|
SPAM
Sqwertz wrote:
> ChattyCathy > wrote: > >> Sqwertz wrote: >> >>> ChattyCathy > wrote: >>> >>>> Sqwertz wrote: >>>> >>>>> Nancy Young > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Well, if Peter Lucas didn't make that crack about his SO, >>>>>> then I apologize for saying what I did. >>>>> >>>>> I do too. >>>> >>>> <Cathy passes Steve a nice fat crow to eat> >>> >>> That's how I always respond to Peter. Fat crow? More like a >>> hummingbird. I had no reason to suspect it wasn't Peter. It was a >>> very good imitation of him. >>> >>> I didn't see you pointing out that it wasn't Peter. Where were you? >> >> Cooking. > > You're beginning to sound like Barbara (sf). Come join her. Ya have a problem with cooking? :P BTW, I actually *did* say that I didn't think it was Peter (in another post in this thread and even gave my reasons why I thought it wasn't him) - albeit a day (or two) late. ;-) <Cathy whispers to Steve> I don't always read r.f.c. every minute of every day, ya know, as shocking as that may be, so I only saw this thread yesterday... -- Cheers Chatty (No, I am NOT paranoid) Cathy |
SPAM
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:32:44 -0600, Sqwertz >
wrote: >Sqwertz > wrote: > >> Lou Decruss > wrote: >> >>> Baking it seems to cut down on the dog food smell. >> >> Thank you for confirming to pet-food smell. >> People without pets don't realize this, but ASPAM is made from >> what's as "byproducts". >> >> In this case, Hormel has found a way to make legal, food-grade pork >> byproducts. > >Damn. I wasn't even drunk when I wrote that mess. I kinda figured out what you were saying. Lou |
SPAM
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:32:44 -0600, Sqwertz wrote:
> Sqwertz > wrote: > >> Lou Decruss > wrote: >> >>> Baking it seems to cut down on the dog food smell. >> >> Thank you for confirming to pet-food smell. >> People without pets don't realize this, but ASPAM is made from >> what's as "byproducts". >> >> In this case, Hormel has found a way to make legal, food-grade pork >> byproducts. > > Damn. I wasn't even drunk when I wrote that mess. > > -sw the solution here is clear. next time, have a few belts first. your pal, blake |
SPAM
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:38:19 -0500, Otto Bahn wrote:
> "blake murphy" > wrote > >>>> So, you're saying that we should only eat giant brontosaurus ribs that tip >>>> our cars over at the drive-in, just like they did back in good-old Bedrock? >>>> >>>> I heartily endorse the all-meat diet they had back before man started >>>> eating those nasty whole-grain junk foods! It was way more healthy for you, >>>> after all. >>> >>> No Neolithic Revolution => no beer. >> >> without farming and the storage of grain, there'd be no civilization, >> really (and i think we can all agree beer is a part of that). you spent >> all your time hunting and gathering (or starving). > > Last time I checked my nonsense before posting it to the usenet, > hunter gatherers had as much free time as anyone. > > --oTTo-- i guess all their art and literature just got lost, then. pity. your pal, blake |
SPAM
"blake murphy" > wrote
>>>>> So, you're saying that we should only eat giant brontosaurus ribs that tip >>>>> our cars over at the drive-in, just like they did back in good-old Bedrock? >>>>> >>>>> I heartily endorse the all-meat diet they had back before man started >>>>> eating those nasty whole-grain junk foods! It was way more healthy for you, >>>>> after all. >>>> >>>> No Neolithic Revolution => no beer. >>> >>> without farming and the storage of grain, there'd be no civilization, >>> really (and i think we can all agree beer is a part of that). you spent >>> all your time hunting and gathering (or starving). >> >> Last time I checked my nonsense before posting it to the usenet, >> hunter gatherers had as much free time as anyone. > > i guess all their art and literature just got lost, then. pity. However, your lame assertion that it was due to spending all their time hunting and gathering remains for all to see. --oTTo-- |
SPAM
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:38:19 -0500, "Otto Bahn" wrote:
>"blake murphy" > wrote > >>>> So, you're saying that we should only eat giant brontosaurus ribs that tip >>>> our cars over at the drive-in, just like they did back in good-old Bedrock? >>>> >>>> I heartily endorse the all-meat diet they had back before man started >>>> eating those nasty whole-grain junk foods! It was way more healthy for you, >>>> after all. >>> >>> No Neolithic Revolution => no beer. >> >> without farming and the storage of grain, there'd be no civilization, >> really (and i think we can all agree beer is a part of that). you spent >> all your time hunting and gathering (or starving). > >Last time I checked my nonsense before posting it to the usenet, >hunter gatherers had as much free time as anyone. But they had no beer! Chris McG. Harming humanity since 1951 "Uh-oh.Looners" - Darla ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
SPAM
On Nov 18, 9:12*am, "Peter-Lucas" > wrote:
> "TammyM" > wrote : > > > > >> I have warned you all that the 'heyzeus' character is one of the > >> stalkers/trolls from ozdebate. It enjoys stirring up shit like that, > >> then tries to blame it on someone else. > > > Regardless of what his posts are or are not like on any other > > newsgroup, it seems to me that Jeus' posts are largely on topic here.. > > *Far as I'm concerned, that's what matters, in rfc terms. > > OK. > > You can't say I didn't warn you. > > Oh big pete what a hero you are --- warning people about people who for VERY good reason have nothing but utter contempt for you . You delusional woman basher you |
SPAM
On Nov 18, 10:51*am, "Peter-Lucas" > wrote:
> "Nancy Young" > wrote in news:jSpUk.81868 > : > > > > >>> Nancy.............. " is a shit stirring > >>> forger/troll/cyber stalker named Bevan Kirkland. > > > Well, if Peter Lucas didn't make that crack about his SO, > > then I apologize for saying what I did. > > S'ok........ I know it's not de rigueur to check the origins of every > post that you reply to, and it really shouldn't be either. > > But when the stalkers and forgers start there pathetic little games, > it's always wise to spend a couple of seconds just looking at the > headers. > > > > > At this point I don't know who's who, so I'm not trimming > > any quotes. > > That's exactly what those pathetic creeps aim for. It's been done in the > past in every newsgroup I post in (defence, skydiving, cars, food, > ozdebate etc, etc). They'll flood the newsgroup with posts *supposedly* > done by me in the hope that everyone will get sick and tired of the > shite and killfile the name Peter Lucas. > > The stalker/forger uses a gmail address. I don't. > > They also crosspost to other groups, such as ozdebate, which they did > with this thread, and which you (probably inadvertantly) did as well. > Which is why I've deleted ozdebate from the followup. > > -- > Peter Lucas > Brisbane > Australia > > "People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it is > safer to harrass rich women than motorcycle gangs." Well check these headers boyo lets see what forgeries and delusional theories you come up with this little lot and to keep it on topic you cant cook to save your life :) |
SPAM
" > wrote in
: > On Nov 18, 9:12*am, "Peter-Lucas" > wrote: >> "TammyM" > wrote >> > .edu: >> >> >> >> >> I have warned you all that the 'heyzeus' character is one of the >> >> stalkers/trolls from ozdebate. It enjoys stirring up shit like >> >> that, then tries to blame it on someone else. >> >> > Regardless of what his posts are or are not like on any other >> > newsgroup, it seems to me that Jeus' posts are largely on topic >> > here > . >> > *Far as I'm concerned, that's what matters, in rfc terms. >> >> OK. >> >> You can't say I didn't warn you. >> >> > Oh big pete what a hero you are --- warning people about people who > for VERY good reason have nothing but utter contempt for you . Stalking me lets them think they are big tuff individuals, when in actual fact they are all, like you putz, as weak as ****. > > You delusional woman basher you > ROFLMAO!! Pathetic little schoolyard comments from a pathetic little 'man'. BTW everyone........ this mutts' name is phil cleaver, a sad and lonely individual that recently got it's arse kicked in here because of it's lies. (Anyone remember it's claim of *300* cases of botulism??!!)It then said it was going to go back to it's idiot mates in ozdebate, and leave me in the "yank cooking group" Here's a picture of it........ http://tinyurl.com/5no8v8 it's down the bottom..... where it belongs. Another addition for the killfile. -- Peter Lucas Brisbane Australia "Life is not like a box of chocolates... it's more like a jar of jalapenos. What you do today... might burn your ass tomorrow." |
SPAM
Peter provided:
> http://tinyurl.com/5no8v8 Hell-O, Leah! BTW, isn't this a picture of you, Peter? http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=9ld1xg&s=4 Bob |
SPAM
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:31:51 -0800, Bob Terwilliger wrote:
> Peter provided: > >> http://tinyurl.com/5no8v8 > > > Hell-O, Leah! > > BTW, isn't this a picture of you, Peter? > > http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=9ld1xg&s=4 > > > Bob tastefully done, girls! very tastefully done! your pal, blake |
SPAM
On Nov 22, 6:57*am, "Peter-Lucas" > wrote:
> " > wrote : > > > > > On Nov 18, 9:12*am, "Peter-Lucas" > wrote: > >> "TammyM" > wrote > >> > > .edu: > > >> >> I have warned you all that the 'heyzeus' character is one of the > >> >> stalkers/trolls from ozdebate. It enjoys stirring up shit like > >> >> that, then tries to blame it on someone else. > > >> > Regardless of what his posts are or are not like on any other > >> > newsgroup, it seems to me that Jeus' posts are largely on topic > >> > here > > . > >> > *Far as I'm concerned, that's what matters, in rfc terms. > > >> OK. > > >> You can't say I didn't warn you. > > > Oh big pete what a *hero you are --- *warning people *about people who > > for VERY good reason have nothing but utter contempt for you . > > Stalking me lets them think they are big tuff individuals, when in > actual fact they are all, like you putz, as weak as ****. > > No PL in Brissie I may be WAP in your view But many over the years have you pegged to a T and perhaps a few in here are starting to get a handle on you even under this incarnation of your many personalities. you can huff & puff and post an out of date link as much as you like. Have a look where I am writing from and it is not some el cheapo supposed visit to KL since you admire posting links to pics so much how was your KL supposed trip ? Lose the camera again did you ? Take it easy old fellah some of your past may just catch up with you |
SPAM
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:28:34 +0000, Jeßus wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 07:39:06 -0800, wrote: > >> On Nov 22, 6:57*am, "Peter-Lucas" > wrote: >>> " > wrote >>> innews:6c248145-75d1-4b4a- > : >>> >>> >>> >>> > On Nov 18, 9:12*am, "Peter-Lucas" > wrote: >>> >> "TammyM" > wrote >>> >> >>> > .edu: >>> >>> >> >> I have warned you all that the 'heyzeus' character is one of the >>> >> >> stalkers/trolls from ozdebate. It enjoys stirring up shit like >>> >> >> that, then tries to blame it on someone else. >>> >>> >> > Regardless of what his posts are or are not like on any other >>> >> > newsgroup, it seems to me that Jeßus' posts are largely on topic >>> >> > here >>> > . >>> >> > *Far as I'm concerned, that's what matters, in rfc terms. >>> >>> >> OK. >>> >>> >> You can't say I didn't warn you. >>> >>> > Oh big pete what a *hero you are --- *warning people *about people >>> > who for VERY good reason have nothing but utter contempt for you . >>> >>> Stalking me lets them think they are big tuff individuals, when in >>> actual fact they are all, like you putz, as weak as ****. >>> >>> >> No PL in Brissie >> I may be WAP in your view But many over the years have you pegged >> to a T >> and perhaps a few in here are starting to get a handle on you even >> under this incarnation of your many personalities. you can huff & puff >> and post an out of date link as much as you like. Have a look where I >> am writing from and it is not some el cheapo supposed visit to KL >> >> since you admire posting links to pics so much how was your KL >> supposed trip ? Lose the camera again did you ? >> >> Take it easy old fellah some of your past may just catch up with you > > When it does - he'll be off to the deed poll office to legally change > his name - for what - the 3rd or 4th time? How did you get Sylvester the Pussy Cat to show up in your headers? |
SPAM
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:17:41 +0000, Horry wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:28:34 +0000, Jeßus wrote: > >> On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 07:39:06 -0800, wrote: >> >>> On Nov 22, 6:57*am, "Peter-Lucas" > wrote: >>>> " > wrote >>>> innews:6c248145-75d1-4b4a- >> : >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> > On Nov 18, 9:12*am, "Peter-Lucas" > wrote: >>>> >> "TammyM" > wrote >>>> >> >>>> > .edu: >>>> >>>> >> >> I have warned you all that the 'heyzeus' character is one of >>>> >> >> the stalkers/trolls from ozdebate. It enjoys stirring up shit >>>> >> >> like that, then tries to blame it on someone else. >>>> >>>> >> > Regardless of what his posts are or are not like on any other >>>> >> > newsgroup, it seems to me that Jeßus' posts are largely on topic >>>> >> > here >>>> > . >>>> >> > *Far as I'm concerned, that's what matters, in rfc terms. >>>> >>>> >> OK. >>>> >>>> >> You can't say I didn't warn you. >>>> >>>> > Oh big pete what a *hero you are --- *warning people *about people >>>> > who for VERY good reason have nothing but utter contempt for you . >>>> >>>> Stalking me lets them think they are big tuff individuals, when in >>>> actual fact they are all, like you putz, as weak as ****. >>>> >>>> >>> No PL in Brissie >>> I may be WAP in your view But many over the years have you pegged >>> to a T >>> and perhaps a few in here are starting to get a handle on you even >>> under this incarnation of your many personalities. you can huff & puff >>> and post an out of date link as much as you like. Have a look where I >>> am writing from and it is not some el cheapo supposed visit to KL >>> >>> since you admire posting links to pics so much how was your KL >>> supposed trip ? Lose the camera again did you ? >>> >>> Take it easy old fellah some of your past may just catch up with >>> you >> >> When it does - he'll be off to the deed poll office to legally change >> his name - for what - the 3rd or 4th time? > > How did you get Sylvester the Pussy Cat to show up in your headers? It's called an 'x-face' : basically a simple graphic converted to text, then added as a header. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-Face |
SPAM
Spam (or Spam Lite) can also be used as you would a regular ham
(remove from can first). Just criss-cross the top with a knife, then using your favorite mustard (ours is Gouldens), slather it over the meat. Take individual cloves and stick them in the points where the lines cross. Bake in a 350 deg oven about 1/2 hour or until mustard is set. Bring out from oven, slice and serve! (Both of my parents served in the Navy in World War II--maybe that's why they loved it so much!) Shybat On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:41:55 -0600, George Shirley > wrote: >Melba's Jammin' wrote: >> From this morning's Strib, <http://www.startribune.com//34498114.html>, >> from a NYTimees article, >> <http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/15/bu...ewanted=2&_r=1 >> &sq=SPAM&st=nyt&scp=2> >> >> The Times story has a couple fun pictures but the Strib has interesting >> reader comments; this is one of my favorites: "No money? Eat Spam!- >> Bad advice! >> >> For the first time in history the less money people have the fatter they >> are getting. Why? Because of articles like this that encourage people to >> suplement their loss of income by eating cheap garbage. Too many people >> would rather spend their only $3 on the a trio of double cheeseburgers >> from McDonald's dollar menu and be full than a lesser portion of >> something healthy. You're better off eating a smaller portion of >> something good for you." posted by hozer85. >> >> I entered a recipe contest at the Fair one year * I think I conjured up >> a SPAMetizer involving pineapple and cheese. Perhaps it was a variation >> on Barfburgers been a long time and I don't recall the details. >> >> HWSRN has fond memories of SPAM; I haven't had it in the house in 15-20 >> years, I'll bet. Blech. >> >> Looks like it's a big seller in a tough economy, though. Strange, that, >> for its per pound cost! >Elitist Southern Canadian! I have a can of Low Sodium Spam chilling in >the fridge at the moment. Makes excellent sandwiches, even better if >it's fried a bit. The chilling makes the fat congeal for that gourmet >taste. So there! |
SPAM?
Spam is wildly popular in Korea--just saw a short TV show about it.
ShyBat On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 11:43:37 -0600, Melba's Jammin' > wrote: >From this morning's Strib, <http://www.startribune.com//34498114.html>, >from a NYTimees article, ><http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/15/bu...ewanted=2&_r=1 >&sq=SPAM&st=nyt&scp=2> > >The Times story has a couple fun pictures but the Strib has interesting >reader comments; this is one of my favorites: "No money? Eat Spam!- >Bad advice! > >For the first time in history the less money people have the fatter they >are getting. Why? Because of articles like this that encourage people to >suplement their loss of income by eating cheap garbage. Too many people >would rather spend their only $3 on the a trio of double cheeseburgers >from McDonald's dollar menu and be full than a lesser portion of >something healthy. You're better off eating a smaller portion of >something good for you." posted by hozer85. > >I entered a recipe contest at the Fair one year * I think I conjured up >a SPAMetizer involving pineapple and cheese. Perhaps it was a variation >on Barfburgers been a long time and I don't recall the details. > >HWSRN has fond memories of SPAM; I haven't had it in the house in 15-20 >years, I'll bet. Blech. > >Looks like it's a big seller in a tough economy, though. Strange, that, >for its per pound cost! |
SPAM
"ShyBat" > wrote in message ... > Spam (or Spam Lite) can also be used as you would a regular ham > (remove from can first). lol |
SPAM
"Plums" > wrote in message ... On Nov 19, 4:29 pm, Peter Lucas > wrote: > ChattyCathy > wrote in news:WnNUk.62671$% > : > > > > > > > Sqwertz wrote: > > >> ChattyCathy > wrote: > > >>> Sqwertz wrote: > > >>>> Nancy Young > wrote: > > >>>>> Well, if Peter Lucas didn't make that crack about his SO, > >>>>> then I apologize for saying what I did. > > >>>> I do too. > > >>> <Cathy passes Steve a nice fat crow to eat> > > >> That's how I always respond to Peter. > > Spurtz responds to me??? > > And I don't even talk to it!! > > >> Fat crow? More like a > >> hummingbird. I had no reason to suspect it wasn't Peter. It was a > >> very good imitation of him. > > Especially when you look at it with your milk-bottle glasses. > > > > >> I didn't see you pointing out that it wasn't Peter. Where were you? > > > Cooking. > > Where every woman should be....... in the kitchen!! > > Barefoot, and pregnant ;-) > > And having said that........ I have to start thinking about what we're > going to have for dinner tonight :-) > Ruth mind waiting for photos so we can see what you serve up to her after her shift slaving in the old peoples home? No not the old people home for I have read in previous posts that Lucas OS is a telephone debt collector and that she used to work for Barclay MIS. Not my belief and I couldn't care less, but I have read that she got the sack for disclosing personal information to Lucas after he posted it on the Internet. Now if that be the case, and I am not saying it is, if you owe money I would be careful about disclosing private details, for those details may well end up on the Internet. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter