To sky. I should never have brought these things up here on rfc.

However, in my defense I also don't feel I should be nagged in chat about
what my insurance riders or what freezer I bought. You're free to offer an
opinion but hey, you aren't the one paying for it. I didn't tell you what
tile to put down when you re-decorated.

As for what is "said in chat stays in chat", it's not like we are discussing
state secrets. I would never disclose intimate, personal information unless
someone told me I could. But that whole thing about "what is said in chat
stays in chat" is just stupid. We're just chatting. I don't even
understand that phrase as it applies to Las Vegas (not that I would ever go
to Vegas). Half the time in chat we're talking about music, DVD's, movies
or the weather. What's the big deal? What should we be keeping a secret.

Anyway, I apoligze to sky for getting upset and mentioning it here. But I
will be 50 years old in July so if someone talks to me like I'm 20 I'm
definitely going to take exception.

Jill

jmcquown wrote:

To sky. I should never have brought these things up here on rfc.


email or chat with this garbage

Nobody gives a shit


--
Mort

Mort wrote:

jmcquown wrote:

To sky. I should never have brought these things up here on rfc.


email or chat with this garbage

Nobody gives a shit


Jill can't help it...she's "extremely self - absorbed", ya see...


--
Best
Greg

Ah8h, yes. The self-righteous drama queen is back in her true form.

So, are there any fat or ugly people at HR Block?

-sw


jmcquown wrote:
To sky. I should never have brought these things up here on rfc.

However, in my defense I also don't feel I should be nagged in chat
about what my insurance riders or what freezer I bought. You're free to
offer an opinion but hey, you aren't the one paying for it. I didn't
tell you what tile to put down when you re-decorated.

As for what is "said in chat stays in chat", it's not like we are
discussing state secrets. I would never disclose intimate, personal
information unless someone told me I could. But that whole thing about
"what is said in chat stays in chat" is just stupid. We're just
chatting. I don't even understand that phrase as it applies to Las Vegas
(not that I would ever go to Vegas). Half the time in chat we're talking
about music, DVD's, movies or the weather. What's the big deal? What
should we be keeping a secret.

Anyway, I apoligze to sky for getting upset and mentioning it here. But
I will be 50 years old in July so if someone talks to me like I'm 20 I'm
definitely going to take exception.

Jill

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:05:07 -0500, "jmcquown"
wrote:

To sky. I should never have brought these things up here on rfc.

However, in my defense

Oh yes. Sounds like the start of a genuine apology. NOT

Ya twit.

Lou

"jmcquown" wrote in message
...
To sky. I should never have brought these things up here on rfc.

However, in my defense I also don't feel I should be nagged in chat about
what my insurance riders or what freezer I bought. You're free to offer
an opinion but hey, you aren't the one paying for it. I didn't tell you
what tile to put down when you re-decorated.

As for what is "said in chat stays in chat", it's not like we are
discussing state secrets. I would never disclose intimate, personal
information unless someone told me I could. But that whole thing about
"what is said in chat stays in chat" is just stupid. We're just chatting.
I don't even understand that phrase as it applies to Las Vegas (not that I
would ever go to Vegas). Half the time in chat we're talking about music,
DVD's, movies or the weather. What's the big deal? What should we be
keeping a secret.

Anyway, I apoligze to sky for getting upset and mentioning it here. But I
will be 50 years old in July so if someone talks to me like I'm 20 I'm
definitely going to take exception.

Jill

Jill, I admire you for having the strength to say what you have said above.
Most, like some above in this thread are incapable of apologizing. They
don't have enough sense of self worth, or ego to say "I made a mistake".
They do everything "correctly" the first time. These are people who fail in
life, or part of their lives and in general don't recognize that.. I've
always felt that a high fraction of ongoing posters are losers, at least in
a significant portion of their lives. That's why we need to post.

Kent
_______

Constantly struggling with my level of ignorance

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:40:46 -0800, "Kent" wrote:


"jmcquown" wrote in message
...
To sky. I should never have brought these things up here on rfc.

However, in my defense I also don't feel I should be nagged in chat about
what my insurance riders or what freezer I bought. You're free to offer
an opinion but hey, you aren't the one paying for it. I didn't tell you
what tile to put down when you re-decorated.

As for what is "said in chat stays in chat", it's not like we are
discussing state secrets. I would never disclose intimate, personal
information unless someone told me I could. But that whole thing about
"what is said in chat stays in chat" is just stupid. We're just chatting.
I don't even understand that phrase as it applies to Las Vegas (not that I
would ever go to Vegas). Half the time in chat we're talking about music,
DVD's, movies or the weather. What's the big deal? What should we be
keeping a secret.

Anyway, I apoligze to sky for getting upset and mentioning it here. But I
will be 50 years old in July so if someone talks to me like I'm 20 I'm
definitely going to take exception.

Jill

Jill, I admire you for having the strength to say what you have said above.
Most, like some above in this thread are incapable of apologizing. They
don't have enough sense of self worth, or ego to say "I made a mistake".
They do everything "correctly" the first time. These are people who fail in
life, or part of their lives and in general don't recognize that.. I've
always felt that a high fraction of ongoing posters are losers, at least in
a significant portion of their lives. That's why we need to post.

Thanks to you and jill for being the moral fiber of RFC

Lou

jmcquown wrote:

I will be 50 years old in July so if someone talks to me like I'm 20 I'm
definitely going to take exception.

Jill

I know exactly what you mean, my response to it in "chat" as much as
anywhere else is to ignore it or abruptly change the subject, and if i
want to "stick it" to the offending person i will play dumb, and
sometimes manage get them very upset with my apparent mental torpidity
--

Mr. Joseph Littleshoes Esq.

Domine, dirige nos.
Let the games begin!
http://fredeeky.typepad.com/fredeeky.../sf_anthem.mp3

"Lou Decruss" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:40:46 -0800, "Kent" wrote:


"jmcquown" wrote in message
...
To sky. I should never have brought these things up here on rfc.

However, in my defense I also don't feel I should be nagged in chat
about
what my insurance riders or what freezer I bought. You're free to offer
an opinion but hey, you aren't the one paying for it. I didn't tell you
what tile to put down when you re-decorated.

As for what is "said in chat stays in chat", it's not like we are
discussing state secrets. I would never disclose intimate, personal
information unless someone told me I could. But that whole thing about
"what is said in chat stays in chat" is just stupid. We're just
chatting.
I don't even understand that phrase as it applies to Las Vegas (not that
I
would ever go to Vegas). Half the time in chat we're talking about
music,
DVD's, movies or the weather. What's the big deal? What should we be
keeping a secret.

Anyway, I apoligze to sky for getting upset and mentioning it here. But
I
will be 50 years old in July so if someone talks to me like I'm 20 I'm
definitely going to take exception.

Jill

Jill, I admire you for having the strength to say what you have said
above.
Most, like some above in this thread are incapable of apologizing. They
don't have enough sense of self worth, or ego to say "I made a mistake".
They do everything "correctly" the first time. These are people who fail
in
life, or part of their lives and in general don't recognize that.. I've
always felt that a high fraction of ongoing posters are losers, at least
in
a significant portion of their lives. That's why we need to post.

Thanks to you and jill for being the moral fiber of RFC

Lou


Lou, I'm not saying I don't have the same problem. I'm not placing myself
above the group.I said "That's why we need to post"

Kent,
___
, constantly struggling with my level of ignorance,

Lou Decruss wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:40:46 -0800, "Kent" wrote:


"jmcquown" wrote in message
...
To sky. I should never have brought these things up here on rfc.

However, in my defense I also don't feel I should be nagged in chat
about what my insurance riders or what freezer I bought. You're
free to offer an opinion but hey, you aren't the one paying for it.
I didn't tell you what tile to put down when you re-decorated.

As for what is "said in chat stays in chat", it's not like we are
discussing state secrets. I would never disclose intimate, personal
information unless someone told me I could. But that whole thing
about "what is said in chat stays in chat" is just stupid. We're
just chatting. I don't even understand that phrase as it applies to
Las Vegas (not that I would ever go to Vegas). Half the time in
chat we're talking about music, DVD's, movies or the weather.
What's the big deal? What should we be keeping a secret.

Anyway, I apoligze to sky for getting upset and mentioning it here.
But I will be 50 years old in July so if someone talks to me like
I'm 20 I'm definitely going to take exception.

Jill

Jill, I admire you for having the strength to say what you have said
above. Most, like some above in this thread are incapable of
apologizing. They don't have enough sense of self worth, or ego to
say "I made a mistake". They do everything "correctly" the first
time. These are people who fail in life, or part of their lives and
in general don't recognize that.. I've always felt that a high
fraction of ongoing posters are losers, at least in a significant
portion of their lives. That's why we need to post.

Thanks to you and jill for being the moral fiber of RFC



Remind to send Kent and Jill some lumber, Lou...that way they can build thei
r crosses even *higher*...


--
Best
Greg

jmcquown wrote:
To sky. I should never have brought these things up here on rfc.

However, in my defense I also don't feel I should be nagged in chat
about what my insurance riders or what freezer I bought. You're free
to offer an opinion but hey, you aren't the one paying for it. I
didn't tell you what tile to put down when you re-decorated.

As for what is "said in chat stays in chat", it's not like we are
discussing state secrets. I would never disclose intimate, personal
information unless someone told me I could. But that whole thing
about "what is said in chat stays in chat" is just stupid. We're just
chatting. I don't even understand that phrase as it applies to Las
Vegas (not that I would ever go to Vegas). Half the time in chat
we're talking about music, DVD's, movies or the weather. What's the
big deal? What should we be keeping a secret.

Anyway, I apoligze to sky for getting upset and mentioning it here.
But I will be 50 years old in July so if someone talks to me like I'm
20 I'm definitely going to take exception.

Jill

That's one very weak apology, and you did "disclose intimate, personal
information" not that long ago from a source that can can no longer
defend herself. You are a narcissist. It's obvious as hell.

Bruce

Lou Decruss wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:40:46 -0800, wrote:


wrote in message
...

To sky. I should never have brought these things up here on rfc.

However, in my defense I also don't feel I should be nagged in chat about
what my insurance riders or what freezer I bought. You're free to offer
an opinion but hey, you aren't the one paying for it. I didn't tell you
what tile to put down when you re-decorated.

As for what is "said in chat stays in chat", it's not like we are
discussing state secrets. I would never disclose intimate, personal
information unless someone told me I could. But that whole thing about
"what is said in chat stays in chat" is just stupid. We're just chatting.
I don't even understand that phrase as it applies to Las Vegas (not that I
would ever go to Vegas). Half the time in chat we're talking about music,
DVD's, movies or the weather. What's the big deal? What should we be
keeping a secret.

Anyway, I apoligze to sky for getting upset and mentioning it here. But I
will be 50 years old in July so if someone talks to me like I'm 20 I'm
definitely going to take exception.

Jill


Jill, I admire you for having the strength to say what you have said above.
Most, like some above in this thread are incapable of apologizing. They
don't have enough sense of self worth, or ego to say "I made a mistake".
They do everything "correctly" the first time. These are people who fail in
life, or part of their lives and in general don't recognize that.. I've
always felt that a high fraction of ongoing posters are losers, at least in
a significant portion of their lives. That's why we need to post.

Thanks to you and jill for being the moral fiber of RFC

Lou


Now THAT was funny!

Bruce

Mr. Joseph Littleshoes Esq. wrote:


jmcquown wrote:

I will be 50 years old in July so if someone talks to me like I'm 20
I'm definitely going to take exception.

Jill

I know exactly what you mean, my response to it in "chat" as much as
anywhere else is to ignore it or abruptly change the subject, and if i
want to "stick it" to the offending person i will play dumb, and
sometimes manage get them very upset with my apparent mental torpidity

So the moral of this story is that when you hit exactly 49-1/2 years old
you lose your morals and become narcissistic?

Bruce

"Bruce" wrote in message
...
Mr. Joseph Littleshoes Esq. wrote:


jmcquown wrote:

I will be 50 years old in July so if someone talks to me like I'm 20 I'm
definitely going to take exception.

Jill

I know exactly what you mean, my response to it in "chat" as much as
anywhere else is to ignore it or abruptly change the subject, and if i
want to "stick it" to the offending person i will play dumb, and
sometimes manage get them very upset with my apparent mental torpidity

So the moral of this story is that when you hit exactly 49-1/2 years old
you lose your morals and become narcissistic?

I can't stand Jill but you are so tiresome. Under any nym.

"Mort" wrote in message
...
jmcquown wrote:

To sky. I should never have brought these things up here on rfc.


email or chat with this garbage

Nobody gives a shit


I'm with you, Mort, but I gotta tell you, you smell like a dirty sock.