The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that he
knows how to post to Usenet using proxies. Seems like he'd do it via
Usenet, doesn't it? He still has his AOL account, too. For email, anyway.
Who the hell still uses AOL? He posts in a pretty green font, too. What a
pussy.

Eat me!
Tuesday, February 10, 2009 11:25 AM
From Tue Feb 10 08:25:52 2009
Return-Path: >
Authentication-Results: mta129.mail.re1.yahoo.com from=aol.com;
domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=aol.com; dkim=neutral (no sig)
Received: from 64.12.143.99 (EHLO imo-m11.mail.aol.com)
(64.12.143.99) by mta129.mail.re1.yahoo.com with SMTP; Tue, 10 Feb 2009
08:28:24 -0800
Received: from by imo-m11.mx.aol.com
(mail_out_v39.1.) id r.c07.546a3fdd (14457) for >; Tue,
10 Feb 2009 11:28:10 -0500 (EST)
From:
Add sender to Contacts
Message-ID: >
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:25:52 EST
Subject: Eat me!
To:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="-----------------------------1234283151"
Content-Length: 3337

Compact Headers
"cybercat" > wrote in message
>...
>
> "Gregory Morrow" > wrote
> > All peeps have to do if they don't want to read him is to killfile him,
> > it's
> > as simple as that.
>
>> The reason I like Usenet is because I like uncensored exchange. Killfiles
>> work fine for me. That said, I like to see assholes inconvenienced, so I
>> am
>> cackling gleefully over Google booting Sheldon. He's too stupid to set up
>> a
>> proxy account, so I guess he's stuck for a while.


>What a bunch of dumb douchebags... I forgot ten times more than any of
>yoose imbeciles know about how to set up proxy >accounts.

>Eat me! LOL

So. no, Sheldon has no ****ing idea how to post to Usenet now.

>"cybercat" > wrote in message
...
> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that he
> knows how to post to Usenet using proxies. *******Seems like he'd do it
> via Usenet, doesn't it?******* He still has his AOL account, too. For
> email, anyway. Who the hell still uses AOL? He posts in a pretty green
> font, too. What a pussy.
>
> Eat me!
> Tuesday, February 10, 2009 11:25 AM
> From Tue Feb 10 08:25:52 2009
> Return-Path: >
> Authentication-Results: mta129.mail.re1.yahoo.com from=aol.com;
> domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=aol.com; dkim=neutral (no sig)
> Received: from 64.12.143.99 (EHLO imo-m11.mail.aol.com)
> (64.12.143.99) by mta129.mail.re1.yahoo.com with SMTP; Tue, 10 Feb 2009
> 08:28:24 -0800
> Received: from by imo-m11.mx.aol.com
> (mail_out_v39.1.) id r.c07.546a3fdd (14457) for >;
> Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:28:10 -0500 (EST)
> From:
> Add sender to Contacts
> Message-ID: >
> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:25:52 EST
> Subject: Eat me!
> To:
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="-----------------------------1234283151"
> Content-Length: 3337
>
> Compact Headers
> "cybercat" > wrote in message
> >...
>>
>> "Gregory Morrow" > wrote
>> > All peeps have to do if they don't want to read him is to killfile him,
>> > it's
>> > as simple as that.
>>
>>> The reason I like Usenet is because I like uncensored exchange.
>>> Killfiles
>>> work fine for me. That said, I like to see assholes inconvenienced, so I
>>> am
>>> cackling gleefully over Google booting Sheldon. He's too stupid to set
>>> up a
>>> proxy account, so I guess he's stuck for a while.
>
>
>>What a bunch of dumb douchebags... ******I forgot ten times more than any
>>of yoose imbeciles know about how to set up proxy >accounts.******

Cut n Paste

>"cybercat" > wrote in message
...
> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that he
> knows how to post to Usenet using proxies. *******Seems like he'd do it
> via Usenet, doesn't it?*******

Priceless!

KW


>
>>Eat me! LOL
>
> So. no, Sheldon has no ****ing idea how to post to Usenet now.
>

"Michael "Dog3"" > wrote in message
...
> "KW" >
> : in rec.food.cooking
>
>>
>>>"cybercat" > posts private email snipped for space>
>
>
>>
>> Priceless!
>>
>> KW
>
> Yes it is. Just when you thought cybercat couldn't sink any lower she
> goes
> and surprises us by diving into the shallow end of the gene pool.
>

Nows this is funny. Or it would be if it were not so illiterate.

"Michael "Dog3"" > wrote in message
...
> "KW" >
> : in rec.food.cooking
>
>>
>>>"cybercat" > posts private email snipped for space>
>
>
>>
>> Priceless!
>>
>> KW
>
> Yes it is. Just when you thought cybercat couldn't sink any lower she
> goes
> and surprises us by diving into the shallow end of the gene pool.
>
> Michael
>
>

Do you hear yourself, you weasely-faced wizened old dickhead? Sheldon sent
me an unsolicited email entitled "Eat Me." And I've somehow taken the low
road by posting it? Just as you proved with the insipid TPB, you need to
choose your battles.

