrote in message > > > He simply cannot tolerate criticism of anything he posts and he thinks we > should all be clapping our hands with glee with his offerings. And he still > hasn't gotten over the spat we had a few months ago when I wouldn't lay down > and die after a similar exchange of words. And yes, he is indeed childish > and probably sulks like a 14 year old girl when he doesn't get his way out > in the real world. He must be a real pain in the butt to have as a > 'friend.' > > > See the dictionary under "projection." You are a rampaging asshole. That > has been established years ago. > > At least I'm not a whiney dickhead who's got a chapped ass because the majority here are not agreeing with me. Aggravating to be shot down on this mess you posted, isn't? Poor widdle baby, sniff-sniff. |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
> wrote in message ... > On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 1:59:56 PM UTC-5, Paul M. Cook wrote: >> >> > wrote in message >> >> >> He simply cannot tolerate criticism of anything he posts and he thinks we >> should all be clapping our hands with glee with his offerings. And he >> still >> hasn't gotten over the spat we had a few months ago when I wouldn't lay >> down >> and die after a similar exchange of words. And yes, he is indeed >> childish >> and probably sulks like a 14 year old girl when he doesn't get his way >> out >> in the real world. He must be a real pain in the butt to have as a >> 'friend.' >> >> >> See the dictionary under "projection." You are a rampaging asshole. >> That >> has been established years ago. >> >> > At least I'm not a whiney dickhead who's got a chapped ass because the > majority here are not agreeing with me. Aggravating to be shot down on > this mess you posted, isn't? Poor widdle baby, sniff-sniff. It's projection, sweetie. You are projecting how YOU would react. I actually am amused and have enjoyed this thread immensely INCLUDING your vitriolic remarks. You clearly are a horrible woman (born a man though, right?) absolutely filled with hatred and anger. You probably have poisoned more lives than Lucricia Borgia. So no, toots, I am not envious of you and I could not possibly care less what you think. People like you make me appreciate myself even more than I already do. --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
"Sqwertz" > wrote in message ... > On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 16:12:46 -0400, jmcquown wrote: > >> A Monte Cristo sandwich is delicious! I first tried one at The Half >> Shell in Memphis, TN. Yeah, it was 25 years ago. > > My last formal Monte Cristo was March 24th, 1995 at Bill's Restaurant > in Willow Glen (San Jose). And it looks like it's still on the menu. > > http://www.billscafe.com/the-menu/ > > And I ended up eating there the next morning for breakfast and I > remember I had the fried calamari, much to the horror of my dining > companions. You were dining with mollusks? |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 5:22:13 PM UTC-10, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message > > ... > > > On 2014-04-22 5:22 PM, dsi1 wrote: > > > > > >> This country loves waffles. Unfortunately, you have to eat the things > > >> within minutes after it leaves the iron. Most waffles served in the US > > >> are just so-so. We order waffles in hopes of getting a great one. Most > > >> of the time, it's a disappointment. A lot of people just give up > > >> ordering waffles. > > > > > > > > > That is why I almost never order them. I have been disappointed too many > > > times. I think my wife and I are two of the few people who make our own. > > > We make them about once a month on the average. Personally, I would just > > > as well make pancakes because they are the same basic ingredients and a > > > lot less work, but my wife loves waffles. It is probably because she likes > > > butter so much and she can get more butter using a waffle as the > > > ingredient than she cane with pancakes. > > > > > > The only restaurant in the area that serves decent pancakes had a serious > > > fire last week and is closed for a while. There is nowhere that I would > > > bother to order waffles. > > > > > > It is a major pet peeve of mine that the restaurants that specialize in > > > waffles and pancakes are among the worst places to get them. > > > > > > > Corporate chain restaurants can't do anything well. If you want awesome > > waffles start looking into your local diners. They probably have a waffle > > iron made in 1950 and is so seasoned they don't even use oil on it. And the > > waffles will be to die for. I have seen these old irons. I have been to places where the woman that waits on you will cook the waffles. I enjoy watching females making waffles. Unfortunately, I can't get any of that at home so I have to go out for that kind of action. :-) |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
