One of the items today... ah yes, the never-ending supply of kaiser rolls!

French Dip
Hot Roast Beef on Kaiser Bun with Beef Ajus
Your Choice of Side*
$8.25

I'd prefer mine on a french roll, thank you very much.

*Sides are sweet potato or white french fries/chips.

Jill

On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:59:57 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

> One of the items today... ah yes, the never-ending supply of kaiser rolls!
>
> French Dip
> Hot Roast Beef on Kaiser Bun with Beef Ajus
> Your Choice of Side*
> $8.25
>
> I'd prefer mine on a french roll, thank you very much.
>
> *Sides are sweet potato or white french fries/chips.
>
Pass. I've never liked French dipped beef sandwiches and don't
understand the mystique.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> One of the items today... ah yes, the never-ending supply of kaiser rolls!
>
> French Dip
> Hot Roast Beef on Kaiser Bun with Beef Ajus
> Your Choice of Side*
> $8.25
>
> I'd prefer mine on a french roll, thank you very much.
>
> *Sides are sweet potato or white french fries/chips.

How can you dip that? You'd have to cut it in half. And where do they keep
getting this bread? At the Kaiser Roll outlet?

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:59:57 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
>
>> *Sides are sweet potato or white french fries/chips.
>
> "...white French fries/chips". What an odd choice of wordage. How
> about "regular French fries". And do they mean British "chips" or
> potato chips?
>


I like the "Hot Roast Beef on Kaiser Bun with Beef with juice" translation.

Sqwertz wrote:
>
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:59:57 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
>
> > *Sides are sweet potato or white french fries/chips.
>
> "...white French fries/chips". What an odd choice of wordage. How
> about "regular French fries". And do they mean British "chips" or
> potato chips?
>
> -sw

They're trying to differentiate sweet potato fries from regular potato
fries, and/or sweet potato chips from regular potato chips. It would be
a lot clearer as a simple list of side options.

On 7/19/2013 5:38 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:59:57 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
>
>> *Sides are sweet potato or white french fries/chips.
>
> "...white French fries/chips". What an odd choice of wordage. How
> about "regular French fries". And do they mean British "chips" or
> potato chips?
>
> -sw
>
I said "chips" just in case Ophelia asked what I meant by fries.

Jill

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 7/19/2013 5:38 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:59:57 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
>>
>>> *Sides are sweet potato or white french fries/chips.
>>
>> "...white French fries/chips". What an odd choice of wordage. How
>> about "regular French fries". And do they mean British "chips" or
>> potato chips?
>>
>> -sw
>>
> I said "chips" just in case Ophelia asked what I meant by fries.

Thank you I do know what 'fries' are though

--
--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:59:56 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
>
>> On 7/19/2013 5:38 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:59:57 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
>>>
>>>> *Sides are sweet potato or white french fries/chips.
>>>
>>> "...white French fries/chips". What an odd choice of wordage. How
>>> about "regular French fries". And do they mean British "chips" or
>>> potato chips?
>>>
>> I said "chips" just in case Ophelia asked what I meant by fries.
>
> So you're responsible for "WHITE French fries?", too? I think
> you'vebeen reading too many of their menus if you're calling them
> WHITE fries!

Hehehe. I wonder how they stay white? Mine are kinda yellow.

On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:04:18 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:59:56 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
>
>> On 7/19/2013 5:38 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:59:57 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
>>>
>>>> *Sides are sweet potato or white french fries/chips.
>>>
>>> "...white French fries/chips". What an odd choice of wordage. How
>>> about "regular French fries". And do they mean British "chips" or
>>> potato chips?
>>>
>> I said "chips" just in case Ophelia asked what I meant by fries.
>
>So you're responsible for "WHITE French fries?", too? I think
>you'vebeen reading too many of their menus if you're calling them
>WHITE fries!

Mayhaps this belongs on the Trayvon/Zimmerman thread.

On 7/19/2013 10:29 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:

> Mayhaps this belongs on the Trayvon/Zimmerman thread.
>
Is that thread still going on?

--
CAPSLOCK–Preventing Login Since 1980.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:59:56 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
>
>> On 7/19/2013 5:38 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:59:57 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
>>>
>>>> *Sides are sweet potato or white french fries/chips.
>>>
>>> "...white French fries/chips". What an odd choice of wordage. How
>>> about "regular French fries". And do they mean British "chips" or
>>> potato chips?
>>>
>> I said "chips" just in case Ophelia asked what I meant by fries.
>
> So you're responsible for "WHITE French fries?", too? I think
> you'vebeen reading too many of their menus if you're calling them
> WHITE fries!

I took it to mean 'as opposed to sweet potato fries'.

--
--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On 7/20/2013 6:34 AM, Ophelia wrote:
>
>
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:59:56 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/19/2013 5:38 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:59:57 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> *Sides are sweet potato or white french fries/chips.
>>>>
>>>> "...white French fries/chips". What an odd choice of wordage. How
>>>> about "regular French fries". And do they mean British "chips" or
>>>> potato chips?
>>>>
>>> I said "chips" just in case Ophelia asked what I meant by fries.
>>
>> So you're responsible for "WHITE French fries?", too? I think
>> you'vebeen reading too many of their menus if you're calling them
>> WHITE fries!
>
> I took it to mean 'as opposed to sweet potato fries'.
>
Yes! I started to say "regular" but then didn't.

Jill

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 7/20/2013 6:34 AM, Ophelia wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:59:56 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 7/19/2013 5:38 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:59:57 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> *Sides are sweet potato or white french fries/chips.
>>>>>
>>>>> "...white French fries/chips". What an odd choice of wordage. How
>>>>> about "regular French fries". And do they mean British "chips" or
>>>>> potato chips?
>>>>>
>>>> I said "chips" just in case Ophelia asked what I meant by fries.
>>>
>>> So you're responsible for "WHITE French fries?", too? I think
>>> you'vebeen reading too many of their menus if you're calling them
>>> WHITE fries!
>>
>> I took it to mean 'as opposed to sweet potato fries'.
>>
> Yes! I started to say "regular" but then didn't.

