![]() |
OT Please - to computer experts
On 2011-07-24, Dora > wrote:
> I'm trying to delete about 100 photos from My Documents in Microsoft > XP SP3. Every time I try to delete, the software automatically makes > a copy of the picture. > I've tried so many times that I have multiple batches of copies these > pictures. How can I delete the things so they're gone? Any help > would be appreciated. Thanks. > Dora What utility are you using to delete the photos? Some photo viewing software, or Explore, the Windows file mgr? If you can't delete the files with the file mgr, use a dos command. start > run > cmd (gotta type in cmd) In the dos box, type the command: cd C:\path\dir_with_photos\ rem photo_filenames cd = change directory rem = remove nb |
OT Please - to computer experts
"notbob" > wrote in message ... > On 2011-07-24, Dora > wrote: >> I'm trying to delete about 100 photos from My Documents in Microsoft >> XP SP3. Every time I try to delete, the software automatically makes >> a copy of the picture. >> I've tried so many times that I have multiple batches of copies these >> pictures. How can I delete the things so they're gone? Any help >> would be appreciated. Thanks. >> Dora > > What utility are you using to delete the photos? Some photo viewing > software, or Explore, the Windows file mgr? If you can't delete the > files with the file mgr, use a dos command. > > start > run > cmd (gotta type in cmd) > > In the dos box, type the command: > > cd C:\path\dir_with_photos\ > rem photo_filenames > > cd = change directory > rem = remove > Um no. REM stands for remark and is used in shell scripts, aka batch files. The proper syntax is DEL. You can get help for the DEL command by typing DEL /?. DOS syntax is non case sensitive, BTW. Paul > > nb |
OT Please - to computer experts
On Jul 24, 4:43*pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote:
> "notbob" > wrote in message > > ... > > > > > On 2011-07-24, Dora > wrote: > >> I'm trying to delete about 100 photos from *My Documents in Microsoft > >> XP SP3. *Every time I try to delete, the software automatically makes > >> a copy of the picture. > >> I've tried so many times that I have multiple batches of copies these > >> pictures. *How can I delete the things so they're gone? *Any help > >> would be appreciated. *Thanks. > >> Dora > > > What utility are you using to delete the photos? *Some photo viewing > > software, or Explore, the Windows file mgr? *If you can't delete the > > files with the file mgr, use a dos command. > > > start > run > cmd * *(gotta type in cmd) > > > In the dos box, type the command: > > > cd C:\path\dir_with_photos\ > > rem photo_filenames > > > cd = change directory > > rem = remove > > Um no. *REM stands for remark and is used in shell scripts, aka batch files. > The proper syntax is DEL. *You can get help for the DEL command by typing > DEL /?. > > DOS syntax is non case sensitive, BTW. > > Paul > > > > > nb Truedat! And 'rm' is the remove command, or 'del'. And there's 'rmdir' too to remove a directory (folder). John Kuthe... |
OT Please - to computer experts
"John Kuthe" > wrote in message ... On Jul 24, 4:43 pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > "notbob" > wrote in message > > ... > > > > > On 2011-07-24, Dora > wrote: > >> I'm trying to delete about 100 photos from My Documents in Microsoft > >> XP SP3. Every time I try to delete, the software automatically makes > >> a copy of the picture. > >> I've tried so many times that I have multiple batches of copies these > >> pictures. How can I delete the things so they're gone? Any help > >> would be appreciated. Thanks. > >> Dora > > > What utility are you using to delete the photos? Some photo viewing > > software, or Explore, the Windows file mgr? If you can't delete the > > files with the file mgr, use a dos command. > > > start > run > cmd (gotta type in cmd) > > > In the dos box, type the command: > > > cd C:\path\dir_with_photos\ > > rem photo_filenames > > > cd = change directory > > rem = remove > > Um no. REM stands for remark and is used in shell scripts, aka batch > files. > The proper syntax is DEL. You can get help for the DEL command by typing > DEL /?. > > DOS syntax is non case sensitive, BTW. > > Paul > > > > > nb Truedat! And 'rm' is the remove command, or 'del'. And there's 'rmdir' too to remove a directory (folder). Nope, no rm command in the DOS shell that comes with XP. What you get with XP is not DOS. Paul |
OT Please - to computer experts
On Jul 24, 8:14*pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:43:30 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe wrote: > > On Jul 24, 4:43*pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > >> "notbob" > wrote in message > > ... > > >>> On 2011-07-24, Dora > wrote: > >>>> I'm trying to delete about 100 photos from *My Documents in Microsoft > >>>> XP SP3. *Every time I try to delete, the software automatically makes > >>>> a copy of the picture. > >>>> I've tried so many times that I have multiple batches of copies these > >>>> pictures. *How can I delete the things so they're gone? *Any help > >>>> would be appreciated. *Thanks. > >>>> Dora > > >>> What utility are you using to delete the photos? *Some photo viewing > >>> software, or Explore, the Windows file mgr? *If you can't delete the > >>> files with the file mgr, use a dos command. > > >>> start > run > cmd * *(gotta type in cmd) > > >>> In the dos box, type the command: > > >>> cd C:\path\dir_with_photos\ > >>> rem photo_filenames > > >>> cd = change directory > >>> rem = remove > > >> Um no. *REM stands for remark and is used in shell scripts, aka batch files. > >> The proper syntax is DEL. *You can get help for the DEL command by typing > >> DEL /?. > > >> DOS syntax is non case sensitive, BTW. > > >> Paul > > >>> nb > > > Truedat! And 'rm' is the remove command, or 'del'. And there's 'rmdir' > > too to remove a directory (folder). > > truedat, bullshit! > > <sigh> *'rm' is Unix. *"del" is DOS. > > -sw Ah, correct! It's been a long time. But 'rmdir' is DOS and removes a directory. John Kuthe... |
OT Please - to computer experts
On Jul 24, 7:22*pm, John Kuthe > wrote:
> On Jul 24, 8:14*pm, Sqwertz > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:43:30 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe wrote: > > > On Jul 24, 4:43*pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > > >> "notbob" > wrote in message > > > ... > > > >>> On 2011-07-24, Dora > wrote: > > >>>> I'm trying to delete about 100 photos from *My Documents in Microsoft > > >>>> XP SP3. *Every time I try to delete, the software automatically makes > > >>>> a copy of the picture. > > >>>> I've tried so many times that I have multiple batches of copies these > > >>>> pictures. *How can I delete the things so they're gone? *Any help > > >>>> would be appreciated. *Thanks. > > >>>> Dora > > > >>> What utility are you using to delete the photos? *Some photo viewing > > >>> software, or Explore, the Windows file mgr? *If you can't delete the > > >>> files with the file mgr, use a dos command. > > > >>> start > run > cmd * *(gotta type in cmd) > > > >>> In the dos box, type the command: > > > >>> cd C:\path\dir_with_photos\ > > >>> rem photo_filenames > > > >>> cd = change directory > > >>> rem = remove > > > >> Um no. *REM stands for remark and is used in shell scripts, aka batch files. > > >> The proper syntax is DEL. *You can get help for the DEL command by typing > > >> DEL /?. > > > >> DOS syntax is non case sensitive, BTW. > > > >> Paul > > > >>> nb > > > > Truedat! And 'rm' is the remove command, or 'del'. And there's 'rmdir' > > > too to remove a directory (folder). > > > truedat, bullshit! > > > <sigh> *'rm' is Unix. *"del" is DOS. > > > -sw > > Ah, correct! It's been a long time. > > But 'rmdir' is DOS and removes a directory. > > John Kuthe... A lot of DOS commands work in XP's pseudo-DOS or emulated DOS or what- ever they call it. I've learned to use what's available and forget the rest. == |
OT Please - to computer experts
"John Kuthe" > wrote in message ... On Jul 24, 8:14 pm, Sqwertz > wrote: > On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:43:30 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe wrote: > > On Jul 24, 4:43 pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > >> "notbob" > wrote in message > > ... > > >>> On 2011-07-24, Dora > wrote: > >>>> I'm trying to delete about 100 photos from My Documents in Microsoft > >>>> XP SP3. Every time I try to delete, the software automatically makes > >>>> a copy of the picture. > >>>> I've tried so many times that I have multiple batches of copies these > >>>> pictures. How can I delete the things so they're gone? Any help > >>>> would be appreciated. Thanks. > >>>> Dora > > >>> What utility are you using to delete the photos? Some photo viewing > >>> software, or Explore, the Windows file mgr? If you can't delete the > >>> files with the file mgr, use a dos command. > > >>> start > run > cmd (gotta type in cmd) > > >>> In the dos box, type the command: > > >>> cd C:\path\dir_with_photos\ > >>> rem photo_filenames > > >>> cd = change directory > >>> rem = remove > > >> Um no. REM stands for remark and is used in shell scripts, aka batch > >> files. > >> The proper syntax is DEL. You can get help for the DEL command by > >> typing > >> DEL /?. > > >> DOS syntax is non case sensitive, BTW. > > >> Paul > > >>> nb > > > Truedat! And 'rm' is the remove command, or 'del'. And there's 'rmdir' > > too to remove a directory (folder). > > truedat, bullshit! > > <sigh> 'rm' is Unix. "del" is DOS. > > -sw Ah, correct! It's been a long time. But 'rmdir' is DOS and removes a directory. DELTREE was the preferred method. Paul |
OT Please - to computer experts
On Jul 25, 12:54*am, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote:
> "John Kuthe" > wrote in message > > ... > On Jul 24, 8:14 pm, Sqwertz > wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:43:30 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe wrote: > > > On Jul 24, 4:43 pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > > >> "notbob" > wrote in message > > > ... > > > >>> On 2011-07-24, Dora > wrote: > > >>>> I'm trying to delete about 100 photos from My Documents in Microsoft > > >>>> XP SP3. Every time I try to delete, the software automatically makes > > >>>> a copy of the picture. > > >>>> I've tried so many times that I have multiple batches of copies these > > >>>> pictures. How can I delete the things so they're gone? Any help > > >>>> would be appreciated. Thanks. > > >>>> Dora > > > >>> What utility are you using to delete the photos? Some photo viewing > > >>> software, or Explore, the Windows file mgr? If you can't delete the > > >>> files with the file mgr, use a dos command. > > > >>> start > run > cmd (gotta type in cmd) > > > >>> In the dos box, type the command: > > > >>> cd C:\path\dir_with_photos\ > > >>> rem photo_filenames > > > >>> cd = change directory > > >>> rem = remove > > > >> Um no. REM stands for remark and is used in shell scripts, aka batch > > >> files. > > >> The proper syntax is DEL. You can get help for the DEL command by > > >> typing > > >> DEL /?. > > > >> DOS syntax is non case sensitive, BTW. > > > >> Paul > > > >>> nb > > > > Truedat! And 'rm' is the remove command, or 'del'. And there's 'rmdir' > > > too to remove a directory (folder). > > > truedat, bullshit! > > > <sigh> 'rm' is Unix. "del" is DOS. > > > -sw > > Ah, correct! It's been a long time. > > But 'rmdir' is DOS and removes a directory. > > DELTREE was the preferred method. > > Paul Paul. please learn some Usenet quoting skills. I don't know what news reader you use. Mine automatically quotes the previous poster's material for me. There are some long standing Unenet quoting conventions youb seem to be flouting and it's very confusing to the reader. Observe the last 4 lines above, below -sw's sig. The top 2 are my text but the bottom 2 are yours. But nothing signifies which are which. If your new reader does not do this for you it is incumbent on YOU to quote material not yours when adding a comment. Please do! Thanks, John Kuthe (and the entire Usenet world!) |
OT Please - to computer experts
On 2011-07-24, Paul M. Cook > wrote:
> Um no. REM stands for remark and is used in shell scripts, aka batch files. > The proper syntax is DEL. You can get help for the DEL command by typing > DEL /?. DOH! You are correct, of course. I've been using Linux too long, where rm means remove. I gotta dig through some pretty cobwebby corners to recall those old dos commands that are often no longer valid in what is passing for dos in the newer Windows OSs. I attribute it to trying answer technical question BC ....before coffee. ;) nb |
OT Please - to computer experts
"notbob" > wrote in message ... > On 2011-07-24, Paul M. Cook > wrote: > >> Um no. REM stands for remark and is used in shell scripts, aka batch >> files. >> The proper syntax is DEL. You can get help for the DEL command by typing >> DEL /?. > > DOH! > > You are correct, of course. I've been using Linux too long, where rm > means remove. I gotta dig through some pretty cobwebby corners to > recall those old dos commands that are often no longer valid in what > is passing for dos in the newer Windows OSs. I attribute it to trying > answer technical question BC ....before coffee. ;) While we have a bunch of computer experts on hand... does anyone know how to make the text colour in WLM default to black? |
OT Please - to computer experts
On 25/07/2011 1:18 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 18:22:31 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe wrote: > >> On Jul 24, 8:14 pm, > wrote: >>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:43:30 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe wrote: >>>> On Jul 24, 4:43 pm, "Paul M. > wrote: >>>>> > wrote in message >>> >>>>> ... >>> >>>>>> On 2011-07-24, > wrote: >>>>>>> I'm trying to delete about 100 photos from My Documents in Microsoft >>>>>>> XP SP3. Every time I try to delete, the software automatically makes >>>>>>> a copy of the picture. >>>>>>> I've tried so many times that I have multiple batches of copies these >>>>>>> pictures. How can I delete the things so they're gone? Any help >>>>>>> would be appreciated. Thanks. >>>>>>> Dora >>> >>>>>> What utility are you using to delete the photos? Some photo viewing >>>>>> software, or Explore, the Windows file mgr? If you can't delete the >>>>>> files with the file mgr, use a dos command. >>> >>>>>> start> run> cmd (gotta type in cmd) >>> >>>>>> In the dos box, type the command: >>> >>>>>> cd C:\path\dir_with_photos\ >>>>>> rem photo_filenames >>> >>>>>> cd = change directory >>>>>> rem = remove >>> >>>>> Um no. REM stands for remark and is used in shell scripts, aka batch files. >>>>> The proper syntax is DEL. You can get help for the DEL command by typing >>>>> DEL /?. >>> >>>>> DOS syntax is non case sensitive, BTW. >>> >>>>> Paul >>> >>>>>> nb >>> >>>> Truedat! And 'rm' is the remove command, or 'del'. And there's 'rmdir' >>>> too to remove a directory (folder). >>> >>> truedat, bullshit! >>> >>> <sigh> 'rm' is Unix. "del" is DOS. >>> >>> -sw >> >> Ah, correct! It's been a long time. >> >> But 'rmdir' is DOS and removes a directory. > > Only if it's empty. > > Put it this way - suggesting the OP use DOS for anything is > ridiculous. You're just confusing her. > > -sw Looks like a severe case of the blind leading the blind here! Krypsis |
OT Please - to computer experts
On 2011-07-25, Ophelia > wrote:
> While we have a bunch of computer experts on hand... does anyone > know how to make the text colour in WLM default to black? I'll leave this question to the "computer experts" that have a clue what a WLM is. ;) nb -- vi ...the heart of evil |
OT Please - to computer experts
On 2011-07-25, Krypsis > wrote:
> Looks like a severe case of the blind leading the blind here! More a case of M$ continually changing everything around to fool the sheep into believing they've improved their product. nb |
OT Please - to computer experts
"notbob" > wrote in message ... > On 2011-07-25, Ophelia > wrote: > >> While we have a bunch of computer experts on hand... does anyone >> know how to make the text colour in WLM default to black? > > I'll leave this question to the "computer experts" that have a clue > what a WLM is. ;) Windows live mail! :) |
OT Please - to computer experts
"John Kuthe" > wrote in message ... On Jul 25, 12:54 am, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > "John Kuthe" > wrote in message > > ... > On Jul 24, 8:14 pm, Sqwertz > wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:43:30 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe wrote: > > > On Jul 24, 4:43 pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > > >> "notbob" > wrote in message > > > ... > > > >>> On 2011-07-24, Dora > wrote: > > >>>> I'm trying to delete about 100 photos from My Documents in > > >>>> Microsoft > > >>>> XP SP3. Every time I try to delete, the software automatically > > >>>> makes > > >>>> a copy of the picture. > > >>>> I've tried so many times that I have multiple batches of copies > > >>>> these > > >>>> pictures. How can I delete the things so they're gone? Any help > > >>>> would be appreciated. Thanks. > > >>>> Dora > > > >>> What utility are you using to delete the photos? Some photo viewing > > >>> software, or Explore, the Windows file mgr? If you can't delete the > > >>> files with the file mgr, use a dos command. > > > >>> start > run > cmd (gotta type in cmd) > > > >>> In the dos box, type the command: > > > >>> cd C:\path\dir_with_photos\ > > >>> rem photo_filenames > > > >>> cd = change directory > > >>> rem = remove > > > >> Um no. REM stands for remark and is used in shell scripts, aka batch > > >> files. > > >> The proper syntax is DEL. You can get help for the DEL command by > > >> typing > > >> DEL /?. > > > >> DOS syntax is non case sensitive, BTW. > > > >> Paul > > > >>> nb > > > > Truedat! And 'rm' is the remove command, or 'del'. And there's 'rmdir' > > > too to remove a directory (folder). > > > truedat, bullshit! > > > <sigh> 'rm' is Unix. "del" is DOS. > > > -sw > > Ah, correct! It's been a long time. > > But 'rmdir' is DOS and removes a directory. > > DELTREE was the preferred method. > > Paul Paul. please learn some Usenet quoting skills. I don't know what news reader you use. Mine automatically quotes the previous poster's material for me. There are some long standing Unenet quoting conventions youb seem to be flouting and it's very confusing to the reader. Outlook Express Observe the last 4 lines above, below -sw's sig. The top 2 are my text but the bottom 2 are yours. But nothing signifies which are which. If your new reader does not do this for you it is incumbent on YOU to quote material not yours when adding a comment. Please do! Thanks, John Kuthe (and the entire Usenet world!) It's your newsreader that is the problem. Sorry, that's the truth. You will notice mine works just fine with everyone else's. Paul |
OT Please - to computer experts
"Sqwertz" > wrote in message ... > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:31:06 +0100, Ophelia wrote: > >> While we have a bunch of computer experts on hand... does anyone >> know how to make the text colour in WLM default to black? > > The real solution is not to use perpetually broken Windows email and > news clients. I am not disagreeing, but that doesn't help atm...:) |
OT Please - to computer experts
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:38:22 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
wrote: > > "John Kuthe" > wrote in message > ... > On Jul 25, 12:54 am, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > > "John Kuthe" > wrote in message > > > > ... > > On Jul 24, 8:14 pm, Sqwertz > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:43:30 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe wrote: > > > > On Jul 24, 4:43 pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > > > >> "notbob" > wrote in message > > > > > ... > > > > > >>> On 2011-07-24, Dora > wrote: > > > >>>> I'm trying to delete about 100 photos from My Documents in > > > >>>> Microsoft > > > >>>> XP SP3. Every time I try to delete, the software automatically > > > >>>> makes > > > >>>> a copy of the picture. > > > >>>> I've tried so many times that I have multiple batches of copies > > > >>>> these > > > >>>> pictures. How can I delete the things so they're gone? Any help > > > >>>> would be appreciated. Thanks. > > > >>>> Dora > > > > > >>> What utility are you using to delete the photos? Some photo viewing > > > >>> software, or Explore, the Windows file mgr? If you can't delete the > > > >>> files with the file mgr, use a dos command. > > > > > >>> start > run > cmd (gotta type in cmd) > > > > > >>> In the dos box, type the command: > > > > > >>> cd C:\path\dir_with_photos\ > > > >>> rem photo_filenames > > > > > >>> cd = change directory > > > >>> rem = remove > > > > > >> Um no. REM stands for remark and is used in shell scripts, aka batch > > > >> files. > > > >> The proper syntax is DEL. You can get help for the DEL command by > > > >> typing > > > >> DEL /?. > > > > > >> DOS syntax is non case sensitive, BTW. > > > > > >> Paul > > > > > >>> nb > > > > > > Truedat! And 'rm' is the remove command, or 'del'. And there's 'rmdir' > > > > too to remove a directory (folder). > > > > > truedat, bullshit! > > > > > <sigh> 'rm' is Unix. "del" is DOS. > > > > > -sw > > > > Ah, correct! It's been a long time. > > > > But 'rmdir' is DOS and removes a directory. > > > > DELTREE was the preferred method. > > > > Paul > > Paul. please learn some Usenet quoting skills. I don't know what news > reader you use. Mine automatically quotes the previous poster's > material for me. There are some long standing Unenet quoting > conventions youb seem to be flouting and it's very confusing to the > reader. > > > Outlook Express > > > Observe the last 4 lines above, below -sw's sig. The top 2 are my text > but the bottom 2 are yours. But nothing signifies which are which. If > your new reader does not do this for you it is incumbent on YOU to > quote material not yours when adding a comment. Please do! > > Thanks, John Kuthe (and the entire Usenet world!) > > > It's your newsreader that is the problem. Sorry, that's the truth. You > will notice mine works just fine with everyone else's. > > Paul > Your news reader did not "quote" John's reply. It looks like you wrote it. -- Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. |
OT Please - to computer experts
On Jul 25, 1:40*pm, sf > wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:38:22 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" > > wrote: > > > > > > > "John Kuthe" > wrote in message > .... > > On Jul 25, 12:54 am, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > > > "John Kuthe" > wrote in message > > > .... > > > On Jul 24, 8:14 pm, Sqwertz > wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:43:30 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe wrote: > > > > > On Jul 24, 4:43 pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > > > > >> "notbob" > wrote in message > > > > > ... > > > > > >>> On 2011-07-24, Dora > wrote: > > > > >>>> I'm trying to delete about 100 photos from My Documents in > > > > >>>> Microsoft > > > > >>>> XP SP3. Every time I try to delete, the software automatically > > > > >>>> makes > > > > >>>> a copy of the picture. > > > > >>>> I've tried so many times that I have multiple batches of copies > > > > >>>> these > > > > >>>> pictures. How can I delete the things so they're gone? Any help > > > > >>>> would be appreciated. Thanks. > > > > >>>> Dora > > > > > >>> What utility are you using to delete the photos? Some photo viewing > > > > >>> software, or Explore, the Windows file mgr? If you can't delete the > > > > >>> files with the file mgr, use a dos command. > > > > > >>> start > run > cmd (gotta type in cmd) > > > > > >>> In the dos box, type the command: > > > > > >>> cd C:\path\dir_with_photos\ > > > > >>> rem photo_filenames > > > > > >>> cd = change directory > > > > >>> rem = remove > > > > > >> Um no. REM stands for remark and is used in shell scripts, aka batch > > > > >> files. > > > > >> The proper syntax is DEL. You can get help for the DEL command by > > > > >> typing > > > > >> DEL /?. > > > > > >> DOS syntax is non case sensitive, BTW. > > > > > >> Paul > > > > > >>> nb > > > > > > Truedat! And 'rm' is the remove command, or 'del'. And there's 'rmdir' > > > > > too to remove a directory (folder). > > > > > truedat, bullshit! > > > > > <sigh> 'rm' is Unix. "del" is DOS. > > > > > -sw > > > > Ah, correct! It's been a long time. > > > > But 'rmdir' is DOS and removes a directory. > > > > DELTREE was the preferred method. > > > > Paul > > > Paul. please learn some Usenet quoting skills. I don't know what news > > reader you use. Mine automatically quotes the previous poster's > > material for me. There are some long standing Unenet quoting > > conventions youb seem to be flouting and it's very confusing to the > > reader. > > > Outlook Express > > > Observe the last 4 lines above, below -sw's sig. The top 2 are my text > > but the bottom 2 are yours. But nothing signifies which are which. If > > your new reader does not do this for you it is incumbent on YOU to > > quote material not yours when adding a comment. Please do! > > > Thanks, John Kuthe (and the entire Usenet world!) > > > It's your newsreader that is the problem. *Sorry, that's the truth. *You > > will notice mine works just fine with everyone else's. > > > Paul > > Your news reader did not "quote" John's reply. *It looks like you > wrote it. > > -- > > Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. Thank you sf. See Paul? It's not just my "newsreader", which is GoogleGroups. Unless sf also uses GoogleGroups, then it may be GoogleGroups. Otherwise, you are not properly quoting your replies to others' posts. John Kuthe... |
OT Please - to computer experts
On Jul 25, 10:39*am, "Ophelia" > wrote:
> "notbob" > wrote in message > > ... > > > On 2011-07-25, Ophelia > wrote: > > >> While we *have a bunch of computer experts on hand... does anyone > >> know how to make the text colour in WLM default to black? > > > I'll leave this question to the "computer experts" that have a clue > > what a WLM is. *;) > > Windows live mail! *:) == Dearest Ophelia...I got this from "Bing": WLM...Tools>Message Rules. ... plain text (not HTML), you can change the default font used to display. That is supposed to work. If it doesn't please don't curse me out as I am just your loyal servant doing my duty for my beautiful Ophelia. == |
OT Please - to computer experts
"Roy" > wrote in message ... > On Jul 25, 10:39 am, "Ophelia" > wrote: >> "notbob" > wrote in message >> >> ... >> >> > On 2011-07-25, Ophelia > wrote: >> >> >> While we have a bunch of computer experts on hand... does anyone >> >> know how to make the text colour in WLM default to black? >> >> > I'll leave this question to the "computer experts" that have a clue >> > what a WLM is. ;) >> >> Windows live mail! :) > > == > Dearest Ophelia...I got this from "Bing": > > WLM...Tools>Message Rules. ... plain text (not HTML), you can change > the default font used to display. > > That is supposed to work. If it doesn't please don't curse me out as I > am just your loyal servant doing my duty for my beautiful Ophelia. rofl.... I promise not to curse you out and thank you *very* much, Roy... I will give it a wee try:)))) |
OT Please - to computer experts
"John Kuthe" > wrote in message ... On Jul 25, 1:40 pm, sf > wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:38:22 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" > > wrote: > > > > > > > "John Kuthe" > wrote in message > ... > > On Jul 25, 12:54 am, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > > > "John Kuthe" > wrote in message > > > ... > > > On Jul 24, 8:14 pm, Sqwertz > wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:43:30 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe wrote: > > > > > On Jul 24, 4:43 pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > > > > >> "notbob" > wrote in message > > > > > ... > > > > > >>> On 2011-07-24, Dora > wrote: > > > > >>>> I'm trying to delete about 100 photos from My Documents in > > > > >>>> Microsoft > > > > >>>> XP SP3. Every time I try to delete, the software automatically > > > > >>>> makes > > > > >>>> a copy of the picture. > > > > >>>> I've tried so many times that I have multiple batches of copies > > > > >>>> these > > > > >>>> pictures. How can I delete the things so they're gone? Any help > > > > >>>> would be appreciated. Thanks. > > > > >>>> Dora > > > > > >>> What utility are you using to delete the photos? Some photo > > > > >>> viewing > > > > >>> software, or Explore, the Windows file mgr? If you can't delete > > > > >>> the > > > > >>> files with the file mgr, use a dos command. > > > > > >>> start > run > cmd (gotta type in cmd) > > > > > >>> In the dos box, type the command: > > > > > >>> cd C:\path\dir_with_photos\ > > > > >>> rem photo_filenames > > > > > >>> cd = change directory > > > > >>> rem = remove > > > > > >> Um no. REM stands for remark and is used in shell scripts, aka > > > > >> batch > > > > >> files. > > > > >> The proper syntax is DEL. You can get help for the DEL command by > > > > >> typing > > > > >> DEL /?. > > > > > >> DOS syntax is non case sensitive, BTW. > > > > > >> Paul > > > > > >>> nb > > > > > > Truedat! And 'rm' is the remove command, or 'del'. And there's > > > > > 'rmdir' > > > > > too to remove a directory (folder). > > > > > truedat, bullshit! > > > > > <sigh> 'rm' is Unix. "del" is DOS. > > > > > -sw > > > > Ah, correct! It's been a long time. > > > > But 'rmdir' is DOS and removes a directory. > > > > DELTREE was the preferred method. > > > > Paul > > > Paul. please learn some Usenet quoting skills. I don't know what news > > reader you use. Mine automatically quotes the previous poster's > > material for me. There are some long standing Unenet quoting > > conventions youb seem to be flouting and it's very confusing to the > > reader. > > > Outlook Express > > > Observe the last 4 lines above, below -sw's sig. The top 2 are my text > > but the bottom 2 are yours. But nothing signifies which are which. If > > your new reader does not do this for you it is incumbent on YOU to > > quote material not yours when adding a comment. Please do! > > > Thanks, John Kuthe (and the entire Usenet world!) > > > It's your newsreader that is the problem. Sorry, that's the truth. You > > will notice mine works just fine with everyone else's. > > > Paul > > Your news reader did not "quote" John's reply. It looks like you > wrote it. > > -- > > Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. Thank you sf. See Paul? It's not just my "newsreader", which is GoogleGroups. Unless sf also uses GoogleGroups, then it may be GoogleGroups. Otherwise, you are not properly quoting your replies to others' posts. The fact that OE does not quote your text is the fault of the software that you use to post. OE in fact works just fine. There is a utility which "fixes" OE but I don't care to use it. So if you want the problem to go away, use something different to post with. I know this is really hard for you to get but I simply don't care about your petty little problem. I know, I know - it's impossible to imagine but there it is. BTW, I am an IT consultant with 26 years of experience. I've done everything in this business including working on RFCs back in the very early days of the Internet or ARPANet as we called it then.. Paul |
OT Please - to computer experts
"Ophelia" > wrote in message ... > > > "Roy" > wrote in message > ... >> On Jul 25, 10:39 am, "Ophelia" > wrote: >>> "notbob" > wrote in message >>> >>> ... >>> >>> > On 2011-07-25, Ophelia > wrote: >>> >>> >> While we have a bunch of computer experts on hand... does anyone >>> >> know how to make the text colour in WLM default to black? >>> >>> > I'll leave this question to the "computer experts" that have a clue >>> > what a WLM is. ;) >>> >>> Windows live mail! :) >> >> == >> Dearest Ophelia...I got this from "Bing": >> >> WLM...Tools>Message Rules. ... plain text (not HTML), you can change >> the default font used to display. >> >> That is supposed to work. If it doesn't please don't curse me out as I >> am just your loyal servant doing my duty for my beautiful Ophelia. > > rofl.... I promise not to curse you out and thank you *very* much, Roy... > I will give it a wee try:)))) Hey Roy thanks:) Not exactly that but it gave me the idea where to look.. and all is well! Thank you again:)) |
OT Please - to computer experts
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:50:47 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
> wrote: > Thank you sf. See Paul? It's not just my "newsreader", which is > GoogleGroups. Unless sf also uses GoogleGroups, Not as a rule. > then it may be > GoogleGroups. Otherwise, you are not properly quoting your replies to > others' posts. -- Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. |
OT Please - to computer experts
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:03:09 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
wrote: > > The fact that OE does not quote your text is the fault of the software that > you use to post. OE in fact works just fine. There is a utility which > "fixes" OE but I don't care to use it. So if you want the problem to go > away, use something different to post with. I know this is really hard for > you to get but I simply don't care about your petty little problem. I know, > I know - it's impossible to imagine but there it is. > > BTW, I am an IT consultant with 26 years of experience. I've done > everything in this business including working on RFCs back in the very early > days of the Internet or ARPANet as we called it then.. > > Paul You still need QuoteFix. -- Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. |
OT Please - to computer experts
On Jul 25, 3:03*pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote:
> "John Kuthe" > wrote in message > > ... > On Jul 25, 1:40 pm, sf > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:38:22 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" > > > wrote: > > > > "John Kuthe" > wrote in message > > .... > > > On Jul 25, 12:54 am, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > > > > "John Kuthe" > wrote in message > > > > ... > > > > On Jul 24, 8:14 pm, Sqwertz > wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:43:30 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe wrote: > > > > > > On Jul 24, 4:43 pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > > > > > >> "notbob" > wrote in message > > > > > > ... > > > > > > >>> On 2011-07-24, Dora > wrote: > > > > > >>>> I'm trying to delete about 100 photos from My Documents in > > > > > >>>> Microsoft > > > > > >>>> XP SP3. Every time I try to delete, the software automatically > > > > > >>>> makes > > > > > >>>> a copy of the picture. > > > > > >>>> I've tried so many times that I have multiple batches of copies > > > > > >>>> these > > > > > >>>> pictures. How can I delete the things so they're gone? Any help > > > > > >>>> would be appreciated. Thanks. > > > > > >>>> Dora > > > > > > >>> What utility are you using to delete the photos? Some photo > > > > > >>> viewing > > > > > >>> software, or Explore, the Windows file mgr? If you can't delete > > > > > >>> the > > > > > >>> files with the file mgr, use a dos command. > > > > > > >>> start > run > cmd (gotta type in cmd) > > > > > > >>> In the dos box, type the command: > > > > > > >>> cd C:\path\dir_with_photos\ > > > > > >>> rem photo_filenames > > > > > > >>> cd = change directory > > > > > >>> rem = remove > > > > > > >> Um no. REM stands for remark and is used in shell scripts, aka > > > > > >> batch > > > > > >> files. > > > > > >> The proper syntax is DEL. You can get help for the DEL command by > > > > > >> typing > > > > > >> DEL /?. > > > > > > >> DOS syntax is non case sensitive, BTW. > > > > > > >> Paul > > > > > > >>> nb > > > > > > > Truedat! And 'rm' is the remove command, or 'del'. And there's > > > > > > 'rmdir' > > > > > > too to remove a directory (folder). > > > > > > truedat, bullshit! > > > > > > <sigh> 'rm' is Unix. "del" is DOS. > > > > > > -sw > > > > > Ah, correct! It's been a long time. > > > > > But 'rmdir' is DOS and removes a directory. > > > > > DELTREE was the preferred method. > > > > > Paul > > > > Paul. please learn some Usenet quoting skills. I don't know what news > > > reader you use. Mine automatically quotes the previous poster's > > > material for me. There are some long standing Unenet quoting > > > conventions youb seem to be flouting and it's very confusing to the > > > reader. > > > > Outlook Express > > > > Observe the last 4 lines above, below -sw's sig. The top 2 are my text > > > but the bottom 2 are yours. But nothing signifies which are which. If > > > your new reader does not do this for you it is incumbent on YOU to > > > quote material not yours when adding a comment. Please do! > > > > Thanks, John Kuthe (and the entire Usenet world!) > > > > It's your newsreader that is the problem. Sorry, that's the truth. You > > > will notice mine works just fine with everyone else's. > > > > Paul > > > Your news reader did not "quote" John's reply. It looks like you > > wrote it. > > > -- > > > Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. > > Thank you sf. See Paul? It's not just my "newsreader", which is > GoogleGroups. Unless sf also uses GoogleGroups, then it may be > GoogleGroups. Otherwise, you are not properly quoting your replies to > others' posts. > > The fact that OE does not quote your text is the fault of the software that > you use to post. *OE in fact works just fine. *There is a utility which > "fixes" OE but I don't care to use it. *So if you want the problem to go > away, use something different to post with. *I know this is really hard for > you to get but I simply don't care about your petty little problem. *I know, > I know - it's impossible to imagine but there it is. > > BTW, I am an IT consultant with 26 years of experience. *I've done > everything in this business including working on RFCs back in the very early > days of the Internet or ARPANet as we called it then.. > > Paul And yet you refuse to properly quote your Usenet postings!! Whatta joke of an IT consultant you are! Or maybe not, if you are the kind that a group lost in the fog in a hot air balloon calls to on the ground and asks "Where are we?" and he says "You're in a hot air balloon." IOW worthless! John Kuthe... |
OT Please - to computer experts
On Jul 25, 3:46*pm, sf > wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:03:09 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" > > wrote: > > > > > The fact that OE does not quote your text is the fault of the software that > > you use to post. *OE in fact works just fine. *There is a utility which > > "fixes" OE but I don't care to use it. *So if you want the problem to go > > away, use something different to post with. *I know this is really hard for > > you to get but I simply don't care about your petty little problem. *I know, > > I know - it's impossible to imagine but there it is. > > > BTW, I am an IT consultant with 26 years of experience. *I've done > > everything in this business including working on RFCs back in the very early > > days of the Internet or ARPANet as we called it then.. > > > Paul > > You still need QuoteFix. > > -- > > Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. Looks like sf has got your fix rightcheer, Paul!! Using MicroSUCK's POS software I see. Outlook Express! Whatta joke! And I was kinda embarrassed to say I use GoogleGroups! At least I didn't have to pay Herr Gates for his substandard not-yet-finished-but- the-SP-will-be-out-soon BLOATware! (That is, if we don't have a whole new malfunctioning OS for you by then that will fix everything for you! Yeah RIGHT!) John Kuthe... |
OT Please - to computer experts
"John Kuthe" > wrote in message ... On Jul 25, 3:03 pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > "John Kuthe" > wrote in message > > ... > On Jul 25, 1:40 pm, sf > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:38:22 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" > > > wrote: > > > > "John Kuthe" > wrote in message > > ... > > > On Jul 25, 12:54 am, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > > > > "John Kuthe" > wrote in message > > > > ... > > > > On Jul 24, 8:14 pm, Sqwertz > wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:43:30 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe wrote: > > > > > > On Jul 24, 4:43 pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > > > > > >> "notbob" > wrote in message > > > > > > ... > > > > > > >>> On 2011-07-24, Dora > wrote: > > > > > >>>> I'm trying to delete about 100 photos from My Documents in > > > > > >>>> Microsoft > > > > > >>>> XP SP3. Every time I try to delete, the software > > > > > >>>> automatically > > > > > >>>> makes > > > > > >>>> a copy of the picture. > > > > > >>>> I've tried so many times that I have multiple batches of > > > > > >>>> copies > > > > > >>>> these > > > > > >>>> pictures. How can I delete the things so they're gone? Any > > > > > >>>> help > > > > > >>>> would be appreciated. Thanks. > > > > > >>>> Dora > > > > > > >>> What utility are you using to delete the photos? Some photo > > > > > >>> viewing > > > > > >>> software, or Explore, the Windows file mgr? If you can't > > > > > >>> delete > > > > > >>> the > > > > > >>> files with the file mgr, use a dos command. > > > > > > >>> start > run > cmd (gotta type in cmd) > > > > > > >>> In the dos box, type the command: > > > > > > >>> cd C:\path\dir_with_photos\ > > > > > >>> rem photo_filenames > > > > > > >>> cd = change directory > > > > > >>> rem = remove > > > > > > >> Um no. REM stands for remark and is used in shell scripts, aka > > > > > >> batch > > > > > >> files. > > > > > >> The proper syntax is DEL. You can get help for the DEL command > > > > > >> by > > > > > >> typing > > > > > >> DEL /?. > > > > > > >> DOS syntax is non case sensitive, BTW. > > > > > > >> Paul > > > > > > >>> nb > > > > > > > Truedat! And 'rm' is the remove command, or 'del'. And there's > > > > > > 'rmdir' > > > > > > too to remove a directory (folder). > > > > > > truedat, bullshit! > > > > > > <sigh> 'rm' is Unix. "del" is DOS. > > > > > > -sw > > > > > Ah, correct! It's been a long time. > > > > > But 'rmdir' is DOS and removes a directory. > > > > > DELTREE was the preferred method. > > > > > Paul > > > > Paul. please learn some Usenet quoting skills. I don't know what news > > > reader you use. Mine automatically quotes the previous poster's > > > material for me. There are some long standing Unenet quoting > > > conventions youb seem to be flouting and it's very confusing to the > > > reader. > > > > Outlook Express > > > > Observe the last 4 lines above, below -sw's sig. The top 2 are my text > > > but the bottom 2 are yours. But nothing signifies which are which. If > > > your new reader does not do this for you it is incumbent on YOU to > > > quote material not yours when adding a comment. Please do! > > > > Thanks, John Kuthe (and the entire Usenet world!) > > > > It's your newsreader that is the problem. Sorry, that's the truth. You > > > will notice mine works just fine with everyone else's. > > > > Paul > > > Your news reader did not "quote" John's reply. It looks like you > > wrote it. > > > -- > > > Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. > > Thank you sf. See Paul? It's not just my "newsreader", which is > GoogleGroups. Unless sf also uses GoogleGroups, then it may be > GoogleGroups. Otherwise, you are not properly quoting your replies to > others' posts. > > The fact that OE does not quote your text is the fault of the software > that > you use to post. OE in fact works just fine. There is a utility which > "fixes" OE but I don't care to use it. So if you want the problem to go > away, use something different to post with. I know this is really hard for > you to get but I simply don't care about your petty little problem. I > know, > I know - it's impossible to imagine but there it is. > > BTW, I am an IT consultant with 26 years of experience. I've done > everything in this business including working on RFCs back in the very > early > days of the Internet or ARPANet as we called it then.. > > Paul And yet you refuse to properly quote your Usenet postings!! Whatta joke of an IT consultant you are! Or maybe not, if you are the kind that a group lost in the fog in a hot air balloon calls to on the ground and asks "Where are we?" and he says "You're in a hot air balloon." IOW worthless! Dude, suck it up. I am not modifying my computer to fix a problem on your end. Deal with it. OE works fine. Possibly you may have to take this up with the Internet Police. Paul |
OT Please - to computer experts
"sf" > wrote in message ... > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:03:09 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" > > wrote: > >> >> The fact that OE does not quote your text is the fault of the software >> that >> you use to post. OE in fact works just fine. There is a utility which >> "fixes" OE but I don't care to use it. So if you want the problem to go >> away, use something different to post with. I know this is really hard >> for >> you to get but I simply don't care about your petty little problem. I >> know, >> I know - it's impossible to imagine but there it is. >> >> BTW, I am an IT consultant with 26 years of experience. I've done >> everything in this business including working on RFCs back in the very >> early >> days of the Internet or ARPANet as we called it then.. >> >> Paul > > > You still need QuoteFix. No I do not. Google can just fix their crummy software. Paul |
OT Please - to computer experts
"heyjoe" > wrote in message ... > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:03:09 -0700, Paul M. Cook wrote: > >> BTW, I am an IT consultant with 26 years of experience. > > If you're using Outlook Express, you're an IT consultant with one year of > experience 26 times. Outlook Express (and Windows Live Mail) are broken > as > far as usenet is concerned. Wake up and smell the roses. They work just fine. Newsgroups are fast becoming relics anyway. Paul |
OT Please - to computer experts
On Jul 25, 4:45*pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote:
> "John Kuthe" > wrote in message > > ... > On Jul 25, 3:03 pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > > > > > "John Kuthe" > wrote in message > > .... > > On Jul 25, 1:40 pm, sf > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:38:22 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" > > > > wrote: > > > > > "John Kuthe" > wrote in message > > > ... > > > > On Jul 25, 12:54 am, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > > > > > "John Kuthe" > wrote in message > > > > > ... > > > > > On Jul 24, 8:14 pm, Sqwertz > wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:43:30 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 24, 4:43 pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > > > > > > >> "notbob" > wrote in message > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > >>> On 2011-07-24, Dora > wrote: > > > > > > >>>> I'm trying to delete about 100 photos from My Documents in > > > > > > >>>> Microsoft > > > > > > >>>> XP SP3. Every time I try to delete, the software > > > > > > >>>> automatically > > > > > > >>>> makes > > > > > > >>>> a copy of the picture. > > > > > > >>>> I've tried so many times that I have multiple batches of > > > > > > >>>> copies > > > > > > >>>> these > > > > > > >>>> pictures. How can I delete the things so they're gone? Any > > > > > > >>>> help > > > > > > >>>> would be appreciated. Thanks. > > > > > > >>>> Dora > > > > > > > >>> What utility are you using to delete the photos? Some photo > > > > > > >>> viewing > > > > > > >>> software, or Explore, the Windows file mgr? If you can't > > > > > > >>> delete > > > > > > >>> the > > > > > > >>> files with the file mgr, use a dos command. > > > > > > > >>> start > run > cmd (gotta type in cmd) > > > > > > > >>> In the dos box, type the command: > > > > > > > >>> cd C:\path\dir_with_photos\ > > > > > > >>> rem photo_filenames > > > > > > > >>> cd = change directory > > > > > > >>> rem = remove > > > > > > > >> Um no. REM stands for remark and is used in shell scripts, aka > > > > > > >> batch > > > > > > >> files. > > > > > > >> The proper syntax is DEL. You can get help for the DEL command > > > > > > >> by > > > > > > >> typing > > > > > > >> DEL /?. > > > > > > > >> DOS syntax is non case sensitive, BTW. > > > > > > > >> Paul > > > > > > > >>> nb > > > > > > > > Truedat! And 'rm' is the remove command, or 'del'. And there's > > > > > > > 'rmdir' > > > > > > > too to remove a directory (folder). > > > > > > > truedat, bullshit! > > > > > > > <sigh> 'rm' is Unix. "del" is DOS. > > > > > > > -sw > > > > > > Ah, correct! It's been a long time. > > > > > > But 'rmdir' is DOS and removes a directory. > > > > > > DELTREE was the preferred method. > > > > > > Paul > > > > > Paul. please learn some Usenet quoting skills. I don't know what news > > > > reader you use. Mine automatically quotes the previous poster's > > > > material for me. There are some long standing Unenet quoting > > > > conventions youb seem to be flouting and it's very confusing to the > > > > reader. > > > > > Outlook Express > > > > > Observe the last 4 lines above, below -sw's sig. The top 2 are my text > > > > but the bottom 2 are yours. But nothing signifies which are which. If > > > > your new reader does not do this for you it is incumbent on YOU to > > > > quote material not yours when adding a comment. Please do! > > > > > Thanks, John Kuthe (and the entire Usenet world!) > > > > > It's your newsreader that is the problem. Sorry, that's the truth. You > > > > will notice mine works just fine with everyone else's. > > > > > Paul > > > > Your news reader did not "quote" John's reply. It looks like you > > > wrote it. > > > > -- > > > > Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. > > > Thank you sf. See Paul? It's not just my "newsreader", which is > > GoogleGroups. Unless sf also uses GoogleGroups, then it may be > > GoogleGroups. Otherwise, you are not properly quoting your replies to > > others' posts. > > > The fact that OE does not quote your text is the fault of the software > > that > > you use to post. OE in fact works just fine. There is a utility which > > "fixes" OE but I don't care to use it. So if you want the problem to go > > away, use something different to post with. I know this is really hard for > > you to get but I simply don't care about your petty little problem. I > > know, > > I know - it's impossible to imagine but there it is. > > > BTW, I am an IT consultant with 26 years of experience. I've done > > everything in this business including working on RFCs back in the very > > early > > days of the Internet or ARPANet as we called it then.. > > > Paul > > And yet you refuse to properly quote your Usenet postings!! > > Whatta joke of an IT consultant you are! Or maybe not, if you are the > kind that a group lost in the fog in a hot air balloon calls to on the > ground and asks "Where are we?" and he says "You're in a hot air > balloon." > > IOW worthless! > > Dude, suck it up. *I am not modifying my computer to fix a problem on your > end. *Deal with it. *OE works fine. *Possibly you may have to take this up > with the Internet Police. On my and several others' ends! Which clearly indicates it's YOUR PROBLEM Paul! FIX IT!! Either programatically or manually. Else continue to look like the noob you are. John Kuthe... |
OT Please - to computer experts
On Jul 25, 4:46*pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote:
> "heyjoe" > wrote in message > > ... > > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:03:09 -0700, Paul M. Cook wrote: > > >> BTW, I am an IT consultant with 26 years of experience. > > > If you're using Outlook Express, you're an IT consultant with one year of > > experience 26 times. *Outlook Express (and Windows Live Mail) are broken > > as > > far as usenet is concerned. *Wake up and smell the roses. > > They work just fine. *Newsgroups are fast becoming relics anyway. > > Paul Bill Gates is still sore because he could not make The Internet into his personal monopoly. MicroSUCKS is infamous for flauting long established Internet standards and trying to make up their own. And I see Paul is one of Herr Gates' evil minions! John Kuthe... |
OT Please - to computer experts
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:45:43 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
wrote: >And yet you refuse to properly quote your Usenet postings!! > >Whatta joke of an IT consultant you are! Or maybe not, if you are the >kind that a group lost in the fog in a hot air balloon calls to on the >ground and asks "Where are we?" and he says "You're in a hot air >balloon." > >IOW worthless! > > >Dude, suck it up. I am not modifying my computer to fix a problem on your >end. Deal with it. OE works fine. Possibly you may have to take this up >with the Internet Police. > >Paul If OE works fine why does quotefix exist? Lou |
OT Please - to computer experts
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:46:16 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
wrote: > >"sf" > wrote in message .. . >> >> You still need QuoteFix. > >No I do not. Google can just fix their crummy software. Google has nothing to do with it. Your quoting is messed up because you are using the software that needs to be fixed. Lou |
OT Please - to computer experts
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:46:16 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
wrote: > > "sf" > wrote in message > ... > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:03:09 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" > > > wrote: > > > >> > >> The fact that OE does not quote your text is the fault of the software > >> that > >> you use to post. OE in fact works just fine. There is a utility which > >> "fixes" OE but I don't care to use it. So if you want the problem to go > >> away, use something different to post with. I know this is really hard > >> for > >> you to get but I simply don't care about your petty little problem. I > >> know, > >> I know - it's impossible to imagine but there it is. > >> > >> BTW, I am an IT consultant with 26 years of experience. I've done > >> everything in this business including working on RFCs back in the very > >> early > >> days of the Internet or ARPANet as we called it then.. > >> > >> Paul > > > > > > You still need QuoteFix. > > No I do not. Google can just fix their crummy software. > You don't even know what you're using. Here it is since you've forgotten - X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931. -- Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. |
OT Please - to computer experts
On Jul 25, 5:33*pm, Lou Decruss > wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:45:43 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" > > wrote: > > >And yet you refuse to properly quote your Usenet postings!! > > >Whatta joke of an IT consultant you are! Or maybe not, if you are the > >kind that a group lost in the fog in a hot air balloon calls to on the > >ground and asks "Where are we?" and he says "You're in a hot air > >balloon." > > >IOW worthless! > > >Dude, suck it up. *I am not modifying my computer to fix a problem on your > >end. *Deal with it. *OE works fine. *Possibly you may have to take this up > >with the Internet Police. > > >Paul > > If OE works fine why does quotefix exist? * > > Lou OE "works fine" at doing all the things it does correctly (which are some) but it does not do everything it should correctly. Like quoting previous poster's text when replying to a Usenet newsgroup post! But to a Gatesian evil minion like Paul, there is no world of incorrectness of anything MicroSUCKS publishes. A convenient delusion promulgated by their leader.. John Kuthe... |
OT Please - to computer experts
"Lou Decruss" > wrote in message ... > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:45:43 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" > > wrote: > >>And yet you refuse to properly quote your Usenet postings!! >> >>Whatta joke of an IT consultant you are! Or maybe not, if you are the >>kind that a group lost in the fog in a hot air balloon calls to on the >>ground and asks "Where are we?" and he says "You're in a hot air >>balloon." >> >>IOW worthless! >> >> >>Dude, suck it up. I am not modifying my computer to fix a problem on your >>end. Deal with it. OE works fine. Possibly you may have to take this up >>with the Internet Police. >> >>Paul > > If OE works fine why does quotefix exist? > A question for the ages, I suppose. Paul |
OT Please - to computer experts
On Jul 25, 6:35*pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote:
> "Lou Decruss" > wrote in message > > ... > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:45:43 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" > > > wrote: > > >>And yet you refuse to properly quote your Usenet postings!! > > >>Whatta joke of an IT consultant you are! Or maybe not, if you are the > >>kind that a group lost in the fog in a hot air balloon calls to on the > >>ground and asks "Where are we?" and he says "You're in a hot air > >>balloon." > > >>IOW worthless! > > >>Dude, suck it up. *I am not modifying my computer to fix a problem on your > >>end. *Deal with it. *OE works fine. *Possibly you may have to take this up > >>with the Internet Police. > > >>Paul > > > If OE works fine why does quotefix exist? > > A question for the ages, I suppose. > > Paul Because the version Paul uses is not finished yet! That's the way MicroSUCKS sells it's software. It's out the door and sold before it's finished. Why do you think SP1 for WinXP was released *before* WinXP was? (True story!) So basically Paul is using an incomplete version of OE. John Kuthe... |