"dsi1" > wrote in message ... > On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 5:22:13 PM UTC-10, Paul M. Cook wrote: >> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message >> >> ... >> >> > On 2014-04-22 5:22 PM, dsi1 wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> This country loves waffles. Unfortunately, you have to eat the things >> >> >> within minutes after it leaves the iron. Most waffles served in the US >> >> >> are just so-so. We order waffles in hopes of getting a great one. Most >> >> >> of the time, it's a disappointment. A lot of people just give up >> >> >> ordering waffles. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > That is why I almost never order them. I have been disappointed too >> > many >> >> > times. I think my wife and I are two of the few people who make our >> > own. >> >> > We make them about once a month on the average. Personally, I would >> > just >> >> > as well make pancakes because they are the same basic ingredients and a >> >> > lot less work, but my wife loves waffles. It is probably because she >> > likes >> >> > butter so much and she can get more butter using a waffle as the >> >> > ingredient than she cane with pancakes. >> >> > >> >> > The only restaurant in the area that serves decent pancakes had a >> > serious >> >> > fire last week and is closed for a while. There is nowhere that I would >> >> > bother to order waffles. >> >> > >> >> > It is a major pet peeve of mine that the restaurants that specialize in >> >> > waffles and pancakes are among the worst places to get them. >> >> > >> >> >> >> Corporate chain restaurants can't do anything well. If you want awesome >> >> waffles start looking into your local diners. They probably have a >> waffle >> >> iron made in 1950 and is so seasoned they don't even use oil on it. And >> the >> >> waffles will be to die for. > > I have seen these old irons. I have been to places where the woman that > waits on you will cook the waffles. I enjoy watching females making > waffles. Unfortunately, I can't get any of that at home so I have to go > out for that kind of action. :-) Girl on waffle action gets me going anyday. |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:22:28 -1000, dsi1
> wrote: >On 4/22/2014 11:06 AM, Jeßus wrote: >> On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 13:19:43 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" > >> wrote: >>> http://www.foodiecrush.com/2013/09/m...ffle-sandwich/ >> >> Admittedly I've never had a waffle before, but they've never looked >> all that appealing to me. But adding powdered sugar, jam and swiss >> cheese as well... I think I'm going to ill :) >> > >This country loves waffles. Unfortunately, you have to eat the things >within minutes after it leaves the iron. Most waffles served in the US >are just so-so. We order waffles in hopes of getting a great one. Most >of the time, it's a disappointment. A lot of people just give up >ordering waffles. If I ever come across 'waffles' here where I live, and they look okay... I'll give them a shot. But in all probability they won't be as authentic as in the U.S, I would imagine. |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
On 4/23/2014 2:33 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:22:28 -1000, dsi1 > > wrote: > >> On 4/22/2014 11:06 AM, Jeßus wrote: >>> On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 13:19:43 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" > >>> wrote: >>>> http://www.foodiecrush.com/2013/09/m...ffle-sandwich/ >>> >>> Admittedly I've never had a waffle before, but they've never looked >>> all that appealing to me. But adding powdered sugar, jam and swisse >>> cheese as well... I think I'm going to ill :) >>> >> >> This country loves waffles. Unfortunately, you have to eat the things >> within minutes after it leaves the iron. Most waffles served in the US >> are just so-so. We order waffles in hopes of getting a great one. Most >> of the time, it's a disappointment. A lot of people just give up >> ordering waffles. > > If I ever come across 'waffles' here where I live, and they look > okay... I'll give them a shot. But in all probability they won't be as > authentic as in the U.S, I would imagine. > I'm guessing that Sweden would be the best place to find a waffle. I bet they make better ones than we do. |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
On 4/23/2014 5:08 PM, John J wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 16:54:17 -1000, dsi1 > > wrote: > >> On 4/23/2014 2:33 PM, Jeßus wrote: >>> On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:22:28 -1000, dsi1 >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/22/2014 11:06 AM, Jeßus wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 13:19:43 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" > >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> http://www.foodiecrush.com/2013/09/m...ffle-sandwich/ >>>>> >>>>> Admittedly I've never had a waffle before, but they've never looked >>>>> all that appealing to me. But adding powdered sugar, jam and swisse >>>>> cheese as well... I think I'm going to ill :) >>>>> >>>> >>>> This country loves waffles. Unfortunately, you have to eat the things >>>> within minutes after it leaves the iron. Most waffles served in the US >>>> are just so-so. We order waffles in hopes of getting a great one. Most >>>> of the time, it's a disappointment. A lot of people just give up >>>> ordering waffles. >>> >>> If I ever come across 'waffles' here where I live, and they look >>> okay... I'll give them a shot. But in all probability they won't be as >>> authentic