blake murphy wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:35:27 -0500, cybercat wrote:
>
> > The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that
he
> > knows how to post to Usenet using proxies. Seems like he'd do it via
> > Usenet, doesn't it? He still has his AOL account, too. For email,
anyway.
> > Who the hell still uses AOL? He posts in a pretty green font, too. What
a
> > pussy.
> >
> >
> >>What a bunch of dumb douchebags... I forgot ten times more than any of
> >>yoose imbeciles know about how to set up proxy >accounts.
> >
> >>Eat me! LOL
> >
> > So. no, Sheldon has no ****ing idea how to post to Usenet now.
>
> how utterly charming that he'd make an effort to e-mail you directly with
a
> message of abuse. that's our boy!


Ya gotta LUV the "Eat me" part...it just might become a "classic".

Lol...


--
Best
Greg

"blake murphy" > wrote:
>
> i'd prefer to look on the bright side and assume he committed suicide.
> or
> maybe his six cats mauled him to death.
>

And pinned a note to his remains saying "all we wanted was some ****ing CAT
FOOD."

"blake murphy" > wrote :
>
> how utterly charming that he'd make an effort to e-mail you directly with
> a
> message of abuse. that's our boy!
>

You KNOW he has emailed others if he emailed me.

Horry wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:09:39 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:
>
>> cybercat > wrote:
>>
>>> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that
>>> he knows how to post to Usenet using proxies.
>> It's obvious neither of you know what a proxy is.
>>
>> Without using the word proxy, please try and explain what you're
>> referring to.
>
> AFAIK, all he needs is a new Google account. And to get a new Google
> Account, he needs an unregistered email address (Gmail, Hotmail, Yahoo,
> whatever).
>
> He'd only need to use a proxy if Google decided to ban his IP address
> (which is unlikely) -- and that's assuming he has a permanent static IP
> (which is also unlikely).

Since he posts through AOL, he's already using one of the AOL proxies.
The IP address on his posts is the same IP address of hundreds...
thousands... of other AOL users.

(These proxies are what AOL uses to spy on their users surfing habits so
efficiently).

So Google would be banning not just Sheldon.

-sw

Horry wrote:

> He'd only need to use a proxy if Google decided to ban his IP address
> (which is unlikely) -- and that's assuming he has a permanent static IP
> (which is also unlikely).

BTW: You're referring to an anonymous proxy. I'm not sure you can
daisy-chain proxies in Sheldon's (AOL's) case.

-sw

cybercat wrote:
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>> cybercat > wrote:
>>
>>> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that he
>>> knows how to post to Usenet using proxies.
>> It's obvious neither of you know what a proxy is.
>>
>> Without using the word proxy, please try and explain what you're
>> referring to.
>>
> Oh, that was YOU. You idiot. Regardless of the service one gets TOSed from,
> posting from a different IP # allows one to set up a new account.
>
> Where in hell would you ever get the idea that anyone here needs to prove
> anything at all to you? You constantly underestimate the intelligence of
> others while overestimating your own. It would be funny if it were not so
> depressing. I am depressed for you.

I didn't think you could answer the simple question with anything other
than smoke and mirrors.

-sw

cybercat wrote:

> Posting via proxy is the fastest way to return to posting via Google without
> even thinking about the issues you bring up. Genius.

Sheldon is already posting VIA AOL's regional proxies.

Google doesn't ban IP addresses anyway. Do you have proof otherwise?

-sw

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> cybercat wrote:
>
>> Posting via proxy is the fastest way to return to posting via Google
>> without even thinking about the issues you bring up. Genius.
>
> Sheldon is already posting VIA AOL's regional proxies.
>
> Google doesn't ban IP addresses anyway. Do you have proof otherwise?
>

I have seen no proof that Sheldon posts via AOL. He just has an AOL email
address.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> cybercat wrote:
>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> cybercat > wrote:
>>>
>>>> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that
>>>> he
>>>> knows how to post to Usenet using proxies.
>>> It's obvious neither of you know what a proxy is.
>>>
>>> Without using the word proxy, please try and explain what you're
>>> referring to.
>>>
>> Oh, that was YOU. You idiot. Regardless of the service one gets TOSed
>> from, posting from a different IP # allows one to set up a new account.
>>
>> Where in hell would you ever get the idea that anyone here needs to prove
>> anything at all to you? You constantly underestimate the intelligence of
>> others while overestimating your own. It would be funny if it were not so
>> depressing. I am depressed for you.
>
> I didn't think you could answer the simple question with anything other
> than smoke and mirrors.
>
You're not worth the time. When I get caught up I will simply post va a
proxy.

