Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
I thought I would make some old fashioned brown rice for dinner... It says
boil then simmer cook 45 minutes. I did that and the timer just went off, but the rice is very sticky and wet... Is there a way to fix this? background: it was a 16 ounce bag and I used it all, and put in 8 ounces water. (Bag said 2 cups water, for 1 cup rice.) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
On Nov 10, 6:49*pm, "Richard K." > wrote:
> I thought I would make some old fashioned brown rice for dinner... *It says > boil then simmer cook 45 minutes. *I did that and the timer just went off, > but the rice is very sticky and wet... *Is there a way to fix this? > > background: *it was a 16 ounce bag and I used it all, and put in 8 ounces > water. *(Bag said 2 cups water, for 1 cup rice.) Get a new stove or start eating out. I make brown rice all the time and never know how it's going to turn out. They actually call for more than double the water to rice, but I always use just about double cause I don't like mine wet. But really it doesn't matter a lot as I typically use the brown rice for daily made stews or soups or pilafs, so it is not necessary that it be fluffy or perfect. I cook a pound and it lasts 6 days. I just ran out. Gonna use white rice this time. Gonna saute a bunch of kale in olive oil and butter, then add rice and water and bring to a boil, then simmer for 15 to 20 minutes. Then each day I toss whatever I want into the mix, veggies, etc. The rice is my base. TJ TJ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
"Tommy Joe" > wrote in message
... On Nov 10, 6:49 pm, "Richard K." > wrote: > I thought I would make some old fashioned brown rice for dinner... It says > boil then simmer cook 45 minutes. I did that and the timer just went off, > but the rice is very sticky and wet... Is there a way to fix this? > > background: it was a 16 ounce bag and I used it all, and put in 8 ounces > water. (Bag said 2 cups water, for 1 cup rice.) Get a new stove or start eating out. I make brown rice all the time and never know how it's going to turn out. They actually call for more than double the water to rice, but I always use just about double cause I don't like mine wet. But really it doesn't matter a lot as I typically use the brown rice for daily made stews or soups or pilafs, so it is not necessary that it be fluffy or perfect. I cook a pound and it lasts 6 days. I just ran out. Gonna use white rice this time. Gonna saute a bunch of kale in olive oil and butter, then add rice and water and bring to a boil, then simmer for 15 to 20 minutes. Then each day I toss whatever I want into the mix, veggies, etc. The rice is my base. TJ === So I can use it for my broccoli mushroom soup mash? I think I will let it steam a bit longer. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:50:22 -0500, "Richard K."
> wrote: >I thought I would make some old fashioned brown rice for dinner... It says >boil then simmer cook 45 minutes. I did that and the timer just went off, >but the rice is very sticky and wet... Is there a way to fix this? > >background: it was a 16 ounce bag and I used it all, and put in 8 ounces >water. (Bag said 2 cups water, for 1 cup rice.) > > As Jill said elsewhere, rice cooking proportions are 1 cup rice, 2 cups water. Don't eyeball it, measure. Bring the water to a boil, stir in the rice. Let the pot come back to a boil, turn the heat down as low as it will go, cover the pot and walk away for 20 minutes or more. Don't stir or peek. If the mixture wants to boil over or foam over at first, try a larger pot next time. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
On 11/11/2012 9:30 AM, Janet Bostwick wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:50:22 -0500, "Richard K." > > wrote: > >> I thought I would make some old fashioned brown rice for dinner... It says >> boil then simmer cook 45 minutes. I did that and the timer just went off, >> but the rice is very sticky and wet... Is there a way to fix this? >> >> background: it was a 16 ounce bag and I used it all, and put in 8 ounces >> water. (Bag said 2 cups water, for 1 cup rice.) >> >> > As Jill said elsewhere, rice cooking proportions are 1 cup rice, 2 > cups water. Don't eyeball it, measure. > Bring the water to a boil, stir in the rice. Let the pot come back to > a boil, turn the heat down as low as it will go, cover the pot and > walk away for 20 minutes or more. Don't stir or peek. If the mixture > wants to boil over or foam over at first, try a larger pot next time. > Janet US > Yep, there's a reason they print the directions on the bag I have no idea how, if he used a lower water ratio, the rice came out sticky. (I'm surprised it's not uncooked and crunchy!) Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:36:28 -0500, jmcquown >