"cybertoxic" wrote:
> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that he
> knows how to post to Usenet using proxies. Seems like he'd do it via
> Usenet, doesn't it? He still has his AOL account, too. For email, anyway.
> Who the hell still uses AOL? He posts in a pretty green font, too. What a
> pussy.
>
> Eat me!
> Tuesday, February 10, 2009 11:25 AM
> From Tue Feb 10 08:25:52 2009
> Return-Path: >
> Authentication-Results: mta129.mail.re1.yahoo.com from=aol.com;
> domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=aol.com; dkim=neutral (no sig)
> Received: from 64.12.143.99 (EHLO imo-m11.mail.aol.com)
> (64.12.143.99) by mta129.mail.re1.yahoo.com with SMTP; Tue, 10 Feb 2009
> 08:28:24 -0800
> Received: from by imo-m11.mx.aol.com
> (mail_out_v39.1.) id r.c07.546a3fdd (14457) for >;
> Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:28:10 -0500 (EST)
> From:
> Add sender to Contacts
> Message-ID: >
> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:25:52 EST
> Subject: Eat me!
> To:
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="-----------------------------1234283151"
> Content-Length: 3337
>
> Compact Headers
> "cybercat" > wrote in message
> >...
>>
>> "Gregory Morrow" > wrote
>> > All peeps have to do if they don't want to read him is to killfile him,
>> > it's
>> > as simple as that.
>>
>>> The reason I like Usenet is because I like uncensored exchange.
>>> Killfiles
>>> work fine for me. That said, I like to see assholes inconvenienced, so I
>>> am
>>> cackling gleefully over Google booting Sheldon. He's too stupid to set
>>> up a
>>> proxy account, so I guess he's stuck for a while.
>
>
>>What a bunch of dumb douchebags... I forgot ten times more than any of
>>yoose imbeciles know about how to set up proxy >accounts.
>
>>Eat me! LOL
>
> So. no, Sheldon has no ****ing idea how to post to Usenet now.

That's is funny.

Posting private email makes you a damn damnsel leper.

"brooklyn1" > wrote in message
...
>
> "cybertoxic" wrote:
>> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that he
>> knows how to post to Usenet using proxies. Seems like he'd do it via
>> Usenet, doesn't it? He still has his AOL account, too. For email, anyway.
>> Who the hell still uses AOL? He posts in a pretty green font, too. What a
>> pussy.
>>
>> Eat me!
>> Tuesday, February 10, 2009 11:25 AM
>> From Tue Feb 10 08:25:52 2009
>> Return-Path: >
>> Authentication-Results: mta129.mail.re1.yahoo.com from=aol.com;
>> domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=aol.com; dkim=neutral (no sig)
>> Received: from 64.12.143.99 (EHLO imo-m11.mail.aol.com)
>> (64.12.143.99) by mta129.mail.re1.yahoo.com with SMTP; Tue, 10 Feb 2009
>> 08:28:24 -0800
>> Received: from by imo-m11.mx.aol.com
>> (mail_out_v39.1.) id r.c07.546a3fdd (14457) for >;
>> Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:28:10 -0500 (EST)
>> From:
>> Add sender to Contacts
>> Message-ID: >
>> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:25:52 EST
>> Subject: Eat me!
>> To:
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>> boundary="-----------------------------1234283151"
>> Content-Length: 3337
>>
>> Compact Headers
>> "cybercat" > wrote in message
>> >...
>>>
>>> "Gregory Morrow" > wrote
>>> > All peeps have to do if they don't want to read him is to killfile
>>> > him,
>>> > it's
>>> > as simple as that.
>>>
>>>> The reason I like Usenet is because I like uncensored exchange.
>>>> Killfiles
>>>> work fine for me. That said, I like to see assholes inconvenienced, so
>>>> I am
>>>> cackling gleefully over Google booting Sheldon. He's too stupid to set
>>>> up a
>>>> proxy account, so I guess he's stuck for a while.
>>
>>
>>>What a bunch of dumb douchebags... I forgot ten times more than any of
>>>yoose imbeciles know about how to set up proxy >accounts.
>>
>>>Eat me! LOL
>>
>> So. no, Sheldon has no ****ing idea how to post to Usenet now.
>
> That's is funny.
>
> Posting private email makes you a damn damnsel leper.

Excellent. Perhaps you and others will refrain from addressing me privately
AND publically. Asshole.

cybercat wrote:

> "brooklyn1" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "cybertoxic" wrote:
> >> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that
he
> >> knows how to post to Usenet using proxies. Seems like he'd do it via
> >> Usenet, doesn't it? He still has his AOL account, too. For email,
anyway.
> >> Who the hell still uses AOL? He posts in a pretty green font, too. What
a
> >> pussy.
> >>
> >> Eat me!
> >> Tuesday, February 10, 2009 11:25 AM
> >> From Tue Feb 10 08:25:52 2009
> >> Return-Path: >
> >> Authentication-Results: mta129.mail.re1.yahoo.com from=aol.com;
> >> domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=aol.com; dkim=neutral (no sig)
> >> Received: from 64.12.143.99 (EHLO imo-m11.mail.aol.com)
> >> (64.12.143.99) by mta129.mail.re1.yahoo.com with SMTP; Tue, 10 Feb 2009
> >> 08:28:24 -0800
> >> Received: from by imo-m11.mx.aol.com
> >> (mail_out_v39.1.) id r.c07.546a3fdd (14457) for >;
> >> Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:28:10 -0500 (EST)
> >> From:
> >> Add sender to Contacts
> >> Message-ID: >
> >> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:25:52 EST
> >> Subject: Eat me!
> >> To:
> >> MIME-Version: 1.0
> >> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> >> boundary="-----------------------------1234283151"
> >> Content-Length: 3337
> >>
> >> Compact Headers
> >> "cybercat" > wrote in message
> >> >...
> >>>
> >>> "Gregory Morrow" > wrote
> >>> > All peeps have to do if they don't want to read him is to killfile
> >>> > him,
> >>> > it's
> >>> > as simple as that.
> >>>
> >>>> The reason I like Usenet is because I like uncensored exchange.
> >>>> Killfiles
> >>>> work fine for me. That said, I like to see assholes inconvenienced,
so
> >>>> I am
> >>>> cackling gleefully over Google booting Sheldon. He's too stupid to
set
> >>>> up a
> >>>> proxy account, so I guess he's stuck for a while.
> >>
> >>
> >>>What a bunch of dumb douchebags... I forgot ten times more than any of
> >>>yoose imbeciles know about how to set up proxy >accounts.
> >>
> >>>Eat me! LOL
> >>
> >> So. no, Sheldon has no ****ing idea how to post to Usenet now.
> >
> > That's is funny.
> >
> > Posting private email makes you a damn damnsel leper.
>
> Excellent. Perhaps you and others will refrain from addressing me
privately
> AND publically. Asshole.


"OH, the DRAMA...!!!"

I'm dyin' laffin' over by here...

;-)


--
Best
Greg

"Gregory Morrow" > wrote in message
m...
>
> cybercat wrote:
>
>> "brooklyn1" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > "cybertoxic" wrote:
>> >> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that
> he
>> >> knows how to post to Usenet using proxies. Seems like he'd do it
>> >> via
>> >> Usenet, doesn't it? He still has his AOL account, too. For email,
> anyway.
>> >> Who the hell still uses AOL? He posts in a pretty green font, too.
>> >> What
> a
>> >> pussy.
>> >>
>> >> Eat me!
>> >> Tuesday, February 10, 2009 11:25 AM
>> >> From Tue Feb 10 08:25:52 2009
>> >> Return-Path: >
>> >> Authentication-Results: mta129.mail.re1.yahoo.com from=aol.com;
>> >> domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=aol.com; dkim=neutral (no sig)
>> >> Received: from 64.12.143.99 (EHLO imo-m11.mail.aol.com)
>> >> (64.12.143.99) by mta129.mail.re1.yahoo.com with SMTP; Tue, 10 Feb
>> >> 2009
>> >> 08:28:24 -0800
>> >> Received: from by imo-m11.mx.aol.com
>> >> (mail_out_v39.1.) id r.c07.546a3fdd (14457) for
>> >> >;
>> >> Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:28:10 -0500 (EST)
>> >> From:
>> >> Add sender to Contacts
>> >> Message-ID: >
>> >> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:25:52 EST
>> >> Subject: Eat me!
>> >> To:
>> >> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> >> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>> >> boundary="-----------------------------1234283151"
>> >> Content-Length: 3337
>> >>
>> >> Compact Headers
>> >> "cybercat" > wrote in message
>> >> >...
>> >>>
>> >>> "Gregory Morrow" > wrote
>> >>> > All peeps have to do if they don't want to read him is to killfile
>> >>> > him,
>> >>> > it's
>> >>> > as simple as that.
>> >>>
>> >>>> The reason I like Usenet is because I like uncensored exchange.
>> >>>> Killfiles
>> >>>> work fine for me. That said, I like to see assholes inconvenienced,
> so
>> >>>> I am
>> >>>> cackling gleefully over Google booting Sheldon. He's too stupid to
> set
>> >>>> up a
>> >>>> proxy account, so I guess he's stuck for a while.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>What a bunch of dumb douchebags... I forgot ten times more than any of
>> >>>yoose imbeciles know about how to set up proxy >accounts.
>> >>
>> >>>Eat me! LOL
>> >>
>> >> So. no, Sheldon has no ****ing idea how to post to Usenet now.
>> >
>> > That's is funny.
>> >
>> > Posting private email makes you a damn damnsel leper.
>>
>> Excellent. Perhaps you and others will refrain from addressing me
> privately
>> AND publically. Asshole.
>
>
> "OH, the DRAMA...!!!"
>
> I'm dyin' laffin' over by here...
>

so I enjoy puffing my fur out and hissing every now and then.

I think it is hilarious that Sheldon still has not figured out how to post.

cybercat wrote:

> "Gregory Morrow" > wrote in message
> m...
> >
> > cybercat wrote:
> >
> >> "brooklyn1" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >
> >> > "cybertoxic" wrote:
> >> >> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me
that
> > he
> >> >> knows how to post to Usenet using proxies. Seems like he'd do it
> >> >> via
> >> >> Usenet, doesn't it? He still has his AOL account, too. For email,
> > anyway.
> >> >> Who the hell still uses AOL? He posts in a pretty green font, too.
> >> >> What
> > a
> >> >> pussy.
> >> >>
> >> >> Eat me!
> >> >> Tuesday, February 10, 2009 11:25 AM
> >> >> From Tue Feb 10 08:25:52 2009
> >> >> Return-Path: >
> >> >> Authentication-Results: mta129.mail.re1.yahoo.com
from=aol.com;
> >> >> domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=aol.com; dkim=neutral (no sig)
> >> >> Received: from 64.12.143.99 (EHLO imo-m11.mail.aol.com)
> >> >> (64.12.143.99) by mta129.mail.re1.yahoo.com with SMTP; Tue, 10 Feb
> >> >> 2009
> >> >> 08:28:24 -0800
> >> >> Received: from by imo-m11.mx.aol.com
> >> >> (mail_out_v39.1.) id r.c07.546a3fdd (14457) for
> >> >> >;
> >> >> Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:28:10 -0500 (EST)
> >> >> From:
> >> >> Add sender to Contacts
> >> >> Message-ID: >
> >> >> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:25:52 EST
> >> >> Subject: Eat me!
> >> >> To:
> >> >> MIME-Version: 1.0
> >> >> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> >> >> boundary="-----------------------------1234283151"
> >> >> Content-Length: 3337
> >> >>
> >> >> Compact Headers
> >> >> "cybercat" > wrote in message
> >> >> >...
> >> >>>
> >> >>> "Gregory Morrow" > wrote
> >> >>> > All peeps have to do if they don't want to read him is to
killfile
> >> >>> > him,
> >> >>> > it's
> >> >>> > as simple as that.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> The reason I like Usenet is because I like uncensored exchange.
> >> >>>> Killfiles
> >> >>>> work fine for me. That said, I like to see assholes
inconvenienced,
> > so
> >> >>>> I am
> >> >>>> cackling gleefully over Google booting Sheldon. He's too stupid to
> > set
> >> >>>> up a
> >> >>>> proxy account, so I guess he's stuck for a while.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>>What a bunch of dumb douchebags... I forgot ten times more than any
of
> >> >>>yoose imbeciles know about how to set up proxy >accounts.
> >> >>
> >> >>>Eat me! LOL
> >> >>
> >> >> So. no, Sheldon has no ****ing idea how to post to Usenet now.
> >> >
> >> > That's is funny.
> >> >
> >> > Posting private email makes you a damn damnsel leper.
> >>
> >> Excellent. Perhaps you and others will refrain from addressing me
> > privately
> >> AND publically. Asshole.
> >
> >
> > "OH, the DRAMA...!!!"
> >
> > I'm dyin' laffin' over by here...
> >
>
> so I enjoy puffing my fur out and hissing every now and then.
>


"The sweetest kittens have the sharpest claws!" as the tagline of _Faster,
Pussycat, Kill, Kill!" goes...

^..^
0


> I think it is hilarious that Sheldon still has not figured out how to
post.
>


These may turn into the longest "Sheldon" threads yet...!!!


--
Best
Greg

"cybercat" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> so I enjoy puffing my fur out and hissing every now and then.
>
> I think it is hilarious that Sheldon still has not figured out how to
> post.
>

I think it's an absolute scream he got banned in the first place and him
still not figuring out how to post yet is just icing on the cake.

The whole thing makes being home from work sick worth it!!

Ms P

"cyberHoe" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Gregory Morrow" > wrote in message
> m...
>>
>> cybercat wrote:
>>
>>> "brooklyn1" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>> >
>>> > "cybertoxic" wrote:
>>> >> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me
>>> >> that
>> he
>>> >> knows how to post to Usenet using proxies. Seems like he'd do it
>>> >> via
>>> >> Usenet, doesn't it? He still has his AOL account, too. For email,
>> anyway.
>>> >> Who the hell still uses AOL? He posts in a pretty green font, too.
>>> >> What
>> a
>>> >> pussy.
>>> >>
>>> >> Eat me!
>>> >> Tuesday, February 10, 2009 11:25 AM
>>> >> From Tue Feb 10 08:25:52 2009
>>> >> Return-Path: >
>>> >> Authentication-Results: mta129.mail.re1.yahoo.com
>>> >> from=aol.com;
>>> >> domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=aol.com; dkim=neutral (no sig)
>>> >> Received: from 64.12.143.99 (EHLO imo-m11.mail.aol.com)
>>> >> (64.12.143.99) by mta129.mail.re1.yahoo.com with SMTP; Tue, 10 Feb
>>> >> 2009
>>> >> 08:28:24 -0800
>>> >> Received: from by imo-m11.mx.aol.com
>>> >> (mail_out_v39.1.) id r.c07.546a3fdd (14457) for
>>> >> >;
>>> >> Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:28:10 -0500 (EST)
>>> >> From:
>>> >> Add sender to Contacts
>>> >> Message-ID: >
>>> >> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:25:52 EST
>>> >> Subject: Eat me!
>>> >> To:
>>> >> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>> >> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>>> >> boundary="-----------------------------1234283151"
>>> >> Content-Length: 3337
>>> >>
>>> >> Compact Headers
>>> >> "cybercat" > wrote in message
>>> >> >...
>>> >>>
>>> >>> "Gregory Morrow" > wrote
>>> >>> > All peeps have to do if they don't want to read him is to killfile
>>> >>> > him,
>>> >>> > it's
>>> >>> > as simple as that.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> The reason I like Usenet is because I like uncensored exchange.
>>> >>>> Killfiles
>>> >>>> work fine for me. That said, I like to see assholes inconvenienced,
>> so
>>> >>>> I am
>>> >>>> cackling gleefully over Google booting Sheldon. He's too stupid to
>> set
>>> >>>> up a
>>> >>>> proxy account, so I guess he's stuck for a while.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>>What a bunch of dumb douchebags... I forgot ten times more than any
>>> >>>of
>>> >>>yoose imbeciles know about how to set up proxy >accounts.
>>> >>
>>> >>>Eat me! LOL
>>> >>
>>> >> So. no, Sheldon has no ****ing idea how to post to Usenet now.
>>> >
>>> > That's is funny.
>>> >
>>> > Posting private email makes you a damn damnsel leper.
>>>
>>> Excellent. Perhaps you and others will refrain from addressing me
>> privately
>>> AND publically. Asshole.
>>
>>
>> "OH, the DRAMA...!!!"
>>
>> I'm dyin' laffin' over by here...
>>
>
> so I enjoy puffing my fur out and hissing every now and then.
>
> I think it is hilarious that Sheldon still has not figured out how to
> post.
>
And you know that, how... yoose wouldn't wanna hafta fellate dem woids...
pubicly!