as in the U.S, I would imagine. >>> >> >> I'm guessing that Sweden would be the best place to find a waffle. I bet >> they make better ones than we do. > > I'd look at the Belgians. > Same thing - haha, just kidding? |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 12:45:38 PM UTC-5, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> > > wrote in message > > > > At least I'm not a whiney dickhead who's got a chapped ass because the > > majority here are not agreeing with me. Aggravating to be shot down on > > this mess you posted, isn't? Poor widdle baby, sniff-sniff. > > > It's projection, sweetie. You are projecting how YOU would react. I > actually am amused and have enjoyed this thread immensely INCLUDING your > vitriolic remarks. You clearly are a horrible woman (born a man though, > right?) absolutely filled with hatred and anger. You probably have poisoned > more lives than Lucricia Borgia. So no, toots, I am not envious of you and > I could not possibly care less what you think. People like you make me > appreciate myself even more than I already do. > > When did I say your were envious of me?? But I nailed your reaction to a T.. And I'm not filled with hatred and anger, just disappointment you can't behave in a discussion group like an adult. More of your delusional posting just as in the last thread when you didn't get your way, you are behaving in the same manner and starting the name calling again. And it all stems from the fact you cannot stand someone, especially a woman, to disagree with you. Maybe someday you will overcome this default in your personality. And I'm sure you "appreciate yourself" more than everyone here combined. But at least I can spell! |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
> wrote in message ... On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 12:45:38 PM UTC-5, Paul M. Cook wrote: > > > wrote in message > > > > At least I'm not a whiney dickhead who's got a chapped ass because the > > majority here are not agreeing with me. Aggravating to be shot down on > > this mess you posted, isn't? Poor widdle baby, sniff-sniff. > > > It's projection, sweetie. You are projecting how YOU would react. I > actually am amused and have enjoyed this thread immensely INCLUDING your > vitriolic remarks. You clearly are a horrible woman (born a man though, > right?) absolutely filled with hatred and anger. You probably have > poisoned > more lives than Lucricia Borgia. So no, toots, I am not envious of you > and > I could not possibly care less what you think. People like you make me > appreciate myself even more than I already do. > > When did I say your were envious of me?? But I nailed your reaction to a T. And I'm not filled with hatred and anger, just disappointment you can't behave in a discussion group like an adult. More of your delusional posting just as in the last thread when you didn't get your way, you are behaving in the same manner and starting the name calling again. And it all stems from the fact you cannot stand someone, especially a woman, to disagree with you. Maybe someday you will overcome this default in your personality. And I'm sure you "appreciate yourself" more than everyone here combined. But at least I can spell! ---------- <---- so Marti won't get confused LOL! I am the nicest guy I know. |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
On 4/23/2014 6:01 PM, John J wrote:
> > But maybe you're right. All I know about Swedish cuisine comes from > Ikea and the Muppet show. > My guess is that there's no Belgian waffles in Belgium. :-) |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 8:36:44 PM UTC-10, John J wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:32:35 -1000, dsi1 > > > wrote: > > > > >On 4/23/2014 6:01 PM, John J wrote: > > >> > > >> But maybe you're right. All I know about Swedish cuisine comes from > > >> Ikea and the Muppet show. > > >> > > > > > >My guess is that there's no Belgian waffles in Belgium. :-) > > > > You're not waffling, are you? > > I'm not waffling nor am I the type of person that does. Heck, I barely have time to eat anything in the morning. > > -- > > John |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
dsi1 wrote:
> > ... Heck, I barely have time to eat anything in the morning. On work days, I never eat in the morning. Lunch is a 12 oz cup of V-8 with pepper. My first solid food comes at dinner about 6pm. I do "snack" again later though. Bad habits sure, but it's worked for me for many years. On days off, still no breakfast but I'll eat a big late lunch about 1pm or so. And then a dinner about 7pm. :-o |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
On 4/24/2014 10:34 AM, Gary wrote:
> dsi1 wrote: >> >> ... Heck, I barely have time to eat anything in the morning. > > On work days, I never eat in the morning. Lunch is a 12 oz cup of V-8 > with pepper. My first solid food comes at dinner about 6pm. I do > "snack" again later though. Bad habits sure, but it's worked for me > for many years. > > On days off, still no breakfast but I'll eat a big late lunch about > 1pm or so. And then a dinner about 7pm. > > :-o > What the heck? You must be some kind of Buddhist or something. :-) |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
Sqwertz wrote:
> > dsi1 wrote: > > My guess is that there's no Belgian waffles in Belgium. :-) > > 1,252 posts with the word "guess". > > Maybe you need to work on your linguistic style if you have to use the > word "guess" or "guessing" (and other similar words) in every other > post you make. Steve! WTH? Have you really 'stalked' him that much to discover 1,252 posts using the word, "guess?" Please tell me you just made up that number. If not, that's a bit scary. :-o Or maybe not... perhaps you ran out of things to do one day and ran those numbers just for the hell of it. I've done that before myself. G. |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
"Paul M. Cook" wrote:
> > Theree is nothing wrong with MY news reader. There is everything wrong with > THEIR non-RFC compliant newsreader. A non-RFC compliant newsreader? LMAO. You use Outlook Express. It sucks. Lose it and get a good newsreader. G. |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 16:54:17 -1000, dsi1
> wrote: >On 4/23/2014 2:33 PM, Jeßus wrote: >> On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:22:28 -1000, dsi1 >> > wrote: >> >>> On 4/22/2014 11:06 AM, Jeßus wrote: >>>> On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 13:19:43 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" > >>>> wrote: >>>>> http://www.foodiecrush.com/2013/09/m...ffle-sandwich/ >>>> >>>> Admittedly I've never had a waffle before, but they've never looked >>>> all that appealing to me. But adding powdered sugar, jam and swisse >>>> cheese as well... I think I'm going to ill :) >>>> >>> >>> This country loves waffles. Unfortunately, you have to eat the things >>> within minutes after it leaves the iron. Most waffles served in the US >>> are just so-so. We order waffles in hopes of getting a great one. Most >>> of the time, it's a disappointment. A lot of people just give up >>> ordering waffles. >> >> If I ever come across 'waffles' here where I live, and they look >> okay... I'll give them a shot. But in all probability they won't be as >> authentic as in the U.S, I would imagine. >> > >I'm guessing that Sweden would be the best place to find a waffle. I bet >they make better ones than we do. Quite possibly... |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
dsi1 wrote:
> > On 4/24/2014 10:34 AM, Gary wrote: > > dsi1 wrote: > >> > >> ... Heck, I barely have time to eat anything in the morning. > > > > On work days, I never eat in the morning. Lunch is a 12 oz cup of V-8 > > with pepper. My first solid food comes at dinner about 6pm. I do > > "snack" again later though. Bad habits sure, but it's worked for me > > for many years. > > > > On days off, still no breakfast but I'll eat a big late lunch about > > 1pm or so. And then a dinner about 7pm. > > > > :-o > > > > What the heck? You must be some kind of Buddhist or something. :-) I avoid killing insects too. Their life is no less valuable than mine. :) |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
On 4/24/2014 12:39 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 16:54:17 -1000, dsi1 > > wrote: > >> On 4/23/2014 2:33 PM, Jeßus wrote: >>> On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:22:28 -1000, dsi1 >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/22/2014 11:06 AM, Jeßus wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 13:19:43 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" > >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> http://www.foodiecrush.com/2013/09/m...ffle-sandwich/ >>>>> >>>>> Admittedly I've never had a waffle before, but they've never looked >>>>> all that appealing to me. But adding powdered sugar, jam and swisse >>>>> cheese as well... I think I'm going to ill :) >>>>> >>>> >>>> This country loves waffles. Unfortunately, you have to eat the things >>>> within minutes after it leaves the iron. Most waffles served in the US >>>> are just so-so. We order waffles in hopes of getting a great one. Most >>>> of the time, it's a disappointment. A lot of people just give up >>>> ordering waffles. >>> >>> If I ever come across 'waffles' here where I live, and they look >>> okay... I'll give them a shot. But in all probability they won't be as >>> authentic as in the U.S, I would imagine. >>> >> >> I'm guessing that Sweden would be the best place to find a waffle. I bet >> they make better ones than we do. > > Quite possibly... > I'll have to ask my Swedish step-mom about waffles. Maybe I'll just buy her a box of Eggo Waffles. She'll probably give me a dour look. Maybe I'll give her a waffle iron for her birthday and tell her to try it out. Boy, I really like waffles... |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
On 4/21/2014 5:09 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 13:19:43 -0700, Paul M. Cook wrote: > >> http://www.foodiecrush.com/2013/09/m...ffle-sandwich/ > > Maybe if you get rid of the powdered sugar and the red gloop, and > double the amount of meat then it would be simply edible. > > -sw > It has way too much bread and too little meat and cheese. What is that, 4 waffles? -- ღ.¸¸.œ«*¨`*œ¶ Cheryl |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