wrote: >On 11/11/2012 9:30 AM, Janet Bostwick wrote: >> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:50:22 -0500, "Richard K." >> > wrote: >> >>> I thought I would make some old fashioned brown rice for dinner... It says >>> boil then simmer cook 45 minutes. I did that and the timer just went off, >>> but the rice is very sticky and wet... Is there a way to fix this? >>> >>> background: it was a 16 ounce bag and I used it all, and put in 8 ounces >>> water. (Bag said 2 cups water, for 1 cup rice.) >>> >>> >> As Jill said elsewhere, rice cooking proportions are 1 cup rice, 2 >> cups water. Don't eyeball it, measure. >> Bring the water to a boil, stir in the rice. Let the pot come back to >> a boil, turn the heat down as low as it will go, cover the pot and >> walk away for 20 minutes or more. Don't stir or peek. If the mixture >> wants to boil over or foam over at first, try a larger pot next time. >> Janet US >> >Yep, there's a reason they print the directions on the bag I have no >idea how, if he used a lower water ratio, the rice came out sticky. >(I'm surprised it's not uncooked and crunchy!) > >Jill I think that is how he started out and probably pot watched and added some water along the way. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
On 11/11/2012 9:43 AM, Janet Bostwick wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:36:28 -0500, jmcquown > > wrote: > >> On 11/11/2012 9:30 AM, Janet Bostwick wrote: >>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:50:22 -0500, "Richard K." >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> I thought I would make some old fashioned brown rice for dinner... It says >>>> boil then simmer cook 45 minutes. I did that and the timer just went off, >>>> but the rice is very sticky and wet... Is there a way to fix this? >>>> >>>> background: it was a 16 ounce bag and I used it all, and put in 8 ounces >>>> water. (Bag said 2 cups water, for 1 cup rice.) >>>> >>>> >>> As Jill said elsewhere, rice cooking proportions are 1 cup rice, 2 >>> cups water. Don't eyeball it, measure. >>> Bring the water to a boil, stir in the rice. Let the pot come back to >>> a boil, turn the heat down as low as it will go, cover the pot and >>> walk away for 20 minutes or more. Don't stir or peek. If the mixture >>> wants to boil over or foam over at first, try a larger pot next time. >>> Janet US >>> >> Yep, there's a reason they print the directions on the bag I have no >> idea how, if he used a lower water ratio, the rice came out sticky. >> (I'm surprised it's not uncooked and crunchy!) >> >> Jill > > I think that is how he started out and probably pot watched and added > some water along the way. > Janet US > I'm betting that's it. It's important with regular rice not to pot watch. Follow the directions on the package, cover the pot and then leave it alone. Rice is cheap so he can always buy another bag. I'd also suggest he start out with 1 cup of rice as a test run rather than try to cook the entire bag. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
"Richard K." > wrote in
: > I thought I would make some old fashioned brown rice for > dinner... It says boil then simmer cook 45 minutes. I did > that and the timer just went off, but the rice is very sticky > and wet... Is there a way to fix this? > > background: it was a 16 ounce bag and I used it all, and put > in 8 ounces water. (Bag said 2 cups water, for 1 cup rice.) A 16 oz bag of rice...were you buying it from a street dealer? First one's free and all that? For one thing, brown rice is usually stickier than some white rice, like Uncle Ben's. That's not an issue. Brown rice requires a touch more water than white rice, so make it 2 cups plus 1 tbsp per cup of rice. -- Traditions are group efforts to keep the unexpected from happening. -- Barbara Tober |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 07:30:32 -0700, Janet Bostwick
> wrote: >On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:50:22 -0500, "Richard K." > wrote: > >>I thought I would make some old fashioned brown rice for dinner... It says >>boil then simmer cook 45 minutes. I did that and the timer just went off, >>but the rice is very sticky and wet... Is there a way to fix this? >> >>background: it was a 16 ounce bag and I used it all, and put in 8 ounces >>water. (Bag said 2 cups water, for 1 cup rice.) >> >> >As Jill said elsewhere, rice cooking proportions are 1 cup rice, 2 >cups water. Don't eyeball it, measure. I think that will work for most [all?] long grained white rice. The brown Nishiki rice I have in the pantry calls for 2 1/2 cups water per cup rice. The Sweet Brown Korean rice doesn't say on the package- but I use 2/1 but cook it longer. I rinse that as it is intended to be a sticky rice & my 'sticky rice' process calls for the long rinse-- and some 'resting'. >Bring the water to a boil, stir in the rice. Let the pot come back to >a boil, turn the heat down as low as it will go, cover the pot and >walk away for 20 minutes or more. Don't stir or peek. If the mixture >wants to boil over or foam over at first, try a larger pot next time. I follow roughly the same program for non-sticky prices- though my rices all take longer. Jim |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 07:30:32 -0700, Janet Bostwick
