General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 19-11-2009, 07:54 PM posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 110
Default Cornstarch vs. flour in pudding?


"Pudding" in the American sense of the word, that is.

I tried a simple, eggless chocolate pudding cooked with flour and it
seemed to work just as well as cornstarch. Since flour is cheaper,
what's the advantage of cornstarch?

However, vanilla pudding (the same recipe, minus the cocoa) always
burns no matter how careful I am, so I assume using flour wouldn't
help.


Lenona.

  #2 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 19-11-2009, 09:30 PM posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 25,973
Default Cornstarch vs. flour in pudding?

Lenona wrote:
"Pudding" in the American sense of the word, that is.

I tried a simple, eggless chocolate pudding cooked with flour and it
seemed to work just as well as cornstarch. Since flour is cheaper,
what's the advantage of cornstarch?

However, vanilla pudding (the same recipe, minus the cocoa) always
burns no matter how careful I am, so I assume using flour wouldn't
help.

I always use cornstarch. It thickens quickly and has a neutral taste.
If you are stirring constantly over a low heat you should not have a
problem with burning. For the amount of corn starch used I can't see
price being a concern. It's not that expensive.
  #3 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 20-11-2009, 03:26 PM posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,446
Default Cornstarch vs. flour in pudding?


"Lenona" wrote in message
...

"Pudding" in the American sense of the word, that is.

I tried a simple, eggless chocolate pudding cooked with flour and it
seemed to work just as well as cornstarch. Since flour is cheaper,
what's the advantage of cornstarch?

However, vanilla pudding (the same recipe, minus the cocoa) always
burns no matter how careful I am, so I assume using flour wouldn't
help.


Lenona.


Read he http://www.foodsubs.com/ThickenStarch.html

Flour will leave a starchy taste (unless cooked for an extended period) and
an opaque result, corn starch does not have the starchy taste and the
thickened product is clearer than using flour - also the "sheen' appearance
is different.


--
Dimitri

Mirepoix

http://kitchenguide.wordpress.com.

  #4 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 20-11-2009, 05:03 PM posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 426
Default Cornstarch vs. flour in pudding?

Dimitri wrote:


"Lenona" wrote in message
...

"Pudding" in the American sense of the word, that is.

I tried a simple, eggless chocolate pudding cooked with flour and it
seemed to work just as well as cornstarch. Since flour is cheaper,
what's the advantage of cornstarch?

However, vanilla pudding (the same recipe, minus the cocoa) always
burns no matter how careful I am, so I assume using flour wouldn't
help.


Read he http://www.foodsubs.com/ThickenStarch.html

Flour will leave a starchy taste (unless cooked for an extended period)
and an opaque result, corn starch does not have the starchy taste and
the thickened product is clearer than using flour - also the "sheen'
appearance is different.



You're on the right track, but I would add that
your standard pastry cream recipe is flour thickened
and I've never detected a starchy taste to it after all
the many times I've made it. I'd even say I like it better
than corn starch thickened preparations. This is one
of the many cases where tasting trumps reading.

--
Reg
  #5 (permalink)   Report Post  
Old 20-11-2009, 05:03 PM posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 11,457
Default Cornstarch vs. flour in pudding?


"RegForte" wrote in message
...
Dimitri wrote:


"Lenona" wrote in message
...

"Pudding" in the American sense of the word, that is.

I tried a simple, eggless chocolate pudding cooked with flour and it
seemed to work just as well as cornstarch. Since flour is cheaper,
what's the advantage of cornstarch?

However, vanilla pudding (the same recipe, minus the cocoa) always
burns no matter how careful I am, so I assume using flour wouldn't
help.


Read he http://www.foodsubs.com/ThickenStarch.html

Flour will leave a starchy taste (unless cooked for an extended period)
and an opaque result, corn starch does not have the starchy taste and the
thickened product is clearer than using flour - also the "sheen'
appearance is different.



You're on the right track, but I would add that
your standard pastry cream recipe is flour thickened
and I've never detected a starchy taste to it after all
the many times I've made it. I'd even say I like it better
than corn starch thickened preparations. This is one
of the many cases where tasting trumps reading.

Horse shit.




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cornstarch in cookies? Kalmia General Cooking 10 13-10-2014 01:54 PM
Flour vs. cornstarch? [email protected] General Cooking 8 10-04-2014 11:46 AM
Need help muy pronto: Using arrowroot instead of flour or cornstarch thickener in a rhubarb pie Melba's Jammin' General Cooking 6 10-06-2009 01:33 AM
Cornstarch substitute? jmcquown General Cooking 52 01-04-2005 05:03 AM
Cornstarch vs. Flour? AzuReBlue General Cooking 16 17-11-2003 11:18 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2017 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"

 

Copyright © 2017