sf wrote:

>
> Using v2x, is it possible to filter by NNTP-Posting-Host?
>
> TIA

No. Now **** off.

sf wrote:

> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:34:44 +0000 (UTC), "Sacha"
> > wrote:
>
> > sf wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Using v2x, is it possible to filter by NNTP-Posting-Host?
> >>
> >> TIA
> >
> > No. Now **** off.
>
> Wonderful. You're such a support.

Glad to be of help, ****.

On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:42:21 +0000 (UTC), "June Hughes" wrote:

>****.

Dear notJune,

It takes one to know one.

On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:59:55 +1200, Nicetameetya
> wrote:

>[Default] On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:40:32 +0000 (UTC), G. Morgan
> declared to all and sundry:
>
>>Nicetameetya wrote:
>>
>>>It's worth upgrading to be able killfile childish trolls who use
>>>anonymous remailers like altopia.com.
>>
>>Altopia is not a remailer.
>
>You're right. But, unlike your provider and mine, Altopia takes no
>responsibility for what their customers post, including off-topic,
>abusive and or forgeries, etc. So they are perfect for anonymous
>trolls like June/Sacha :
>
>An excerpt from their About webpage:
>
>https://www.altopia.com/about.html
>
>In 1995 our founder created Altopia. After having been compelled to
>censor a Usenet site in college, he decided to provide an uncensored
>service. Many of our customers back then were from schools and
>organizations which censored their Usenet service.
>
>Since then we have worked hard to continue to be a source for
>uncensored Usenet access. In addition to carrying any group requested,
>we also try to push the limits on freedom of expression so that our
>customers can type what they want, without worry. (This does not mean
>we allow abuse of Usenet, such as flooding.) As a carrier, we protect
>customer privacy to the maximum extent allowed by law while we
>cooperate with law enforcement and copyright holders as required by
>law.
>
>An excerpt from their FAQ:
>
>https://www.altopia.com/polfaq.html
>
>Q: What is your policy on off-topic postings?
>
>A: We do not have a policy against off-topic postings and we rely on
>customers to operate in a way that they feel is appropriate for Usenet
>and/or the groups they are participating in.
>
>Q: What is your policy on a customer posting with a bogus return
>address?
>
>A: We feel customers have a right to decide whether to be anonymous or
>not and so we do not have a problem with a customer posting with a
>bogus return address. The news server software does require that a
>return address be in Internet standard format, such as foo@bar, but
>the address does not have to be real. We do require that customers
>verify that the address they choose to use is not actually someone
>else's valid address or domain. For example, is actually a
>valid email address, because foo.com is a registered domain.
>
>Q: What is your policy on forgery?
>
>A: We have a policy against a customer of Altopia making posts in a
>way that uses the email address of another user on Usenet or the
>Internet, in an attempt to deceive readers of the true identity of the
>poster, without that email address owner's permission. In addition, if
>you are the victim or witness to a forgery, you may want to contact
>the appropriate law enforcement agency so they may then contact us and
>follow-up as they feel appropriate.

****IN' PMSL!

On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:56:43 +0100, Stephen Wolstenholme
> wrote:

>On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:59:55 +1200, Nicetameetya
> wrote:
>
>>[Default] On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:40:32 +0000 (UTC), G. Morgan
> declared to all and sundry:
>>
>>>Nicetameetya wrote:
>>>
>>>>It's worth upgrading to be able killfile childish trolls who use
>>>>anonymous remailers like altopia.com.
>>>
>>>Altopia is not a remailer.
>>
>>You're right. But, unlike your provider and mine, Altopia takes no
>>responsibility for what their customers post, including off-topic,
>>abusive and or forgeries, etc. So they are perfect for anonymous
>>trolls like June/Sacha :
>
>Please note that the messages supposable from June and Sacha are
>really from a PITA faking peoples names.
>
>Steve

Yeah, you did them you sicko.

On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:23:49 +1200, Nicetameetya
> wrote:

>[Default] On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:56:43 +0100, Stephen Wolstenholme
> declared to all and sundry:
>
>>On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:59:55 +1200, Nicetameetya
> wrote:
>>
>>>[Default] On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:40:32 +0000 (UTC), G. Morgan
> declared to all and sundry:
>>>
>>>>Nicetameetya wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>It's worth upgrading to be able killfile childish trolls who use
>>>>>anonymous remailers like altopia.com.
>>>>
>>>>Altopia is not a remailer.
>>>
>>>You're right. But, unlike your provider and mine, Altopia takes no
>>>responsibility for what their customers post, including off-topic,
>>>abusive and or forgeries, etc. So they are perfect for anonymous
>>>trolls like June/Sacha :
>>
>>Please note that the messages supposable from June and Sacha are
>>really from a PITA faking peoples names.
>
>A PITA using an altopia.com server to post them and the following
>filter works (in Agent v5) to block messages from posters using that
>server:
>
>Message-ID:{news\.alt\.net}
>
>BTW - trolls in other ng's also use altopia.com to harass those ng's
>and the filter works on them too. I've yet to see any genuine posters
>using altopia.com, but the filter will zap them too.

Wow you're a ****ing hero. Can I suck your cock?

On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:35:31 +0100, Stephen Wolstenholme
> wrote:

>On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:23:49 +1200, Nicetameetya
> wrote:
>
>>[Default] On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:56:43 +0100, Stephen Wolstenholme
> declared to all and sundry:
>>
>>>On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:59:55 +1200, Nicetameetya
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>[Default] On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:40:32 +0000 (UTC), G. Morgan
> declared to all and sundry:
>>>>
>>>>>Nicetameetya wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>It's worth upgrading to be able killfile childish trolls who use
>>>>>>anonymous remailers like altopia.com.
>>>>>
>>>>>Altopia is not a remailer.
>>>>
>>>>You're right. But, unlike your provider and mine, Altopia takes no
>>>>responsibility for what their customers post, including off-topic,
>>>>abusive and or forgeries, etc. So they are perfect for anonymous
>>>>trolls like June/Sacha :
>>>
>>>Please note that the messages supposable from June and Sacha are
>>>really from a PITA faking peoples names.
>>
>>A PITA using an altopia.com server to post them and the following
>>filter works (in Agent v5) to block messages from posters using that
>>server:
>>
>>Message-ID:{news\.alt\.net}
>>
>>BTW - trolls in other ng's also use altopia.com to harass those ng's
>>and the filter works on them too. I've yet to see any genuine posters
>>using altopia.com, but the filter will zap them too.
>
>I've had a global kill on altopia for as long as Agent has allowed
>Message-ID: filters. I have seen a few messages with news.alt.net on
>the path but not in the Message-ID. It would be nice if Agent could
>filter on parts of the path.
>
>Steve

****ing great idea.

On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:35:33 +1200, Nicetameetya
> wrote:

>[Default] On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:18:39 +0000 (UTC), G. Morgan
> declared to all and sundry:
>
>>Stephen Wolstenholme wrote:
>>
>>>It would be nice if Agent could
>>>filter on parts of the path.
>>
>>
>>No shit.
>>
>>I don't know why after all these years Agent still cannot filter on *any*
>>header field.
>>
>>I resent having to kludge NewsProxy with Agent.
>
>So do I. But I resent childish trolls like June/Sacha even more.

Right ****in' ****s aren't they?

On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:30:03 -0700, sf > wrote:

>On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:35:33 +1200, Nicetameetya
> wrote:
>
>>[Default] On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:18:39 +0000 (UTC), G. Morgan
> declared to all and sundry:
>>
>>>Stephen Wolstenholme wrote:
>>>
>>>>It would be nice if Agent could
>>>>filter on parts of the path.
>>>
>>>
>>>No shit.
>>>
>>>I don't know why after all these years Agent still cannot filter on *any*
>>>header field.
>>>
>>>I resent having to kludge NewsProxy with Agent.
>>
>>So do I. But I resent childish trolls like June/Sacha even more.
>
>Don't you think trolls wouldn't be a problem if Agent R&D concentrated
>more on improving usenet access/filtering and less on other things?

****in' good idea, slappa.

On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:32:42 -0700, sf > wrote:

>On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:41:22 -0700, Steve Urbach
> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:18:39 +0000 (UTC), G. Morgan >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Stephen Wolstenholme wrote:
>>>
>>>>It would be nice if Agent could
>>>>filter on parts of the path.
>>>
>>>
>>>No shit.
>>>
>>>I don't know why after all these years Agent still cannot filter on *any*
>>>header field.
>>>
>>>I resent having to kludge NewsProxy with Agent.
>>You have not been listening. :/
>>
>>*All* headers do not exist UNTIL the message BODY has been COMPLETELY
>>downloaded.
>>
>>So the /kludge/ is to ask the (non-standard in NNTP) server to do the
>>filtering of the message list for you.
>>
>>It is sort of like trying to guess (without caller ID) who will call me
>>tomorrow? The only way to find out is to answer the phone when it rings.
>>I can't say, "That xyz Telemarketing about to ring my phone". I have to
>>answer it (and hang up when I hear the dead line before a human comes on).
>
>I really don't care how many headers or bodies have to be downloaded,
>I'm not on dial up. Just give me the capability of filtering out the
>trolls/spoofers and of course spam as needed.

I hope the ****ing *******s listen!

On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:29:33 -0500, Joe > wrote:

>sf > wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:34:44 +0000 (UTC), "Sacha"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >sf wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Using v2x, is it possible to filter by NNTP-Posting-Host?
>> >>
>> >> TIA
>> >
>> >No. Now **** off.
>>
>> Wonderful. You're such a support.
>
> It's teaching you to use your filter. I have this animal filtered long
>ago, or I didn't see it until you quote it.

Me too.