Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
.. . . . . . that most 4-burner stoves/ranges have the large burners**
up front and close, or rather, why is it the small burner is typically located in the back row of burners? Isn't it more hazardous to reach over and behind a tall hot pan/pot to tend the little simmering pan at the back? SF's post about her really nice new 6-burner cook-top had me thinking about this conundrum. My GE natural-gas range has large and middle burners in the front, then middle & small burners at the back. Seems to me the 'natural order of things' should be little, shorter pans cook up front with the taller pots to the back when one cooks several things at the same time. Although, I can see how the large burner can be handy in the front row when cooking something like a big batch of stir-fry or fried chicken and such. Sky ** "Large", "middle" & "small" refer to the BTU output for stove burners -- Ultra Ultimate Kitchen Rule - Use the Timer! Ultimate Kitchen Rule -- Cook's Choice |