> wrote: >On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:50:22 -0500, "Richard K." > wrote: > >>I thought I would make some old fashioned brown rice for dinner... It says >>boil then simmer cook 45 minutes. I did that and the timer just went off, >>but the rice is very sticky and wet... Is there a way to fix this? >> >>background: it was a 16 ounce bag and I used it all, and put in 8 ounces >>water. (Bag said 2 cups water, for 1 cup rice.) >> >Bring the water to a boil, stir in the rice. Why? Rice isn't pasta. Place everyting in a pot, rice, water, seasonings, bring to a boil, stir, turn down heat and cover. Often I toast the rice in the pot and then proceed, if anything add the rice first. >Let the pot come back to >a boil, turn the heat down as low as it will go, cover the pot and >walk away for 20 minutes or more. Don't stir or peek. If the mixture >wants to boil over or foam over at first, try a larger pot next time. >Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 14:04:23 -0500, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote:
>On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 07:30:32 -0700, Janet Bostwick > wrote: > >>On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:50:22 -0500, "Richard K." > wrote: >> >>>I thought I would make some old fashioned brown rice for dinner... It says >>>boil then simmer cook 45 minutes. I did that and the timer just went off, >>>but the rice is very sticky and wet... Is there a way to fix this? >>> >>>background: it was a 16 ounce bag and I used it all, and put in 8 ounces >>>water. (Bag said 2 cups water, for 1 cup rice.) >>> >>Bring the water to a boil, stir in the rice. > >Why? Rice isn't pasta. Place everyting in a pot, rice, water, >seasonings, bring to a boil, stir, turn down heat and cover. Often I >toast the rice in the pot and then proceed, if anything add the rice >first. Agree. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
On 11/11/2012 2:49 PM, Janet Bostwick wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 14:04:23 -0500, Brooklyn1 <Gravesend1> wrote: > >> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 07:30:32 -0700, Janet Bostwick >> > wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:50:22 -0500, "Richard K." >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> I thought I would make some old fashioned brown rice for dinner... It says >>>> boil then simmer cook 45 minutes. I did that and the timer just went off, >>>> but the rice is very sticky and wet... Is there a way to fix this? >>>> >>>> background: it was a 16 ounce bag and I used it all, and put in 8 ounces >>>> water. (Bag said 2 cups water, for 1 cup rice.) >>>> >>> Bring the water to a boil, stir in the rice. >> >> Why? Rice isn't pasta. Place everyting in a pot, rice, water, >> seasonings, bring to a boil, stir, turn down heat and cover. Often I >> toast the rice in the pot and then proceed, if anything add the rice >> first. > I usually use Basmati rise. I put it a pot, add some water, swoosh it around and dump off the water, then add two parts water to each part of rice, a bit of salt, bring it to a boil, put a top on, turn down the heat and give it 15 minutes. Fluff it and leave the top on till ready to serve. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
"Janet Bostwick" > wrote in message
news > On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:50:22 -0500, "Richard K." > > wrote: > >>I thought I would make some old fashioned brown rice for dinner... It >>says >>boil then simmer cook 45 minutes. I did that and the timer just went off, >>but the rice is very sticky and wet... Is there a way to fix this? >> >>background: it was a 16 ounce bag and I used it all, and put in 8 ounces >>water. (Bag said 2 cups water, for 1 cup rice.) >> >> > As Jill said elsewhere, rice cooking proportions are 1 cup rice, 2 > cups water. Don't eyeball it, measure. > Bring the water to a boil, stir in the rice. Let the pot come back to > a boil, turn the heat down as low as it will go, cover the pot and > walk away for 20 minutes or more. Don't stir or peek. If the mixture > wants to boil over or foam over at first, try a larger pot next time. > Janet US I did measure. I think it was the pot size. I was trying to be efficient using the whole bag but ended up throwing out the rice. Live and learn. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
Richard K. wrote:
> "Janet Bostwick" > wrote in message > news >> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:50:22 -0500, "Richard K." >> > wrote: >> >>> I thought I would make some old fashioned brown rice for dinner... It >>> says >>> boil then simmer cook 45 minutes. I did that and the timer just went off, >>> but the rice is very sticky and wet... Is there a way to fix this? >>> >>> background: it was a 16 ounce bag and I used it all, and put in 8 ounces >>> water. (Bag said 2 cups water, for 1 cup rice.) >>> >>> >> As Jill said elsewhere, rice cooking proportions are 1 cup rice, 2 >> cups water. Don't eyeball it, measure. >> Bring the water to a boil, stir in the rice. Let the pot come back to >> a boil, turn the heat down as low as it will go, cover the pot and >> walk away for 20 minutes or more. Don't stir or peek. If the mixture >> wants to boil over or foam over at first, try a larger pot next time. >> Janet US > > > I did measure. I think it was the pot size. I was trying to be efficient > using the whole bag but ended up throwing out the rice. Live and learn. > > But the ratio that you said you used made no sense--and wasn't what the package directions indicated. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
On Nov 11, 10:06*pm, "Jean B." > wrote:
> But the ratio that you said you used made no sense--and wasn't > what the package directions indicated. In that case the recipe should have worked since Richard K himself makes no sense. I'll bet you could put whatever amount of rice you want in enough water and just boil it till it's done, then take it and strain it and let it dry. However, I will not bet that you'd eat it. I have done it that way though, in the past. One poster in this thread said they learned from the Galloping Gourmet. Another great teacher is hunger. Oh how inventive the starving become. TJ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
"Tommy Joe" > wrote in message
... On Nov 11, 10:06 pm, "Jean B." > wrote: > But the ratio that you said you used made no sense--and wasn't > what the package directions indicated. In that case the recipe should have worked since Richard K himself makes no sense. === If I get the seasonal job, perhaps I will... Plus learn about seasonings. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
"jmcquown" > wrote in message ... > On 11/11/2012 9:30 AM, Janet Bostwick wrote: >> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:50:22 -0500, "Richard K." >> > wrote: >> >>> I thought I would make some old fashioned brown rice for dinner... It >>> says >>> boil then simmer cook 45 minutes. I did that and the timer just went >>> off, >>> but the rice is very sticky and wet... Is there a way to fix this? >>> >>> background: it was a 16 ounce bag and I used it all, and put in 8 >>> ounces >>> water. (Bag said 2 cups water, for 1 cup rice.) >>> >>> >> As Jill said elsewhere, rice cooking proportions are 1 cup rice, 2 >> cups water. Don't eyeball it, measure. >> Bring the water to a boil, stir in the rice. Let the pot come back to >> a boil, turn the heat down as low as it will go, cover the pot and >> walk away for 20 minutes or more. Don't stir or peek. If the mixture >> wants to boil over or foam over at first, try a larger pot next time. >> Janet US >> > Yep, there's a reason they print the directions on the bag I have no > idea how, if he used a lower water ratio, the rice came out sticky. (I'm > surprised it's not uncooked and crunchy!) Yeah. That doesn't sound right at all. I always have to add a little more water. Mine is always perfect. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, no longer time sensitive
"Tommy Joe" > wrote in message
... On Nov 11, 10:06 pm, "Jean B." > wrote: > But the ratio that you said you used made no sense--and wasn't > what the package directions indicated. I'll bet you could put whatever amount of rice you want in enough water and just boil it till it's done, then take it and strain it and let it dry. TJ --- On Brooklyn's advice, I put some of the "rice" in the leftover tomato soup... The bottom of the rice was burned, so think it was the pot was not right for the amount I tried to cook... Yet, how do rice cookers get it right? I used that a couple times, and the rice did come out perfect. And that was about 4 cups of rice. The one I attempted in the pot was just a couple. I totally missed watching any (american) football today. How did the Steelers and Broncos do? Any season ending injuries? When does Palimono come back? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
"Brooklyn1" <Gravesend1> wrote in message ... > Why? Rice isn't pasta. Place everyting in a pot, rice, water, > seasonings, bring to a boil, stir, turn down heat and cover. Often I > toast the rice in the pot and then proceed, if anything add the rice > first. That's how I do it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
... > Yeah. That doesn't sound right at all. I always have to add a little > more water. Mine is always perfect. The rice is making me feeling "inadequate"; everyone keeps saying how simple it is... Sometimes, the simplest things in life are difficult for me, but I will not give up. And will try again... I've never had a problem making microwaved rice. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