On 4/22/2014 4:12 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> A Monte Cristo sandwich is delicious! I first tried one at The Half > Shell in Memphis, TN. Yeah, it was 25 years ago. Ham, turkey, > provolone cheese, bread dipped in batter and deep fried. Such a > sandwich should be a very rare indulgence. ;) > > I did have them hold the powdered sugar. They put the strawberry jam in > a souffle cup on the side, just in case. No waffles involved. I had one in the deli in the building where I work. Well, used to work, we moved to a new building and I haven't been to their deli yet. From what I've been told, it's about a mile round trip from where we sit to the deli, next building over but connected. That would take up my whole lunch 45 mins. lol Anyway, the MC from that deli was delicious. They also served the jelly on the side. I don't think they were battered and fried though. Just grilled like a grilled cheese sandwich. The deli in that building was actually very good. People from other buildings would come to eat there and it was always packed. -- ღ.¸¸.œ«*¨`*œ¶ Cheryl |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
On 4/22/2014 6:12 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> > At various times in my life, I have made waffles. I might be wanting to > have another go at it. I'd like to try waffles leavened with yeast this > time around. It actually makes for a pretty good waffle. > > I have had disaster strike places where I discover great eats. Mostly > they fold up the business but one of them got hit with arson and another > got hit with a truck. The truck did relatively minor damage but the > building was a little shack and the spot the truck penetrated was where > the goofy Chinese guy made wonderful roast pork. No more roast pork > after that. Life is like that - one day the sun is shining and the world > is a beautiful place and the next day, there's no more roast pork. Why not try them with the eggs separated and the whites whipped to stiff peaks and folded into the batter? Would make for a light, airy waffle. -- ღ.¸¸.œ«*¨`*œ¶ Cheryl |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
I must be dead because to me, it looks creepily disgusting. The individual components are probably tasty,
but together, they're a mess. N. |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
On 4/24/2014 4:00 PM, Cheryl wrote:
> On 4/22/2014 6:12 PM, dsi1 wrote: >> >> At various times in my life, I have made waffles. I might be wanting to >> have another go at it. I'd like to try waffles leavened with yeast this >> time around. It actually makes for a pretty good waffle. >> >> I have had disaster strike places where I discover great eats. Mostly >> they fold up the business but one of them got hit with arson and another >> got hit with a truck. The truck did relatively minor damage but the >> building was a little shack and the spot the truck penetrated was where >> the goofy Chinese guy made wonderful roast pork. No more roast pork >> after that. Life is like that - one day the sun is shining and the world >> is a beautiful place and the next day, there's no more roast pork. > > Why not try them with the eggs separated and the whites whipped to stiff > peaks and folded into the batter? Would make for a light, airy waffle. > I have done this before and some people swear by it. I may try it again in the future. Thanks. |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
On 4/24/2014 4:05 PM, Nancy2 wrote:
> I must be dead because to me, it looks creepily disgusting. The individual components are probably tasty, > but together, they're a mess. > > N. > OK, so the OP may have oversold this thing just a wee bit. That is, of course, unless you're dead... :-) |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
"Gary" > wrote in message ... > "Paul M. Cook" wrote: >> >> Theree is nothing wrong with MY news reader. There is everything wrong >> with >> THEIR non-RFC compliant newsreader. > > A non-RFC compliant newsreader? LMAO. > You use Outlook Express. It sucks. Lose it and get a good newsreader. > It works just fine. |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
"Nancy2" > wrote in message ... >I must be dead because to me, it looks creepily disgusting. The individual >components are probably tasty, > but together, they're a mess. You could be metabolically challenged as we say. Seriously, you never heard of a montechristo sandwich? That is what I got out of this thread is most people simply never have heard of them. It's really a great sandwich - easily my all time favorite next to the BLT. Smked ham, eggs, melted cheese, turkey with a side of jelly - what's not to like? |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
"dsi1" > wrote in message ... > On 4/24/2014 4:00 PM, Cheryl wrote: >> On 4/22/2014 6:12 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>> >>> At various times in my life, I have made waffles. I might be wanting to >>> have another go at it. I'd like to try waffles leavened with yeast this >>> time around. It actually makes for a pretty good waffle. >>> >>> I have had disaster strike places where I discover great eats. Mostly >>> they fold up the business but one of them got hit with arson and another >>> got hit with a truck. The truck did relatively minor damage but the >>> building was a little shack and the spot the truck penetrated was where >>> the goofy Chinese guy made wonderful roast pork. No more roast pork >>> after that. Life is like that - one day the sun is shining and the world >>> is a beautiful place and the next day, there's no more roast pork. >> >> Why not try them with the eggs separated and the whites whipped to stiff >> peaks and folded into the batter? Would make for a light, airy waffle. >> > > I have done this before and some people swear by it. I may try it again in > the future. Thanks. Betty Crocker's recipe from the 50s calls for egg whites. You cannot make a good waffle any other way. |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
