Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It seems that our Compassionate Conservative President isn't
willing to address issues that are of VITAL importance to us. He wants to fingerprint people entering and exiting the country, when he should be attending to the welfare of the Republic, such as safe guarding our food supply. http://makeashorterlink.com/?I60A225F6 . this is what really creeped me out:: According to USDA spokesman Matthew Baun, it's up to consumers to check with their grocers, butchers or restaurants to find out if any of the recalled meat may have landed on their tables. "We are prohibited from releasing information that companies would consider proprietary,'' he explained. "If you are concerned whether you may have purchased the product, you can call your retail store. They would know. .. . The only way to know for sure is to contact stores." All this secrecy is grounded in USDA rules surrounding the voluntary nature of tainted meat recalls, and in an 18-month-old memorandum of understanding that arose in an earlier tainted-meat episode. The memorandum was agreed to between the federal agency, California and several other states, and was meant to give states a bigger role in verifying that the recall was working. * * * I'm unclear why this hasn't been an issue here in rfc. Sure we've had "you too" from Canadian supporters, but no post has indicated the complicity of our government to such a degree. The public distribution of (however faintly) tainted cattle parts is a very serious matter and the reluctance of our government to regulate it is truly concerning. Our rights have been eaten away by the Patriot Act, yet no one in government is willing to stand up and declare that parts from a few tainted animals should be recalled? So what if that mean every single animal part should be returned? We are talking about the public welfare... health and safety. In the end, it turns out that meat for pet food is better regulated than meat for human consumption. Practice safe eating - always use condiments |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf > wrote in
: > It seems that our Compassionate Conservative President isn't > willing to address issues that are of VITAL importance to > us. He wants to fingerprint people entering and exiting the > country, when he should be attending to the welfare of the > Republic, such as safe guarding our food supply. > > http://makeashorterlink.com/?I60A225F6 . > this is what really creeped me out:: > > According to USDA spokesman Matthew Baun, it's up to > consumers to check with their grocers, butchers or > restaurants to find out if any of the recalled meat may have > landed on their tables. > > "We are prohibited from releasing information that companies > would consider proprietary,'' he explained. "If you are > concerned whether you may have purchased the product, you > can call your retail store. They would know. .. . The only > way to know for sure is to contact stores." > > All this secrecy is grounded in USDA rules surrounding the > voluntary nature of tainted meat recalls, and in an > 18-month-old memorandum of understanding that arose in an > earlier tainted-meat episode. The memorandum was agreed to > between the federal agency, California and several other > states, and was meant to give states a bigger role in > verifying that the recall was working. > > * * * > > I'm unclear why this hasn't been an issue here in rfc. Sure > we've had "you too" from Canadian supporters, but no post > has indicated the complicity of our government to such a > degree. > > The public distribution of (however faintly) tainted cattle > parts is a very serious matter and the reluctance of our > government to regulate it is truly concerning. Our rights > have been eaten away by the Patriot Act, yet no one in > government is willing to stand up and declare that parts > from a few tainted animals should be recalled? So what if > that mean every single animal part should be returned? We > are talking about the public welfare... health and safety. Agreed with all above. > In the end, it turns out that meat for pet food is better > regulated than meat for human consumption. Time to drag out the carton of Fancy Feast! I'm partial to Chunky Chicken myself! <G> Wayne |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Look at This Thread was New here | General Cooking | |||
Pizza Hut thread | General Cooking | |||
Another pet thread | General Cooking | |||
drag bits, step drag bits, chevron drag bits, API Reg thread dragbits, API IF thread drag bits, Arod thread drag bits, Nrod thread drag bits,2-wings drag bits, 3-wings drag bits, 4-wings drag bits, carbide drag bits,PDC drag bits, clay bits | Baking | |||
YAK - Yet Another Knife thread | Cooking Equipment |