Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
d tie it, sear it
> till browned in a hot pan with olive oil and roast at about 325 until the > internal temp was about 160. > > Always let the roast rest for 15 minutes to set the juices. > > Paul Mein Gott, 160 deg. for lamb is way overdone. It should always be served rare or nearly rare. Nobody wants it well done. N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Nancy2" > wrote in message ... >d tie it, sear it >> till browned in a hot pan with olive oil and roast at about 325 until the >> internal temp was about 160. >> >> Always let the roast rest for 15 minutes to set the juices. >> >> Paul > > Mein Gott, 160 deg. for lamb is way overdone. It should always be > served rare or nearly rare. Nobody wants it well done. Actually the times we made the roast I described it was quite lovely. Plenty of juice and not at all dry. Well done, yes but I would say leaning towards medium well. I surely would not want it any more well done than that. Paul |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 9, 12:00*pm, "Paul M. Cook" > wrote:
> "Nancy2" > wrote in message > > ... > > >d tie it, sear it > >> till browned in a hot pan with olive oil and roast at about 325 until the > >> internal temp was about 160. > > >> Always let the roast rest for 15 minutes to set the juices. > > >> Paul > > > Mein Gott, 160 deg. for lamb is way overdone. *It should always be > > served rare or nearly rare. *Nobody wants it well done. > > Actually the times we made the roast I described it was quite lovely. > Plenty of juice and not at all dry. *Well done, yes but I would say leaning > towards medium well. *I surely would not want it any more well done than > that. > > Paul Good. I exaggerated, but you have redeemed yourself. ;-) I should have said that I don't know anyone who likes it more well done than rare or medium rare. N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nancy2 wrote about lamb:
> I should have said that I don't know anyone who likes it more well done > than rare or medium rare. It ought to depend on the cut. Cook's Illustrated ran lamb shoulder chops through their test kitchen and battery of tasters, and came to the conclusion that they are much better when they're cooked medium-well rather than medium or less. Lamb loin chops, on the other hand, are wonderful rare. Bob |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|