"Richard K." > wrote in message ... > "Julie Bove" > wrote in message > ... > >> Yeah. That doesn't sound right at all. I always have to add a little >> more water. Mine is always perfect. > > The rice is making me feeling "inadequate"; everyone keeps saying how > simple it is... Sometimes, the simplest things in life are difficult for > me, but I will not give up. And will try again... I've never had a > problem making microwaved rice. So why don't you keep using that method? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
... > > "Richard K." > wrote in message >> The rice is making me feeling "inadequate"; everyone keeps saying how >> simple it is... Sometimes, the simplest things in life are difficult for >> me, but I will not give up. And will try again... I've never had a >> problem making microwaved rice. > > So why don't you keep using that method? I thought rice in a bag would be cheaper, and perhaps slightly healthier. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
"Richard K." > wrote in message ... > "Julie Bove" > wrote in message > ... >> >> "Richard K." > wrote in message >>> The rice is making me feeling "inadequate"; everyone keeps saying how >>> simple it is... Sometimes, the simplest things in life are difficult >>> for me, but I will not give up. And will try again... I've never had >>> a problem making microwaved rice. >> >> So why don't you keep using that method? > > I thought rice in a bag would be cheaper, and perhaps slightly healthier. Okay... You are confusing me. How do you cook it in the microwave then? You do know that you can cook rice in the bag in the microwave. Right? Not that I do it. Because I don't. Once in a while I buy those little cups or pouches of precooked for my daughter. I don't personally like them but she doesn't mind. They are okay to put in a quick soup when you're sick but I don't like to eat them as is. I don't like instant rice either. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
On 11/12/2012 2:02 AM, Richard K. wrote:
> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message > ... > >> Yeah. That doesn't sound right at all. I always have to add a little >> more water. Mine is always perfect. > > The rice is making me feeling "inadequate"; everyone keeps saying how simple > it is... Sometimes, the simplest things in life are difficult for me, but I > will not give up. And will try again... I've never had a problem making > microwaved rice. > > So go back to buying the Kroger microwave rice you mentioned. Or get the boil-n bag par-boiled brown rice. I believe the brand name is Success. My mom used it once she got past thinking the only kind of rice she could cook was Minute Rice Jill -- The person who rows the boat seldom has time to rock it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
"jmcquown" > wrote in message
... > So go back to buying the Kroger microwave rice you mentioned. Or get the > boil-n bag par-boiled brown rice. I believe the brand name is Success. > My mom used it once she got past thinking the only kind of rice she could > cook was Minute Rice > > Jill yes there is a Kroger version of Minute Rice, brown rice. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, no longer time sensitive
On Nov 12, 1:54*am, "Richard K." > wrote:
> I totally missed watching any (american) football today. *How did the > Steelers and Broncos do? *Any season ending injuries? *When does Palimono > come back? You don't even care how lame your ploys for response are. All these questions. It's a tactic a really stupid person would use, ending a post with a ton of questions. You do that a lot. Unlike others I am aware that your questions are designed only to get some kind of response from someone, anyone, even me. And here I am, at your service once again. There's a 24 hour sports station called ESPN that would have these answers for you, and you know it. I feel sorry for you sometimes when your ploys are so lame and obvious and everyone is beginning to see it. I want you to improve to the point where your phoniness becomes less obvious. Please improve in that regard. For my sake as well as your own. Thanks. TJ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
On Nov 12, 2:01*am, "Richard K." > wrote:
> Sometimes, the simplest things in life are difficult for me, but I will not give up. Please do. TJ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
"Tommy Joe" > wrote in message
... On Nov 12, 2:01 am, "Richard K." > wrote: > Sometimes, the simplest things in life are difficult for me, but I will > not give up. Please do. TJ --- ummm.... no. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, no longer time sensitive
"Tommy Joe" > wrote in message
... On Nov 12, 1:54 am, "Richard K." > wrote: > I totally missed watching any (american) football today. How did the > Steelers and Broncos do? Any season ending injuries? When does Palimono > come back? You don't even care how lame your ploys for response are. All these questions. It's a tactic a really stupid person would use, ending a post with a ton of questions. You do that a lot. Unlike others I am aware that your questions are designed only to get some kind of response from someone, anyone, even me. And here I am, at your service once again. There's a 24 hour sports station called ESPN that would have these answers for you, and you know it. I feel sorry for you sometimes when your ploys are so lame and obvious and everyone is beginning to see it. I want you to improve to the point where your phoniness becomes less obvious. Please improve in that regard. For my sake as well as your own. Thanks. TJ === I am aware of the ESPN and did consult them when I did not get a response... btw, your response was not very timely. I am put you in the "questionable" file as a source. sometimes, sir. You are a pompous ass... (other times, a nitwit.) boo to you! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, time sensitive
jmcquown wrote:
> On 11/11/2012 9:43 AM, Janet Bostwick wrote: >> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:36:28 -0500, jmcquown > >> wrote: >> >>> On 11/11/2012 9:30 AM, Janet Bostwick wrote: >>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:50:22 -0500, "Richard K." >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> I thought I would make some old fashioned brown rice for >>>>> dinner... It says >>>>> boil then simmer cook 45 minutes. I did that and the timer just >>>>> went off, >>>>> but the rice is very sticky and wet... Is there a way to fix this? >>>>> >>>>> background: it was a 16 ounce bag and I used it all, and put in 8 >>>>> ounces >>>>> water. (Bag said 2 cups water, for 1 cup rice.) >>>>> >>>>> >>>> As Jill said elsewhere, rice cooking proportions are 1 cup rice, 2 >>>> cups water. Don't eyeball it, measure. >>>> Bring the water to a boil, stir in the rice. Let the pot come back to >>>> a boil, turn the heat down as low as it will go, cover the pot and >>>> walk away for 20 minutes or more. Don't stir or peek. If the mixture >>>> wants to boil over or foam over at first, try a larger pot next time. >>>> Janet US >>>> >>> Yep, there's a reason they print the directions on the bag I have no >>> idea how, if he used a lower water ratio, the rice came out sticky. >>> (I'm surprised it's not uncooked and crunchy!) >>> >>> Jill >> >> I think that is how he started out and probably pot watched and added >> some water along the way. >> Janet US >> > > I'm betting that's it. It's important with regular rice not to pot > watch. Follow the directions on the package, cover the pot and then > leave it alone. > > Rice is cheap so he can always buy another bag. I'd also suggest he > start out with 1 cup of rice as a test run rather than try to cook the > entire bag. > > Jill http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/Cons.../ucm319827.htm |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, no longer time sensitive
On Nov 13, 2:21*am, "Richard K." > wrote:
"Tommy Joe" > wrote in message > sometimes, sir. *You are a pompous ass... *(other times, a nitwit.) Add selfish to the list. I enjoyed writing my post, that's what it's all about, how much enjoyment I can get out of it. My critiques are never brutal and you know it. I am not pompous, but I am an ass. I am not a wit, but I am a nit. I'm in this purely for enjoyment - my own and what I might incidentally or on purpose give to others. I'm a nice guy. You know it. It's time for you to admit it. It's time for you to admit many things. Then you will be on the road to recovery. Let us help you. Come, follow us TJ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
rice problem, no longer time sensitive
"Tommy Joe" > wrote in message
... On Nov 13, 2:21 am, "Richard K." > wrote: "Tommy Joe" > wrote in message > sometimes, sir. You are a pompous ass... (other times, a nitwit.) Add selfish to the list. I enjoyed writing my post, that's what it's all about, how much enjoyment I can get out of it. My critiques are never brutal and you know it. I am not pompous, but I am an ass. I am not a wit, but I am a nit. I'm in this purely for enjoyment - my own and what I might incidentally or on purpose give to others. I'm a nice guy. You know it. It's time for you to admit it. It's time for you to admit many things. Then you will be on the road to recovery. Let us help you. Come, follow us TJ === apology accepted. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
PRE-LAUNCh 9 April 2012..TIME SENSITIVE] Please Open Immediately! | General Cooking | |||
PRE-LAUNCh 9 April 2012..TIME SENSITIVE] Please Open Immediately! | General Cooking | |||
Requesting advice - a good Formosa Fanciest Oolong. Sorta time-sensitive ^_^ | Tea | |||
The Pentagon Germ = AIDS ! Time Sensitive, Pass it on. | General Cooking | |||
very sensitive scale problem--wine alcohol loss experiment | General Cooking |