![]() |
My Sous Vide Experiences. (WAS: Hacking your slow cooker for Sous Vide)
Curt, have you experimented with working searing of steaks, etc. into
your sous vide cooking methodology? How do you address the problem of appearance? -- Larry |
My Sous Vide Experiences. (WAS: Hacking your slow cooker for Sous Vide)
In article >,
wrote: > Curt, have you experimented with working searing of steaks, etc. into > your sous vide cooking methodology? How do you address the problem of > appearance? A picture is worth a thousand words. Two pictures, therefore, should be worth two thousand words? He supplied a URL to two beautiful pictures, with full sear marks, one of a steak and one of a chicken breast. Both were cut so you could see the inside. -- Dan Abel Petaluma, California USA |
My Sous Vide Experiences. (WAS: Hacking your slow cooker forSous Vide)
|
My Sous Vide Experiences. (WAS: Hacking your slow cooker for Sous Vide)
On Nov 9, 11:52*am, Dan Abel > wrote:
> In article >, > > wrote: > > Curt, have you experimented with working searing of steaks, etc. into > > your sous vide cooking methodology? How do you address the problem of > > appearance? > > A picture is worth a thousand words. *Two pictures, therefore, should be > worth two thousand words? *He supplied a URL to two beautiful pictures, > with full sear marks, one of a steak and one of a chicken breast. *Both > were cut so you could see the inside. The steak looked medium well. I'd like to see one medium rare. > > -- > Dan Abel --Bryan |
My Sous Vide Experiences. (WAS: Hacking your slow cooker for Sous Vide)
In article
>, Bryan > wrote: > On Nov 9, 11:52*am, Dan Abel > wrote: > > In article >, > > > > wrote: > > > Curt, have you experimented with working searing of steaks, etc. into > > > your sous vide cooking methodology? How do you address the problem of > > > appearance? > > > > A picture is worth a thousand words. *Two pictures, therefore, should be > > worth two thousand words? *He supplied a URL to two beautiful pictures, > > with full sear marks, one of a steak and one of a chicken breast. *Both > > were cut so you could see the inside. > > The steak looked medium well. I'd like to see one medium rare. The beauty of sous vide is that you can have it cooked *exactly* as you like it, every time, time after time. Isaac |
My Sous Vide Experiences. (WAS: Hacking your slow cooker for Sous Vide)
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:52:29 -0800, Dan Abel > wrote:
>A picture is worth a thousand words. Two pictures, therefore, should be >worth two thousand words? He supplied a URL to two beautiful pictures, >with full sear marks, one of a steak and one of a chicken breast. Both >were cut so you could see the inside. Yes, but they don't tell me when he seared them -- before or after sous vide, or whether he experimented with both possibilities. -- Larry |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter