ChattyCathy wrote:
> Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>> Damn, damn, and damn! If I had remembered this, I would have asked
>> for a halt to the postings immediately. The group is archived all
>> over the internet. The PDF file, if it's made available on the RFC
>> site, will be mass distributed. Count on it.
>>
>> I don't know if so much time has passed that it's become a non-issue
>> or not.
>>
>> What do people think?
>
> I have taken the liberty of putting up a survey about this on the RFC
> site. Of course there are no 'maybes' or 'MCINLs' in this one.


I'm in the mood for the brain locker, but I should say that I read the
second question in the subjunctive and didn't notice the third options,
so I said "no".

In these discussions, I'm always in favor of giving out recipes for
free. I'm often on the minority side of the argument, but it's how I
feel. My cooking is a part of the gift economy, and if I can find
recipes I think will add joy to the world, I choose to give them away.
That's not to say it's wrong to charge for a recipe book, but that if I
contributed one (or ten) recipe(s) to a book by a group of friends in a
not-for-profit venture, and there was a way to do it for free, I'd
support that.

Serene

--
42 Magazine, celebrating life with meaning. Inaugural issue March '09!
http://42magazine.com

"I am an agnostic only to the extent that I am agnostic about fairies at
the bottom of the garden." -- Richard Dawkins

On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 11:05:34 -0700, Serene Vannoy
> wrote:

>I should say that I read the
>second question in the subjunctive and didn't notice the third options,
>so I said "no".

So it's only one vote against - maybe that one is like you and really
should be an n/a.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West