On Sep 15, 4:27*pm, blake murphy > wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:45:18 GMT, Saerah Gray wrote:
> > Omelet > fnord
> >news
>
> >> In article > ,
> >> *T > wrote:
>
> >>> So tell me since you're the expert, what reforms would you make to
> >>> the welfare system?
>
> >> Government work programs. *I already stated that.
>
> >> Give them the welfare they need, but make them work for it.
> >> It really is that simple...
>
> >> I believe in helping people, just not in giving them a totally free
> >> ride. I work hard for the money I make.
>
> > So will the government pay for child care under your program, too?
>
> > An overhaul of the system is needed, certainly. What kind of jobs are we
> > going to give these people so that they can get off welfare and make a
> > living that is enough to support their family?
>
> > It's more complicated than "have them work for the money". Basically,
> > you would have these people work for *less* than minimum wage. And
> > that's not a solution.
>
> well, then, they'll just have to starve! *problem solved!
>
> (dibs on their big-screen t.v.'s.)

I get the Cadillacs.

John Kane Kingston ON Canada

On Tue 16 Sep 2008 07:23:44a, John Kane told us...

> On Sep 15, 4:27*pm, blake murphy > wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:45:18 GMT, Saerah Gray wrote:
>> > Omelet > fnord
>> >news
>>
>> >> In article > ,
>> >> *T > wrote:
>>
>> >>> So tell me since you're the expert, what reforms would you make to
>> >>> the welfare system?
>>
>> >> Government work programs. *I already stated that.
>>
>> >> Give them the welfare they need, but make them work for it.
>> >> It really is that simple...
>>
>> >> I believe in helping people, just not in giving them a totally free
>> >> ride. I work hard for the money I make.
>>
>> > So will the government pay for child care under your program, too?
>>
>> > An overhaul of the system is needed, certainly. What kind of jobs are
w
> e
>> > going to give these people so that they can get off welfare and make a
>> > living that is enough to support their family?
>>
>> > It's more complicated than "have them work for the money". Basically,
>> > you would have these people work for *less* than minimum wage. And
>> > that's not a solution.
>>
>> well, then, they'll just have to starve! *problem solved!
>>
>> (dibs on their big-screen t.v.'s.)
>
> I get the Cadillacs.

They'd probabaly rust buckets by now, given the age and how much salt
Cleveland used to use on their roads in those days. Otherwise, they might
be nice vintage cars.

> John Kane Kingston ON Canada
>



--
Wayne Boatwright

*******************************************
Date: Tuesday, 09(IX)/16(XVI)/08(MMVIII)
*******************************************
Countdown till Veteran's Day
7wks 6dys 15hrs 49mins
*******************************************
'Help me, will ya? I'm old.'--Slappy
*******************************************

On Sep 16, 11:12*am, Wayne Boatwright >
wrote:
> On Tue 16 Sep 2008 07:23:44a, John Kane told us...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 15, 4:27*pm, blake murphy > wrote:
> >> On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:45:18 GMT, Saerah Gray wrote:
> >> > Omelet > fnord
> >> >news
>
> >> >> In article > ,
> >> >> *T > wrote:
>
> >> >>> So tell me since you're the expert, what reforms would you make to
> >> >>> the welfare system?
>
> >> >> Government work programs. *I already stated that.
>
> >> >> Give them the welfare they need, but make them work for it.
> >> >> It really is that simple...
>
> >> >> I believe in helping people, just not in giving them a totally free
> >> >> ride. I work hard for the money I make.
>
> >> > So will the government pay for child care under your program, too?
>
> >> > An overhaul of the system is needed, certainly. What kind of jobs are
> w
> > e
> >> > going to give these people so that they can get off welfare and make a
> >> > living that is enough to support their family?
>
> >> > It's more complicated than "have them work for the money". Basically,
> >> > you would have these people work for *less* than minimum wage. And
> >> > that's not a solution.
>
> >> well, then, they'll just have to starve! *problem solved!
>
> >> (dibs on their big-screen t.v.'s.)
>
> > I get the Cadillacs.
>
> They'd probabaly rust buckets by now, given the age and how much salt
> Cleveland used to use on their roads in those days. *Otherwise, they might
> be nice vintage cars.
>
> > John Kane Kingston ON Canada
>
I know a few collectors who probably would go for them anyway