Horry wrote:

> In the sense the word is currently being used, here's a quick answer:
>
> It's a computer that acts as a "middle-man" between you and the website
> you're accessing.
>
> Rather than sending a request (e.g., for a webpage, image, or other file)
> directly to the webserver, you send the request to the proxy server,
> which then forwards your request to the webserver.
>
> The end-result is that the webserver (in this case, Google's server) will
> be aware of the proxy's IP address, but not the IP address of the end-
> user.

That's a good explanation. Most companies and universities use proxies to
funnel all the traffioc to/from the Internet. In that case, all users
data appears to be coming from the same IP address.

I kinda refer to proxies as "brokers".

Open proxies: Ususually misconfigured servers or even home machines that
allow hackers to use your IP address as if it were their own.

Anonymous proxies: servers purposely configured to allow public, anonymous
web surfing and possibly has other ports open for other uses. Generally
they are very slow and a PITA.

-sw

"cyberAnus" wrote
>
> Posting via proxy is the fastest way to return to posting via Google.
>
Are you a Proxologist?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbyajJP8DV8

Boney Maroney

"cyberHoe" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Gregory Morrow" > wrote in message
> m...
>>
>> cybercat wrote:
>>
>>> "brooklyn1" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>> >
>>> > "cybertoxic" wrote:
>>> >> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me
>>> >> that
>> he
>>> >> knows how to post to Usenet using proxies. Seems like he'd do it
>>> >> via
>>> >> Usenet, doesn't it? He still has his AOL account, too. For email,
>> anyway.
>>> >> Who the hell still uses AOL? He posts in a pretty green font, too.
>>> >> What
>> a
>>> >> pussy.
>>> >>
>>> >> Eat me!
>>> >> Tuesday, February 10, 2009 11:25 AM
>>> >> From Tue Feb 10 08:25:52 2009
>>> >> Return-Path: >
>>> >> Authentication-Results: mta129.mail.re1.yahoo.com
>>> >> from=aol.com;
>>> >> domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=aol.com; dkim=neutral (no sig)
>>> >> Received: from 64.12.143.99 (EHLO imo-m11.mail.aol.com)
>>> >> (64.12.143.99) by mta129.mail.re1.yahoo.com with SMTP; Tue, 10 Feb
>>> >> 2009
>>> >> 08:28:24 -0800
>>> >> Received: from by imo-m11.mx.aol.com
>>> >> (mail_out_v39.1.) id r.c07.546a3fdd (14457) for
>>> >> >;
>>> >> Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:28:10 -0500 (EST)
>>> >> From:
>>> >> Add sender to Contacts
>>> >> Message-ID: >
>>> >> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:25:52 EST
>>> >> Subject: Eat me!
>>> >> To:
>>> >> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>> >> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>>> >> boundary="-----------------------------1234283151"
>>> >> Content-Length: 3337
>>> >>
>>> >> Compact Headers
>>> >> "cybercat" > wrote in message
>>> >> >...
>>> >>>
>>> >>> "Gregory Morrow" > wrote
>>> >>> > All peeps have to do if they don't want to read him is to killfile
>>> >>> > him,
>>> >>> > it's
>>> >>> > as simple as that.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> The reason I like Usenet is because I like uncensored exchange.
>>> >>>> Killfiles
>>> >>>> work fine for me. That said, I like to see assholes inconvenienced,
>> so
>>> >>>> I am
>>> >>>> cackling gleefully over Google booting Sheldon. He's too stupid to
>> set
>>> >>>> up a
>>> >>>> proxy account, so I guess he's stuck for a while.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>>What a bunch of dumb douchebags... I forgot ten times more than any
>>> >>>of
>>> >>>yoose imbeciles know about how to set up proxy >accounts.
>>> >>
>>> >>>Eat me! LOL
>>> >>
>>> >> So. no, Sheldon has no ****ing idea how to post to Usenet now.
>>> >
>>> > That's is funny.
>>> >
>>> > Posting private email makes you a damn damnsel leper.
>>>
>>> Excellent. Perhaps you and others will refrain from addressing me
>> privately
>>> AND publically. Asshole.
>>
>>
>> "OH, the DRAMA...!!!"
>>
>> I'm dyin' laffin' over by here...
>>
>
> so I enjoy puffing my fur out and hissing every now and then.
>
> I think it is hilarious that Sheldon still has not figured out how to
> post.
>
And you know that, how... yoose wouldn't wanna hafta fellate dem woids...
pubicly!

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:07:44 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:

> Horry wrote:
>
>> He'd only need to use a proxy if Google decided to ban his IP address
>> (which is unlikely) -- and that's assuming he has a permanent static IP
>> (which is also unlikely).
>
> BTW: You're referring to an anonymous proxy. I'm not sure you can
> daisy-chain proxies in Sheldon's (AOL's) case.

Yes, I know (which is why I added the caveat "[i]n the sense the word is
currently being used" in my reply to sf's question).

Or, at least, I *assumed* everyone else was referring to anonymous
proxies. Suggestions that Sheldon use a transparent proxy would make
even less sense than a suggestion that he use an anon. proxy.

Proxies are completely irrelevant to Sheldon's predicament.

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:47:28 GMT, "l, not -l" > wrote:

>
>On 10-Feb-2009, "cybercat" > wrote:
>
>> That amounts to still using AOL. When did the general IQ of this group
>> dive
>> into the toilet?
>
>OMG, you are so right, how could I have missed that? It never occurred to
>me that using AOL mail would be any worse than, oh, say using Yahoo mail.
>So the hierarchy of email account pussyness is what? Aol, gmail, hotmail,
>yahoo, mailinator, juno; is that the right order?
>
>You make Sheldon look good.

Is your list from best to worst or worst to best? I can't tell.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:20:19 -0500, "cybercat" >
wrote:

>I am so sorry, but the fact is, AOL was designed for idiots and STILL has
>the most ridiculous interface of all email providers/ISPs. Your aol address
>tells people exactly what you are. Stick with it. Nothing wrong with truth
>in advertising.

AOL hasn't provided news group access in a long time (years?). I
can't imagine why anyone cares who uses AOL or not.... other than for
flogging purposes.

I think if you can wade your way through all that peripheral stuff,
you're a whole lot better able to focus than I am and you're a lot
more tolerant of visual clutter!

I've tried to help my neighbor with AOL email in the past and I've
been floored by how much *crap* they enclose the actual text window in
(with no option to close the surrounding frames). The working window
is maybe 6 inches across, at best. It drives me nuts! I always ask
her why she insists on using AOL, but it's one of those "I know this
and I don't know that" kind of things. I find nothing foolproof about
AOL, but you go with what you know. If it was my ISP, I'd be annoyed
to the point that I wouldn't use it... but I don't use AOL. Moot
point.

Additionally, I've never heard anyone say they were switching *to*
AOL.... but I can certainly understand it when people say they are
switching "from" AOL. My only advocation about "switching" to AOL
isn't about switching ISPs, it's about switching to an AOL style email
delivery system. UGH.

:/




--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:56:30 GMT, blake murphy
> wrote:

>i'd prefer to look on the bright side and assume he committed suicide. or
>maybe his six cats mauled him to death.

Don't ASSume. Considering his age, there are other things that could
have kept him from posting recently.

<suppositions deleted>


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:11:16 -0800, sf > wrote:

>On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:20:19 -0500, "cybercat" >
>wrote:
>
>>I am so sorry, but the fact is, AOL was designed for idiots and STILL has
>>the most ridiculous interface of all email providers/ISPs. Your aol address
>>tells people exactly what you are. Stick with it. Nothing wrong with truth
>>in advertising.
>
>AOL hasn't provided news group access in a long time (years?). I
>can't imagine why anyone cares who uses AOL or not.... other than for
>flogging purposes.
>
>I think if you can wade your way through all that peripheral stuff,
>you're a whole lot better able to focus than I am and you're a lot
>more tolerant of visual clutter!
>
>I've tried to help my neighbor with AOL email in the past and I've
>been floored by how much *crap* they enclose the actual text window in
>(with no option to close the surrounding frames). The working window
>is maybe 6 inches across, at best. It drives me nuts! I always ask
>her why she insists on using AOL, but it's one of those "I know this
>and I don't know that" kind of things. I find nothing foolproof about
>AOL, but you go with what you know. If it was my ISP, I'd be annoyed
>to the point that I wouldn't use it... but I don't use AOL. Moot
>point.
>
>Additionally, I've never heard anyone say they were switching *to*
>AOL.... but I can certainly understand it when people say they are
>switching "from" AOL. My only advocation about "switching" to AOL
>isn't about switching ISPs, it's about switching to an AOL style email
>delivery system. UGH.

AOL was like training wheels for newbies in the 90's. Anyone who used
it for more than a year must have been pretty silly. I used it back
then until I could figure out what the hell was going on and then got
a real ISP and reformatted the machine to get all the crap off.
Everything about AOL sucked.

Lou

"Lou Decruss" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:11:16 -0800, sf > wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:20:19 -0500, "cybercat" >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>I am so sorry, but the fact is, AOL was designed for idiots and STILL has
>>>the most ridiculous interface of all email providers/ISPs. Your aol
>>>address
>>>tells people exactly what you are. Stick with it. Nothing wrong with
>>>truth
>>>in advertising.
>>
>>AOL hasn't provided news group access in a long time (years?). I
>>can't imagine why anyone cares who uses AOL or not.... other than for
>>flogging purposes.
>>
>>I think if you can wade your way through all that peripheral stuff,
>>you're a whole lot better able to focus than I am and you're a lot
>>more tolerant of visual clutter!
>>
>>I've tried to help my neighbor with AOL email in the past and I've
>>been floored by how much *crap* they enclose the actual text window in
>>(with no option to close the surrounding frames). The working window
>>is maybe 6 inches across, at best. It drives me nuts! I always ask
>>her why she insists on using AOL, but it's one of those "I know this
>>and I don't know that" kind of things. I find nothing foolproof about
>>AOL, but you go with what you know. If it was my ISP, I'd be annoyed
>>to the point that I wouldn't use it... but I don't use AOL. Moot
>>point.
>>
>>Additionally, I've never heard anyone say they were switching *to*
>>AOL.... but I can certainly understand it when people say they are
>>switching "from" AOL. My only advocation about "switching" to AOL
>>isn't about switching ISPs, it's about switching to an AOL style email
>>delivery system. UGH.
>
> AOL was like training wheels for newbies in the 90's. Anyone who used
> it for more than a year must have been pretty silly. I used it back
> then until I could figure out what the hell was going on and then got
> a real ISP and reformatted the machine to get all the crap off.
> Everything about AOL sucked.

Horseshit! The only thing about AOL that sucked was that originally when
there was only dial-up it cost more, so yoose cheap *******s cried sour
grapes. Now that it's free with any broad band ISP many of the earlier AOL
detractors have an AOL account that they won't ever admit to. Unfortunately
now that it's free AOL has pared back drastically so it hasn't anywhere near
as much content. So knock off the horseshit, you and yoose ilk simply have
short arm disease, arms too short to reach yoose wallets. Never ceases to
amaze how many cry something sucks when in actuality they can't afford it.
... you poor *******! LOL

Boney Maroney

On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:42:41 GMT, "brooklyn1"
> wrote:

>> AOL was like training wheels for newbies in the 90's. Anyone who used
>> it for more than a year must have been pretty silly. I used it back
>> then until I could figure out what the hell was going on and then got
>> a real ISP and reformatted the machine to get all the crap off.
>> Everything about AOL sucked.
>
>Horseshit! The only thing about AOL that sucked was that originally when
>there was only dial-up it cost more, so yoose cheap *******s cried sour
>grapes. Now that it's free with any broad band ISP many of the earlier AOL
>detractors have an AOL account that they won't ever admit to. Unfortunately
>now that it's free AOL has pared back drastically so it hasn't anywhere near
>as much content. So knock off the horseshit, you and yoose ilk simply have
>short arm disease, arms too short to reach yoose wallets. Never ceases to
>amaze how many cry something sucks when in actuality they can't afford it.
>.. you poor *******! LOL
>
>Boney Maroney

Thanks for taking the bait sheldon. It doesn't matter what name you
use you're still an asshole.

Lou

"cybercat" > wrote in message
...
>
> "l, not -l" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> On 10-Feb-2009, "cybercat" > wrote:
>>
>>> That amounts to still using AOL. When did the general IQ of this group
>>> dive
>>> into the toilet?
>>
>> OMG, you are so right, how could I have missed that? It never occurred
>> to
>> me that using AOL mail would be any worse than, oh, say using Yahoo mail.
>> So the hierarchy of email account pussyness is what? Aol, gmail,
>> hotmail,
>> yahoo, mailinator, juno; is that the right order?
>>
>> You make Sheldon look good.
>> --
>
> I am so sorry, but the fact is, AOL was designed for idiots and STILL has
> the most ridiculous interface of all email providers/ISPs. Your aol
> address tells people exactly what you are. Stick with it. Nothing wrong
> with truth in advertising.
>

I remember getting a free AOL account years ago. One of their newsgroups was
described as 'Cute Puffy Teddy Bear pictures'. It was an x-rated site called
Puffies <defer to your imagination here>. When I notified them of their
stupidity, they offered a free month. I cancelled the account.

On Feb 11, 1:33�pm, "cybercat" > wrote:
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > cybercat wrote:
>
> >> Posting via proxy is the fastest way to return to posting via Google
> >> without even thinking about the issues you bring up. Genius.
>
> > Sheldon is already posting VIA AOL's regional proxies.
>
> > Google doesn't ban IP addresses anyway. �Do you have proof otherwise?
>
> I have seen no proof that Sheldon posts via AOL. He just has an AOL email
> address.

I don't think AOL has newsgroups any more, so I post through Google
groups. I don't mind it, If I don't like something I don't read it. I
am not a moron, tho I am not especially computer savy. Have used AOL
for a long time and for what I do online it suffices. It isn't life.
Did I cover it all ? I am not a moron. I have no problem with A,OL or
Google groups,oh, I am not cheap either.

Rosie

On Feb 12, 12:59�pm, "Kswck" > wrote:
> "cybercat" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "l, not -l" > wrote in message
> . ..
>
> >> On 10-Feb-2009, "cybercat" > wrote:
>
> >>> That amounts to still using AOL. When did the general IQ of this group
> >>> dive
> >>> into the toilet?
>
> >> OMG, you are so right, how could I have missed that? �It never occurred
> >> to
> >> me that using AOL mail would be any worse than, oh, say using Yahoo mail.
> >> So the hierarchy of email account pussyness is what? �Aol, gmail,
> >> hotmail,
> >> yahoo, mailinator, juno; is that the right order?
>
> >> You make Sheldon look good.
> >> --
>
> > I am so sorry, but the fact is, AOL was designed for idiots and STILL has
> > the most ridiculous interface of all email providers/ISPs. Your aol
> > address tells people exactly what you are. Stick with it. Nothing wrong
> > with truth in advertising.
>
> I remember getting a free AOL account years ago. One of their newsgroups was
> described as 'Cute Puffy Teddy Bear pictures'. It was an x-rated site called
> Puffies <defer to your imagination here>. When I notified them of their
> stupidity, they offered a free month. I cancelled the account.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Cute puffy Teddy bears... do you collect them?? LOL

Rosie

"Lou Decruss" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:42:41 GMT, "brooklyn1"
> > wrote:
>
>>> AOL was like training wheels for newbies in the 90's. Anyone who used
>>> it for more than a year must have been pretty silly. I used it back
>>> then until I could figure out what the hell was going on and then got
>>> a real ISP and reformatted the machine to get all the crap off.
>>> Everything about AOL sucked.
>>
>>Horseshit! The only thing about AOL that sucked was that originally when
>>there was only dial-up it cost more, so yoose cheap *******s cried sour
>>grapes. Now that it's free with any broad band ISP many of the earlier
>>AOL
>>detractors have an AOL account that they won't ever admit to.
>>Unfortunately
>>now that it's free AOL has pared back drastically so it hasn't anywhere
>>near
>>as much content. So knock off the horseshit, you and yoose ilk simply
>>have
>>short arm disease, arms too short to reach yoose wallets. Never ceases to
>>amaze how many cry something sucks when in actuality they can't afford it.
>>.. you poor *******! LOL
>>
>>Boney Maroney
>
> Thanks for taking the bait sheldon. It doesn't matter what name you
> use you're still an asshole.
>
> Lou

What phukin' bait, like I really tried to hide, you luser moron. And at
least I ain't a CHEAP whiny asshole like you, you nameless COWARD... still
hiding in the filthy crack of yo momma's hoe ass. LOL

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:04:29 GMT, "brooklyn1"
> wrote:

>Posting private email makes you a damn damnsel leper.

AHHHHHH-hahahahahahaha!

"brooklyn1" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Lou Decruss" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:42:41 GMT, "brooklyn1"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>> AOL was like training wheels for newbies in the 90's. Anyone who used
>>>> it for more than a year must have been pretty silly. I used it back
>>>> then until I could figure out what the hell was going on and then got
>>>> a real ISP and reformatted the machine to get all the crap off.
>>>> Everything about AOL sucked.
>>>
>>>Horseshit! The only thing about AOL that sucked was that originally when
>>>there was only dial-up it cost more, so yoose cheap *******s cried sour
>>>grapes. Now that it's free with any broad band ISP many of the earlier
>>>AOL
>>>detractors have an AOL account that they won't ever admit to.
>>>Unfortunately
>>>now that it's free AOL has pared back drastically so it hasn't anywhere
>>>near
>>>as much content. So knock off the horseshit, you and yoose ilk simply
>>>have
>>>short arm disease, arms too short to reach yoose wallets. Never ceases
>>>to
>>>amaze how many cry something sucks when in actuality they can't afford
>>>it.
>>>.. you poor *******! LOL
>>>
>>>Boney Maroney
>>
>> Thanks for taking the bait sheldon. It doesn't matter what name you
>> use you're still an asshole.
>>
>> Lou
>
> What phukin' bait, like I really tried to hide, you luser moron. And at
> least I ain't a CHEAP whiny asshole like you, you nameless COWARD... still
> hiding in the filthy crack of yo momma's hoe ass. LOL
>
Now we're cooking!

"rosie" > wrote in message
...
On Feb 11, 1:33?pm, "cybercat" > wrote:
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > cybercat wrote:
>
> >> Posting via proxy is the fastest way to return to posting via Google
> >> without even thinking about the issues you bring up. Genius.
>
> > Sheldon is already posting VIA AOL's regional proxies.
>
> > Google doesn't ban IP addresses anyway. ?Do you have proof otherwise?
>
> I have seen no proof that Sheldon posts via AOL. He just has an AOL email
> address.

>I don't think AOL has newsgroups any more, so I post through Google
>groups. I don't mind it, If I don't like something I don't read it. I
>am not a moron, tho I am not especially computer savy. Have used AOL
>for a long time and for what I do online it suffices. It isn't life.
>Did I cover it all ? I am not a moron. I have no problem with A,OL or
?Google groups,oh, I am not cheap either.

All I said was, Sheldon has an AOL address but does not post through AOL. He
posts through verizon, at least until that account gets yanked. Then he's
going to need a new way to connect to the Internet. (Based upon the
assumption that since getting TOSED by GG is damned near impossible, getting
TOSED by Verizon will be a lot easier for whichever netcop is after him.

"Damsel in dis Dress" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:04:29 GMT, "brooklyn1"
> > wrote:
>
>>Posting private email makes you a damn damnsel leper.
>
> AHHHHHH-hahahahahahaha!

I thought that was pretty funny too.

"rosie" > wrote in message
...
On Feb 12, 12:59?pm, "Kswck" > wrote:
> "cybercat" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "l, not -l" > wrote in message
> . ..
>
> >> On 10-Feb-2009, "cybercat" > wrote:
>
> >>> That amounts to still using AOL. When did the general IQ of this group
> >>> dive
> >>> into the toilet?
>
> >> OMG, you are so right, how could I have missed that? ?It never occurred
> >> to
> >> me that using AOL mail would be any worse than, oh, say using Yahoo
> >> mail.
> >> So the hierarchy of email account pussyness is what? ?Aol, gmail,
> >> hotmail,
> >> yahoo, mailinator, juno; is that the right order?
>
> >> You make Sheldon look good.
> >> --
>
> > I am so sorry, but the fact is, AOL was designed for idiots and STILL
> > has
> > the most ridiculous interface of all email providers/ISPs. Your aol
> > address tells people exactly what you are. Stick with it. Nothing wrong
> > with truth in advertising.
>
> I remember getting a free AOL account years ago. One of their newsgroups
> was
> described as 'Cute Puffy Teddy Bear pictures'. It was an x-rated site
> called
> Puffies <defer to your imagination here>. When I notified them of their
> stupidity, they offered a free month. I cancelled the account.- Hide
> quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

> Cute puffy Teddy bears... do you collect them?? LOL

You really don't seem like the type to still have an AOL address, Rosie.

brooklyn1 wrote:

> And you know that, how... yoose wouldn't wanna hafta fellate dem woids...
> pubicly!

Yeah - I figured you were Sheldon. Posting from Plattsburgh, NY.

Welcome back, Sheldon.

BTW: I'm telling Gooogle Groups your new nick.

-sw

On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:32:42 -0600, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>brooklyn1 wrote:
>
>> And you know that, how... yoose wouldn't wanna hafta fellate dem woids...
>> pubicly!
>
>Yeah - I figured you were Sheldon. Posting from Plattsburgh, NY.
>
>Welcome back, Sheldon.
>
>BTW: I'm telling Gooogle Groups your new nick.

