merryb wrote:

>> > CRITICISM: PLEASE REFRAIN FROM all caps SUBJECT TITLES.

>Pandora, don't worry about them. I don't understand why some people
>are so upset about it.

They're not upset. That's not why they bring it up. You really don't
know what motivates them?

Andy wrote:

>>>> > CRITICISM: PLEASE REFRAIN FROM all caps SUBJECT TITLES.
>>
>>>Pandora, don't worry about them. I don't understand why some people
>>>are so upset about it.
>>
>> They're not upset. That's not why they bring it up. You really don't
>> know what motivates them?
>
>
>George M. Middius,
>
>Being a journeyman typographer, making information "anxiously" readable and
>supremely easy on the eyes is the object of the game!
>
>Usenet is the worst form of readable communication, ergo, comprehension.

Would you like to know how many grammatical errors you committed in
those two sentences? (It's more than 1.)

Andy wrote:

>>>>>> > CRITICISM: PLEASE REFRAIN FROM all caps SUBJECT TITLES.
>>>>
>>>>>Pandora, don't worry about them. I don't understand why some people
>>>>>are so upset about it.
>>>>
>>>> They're not upset. That's not why they bring it up. You really don't
>>>> know what motivates them?
>>>
>>>
>>>George M. Middius,
>>>
>>>Being a journeyman typographer, making information "anxiously"
>>>readable and supremely easy on the eyes is the object of the game!
>>>
>>>Usenet is the worst form of readable communication, ergo,
>>>comprehension.
>>
>> Would you like to know how many grammatical errors you committed in
>> those two sentences? (It's more than 1.)

>Heh heh heh!
>You're a proofreader!!!
>We had them, once upon a time!

Proofreading is one of many arrows in my quiver. I like to think I'm
pretty good at troll-spotting too.