Dnia 2008-05-06 Tom Anderson napisa³(a):
> On Tue, 6 May 2008, Omelet wrote:
>
>> In article > ,
>> Tom Anderson > wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 5 May 2008, (David P.) wrote:
>>>
>>>> Tom Anderson > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> #2 was about how keeping milk in a transparent container leaves it
>>>>> vulnerable to light. If the author hasn't realised that the light goes
>>>>> off when you close the fridge door, ...
>>>>
>>>> Don't you think they were referring to when the container is left out on
>>>> the table during the meal, exposed to light?
>>>
>>> No, actually, i think it was referring to storing dry foods in transparent
>>> containers on the worktop. After the initial mention of milk, that's what
>>> the article talks about.
>>>
>>> I do think this is all hokum, though.
>>
>> No, it's not. especially if you use fluorescent fixtures or bulbs like
>> many do now. There is more UV and it DOES influence some vitamin
>> content.
>
> You show me someone who's got rickets because fluorescent lights destroyed
> the vitamin D in their milk,

They should get a suntan first, and it so happens, that vitamin D is
synthesized in the skin, so IF fluorescent light destroys vit D in the
milk, it will synthesize it in your skin.

What a bunch of concentrated nonsense, but funny.

> or a population in which the frequency of
> rickets, or any other malnutrition disorder, has increased because of the
> use of fluorescent lights, and i'll take my statement back.
>
> Until then, i maintain that it's hokum.

Of course it is, but mainly because UV is absorbed by normal glass.

--
Andrzej Rosa 1127R

In article >,
Andrzej Rosa > wrote:

> > You show me someone who's got rickets because fluorescent lights destroyed
> > the vitamin D in their milk,
>
> They should get a suntan first, and it so happens, that vitamin D is
> synthesized in the skin, so IF fluorescent light destroys vit D in the
> milk, it will synthesize it in your skin.
>
> What a bunch of concentrated nonsense, but funny.
>
> > or a population in which the frequency of
> > rickets, or any other malnutrition disorder, has increased because of the
> > use of fluorescent lights, and i'll take my statement back.
> >
> > Until then, i maintain that it's hokum.
>
> Of course it is, but mainly because UV is absorbed by normal glass.

Good points. ;-)

Since I work nights tho', I don't get much (if any) sun.
I supplement Vitamin A&D in gelcaps. It's encapsulated fish liver oil.

I don't drink milk. At all. I get some dairy from cheese, and
occasionally cottage cheese or yogurt.

I don't worry about Calcium as I also take a good balanced mineral
supplement daily.
--
--

Peace! Om

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a Bitch."
-- Jack Nicholson

Omelet wrote:
> In article >,
> Andrzej Rosa > wrote:
>
>>> You show me someone who's got rickets because fluorescent lights destroyed
>>> the vitamin D in their milk,
>> They should get a suntan first, and it so happens, that vitamin D is
>> synthesized in the skin, so IF fluorescent light destroys vit D in the
>> milk, it will synthesize it in your skin.
>>
>> What a bunch of concentrated nonsense, but funny.
>>
>>> or a population in which the frequency of
>>> rickets, or any other malnutrition disorder, has increased because of the
>>> use of fluorescent lights, and i'll take my statement back.
>>>
>>> Until then, i maintain that it's hokum.
>> Of course it is, but mainly because UV is absorbed by normal glass.
>
> Good points. ;-)
>
> Since I work nights tho', I don't get much (if any) sun.
> I supplement Vitamin A&D in gelcaps. It's encapsulated fish liver oil.
>
> I don't drink milk. At all. I get some dairy from cheese, and
> occasionally cottage cheese or yogurt.
>
> I don't worry about Calcium as I also take a good balanced mineral

.... DEW EWE SHOVE IT UP UR ASSS!!!

BINKY
PS-THINGY;
EYE CILL MYSELF!!

HAW ! HAW!! HAW!@!

> supplement daily.