You forgot the, "Na-na-na-boo-boo!" part, Steve-O!

Carol

--
Change "invalid" to JamesBond's agent number to reply.

cybercat wrote:
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>> cybercat wrote:
>>
>>> Posting via proxy is the fastest way to return to posting via Google
>>> without even thinking about the issues you bring up. Genius.
>> Sheldon is already posting VIA AOL's regional proxies.
>>
>> Google doesn't ban IP addresses anyway. Do you have proof otherwise?
>>
>
> I have seen no proof that Sheldon posts via AOL. He just has an AOL email
> address.

Yes - he posts VIA AOL. Or at least used to. Now he posts VIA Verizon.

-sw

brooklyn1 wrote:

> Horseshit! The only thing about AOL that sucked was that originally when
> there was only dial-up it cost more, so yoose cheap *******s cried sour
> grapes. Now that it's free with any broad band ISP many of the earlier AOL
> detractors have an AOL account that they won't ever admit to. Unfortunately
> now that it's free AOL has pared back drastically so it hasn't anywhere near
> as much content. So knock off the horseshit, you and yoose ilk simply have
> short arm disease, arms too short to reach yoose wallets. Never ceases to
> amaze how many cry something sucks when in actuality they can't afford it.
> .. you poor *******! LOL

No question about it now.

-sw

brooklyn1 wrote:

> What phukin' bait, like I really tried to hide, you luser moron. And at
> least I ain't a CHEAP whiny asshole like you, you nameless COWARD... still
> hiding in the filthy crack of yo momma's hoe ass. LOL

Nope. It won't take Verizon long to boot you at all.

So what *are* your other options for broadband out there in th the sticks,
Sheldon? You'd better start shopping now, or else you can watch that
$4,000 POS computer you bought collect dust.

-sw

On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:53:29 -0600, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>brooklyn1 wrote:
>
>> Horseshit! The only thing about AOL that sucked was that originally when
>> there was only dial-up it cost more, so yoose cheap *******s cried sour
>> grapes. Now that it's free with any broad band ISP many of the earlier AOL
>> detractors have an AOL account that they won't ever admit to. Unfortunately
>> now that it's free AOL has pared back drastically so it hasn't anywhere near
>> as much content. So knock off the horseshit, you and yoose ilk simply have
>> short arm disease, arms too short to reach yoose wallets. Never ceases to
>> amaze how many cry something sucks when in actuality they can't afford it.
>> .. you poor *******! LOL
>
>No question about it now.

Told ya!

Carol

--
Change "invalid" to JamesBond's agent number to reply.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> cybercat wrote:
>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> cybercat wrote:
>>>
>>>> Posting via proxy is the fastest way to return to posting via Google
>>>> without even thinking about the issues you bring up. Genius.
>>> Sheldon is already posting VIA AOL's regional proxies.
>>>
>>> Google doesn't ban IP addresses anyway. Do you have proof otherwise?
>>>
>>
>> I have seen no proof that Sheldon posts via AOL. He just has an AOL email
>> address.
>
> Yes - he posts VIA AOL. Or at least used to. Now he posts VIA Verizon.
>
Why would he have stopped posting via AOL if he was, Steve?

"Sqwertz" swertz@clueless spewed:
>
> It won't take Verizon long to boot you at all.

*_It won't take long at all for Verizon to boot you._*

You mangle the English language like a dumb WOP... I just know you failed
your GED.

> So what *are* your other options for broadband out there in th the sticks,
> Sheldon?

Oh, there's Road Runner, Cable, more than a few satellite dish outfits, and
a host of other phone companys offering DSL. Located in the main corridor
between NYC and the NYS Capitol I wouldn't quite refer to the Hudson Valley
as the sticks... there are more broad band options available here than in
the entire state of Texass, and with each adjacent state thrown in, even all
of Mejico. Most TexMexans access the net with paper cups and strring. LOL

Google lost nothing, I didn't buy any service from them.
But I pay big bucks to my ISPs. Anyone who actually knows how to read
headers would know that I changed ISPs often over the years and that I used
Google for a rather short time. Between cable for my TVs (usta access the
net with cable just two years ago, still can) and Verizon for land
lines/Blackberry/DSL I spend close to $500/mo... for six grand a year
they'll suck my peepee, they ain't cancelling my account for a few blue
woids on some furiner's say-so.

There are few at rfc with a lower IQ than the sqwartz, and none with less
common sense... even with all his phony geeky mouthing off he needed a slew
of comparative newbies to clue him in before he caught on... and while he
was running off at the mouth with his thumb up his dwarf butt claiming I
wouldn't know how to access usenet there I was all along, I missed maybe an
hour. What the sqwartz actually knows about computers would fit on the head
of a pin... and what he knows about cooking, only what he remembers to
regurgitate from moi. Later for you, dwarf.

Boney Maroney

"brooklyn1" > wrote in message
...
> "Sqwertz" swertz@clueless spewed:
>>
>> It won't take Verizon long to boot you at all.
>
> *_It won't take long at all for Verizon to boot you._*
>
> You mangle the English language like a dumb WOP... I just know you failed
> your GED.
>
>> So what *are* your other options for broadband out there in th the
>> sticks, Sheldon?
>
> Oh, there's Road Runner, Cable, more than a few satellite dish outfits,
> and a host of other phone companys offering DSL. Located in the main
> corridor between NYC and the NYS Capitol I wouldn't quite refer to the
> Hudson Valley as the sticks... there are more broad band options available
> here than in the entire state of Texass, and with each adjacent state
> thrown in, even all of Mejico. Most TexMexans access the net with paper
> cups and strring. LOL
>
> Google lost nothing, I didn't buy any service from them.
> But I pay big bucks to my ISPs. Anyone who actually knows how to read
> headers would know that I changed ISPs often over the years and that I
> used Google for a rather short time. Between cable for my TVs (usta
> access the net with cable just two years ago, still can) and Verizon for
> land lines/Blackberry/DSL I spend close to $500/mo... for six grand a year
> they'll suck my peepee, they ain't cancelling my account for a few blue
> woids on some furiner's say-so.
>
> There are few at rfc with a lower IQ than the sqwartz, and none with less
> common sense... even with all his phony geeky mouthing off he needed a
> slew of comparative newbies to clue him in before he caught on... and
> while he was running off at the mouth with his thumb up his dwarf butt
> claiming I wouldn't know how to access usenet there I was all along, I
> missed maybe an hour. What the sqwartz actually knows about computers
> would fit on the head of a pin... and what he knows about cooking, only
> what he remembers to regurgitate from moi. Later for you, dwarf.
>
> Boney Maroney

Oh no. Is this guy Sheldon? or are we into a whole Lucas episode?

Cripes this is no ng for the mentally unsound.

Or is it???

--
http://www.gillsmith999.plus.com/

On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:19:42 -0500, "cybercat" >
wrote:

>You really don't seem like the type to still have an AOL address, Rosie.
>
AOL addresses are free to former users. Maybe it's her throw away
account.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

cybercat > wrote:

> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>> cybercat wrote:
>>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> cybercat wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Posting via proxy is the fastest way to return to posting via Google
>>>>> without even thinking about the issues you bring up. Genius.
>>>> Sheldon is already posting VIA AOL's regional proxies.
>>>>
>>>> Google doesn't ban IP addresses anyway. Do you have proof otherwise?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I have seen no proof that Sheldon posts via AOL. He just has an AOL email
>>> address.
>>
>> Yes - he posts VIA AOL. Or at least used to. Now he posts VIA Verizon.
>>
> Why would he have stopped posting via AOL if he was, Steve?

Because he's paranoid.

It's easy enough for you to go back 4+ weeks and look up the IP
addresses of his posts. It's a well-known fact for the last 15
years that he used AOL.

Now run along like a like a good 'lil doggie.

-sw

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> cybercat > wrote:
>
>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> cybercat wrote:
>>>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> cybercat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Posting via proxy is the fastest way to return to posting via Google
>>>>>> without even thinking about the issues you bring up. Genius.
>>>>> Sheldon is already posting VIA AOL's regional proxies.
>>>>>
>>>>> Google doesn't ban IP addresses anyway. Do you have proof otherwise?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have seen no proof that Sheldon posts via AOL. He just has an AOL
>>>> email
>>>> address.
>>>
>>> Yes - he posts VIA AOL. Or at least used to. Now he posts VIA Verizon.
>>>
>> Why would he have stopped posting via AOL if he was, Steve?
>
> Because he's paranoid.

Stupid answer noted.

>
> It's easy enough for you to go back 4+ weeks and look up the IP
> addresses of his posts. It's a well-known fact for the last 15
> years that he used AOL.
>
> Now run along like a like a good 'lil doggie.
>

Lame attempt at condescendion noted and snorted at.