I just have to do this !

It's not "grammer"--it's "grammar". That's "grammAr".

And it's not "receipe", it's "recipe". That's r-e-c-i-p-e !

Thanks. I feel better now.
signed, The Grouch

On 30 Aug 2004 02:41:01 GMT, (Stjoe214) wrote:
>I just have to do this !
[snip]

No you didn't but I'll help you out just the same.

Neither of the gentleman you "tagged" (in your subject line) post here
regularly. They might participate in a crosspost but they do not read
rfc (intentionally.)

The "Anti-St" Ranger
--
"Everyone is subject to the laws of Darwinism whether or not they
believe in them, agree with them, or accept them. There is no trial,
no jury, no argument, and no appeal."
-- Anonymous

On 30 Aug 2004 02:41:01 GMT, (Stjoe214) wrote:
>I just have to do this !
[snip]

No you didn't but I'll help you out just the same.

Neither of the gentleman you "tagged" (in your subject line) post here
regularly. They might participate in a crosspost but they do not read
rfc (intentionally.)

The "Anti-St" Ranger
--
"Everyone is subject to the laws of Darwinism whether or not they
believe in them, agree with them, or accept them. There is no trial,
no jury, no argument, and no appeal."
-- Anonymous

"Stjoe214" > wrote in message
...
> I just have to do this !
>
> It's not "grammer"--it's "grammar". That's "grammAr".
>
> And it's not "receipe", it's "recipe". That's r-e-c-i-p-e !
>
> Thanks. I feel better now.
> signed, The Grouch

You can reach them on alt.cooking-chat.

Dora

"Stjoe214" > wrote in message
...
> I just have to do this !
>
> It's not "grammer"--it's "grammar". That's "grammAr".
>
> And it's not "receipe", it's "recipe". That's r-e-c-i-p-e !
>
> Thanks. I feel better now.
> signed, The Grouch

You can reach them on alt.cooking-chat.

Dora

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:18:02 -0400, "limey" >
wrote:
[snip]
> You can reach them on alt.cooking-chat.

TMI.

The Ranger

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:18:02 -0400, "limey" >
wrote:
[snip]
> You can reach them on alt.cooking-chat.

TMI.

The Ranger

"The Ranger" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:18:02 -0400, "limey" >
> wrote:
> [snip]
> > You can reach them on alt.cooking-chat.
>
> TMI.
>
> The Ranger

Why's that?

Dora

"The Ranger" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:18:02 -0400, "limey" >
> wrote:
> [snip]
> > You can reach them on alt.cooking-chat.
>
> TMI.
>
> The Ranger

Why's that?

Dora

"The Ranger" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:18:02 -0400, "limey" >
> wrote:
> [snip]
> > You can reach them on alt.cooking-chat.
>
> TMI.
>
> The Ranger

Why's that?

Dora

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:53:44 -0400, "limey" >
wrote:
>"The Ranger" > wrote in message ...
> > On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:18:02 -0400, "limey" > wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > You can reach them on alt.cooking-chat.
> > >
> > TMI.
> >
> Why's that?
>
Did you really want to read it again in ac-c?

The Ranger

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:53:44 -0400, "limey" >
wrote:
>"The Ranger" > wrote in message ...
> > On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:18:02 -0400, "limey" > wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > You can reach them on alt.cooking-chat.
> > >
> > TMI.
> >
> Why's that?
>
Did you really want to read it again in ac-c?

The Ranger

"The Ranger"wrote in message
> >
> Did you really want to read it again in ac-c?
>
> The Ranger

There's a lot I don't want to read in ac-c ;-(.
Someday I'll send you a copy of an e-mail I received.

Dora

"The Ranger"wrote in message
> >
> Did you really want to read it again in ac-c?
>
> The Ranger

There's a lot I don't want to read in ac-c ;-(.
Someday I'll send you a copy of an e-mail I received.

Dora

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:29:39 -0400, "limey" >
wrote:
>Someday I'll send you a copy of an e-mail I received.

When you do, just remove a "-" to do that.

The Ranger

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:29:39 -0400, "limey" >
wrote:
>Someday I'll send you a copy of an e-mail I received.

When you do, just remove a "-" to do that.

The Ranger

"Recipe" formerly was "receipt", by the way, and "receipt books" were
difficult to get, expensive, and thus kept with the Bible, Pilgrims
Progress, and other important books rather than in kitchen areas. Just
a bit of trivia . . .

> > I just have to do this !
> >
> > It's not "grammer"--it's "grammar". That's "grammAr".
> >
> > And it's not "receipe", it's "recipe". That's r-e-c-i-p-e !
> >
> > Thanks. I feel better now.
> > signed, The Grouch
>

"Recipe" formerly was "receipt", by the way, and "receipt books" were
difficult to get, expensive, and thus kept with the Bible, Pilgrims
Progress, and other important books rather than in kitchen areas. Just
a bit of trivia . . .

> > I just have to do this !
> >
> > It's not "grammer"--it's "grammar". That's "grammAr".
> >
> > And it's not "receipe", it's "recipe". That's r-e-c-i-p-e !
> >
> > Thanks. I feel better now.
> > signed, The Grouch
>