Andrzej Rosa wrote:
> Dnia 2008-05-06 Tom Anderson napisa³(a):
>> On Tue, 6 May 2008, Omelet wrote:
>>
>>> In article > ,
>>> Tom Anderson > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 5 May 2008, (David P.) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Tom Anderson > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> #2 was about how keeping milk in a transparent container leaves it
>>>>>> vulnerable to light. If the author hasn't realised that the light goes
>>>>>> off when you close the fridge door, ...
>>>>> Don't you think they were referring to when the container is left out on
>>>>> the table during the meal, exposed to light?
>>>> No, actually, i think it was referring to storing dry foods in transparent
>>>> containers on the worktop. After the initial mention of milk, that's what
>>>> the article talks about.
>>>>
>>>> I do think this is all hokum, though.
>>> No, it's not. especially if you use fluorescent fixtures or bulbs like
>>> many do now. There is more UV and it DOES influence some vitamin
>>> content.
>> You show me someone who's got rickets because fluorescent lights destroyed
>> the vitamin D in their milk,
>
> They should get a suntan first, and it so happens, that vitamin D is
> synthesized in the skin, so IF fluorescent light destroys vit D in the
> milk, it will synthesize it in your skin.
>
> What a bunch of concentrated nonsense, but funny.
>
>> or a population in which the frequency of
>> rickets, or any other malnutrition disorder, has increased because of the
>> use of fluorescent lights, and i'll take my statement back.
>>
>> Until then, i maintain that it's hokum.
>
> Of course it is, but mainly because UV is absorbed by normal glass.

.... no! it omly *seems* that way.in reality, the light is absorbed
ans refracted to a new dimension.

b
ps;
this is true
>

On Wed, 7 May 2008, beelzibub wrote:

> Andrzej Rosa wrote:
>> Dnia 2008-05-06 Tom Anderson napisa?(a):
>>> On Tue, 6 May 2008, Omelet wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article > ,
>>>> Tom Anderson > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 5 May 2008, (David P.) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Tom Anderson > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #2 was about how keeping milk in a transparent container leaves it
>>>>>>> vulnerable to light. If the author hasn't realised that the light goes
>>>>>>> off when you close the fridge door, ...
>>>>>> Don't you think they were referring to when the container is left out
>>>>>> on
>>>>>> the table during the meal, exposed to light?
>>>>> No, actually, i think it was referring to storing dry foods in
>>>>> transparent
>>>>> containers on the worktop. After the initial mention of milk, that's
>>>>> what
>>>>> the article talks about.
>>>>>
>>>>> I do think this is all hokum, though.
>>>> No, it's not. especially if you use fluorescent fixtures or bulbs like
>>>> many do now. There is more UV and it DOES influence some vitamin content.
>>> You show me someone who's got rickets because fluorescent lights destroyed
>>> the vitamin D in their milk,
>>
>> They should get a suntan first, and it so happens, that vitamin D is
>> synthesized in the skin, so IF fluorescent light destroys vit D in the
>> milk, it will synthesize it in your skin.
>>
>> What a bunch of concentrated nonsense, but funny.
>>
>>> or a population in which the frequency of rickets, or any other
>>> malnutrition disorder, has increased because of the use of fluorescent
>>> lights, and i'll take my statement back.
>>>
>>> Until then, i maintain that it's hokum.
>>
>> Of course it is, but mainly because UV is absorbed by normal glass.
>
> ... no! it omly *seems* that way.in reality, the light is absorbed
> ans refracted to a new dimension.
>
> b
> ps;
> this is true

WE KNEW THAT.

tom

--
Pave the world

["Followup-To:" header set to misc.fitness.weights.]
Dnia 2008-05-07 Tom Anderson napisa³(a):
> On Wed, 7 May 2008, beelzibub wrote:
>
>>>> malnutrition disorder, has increased because of the use of fluorescent
>>>> lights, and i'll take my statement back.
>>>>
>>>> Until then, i maintain that it's hokum.
>>>
>>> Of course it is, but mainly because UV is absorbed by normal glass.
>>
>> ... no! it omly *seems* that way.in reality, the light is absorbed
>> ans refracted to a new dimension.
>>
>> b
>> ps;
>> this is true
>
> WE KNEW THAT.

Is there some grain of sense here which I'm not detecting? This
dimensions thingy smells superstrings, but they couldn't explain
anything which happens in observable universe last time I checked
(horizon of events doesn't count as observable universe, the way I
see it).

Oh, whatever. I'm off to train. Outside, as usual. I think Zen
doubted that anybody here trains outside. I do, rain or fine weather,
but I do prefer when the lawn is speckled with fallen flowers of apple
tree like today, than with patches of snow in the mud. ;-)

--
Andrzej Rosa 1127R