See some of us understand you <g>
--
--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 13:59:32 +0100, "Ophelia"
> wrote:

>
>
> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On 7/20/2013 6:34 AM, Ophelia wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >>> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:59:56 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 7/19/2013 5:38 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:59:57 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> *Sides are sweet potato or white french fries/chips.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "...white French fries/chips". What an odd choice of wordage. How
> >>>>> about "regular French fries". And do they mean British "chips" or
> >>>>> potato chips?
> >>>>>
> >>>> I said "chips" just in case Ophelia asked what I meant by fries.
> >>>
> >>> So you're responsible for "WHITE French fries?", too? I think
> >>> you'vebeen reading too many of their menus if you're calling them
> >>> WHITE fries!
> >>
> >> I took it to mean 'as opposed to sweet potato fries'.
> >>
> > Yes! I started to say "regular" but then didn't.
>
> See some of us understand you <g>
> --

I didn't have any questions either.

--
Food is an important part of a balanced diet.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 13:59:32 +0100, Ophelia wrote:
>
>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 7/20/2013 6:34 AM, Ophelia wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:59:56 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/19/2013 5:38 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:59:57 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Sides are sweet potato or white french fries/chips.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "...white French fries/chips". What an odd choice of wordage. How
>>>>>>> about "regular French fries". And do they mean British "chips" or
>>>>>>> potato chips?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I said "chips" just in case Ophelia asked what I meant by fries.
>>>>>
>>>>> So you're responsible for "WHITE French fries?", too? I think
>>>>> you'vebeen reading too many of their menus if you're calling them
>>>>> WHITE fries!
>>>>
>>>> I took it to mean 'as opposed to sweet potato fries'.
>>>>
>>> Yes! I started to say "regular" but then didn't.
>>
>> See some of us understand you <g>
>
> I understood it, otherwise I wouldn't have offered the alternative
> phrase "REGULAR french fries". So much for misunderstandings, eh?

Don't worry Steve, it's a woman thing

--
--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 13:59:32 +0100, Ophelia wrote:
>
>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 7/20/2013 6:34 AM, Ophelia wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:59:56 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/19/2013 5:38 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:59:57 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Sides are sweet potato or white french fries/chips.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "...white French fries/chips". What an odd choice of wordage. How
>>>>>>> about "regular French fries". And do they mean British "chips" or
>>>>>>> potato chips?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I said "chips" just in case Ophelia asked what I meant by fries.
>>>>>
>>>>> So you're responsible for "WHITE French fries?", too? I think
>>>>> you'vebeen reading too many of their menus if you're calling them
>>>>> WHITE fries!
>>>>
>>>> I took it to mean 'as opposed to sweet potato fries'.
>>>>
>>> Yes! I started to say "regular" but then didn't.
>>
>> See some of us understand you <g>
>
> I understood it, otherwise I wouldn't have offered the alternative
> phrase "REGULAR french fries". So much for misunderstandings, eh?

OMG! You've gone all Canadian!

Sqwertz wrote:
> So much for misunderstandings, eh?
>
> -sw

But you shoot loads of mayo all over your overbuilt sammiches, ya freak.


Squirty:

http://www.yelp.com/user_details?use...qvcdFuU1dR8bgA

Steve "Rockin the Boat" W.'s Profile

Location
Austin, TX

Yelping Since
September 2008

Find Me In
Clothes, usually

My Hometown
Santa Cruz, CA and Pittsburgh, PA

My Blog Or Website
http://www.flickr.com/ph…

My Second Favorite Website
http://IMDB.com: one of the first really useful sites on the Internet.

The Last Great Book I Read
Grapes of Wrath (I was a late Steinbeck devotee)

My First Concert
Rush - Moving PIctures (Twice, SF and Pittsburgh)

My Last Meal On Earth
I'd rather spend that hour raping and pillaging

Don't Tell Anyone Else But...
I'd rather be posting to Usenet

Most Recent Discovery
I'm getting older

Current Crush
Grape

Shell Gas Station
Categories: Gas & Service Stations, Convenience Stores
Neighborhoods: 78704 (South Austin), South Lamar District
12/17/2012 First to Review
I went in to buy cigarettes as I do twice a week for the last 6 months
and was given "short" cigarettes instead of the longer 100's style. I
was halfway out the door when I realized the mistake. The door hadn't
even had time to close behind me when I went back in to get the right
cigarettes. Had to wait behind a few other people at the cash
register but when I got there he said they have a policy that once you
leave the store you cannot return or exchange anything. I told him
the door never even closed behind me so technically I never left the
store. And more importantly you gave me the wrong cigarettes. It was
a simple exchange.

He said "No, you asked for 'Short' cigarettes", which was total BS as
I told him, "I do this twice a week, and you give me the correct
cigarettes every other time. The word "shorts" is not even in my
vocabulary." He still insisted those are what I asked for. Rather
than providing the simplest customer service he chose to argue with me
and insist I said something that I didn't. He refused to exchange the
cigarettes for the ones I originally asked for.

This is the same Shell station where a woman accused the store clerk
(Amirali Noorji Maknojia, age 44) of sexually assaulting her in the
bathroom back on March 4th, 2008 (story available in
http://Statesmen.com archives, author Tony Plohetski). While I didn't
exactly get raped in the sexual sense, I'm still amazed at the
treatment. It's clear that their pig-headed customer service still
has a quite a ways to go if hey can't even provide the most basic
customer service for regular customers.