"John J" > wrote in message ... > On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 19:38:20 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" > > wrote: > >> >>"Nancy2" > wrote in message ... >>>I must be dead because to me, it looks creepily disgusting. The >>>individual >>>components are probably tasty, >>> but together, they're a mess. >> >>You could be metabolically challenged as we say. Seriously, you never >>heard >>of a montechristo sandwich? That is what I got out of this thread is most >>people simply never have heard of them. It's really a great sandwich - >>easily my all time favorite next to the BLT. Smked ham, eggs, melted >>cheese, turkey with a side of jelly - what's not to like? > > The ham, the turkey and the jelly. You never heard of a turkey sandwich with cranberry sauce? You never had a ham sandwich with honey glaze? Ham and jam are like peas and carrots. They really work together. |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
On 4/24/2014 5:18 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> > Betty Crocker's recipe from the 50s calls for egg whites. You cannot make a > good waffle any other way. > > The people in the 50s thought TV dinners and Jello salad were good ideas too. The 50s sucked. |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
"dsi1" > wrote in message ... > On 4/24/2014 5:18 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote: >> >> Betty Crocker's recipe from the 50s calls for egg whites. You cannot >> make a >> good waffle any other way. >> >> > The people in the 50s thought TV dinners and Jello salad were good ideas > too. The 50s sucked. They got waffles right. --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
I have had a Monte Christo, thanks, and this is not it. An MC doesn't have a waffle as part of it. And a side of jelly
isn't jelly slopped all over it. N. |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
On 4/24/2014 6:06 PM, Gary wrote:
> "Paul M. Cook" wrote: >> >> Theree is nothing wrong with MY news reader. There is everything wrong with >> THEIR non-RFC compliant newsreader. > > A non-RFC compliant newsreader? LMAO. > You use Outlook Express. It sucks. Lose it and get a good newsreader. > > G. > Actually OE with Quotefix wasn't bad. The later versions of Windows mail truly sucked for newsgroups and the folks who wrote Quotefix weren't inclined to rewrite the app for the subsequent iterations of Windows mail. The real problem is Paul insisting we all must think this "waffle sandwich" is fantasmagorical. It's really not. Jill |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
On 4/25/2014 8:25 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
> I have had a Monte Christo, thanks, and this is not it. An MC doesn't have a waffle as part of it. And a side of jelly > isn't jelly slopped all over it. > > N. > Too true. The few times I've had a Monte Cristo sandwich the jam was served on the side. There were absolutely NO waffles involved. No need to reinvent the wheel to include waffles. Jill |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
On 4/24/2014 9:08 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> I'll have to ask my Swedish step-mom about waffles. Maybe I'll just buy > her a box of Eggo Waffles. She'll probably give me a dour look. Maybe > I'll give her a waffle iron for her birthday and tell her to try it out. > Boy, I really like waffles... I have a circa 1950's waffle iron I'd be glad to sell you. ;) But please, don't use it to make a Monte Cristo Sandwich! Jill |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
On 2014-04-25 4:33 AM, dsi1 wrote:
> On 4/24/2014 5:18 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote: >> >> Betty Crocker's recipe from the 50s calls for egg whites. You cannot >> make a >> good waffle any other way. >> >> > The people in the 50s thought TV dinners and Jello salad were good ideas > too. The 50s sucked. TV dinners were a novelty. They weren't great, but they were better than some people could do on their own. I have never made a Jello Salad but I confess to enjoying them in small doses. |
If you don't drool over this, you are possibly dead
On 2014-04-24 9:08 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> I'll have to ask my Swedish step-mom about waffles. Maybe I'll just buy > her a box of Eggo Waffles. She'll probably give me a dour look. Maybe > I'll give her a waffle iron for her birthday and tell her to try it out. > Boy, I really like waffles... Eggo Waffles may be one of the reasons that people think waffles aren't worth making. I didn't know that Sweden is famous for waffles, but I have heard about Swedish pancakes. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter