Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > Thank you for your advice. I'm glad it will be so simple. If anything simple worked no one would be fat. Go to the mall and look. There are fat people there more than in any previous generation. If you imagine that even one of those fat people hasn't tried a long list of simple approaches you're delusional. Whatever the solution is it isn't simple. With a caveat. I once wrote the same thing with the word moderation in the place of simple. Someone responded that if folks do more and more work without limit until it worked then moderation would work. I pointed out that "more and more without" is not what moderate means. The person was suggesting an inmoderate solution and calling it moderate. So I'll point out a simple solution that isn't easy. Running a marathon by a person in excellent shape burns about a pound of fat. It's why there are zero obese marathoners. If every fat person in the world started training for marathons and started doing marathons there would be no more fat people in a few years. But even that's not really simple. The reason the first Marathon is still famous is the guy who ran it died. Training to survive a marathon is a different than just starting to walk on a treadmill and building to runs. Simple - Here's a pick axe and shovel. There's a mountain. Move it several feet south please. Sometimes simple is the opposite of easy. Clearly my paragraph at the top doesn't quite work with the word "simple" the way it does with "moderation". It works with either "easy" or "moderate". Think about it - The paragraph also works with the word "acceptable". |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|