WTF wrote:

>>> It was an old black woman that the hospital had put in a cab, still in
>>> her hospital gown and dropped in the middle of the street in front of
>>> a halfway house because she couldn't pay her bill.
>>> Is that the way you want to be treated when you get old?
>> Get the whole story......you're presenting the "bleeding heart".......
>
>
> You tell all of us the story, you seem to think you know all about it.
> Did you watch the actual surveillance video of the cab dropping her
> off at the front of the halfway house in the middle of the roadway?

Hey... I've seen that patient before! The one who isn't in need of
hospitalization anymore from whatever brought her in. Her family has cut
all ties and refuses to allow her back in the home again. No one will
come get her, nor bring her clothes to wear. She is squatting in the
hospital room she doesn't need anymore, and given the option of a
shelter or the police, she took the shelter. And apparently the donated
clothes closet that the nurses stock with their own family's unwanted
clothes was empty or unavailable to give her something better to wear.
Yes, I've seen all this. I think that Stu watching one movie with an
obvious biased slant, then bringing it in to a cooking group is a tad
suspect (lame).

Goomba wrote:

> Hey... I've seen that patient before! The one who isn't in need of
> hospitalization anymore from whatever brought her in. Her family has
> cut all ties and refuses to allow her back in the home again. No one
> will come get her, nor bring her clothes to wear. She is squatting in
> the hospital room she doesn't need anymore, and given the option of a
> shelter or the police, she took the shelter. And apparently the
> donated clothes closet that the nurses stock with their own family's
> unwanted clothes was empty or unavailable to give her something better
> to wear. Yes, I've seen all this. I think that Stu watching one movie
> with an obvious biased slant, then bringing it in to a cooking group
> is a tad suspect (lame).

The "Double Standards Queen" posts her OT views to an OT thread on a
Cooking Group (yet again). Now that's what I'd call 'lame'

<snork>
--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

ChattyCathy wrote:

> The "Double Standards Queen" posts her OT views to an OT thread on a
> Cooking Group (yet again). Now that's what I'd call 'lame'
>
> <snork>

And I have said again and again- NEVER do I start an OT thread. Yet
choose to occasionally respond to one or to a thread that has drifted. I
don't think ANYONE should start a deliberate off topic thread in a
cooking group. How hard is that for you to understand?

Goomba wrote:

> ChattyCathy wrote:
>
>> The "Double Standards Queen" posts her OT views to an OT thread on a
>> Cooking Group (yet again). Now that's what I'd call 'lame'
>>
>> <snork>
>
> And I have said again and again- NEVER do I start an OT thread. Yet
> choose to occasionally respond to one or to a thread that has drifted.
> I don't think ANYONE should start a deliberate off topic thread in a
> cooking group. How hard is that for you to understand?

Oh, Puh-lee-ze, spare me. How hard is for *you* to understand that *you*
are exacerbating the very thing that (supposedly) ****es you off? i.e.
posting (mostly whining drivel) to OT threads.

If you didn't "join in" on the OT threads - as and when you feel like
it - you just *might* have a leg to stand on...

Methinks that you and and a few other OT-post whiners should "do lunch"
some time; at least that would be food-related, don't you agree?
--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy