Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 29 Nov 2003 09:43:08 -0800,
(George Bray) wrote: > On 2002-03-11 09:52:44 PST , wrote about Ragu > (Bolognese sauce): > > >"...cook, uncovered, at the merest simmer for a long, long time; not > less than >3 hours is necessary, more is better." > > I've read about very long cooking times in various other recipes from > leading authors but how is it justified? By any normal standards, > won't all the main ingredients be way-overcooked, so all you're really > left with is a good stock sauce? But even if you're making beef stock, > the recipes would seldom suggest you simmer the stock for that long. > > I have tested 3-5 hour cooking times and I don't doubt that the > results are quite good, as is a 30 minute simmer actually, in my > opinion. > > How do the long cooking times work? > I believe the short time is for tomato sauce w/o meat. If it has meat, then you cook it longer. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bolognese (Ragł) sauce | General Cooking | |||
U Like Ragu spaghetti sauce? | General Cooking | |||
Ragu Pasta Sauce | Recipes | |||
Ragł (Bolognese sauce) | General Cooking |