OT Please - to computer experts
"John Kuthe" > wrote in message ... On Jul 25, 4:46 pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > "heyjoe" > wrote in message > > ... > > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:03:09 -0700, Paul M. Cook wrote: > > >> BTW, I am an IT consultant with 26 years of experience. > > > If you're using Outlook Express, you're an IT consultant with one year > > of > > experience 26 times. Outlook Express (and Windows Live Mail) are broken > > as > > far as usenet is concerned. Wake up and smell the roses. > > They work just fine. Newsgroups are fast becoming relics anyway. > > Paul Bill Gates is still sore because he could not make The Internet into his personal monopoly. MicroSUCKS is infamous for flauting long established Internet standards and trying to make up their own. And I see Paul is one of Herr Gates' evil minions! Viva Bill! Paul |
OT Please - to computer experts
"John Kuthe" > wrote in message ... On Jul 25, 4:45 pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > "John Kuthe" > wrote in message > > ... > On Jul 25, 3:03 pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > > > > > "John Kuthe" > wrote in message > > ... > > On Jul 25, 1:40 pm, sf > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:38:22 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" > > > > wrote: > > > > > "John Kuthe" > wrote in message > > > ... > > > > On Jul 25, 12:54 am, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > > > > > "John Kuthe" > wrote in message > > > > > ... > > > > > On Jul 24, 8:14 pm, Sqwertz > wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 15:43:30 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 24, 4:43 pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > > > > > > >> "notbob" > wrote in message > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > >>> On 2011-07-24, Dora > wrote: > > > > > > >>>> I'm trying to delete about 100 photos from My Documents in > > > > > > >>>> Microsoft > > > > > > >>>> XP SP3. Every time I try to delete, the software > > > > > > >>>> automatically > > > > > > >>>> makes > > > > > > >>>> a copy of the picture. > > > > > > >>>> I've tried so many times that I have multiple batches of > > > > > > >>>> copies > > > > > > >>>> these > > > > > > >>>> pictures. How can I delete the things so they're gone? Any > > > > > > >>>> help > > > > > > >>>> would be appreciated. Thanks. > > > > > > >>>> Dora > > > > > > > >>> What utility are you using to delete the photos? Some photo > > > > > > >>> viewing > > > > > > >>> software, or Explore, the Windows file mgr? If you can't > > > > > > >>> delete > > > > > > >>> the > > > > > > >>> files with the file mgr, use a dos command. > > > > > > > >>> start > run > cmd (gotta type in cmd) > > > > > > > >>> In the dos box, type the command: > > > > > > > >>> cd C:\path\dir_with_photos\ > > > > > > >>> rem photo_filenames > > > > > > > >>> cd = change directory > > > > > > >>> rem = remove > > > > > > > >> Um no. REM stands for remark and is used in shell scripts, > > > > > > >> aka > > > > > > >> batch > > > > > > >> files. > > > > > > >> The proper syntax is DEL. You can get help for the DEL > > > > > > >> command > > > > > > >> by > > > > > > >> typing > > > > > > >> DEL /?. > > > > > > > >> DOS syntax is non case sensitive, BTW. > > > > > > > >> Paul > > > > > > > >>> nb > > > > > > > > Truedat! And 'rm' is the remove command, or 'del'. And there's > > > > > > > 'rmdir' > > > > > > > too to remove a directory (folder). > > > > > > > truedat, bullshit! > > > > > > > <sigh> 'rm' is Unix. "del" is DOS. > > > > > > > -sw > > > > > > Ah, correct! It's been a long time. > > > > > > But 'rmdir' is DOS and removes a directory. > > > > > > DELTREE was the preferred method. > > > > > > Paul > > > > > Paul. please learn some Usenet quoting skills. I don't know what > > > > news > > > > reader you use. Mine automatically quotes the previous poster's > > > > material for me. There are some long standing Unenet quoting > > > > conventions youb seem to be flouting and it's very confusing to the > > > > reader. > > > > > Outlook Express > > > > > Observe the last 4 lines above, below -sw's sig. The top 2 are my > > > > text > > > > but the bottom 2 are yours. But nothing signifies which are which. > > > > If > > > > your new reader does not do this for you it is incumbent on YOU to > > > > quote material not yours when adding a comment. Please do! > > > > > Thanks, John Kuthe (and the entire Usenet world!) > > > > > It's your newsreader that is the problem. Sorry, that's the truth. > > > > You > > > > will notice mine works just fine with everyone else's. > > > > > Paul > > > > Your news reader did not "quote" John's reply. It looks like you > > > wrote it. > > > > -- > > > > Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground. > > > Thank you sf. See Paul? It's not just my "newsreader", which is > > GoogleGroups. Unless sf also uses GoogleGroups, then it may be > > GoogleGroups. Otherwise, you are not properly quoting your replies to > > others' posts. > > > The fact that OE does not quote your text is the fault of the software > > that > > you use to post. OE in fact works just fine. There is a utility which > > "fixes" OE but I don't care to use it. So if you want the problem to go > > away, use something different to post with. I know this is really hard > > for > > you to get but I simply don't care about your petty little problem. I > > know, > > I know - it's impossible to imagine but there it is. > > > BTW, I am an IT consultant with 26 years of experience. I've done > > everything in this business including working on RFCs back in the very > > early > > days of the Internet or ARPANet as we called it then.. > > > Paul > > And yet you refuse to properly quote your Usenet postings!! > > Whatta joke of an IT consultant you are! Or maybe not, if you are the > kind that a group lost in the fog in a hot air balloon calls to on the > ground and asks "Where are we?" and he says "You're in a hot air > balloon." > > IOW worthless! > > Dude, suck it up. I am not modifying my computer to fix a problem on your > end. Deal with it. OE works fine. Possibly you may have to take this up > with the Internet Police. On my and several others' ends! Which clearly indicates it's YOUR PROBLEM Paul! FIX IT!! Either programatically or manually. Else continue to look like the noob you are. Been posting to NGs since 88. Long before you even knew what one was. Paul |
OT Please - to computer experts
"John Kuthe" > wrote in message ... On Jul 25, 6:35 pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote: > "Lou Decruss" > wrote in message > > ... > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:45:43 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" > > > wrote: > > >>And yet you refuse to properly quote your Usenet postings!! > > >>Whatta joke of an IT consultant you are! Or maybe not, if you are the > >>kind that a group lost in the fog in a hot air balloon calls to on the > >>ground and asks "Where are we?" and he says "You're in a hot air > >>balloon." > > >>IOW worthless! > > >>Dude, suck it up. I am not modifying my computer to fix a problem on > >>your > >>end. Deal with it. OE works fine. Possibly you may have to take this up > >>with the Internet Police. > > >>Paul > > > If OE works fine why does quotefix exist? > > A question for the ages, I suppose. > > Paul Because the version Paul uses is not finished yet! That's the way MicroSUCKS sells it's software. It's out the door and sold before it's finished. Why do you think SP1 for WinXP was released *before* WinXP was? (True story!) So basically Paul is using an incomplete version of OE. Why? I dunno, I suppose if they releasd SP2 first they would have felt silly. Paul |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter