blake murphy wrote:
>
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 20:48:17 -0500, Pete C. wrote:
>
> > sf wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 17:25:00 -0500, "Pete C." >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Ask the folks in CA, IL, NY, CT, NJ and a few other states where peoples
> >>> constitutional rights are indeed being trampled. Ask folks who's rights
> >>> were trampled by the now expired ugly gun ban. When the second amendment
> >>> was written it wasn't about "sporting" guns, or antique guns, it was
> >>> about guns that were the then state of the art and defensive use was
> >>> very much what was being considered.
> >>
> >> The gun laws in California are the way voters want them, and we're
> >> working on making them even more restrictive.
> >
> > The courts may have something to say about your attempts to infringe on
> > peoples constitutional rights. Indeed, I recently read that there have
> > been significant increases in issuing CHLs in parts of CA this year.
>
> ooh, sounds like their rights are being trampled, all right. or would you
> prefer 'must carry' laws?

"Must issue" (with clean background check) is just fine thank you.