General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Sky Sky is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,348
Default Why is it . . . . . ?

.. . . . . . that most 4-burner stoves/ranges have the large burners**
up front and close, or rather, why is it the small burner is typically
located in the back row of burners? Isn't it more hazardous to reach
over and behind a tall hot pan/pot to tend the little simmering pan at
the back? SF's post about her really nice new 6-burner cook-top had me
thinking about this conundrum. My GE natural-gas range has large and
middle burners in the front, then middle & small burners at the back.
Seems to me the 'natural order of things' should be little, shorter pans
cook up front with the taller pots to the back when one cooks several
things at the same time. Although, I can see how the large burner can
be handy in the front row when cooking something like a big batch of
stir-fry or fried chicken and such.

Sky

** "Large", "middle" & "small" refer to the BTU output for stove burners

--
Ultra Ultimate Kitchen Rule - Use the Timer!
Ultimate Kitchen Rule -- Cook's Choice
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"