"brooklyn1" > wrote in message
...
>
> "cybertoxic" wrote:
>> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that he
>> knows how to post to Usenet using proxies. Seems like he'd do it via
>> Usenet, doesn't it? He still has his AOL account, too. For email, anyway.
>> Who the hell still uses AOL? He posts in a pretty green font, too. What a
>> pussy.
>>
>> Eat me!


Oh well, there goes my appetite.

Paul

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:04:29 GMT, "brooklyn1"
> wrote:

>Posting private email makes you a damn damnsel leper.

AHHHHHH-hahahahahahaha!

"Damsel in dis Dress" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:04:29 GMT, "brooklyn1"
> > wrote:
>
>>Posting private email makes you a damn damnsel leper.
>
> AHHHHHH-hahahahahahaha!

I thought that was pretty funny too.

cybercat wrote:
>
> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that he
> knows how to post to Usenet using proxies. Seems like he'd do it via
> Usenet, doesn't it? He still has his AOL account, too. For email, anyway.
> Who the hell still uses AOL? He posts in a pretty green font, too. What a
> pussy.
>
> Eat me!
> Tuesday, February 10, 2009 11:25 AM
> From Tue Feb 10 08:25:52 2009
> Return-Path: >
> Authentication-Results: mta129.mail.re1.yahoo.com from=aol.com;
> domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=aol.com; dkim=neutral (no sig)
> Received: from 64.12.143.99 (EHLO imo-m11.mail.aol.com)
> (64.12.143.99) by mta129.mail.re1.yahoo.com with SMTP; Tue, 10 Feb 2009
> 08:28:24 -0800
> Received: from by imo-m11.mx.aol.com
> (mail_out_v39.1.) id r.c07.546a3fdd (14457) for >; Tue,
> 10 Feb 2009 11:28:10 -0500 (EST)
> From:
> Add sender to Contacts
> Message-ID: >
> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:25:52 EST
> Subject: Eat me!
> To:
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="-----------------------------1234283151"
> Content-Length: 3337
>
> Compact Headers
> "cybercat" > wrote in message
> >...
> >
> > "Gregory Morrow" > wrote
> > > All peeps have to do if they don't want to read him is to killfile him,
> > > it's
> > > as simple as that.
> >
> >> The reason I like Usenet is because I like uncensored exchange. Killfiles
> >> work fine for me. That said, I like to see assholes inconvenienced, so I
> >> am
> >> cackling gleefully over Google booting Sheldon. He's too stupid to set up
> >> a
> >> proxy account, so I guess he's stuck for a while.
>
> >What a bunch of dumb douchebags... I forgot ten times more than any of
> >yoose imbeciles know about how to set up proxy >accounts.
>
> >Eat me! LOL
>
> So. no, Sheldon has no ****ing idea how to post to Usenet now.

Does seem to be authentic Sheldon, alright.

cybercat > wrote:

> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that he
> knows how to post to Usenet using proxies.

It's obvious neither of you know what a proxy is.

Without using the word proxy, please try and explain what you're
referring to.

-sw

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> cybercat > wrote:
>
>> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that he
>> knows how to post to Usenet using proxies.
>
> It's obvious neither of you know what a proxy is.
>
> Without using the word proxy, please try and explain what you're
> referring to.
>
> -sw

In your case I'm thinking hooker.

Paul

Paul M. Cook wrote:

> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
> > cybercat > wrote:
> >
> >> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that
he
> >> knows how to post to Usenet using proxies.
> >
> > It's obvious neither of you know what a proxy is.
> >
> > Without using the word proxy, please try and explain what you're
> > referring to.
> >
> > -sw
>
> In your case I'm thinking hooker.


ROFLMAO...

I honestly think that Steve is somewhat sexually "excited" by all this
Sheldon "contretemps"...

It's going to be pretty funny when Sheldon "returns" to sail into
Sqwertz...the best show in town!


--
Best
Greg

On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:09:39 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:

> cybercat > wrote:
>
>> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that
>> he knows how to post to Usenet using proxies.
>
> It's obvious neither of you know what a proxy is.
>
> Without using the word proxy, please try and explain what you're
> referring to.

AFAIK, all he needs is a new Google account. And to get a new Google
Account, he needs an unregistered email address (Gmail, Hotmail, Yahoo,
whatever).

He'd only need to use a proxy if Google decided to ban his IP address
(which is unlikely) -- and that's assuming he has a permanent static IP
(which is also unlikely).

Horry said...

> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:09:39 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:
>
>> cybercat > wrote:
>>
>>> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that
>>> he knows how to post to Usenet using proxies.
>>
>> It's obvious neither of you know what a proxy is.
>>
>> Without using the word proxy, please try and explain what you're
>> referring to.
>
> AFAIK, all he needs is a new Google account. And to get a new Google
> Account, he needs an unregistered email address (Gmail, Hotmail, Yahoo,
> whatever).
>
> He'd only need to use a proxy if Google decided to ban his IP address
> (which is unlikely) -- and that's assuming he has a permanent static IP
> (which is also unlikely).


I'm dumfounded that so many BUMS!!! actually care and that it's been drawn
out to this extent!

The man is not a toddler!

AND you all begin questioning eath other's intelligence?!?

How pathetic!

Imho,

Andy

On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:59:33 -0600, Andy wrote:

> Horry said...
>
>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:09:39 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:
>>
>>> cybercat > wrote:
>>>
>>>> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me
>>>> that he knows how to post to Usenet using proxies.
>>>
>>> It's obvious neither of you know what a proxy is.
>>>
>>> Without using the word proxy, please try and explain what you're
>>> referring to.
>>
>> AFAIK, all he needs is a new Google account. And to get a new Google
>> Account, he needs an unregistered email address (Gmail, Hotmail, Yahoo,
>> whatever).
>>
>> He'd only need to use a proxy if Google decided to ban his IP address
>> (which is unlikely) -- and that's assuming he has a permanent static IP
>> (which is also unlikely).
>
>
> I'm dumfounded that so many BUMS!!! actually care and that it's been
> drawn out to this extent!
>
> The man is not a toddler!
>
> AND you all begin questioning eath other's intelligence?!?
>
> How pathetic!

I was *trying* to be informative.

And I never questioned anyone's intelligence.

Horry said...

> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:59:33 -0600, Andy wrote:
>
>> Horry said...
>>
>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:09:39 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>
>>>> cybercat > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me
>>>>> that he knows how to post to Usenet using proxies.
>>>>
>>>> It's obvious neither of you know what a proxy is.
>>>>
>>>> Without using the word proxy, please try and explain what you're
>>>> referring to.
>>>
>>> AFAIK, all he needs is a new Google account. And to get a new Google
>>> Account, he needs an unregistered email address (Gmail, Hotmail, Yahoo,
>>> whatever).
>>>
>>> He'd only need to use a proxy if Google decided to ban his IP address
>>> (which is unlikely) -- and that's assuming he has a permanent static IP
>>> (which is also unlikely).
>>
>>
>> I'm dumfounded that so many BUMS!!! actually care and that it's been
>> drawn out to this extent!
>>
>> The man is not a toddler!
>>
>> AND you all begin questioning eath other's intelligence?!?
>>
>> How pathetic!
>
> I was *trying* to be informative.
>
> And I never questioned anyone's intelligence.


Horry,

Sorry I accidently happened to reply to your post. I've paid little
attention to the threads.

Best,

Andy

Andy wrote:

> Horry said...
>
> > On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:09:39 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:
> >
> >> cybercat > wrote:
> >>
> >>> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that
> >>> he knows how to post to Usenet using proxies.
> >>
> >> It's obvious neither of you know what a proxy is.
> >>
> >> Without using the word proxy, please try and explain what you're
> >> referring to.
> >
> > AFAIK, all he needs is a new Google account. And to get a new Google
> > Account, he needs an unregistered email address (Gmail, Hotmail, Yahoo,
> > whatever).
> >
> > He'd only need to use a proxy if Google decided to ban his IP address
> > (which is unlikely) -- and that's assuming he has a permanent static IP
> > (which is also unlikely).
>
>
> I'm dumfounded that so many BUMS!!! actually care and that it's been drawn
> out to this extent!
>
> The man is not a toddler!
>
> AND you all begin questioning eath other's intelligence?!?
>
> How pathetic!
>
> Imho,


Fvckin' A, Andy...and it's not "opinion" - it's FACT...!!!

LOL...


--
Best
Greg

Horry wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:09:39 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:
>
>> cybercat > wrote:
>>
>>> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that
>>> he knows how to post to Usenet using proxies.
>> It's obvious neither of you know what a proxy is.
>>
>> Without using the word proxy, please try and explain what you're
>> referring to.
>
> AFAIK, all he needs is a new Google account. And to get a new Google
> Account, he needs an unregistered email address (Gmail, Hotmail, Yahoo,
> whatever).
>
> He'd only need to use a proxy if Google decided to ban his IP address
> (which is unlikely) -- and that's assuming he has a permanent static IP
> (which is also unlikely).

Since he posts through AOL, he's already using one of the AOL proxies.
The IP address on his posts is the same IP address of hundreds...
thousands... of other AOL users.

(These proxies are what AOL uses to spy on their users surfing habits so
efficiently).

So Google would be banning not just Sheldon.

-sw

Horry wrote:

> He'd only need to use a proxy if Google decided to ban his IP address
> (which is unlikely) -- and that's assuming he has a permanent static IP
> (which is also unlikely).

BTW: You're referring to an anonymous proxy. I'm not sure you can
daisy-chain proxies in Sheldon's (AOL's) case.

-sw

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:07:44 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:

> Horry wrote:
>
>> He'd only need to use a proxy if Google decided to ban his IP address
>> (which is unlikely) -- and that's assuming he has a permanent static IP
>> (which is also unlikely).
>
> BTW: You're referring to an anonymous proxy. I'm not sure you can
> daisy-chain proxies in Sheldon's (AOL's) case.

Yes, I know (which is why I added the caveat "[i]n the sense the word is
currently being used" in my reply to sf's question).

Or, at least, I *assumed* everyone else was referring to anonymous
proxies. Suggestions that Sheldon use a transparent proxy would make
even less sense than a suggestion that he use an anon. proxy.

Proxies are completely irrelevant to Sheldon's predicament.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> cybercat > wrote:
>
>> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that he
>> knows how to post to Usenet using proxies.
>
> It's obvious neither of you know what a proxy is.
>
> Without using the word proxy, please try and explain what you're
> referring to.
>
Oh, that was YOU. You idiot. Regardless of the service one gets TOSed from,
posting from a different IP # allows one to set up a new account.

Where in hell would you ever get the idea that anyone here needs to prove
anything at all to you? You constantly underestimate the intelligence of
others while overestimating your own. It would be funny if it were not so
depressing. I am depressed for you.

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:03:11 -0500, "cybercat" >
wrote:

>You constantly underestimate the intelligence of
>others while overestimating your own. It would be funny if it were not so
>depressing. I am depressed for you.

Can you be depressed for me too? I could use a little help.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:45:32 -0800, sf wrote:

> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:03:11 -0500, "cybercat" >
> wrote:
>
>>You constantly underestimate the intelligence of
>>others while overestimating your own. It would be funny if it were not so
>>depressing. I am depressed for you.
>
> Can you be depressed for me too? I could use a little help.

i thought there was always plenty of depression going around. unless it's
that damned prozac nation thing again.

your pal,
blake

cybercat wrote:
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>> cybercat > wrote:
>>
>>> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that he
>>> knows how to post to Usenet using proxies.
>> It's obvious neither of you know what a proxy is.
>>
>> Without using the word proxy, please try and explain what you're
>> referring to.
>>
> Oh, that was YOU. You idiot. Regardless of the service one gets TOSed from,
> posting from a different IP # allows one to set up a new account.
>
> Where in hell would you ever get the idea that anyone here needs to prove
> anything at all to you? You constantly underestimate the intelligence of
> others while overestimating your own. It would be funny if it were not so
> depressing. I am depressed for you.

I didn't think you could answer the simple question with anything other
than smoke and mirrors.

-sw

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> cybercat wrote:
>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> cybercat > wrote:
>>>
>>>> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that
>>>> he
>>>> knows how to post to Usenet using proxies.
>>> It's obvious neither of you know what a proxy is.
>>>
>>> Without using the word proxy, please try and explain what you're
>>> referring to.
>>>
>> Oh, that was YOU. You idiot. Regardless of the service one gets TOSed
>> from, posting from a different IP # allows one to set up a new account.
>>
>> Where in hell would you ever get the idea that anyone here needs to prove
>> anything at all to you? You constantly underestimate the intelligence of
>> others while overestimating your own. It would be funny if it were not so
>> depressing. I am depressed for you.
>
> I didn't think you could answer the simple question with anything other
> than smoke and mirrors.
>
You're not worth the time. When I get caught up I will simply post va a
proxy.

On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:35:27 -0500, cybercat wrote:

> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that he
> knows how to post to Usenet using proxies. Seems like he'd do it via
> Usenet, doesn't it? He still has his AOL account, too. For email, anyway.
> Who the hell still uses AOL? He posts in a pretty green font, too. What a
> pussy.
>
>
>>What a bunch of dumb douchebags... I forgot ten times more than any of
>>yoose imbeciles know about how to set up proxy >accounts.
>
>>Eat me! LOL
>
> So. no, Sheldon has no ****ing idea how to post to Usenet now.

how utterly charming that he'd make an effort to e-mail you directly with a
message of abuse. that's our boy!

your pal,
blake

blake murphy wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:35:27 -0500, cybercat wrote:
>
> > The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that
he
> > knows how to post to Usenet using proxies. Seems like he'd do it via
> > Usenet, doesn't it? He still has his AOL account, too. For email,
anyway.
> > Who the hell still uses AOL? He posts in a pretty green font, too. What
a
> > pussy.
> >
> >
> >>What a bunch of dumb douchebags... I forgot ten times more than any of
> >>yoose imbeciles know about how to set up proxy >accounts.
> >
> >>Eat me! LOL
> >
> > So. no, Sheldon has no ****ing idea how to post to Usenet now.
>
> how utterly charming that he'd make an effort to e-mail you directly with
a
> message of abuse. that's our boy!


Ya gotta LUV the "Eat me" part...it just might become a "classic".

Lol...


--
Best
Greg

"blake murphy" > wrote :
>
> how utterly charming that he'd make an effort to e-mail you directly with
> a
> message of abuse. that's our boy!
>

You KNOW he has emailed others if he emailed me.

"l, not -l" > wrote in message
...
>
> On 10-Feb-2009, "cybercat" > wrote:
>
>> The dickhead has never emailed me before, and did so to assure me that he
>> knows how to post to Usenet using proxies. Seems like he'd do it via
>> Usenet, doesn't it? He still has his AOL account, too. For email, anyway.
>> Who the hell still uses AOL? He posts in a pretty green font, too. What a
>> pussy.
>
> Having an AOL email account does not necessarily mean he uses AOL; when I
> terminated the family AOL service years ago, I was allowed to keep the
> email
> address

That amounts to still using AOL. When did the general IQ of this group dive
into the toilet?

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:55:40 -0500, "cybercat" >
wrote:

>That amounts to still using AOL. When did the general IQ of this group dive
>into the toilet?

I'm still amazed that they offer free accounts.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

"l, not -l" > wrote in message
...
>
> On 10-Feb-2009, "cybercat" > wrote:
>
>> That amounts to still using AOL. When did the general IQ of this group
>> dive
>> into the toilet?
>
> OMG, you are so right, how could I have missed that? It never occurred to
> me that using AOL mail would be any worse than, oh, say using Yahoo mail.
> So the hierarchy of email account pussyness is what? Aol, gmail, hotmail,
> yahoo, mailinator, juno; is that the right order?
>
> You make Sheldon look good.
> --

I am so sorry, but the fact is, AOL was designed for idiots and STILL has
the most ridiculous interface of all email providers/ISPs. Your aol address
tells people exactly what you are. Stick with it. Nothing wrong with truth
in advertising.

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:20:19 -0500, "cybercat" >
wrote:

>I am so sorry, but the fact is, AOL was designed for idiots and STILL has
>the most ridiculous interface of all email providers/ISPs. Your aol address
>tells people exactly what you are. Stick with it. Nothing wrong with truth
>in advertising.

AOL hasn't provided news group access in a long time (years?). I
can't imagine why anyone cares who uses AOL or not.... other than for
flogging purposes.

I think if you can wade your way through all that peripheral stuff,
you're a whole lot better able to focus than I am and you're a lot
more tolerant of visual clutter!

I've tried to help my neighbor with AOL email in the past and I've
been floored by how much *crap* they enclose the actual text window in
(with no option to close the surrounding frames). The working window
is maybe 6 inches across, at best. It drives me nuts! I always ask
her why she insists on using AOL, but it's one of those "I know this
and I don't know that" kind of things. I find nothing foolproof about
AOL, but you go with what you know. If it was my ISP, I'd be annoyed
to the point that I wouldn't use it... but I don't use AOL. Moot
point.

Additionally, I've never heard anyone say they were switching *to*
AOL.... but I can certainly understand it when people say they are
switching "from" AOL. My only advocation about "switching" to AOL
isn't about switching ISPs, it's about switching to an AOL style email
delivery system. UGH.

:/




--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:11:16 -0800, sf > wrote:

>On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:20:19 -0500, "cybercat" >
>wrote:
>
>>I am so sorry, but the fact is, AOL was designed for idiots and STILL has
>>the most ridiculous interface of all email providers/ISPs. Your aol address
>>tells people exactly what you are. Stick with it. Nothing wrong with truth
>>in advertising.
>
>AOL hasn't provided news group access in a long time (years?). I
>can't imagine why anyone cares who uses AOL or not.... other than for
>flogging purposes.
>
>I think if you can wade your way through all that peripheral stuff,
>you're a whole lot better able to focus than I am and you're a lot
>more tolerant of visual clutter!
>
>I've tried to help my neighbor with AOL email in the past and I've
>been floored by how much *crap* they enclose the actual text window in
>(with no option to close the surrounding frames). The working window
>is maybe 6 inches across, at best. It drives me nuts! I always ask
>her why she insists on using AOL, but it's one of those "I know this
>and I don't know that" kind of things. I find nothing foolproof about
>AOL, but you go with what you know. If it was my ISP, I'd be annoyed
>to the point that I wouldn't use it... but I don't use AOL. Moot
>point.
>
>Additionally, I've never heard anyone say they were switching *to*
>AOL.... but I can certainly understand it when people say they are
>switching "from" AOL. My only advocation about "switching" to AOL
>isn't about switching ISPs, it's about switching to an AOL style email
>delivery system. UGH.

AOL was like training wheels for newbies in the 90's. Anyone who used
it for more than a year must have been pretty silly. I used it back
then until I could figure out what the hell was going on and then got
a real ISP and reformatted the machine to get all the crap off.
Everything about AOL sucked.

Lou

"Lou Decruss" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:11:16 -0800, sf > wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:20:19 -0500, "cybercat" >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>I am so sorry, but the fact is, AOL was designed for idiots and STILL has
>>>the most ridiculous interface of all email providers/ISPs. Your aol
>>>address
>>>tells people exactly what you are. Stick with it. Nothing wrong with
>>>truth
>>>in advertising.
>>
>>AOL hasn't provided news group access in a long time (years?). I
>>can't imagine why anyone cares who uses AOL or not.... other than for
>>flogging purposes.
>>
>>I think if you can wade your way through all that peripheral stuff,
>>you're a whole lot better able to focus than I am and you're a lot
>>more tolerant of visual clutter!
>>
>>I've tried to help my neighbor with AOL email in the past and I've
>>been floored by how much *crap* they enclose the actual text window in
>>(with no option to close the surrounding frames). The working window
>>is maybe 6 inches across, at best. It drives me nuts! I always ask
>>her why she insists on using AOL, but it's one of those "I know this
>>and I don't know that" kind of things. I find nothing foolproof about
>>AOL, but you go with what you know. If it was my ISP, I'd be annoyed
>>to the point that I wouldn't use it... but I don't use AOL. Moot
>>point.
>>
>>Additionally, I've never heard anyone say they were switching *to*
>>AOL.... but I can certainly understand it when people say they are
>>switching "from" AOL. My only advocation about "switching" to AOL
>>isn't about switching ISPs, it's about switching to an AOL style email
>>delivery system. UGH.
>
> AOL was like training wheels for newbies in the 90's. Anyone who used
> it for more than a year must have been pretty silly. I used it back
> then until I could figure out what the hell was going on and then got
> a real ISP and reformatted the machine to get all the crap off.
> Everything about AOL sucked.

Horseshit! The only thing about AOL that sucked was that originally when
there was only dial-up it cost more, so yoose cheap *******s cried sour
grapes. Now that it's free with any broad band ISP many of the earlier AOL
detractors have an AOL account that they won't ever admit to. Unfortunately
now that it's free AOL has pared back drastically so it hasn't anywhere near
as much content. So knock off the horseshit, you and yoose ilk simply have
short arm disease, arms too short to reach yoose wallets. Never ceases to
amaze how many cry something sucks when in actuality they can't afford it.
... you poor *******! LOL

Boney Maroney