Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 07:19:21 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
wrote: >Janet Baraclough wrote: >> > James Silverton wrote: >> >> ?I saw some large navel >> > > oranges marked "10 for....." That looked interesting until I saw >> > > it was "10 for $10" or a dollar each. Don't people do the simple >> > > arithmetic. >> >> ? ?Sadly. huge numbers of people today are incapable of the most basic >> mental arithmetic. > >What if you bought ten oranges, and after a week the last two were >rotted... that happens with produce, very often... when produce goes >on those volume sales it's far more often because it's ready to go off >than there's a glut. > >Actually a far greater percentage of people today than ever are >capable of arithmetic... reading/writing too. Far more people today >receive an eduction than ever before and a far better education... >perhaps you don't associate with educated people, I have a strong >suspician you don't, otherwise you'd not be so reactive regarding >things you know nothing about... the uneducated tend to shoot from the >hip, they don't think first.. very prevalent with newsgroup posters >who typically race to reply, and often, especially about topics of >which they know nothing. > >I think most shopppers do very well with calculating pricing, actually >too well. But many of today's marketing tactics are about placement >strategies, ego stroking, and impulse buying, but have little to do >with a patron's mathematical abilities. Most people, in the US >anyway, buy food items based more on what they need at the moment >rather than based exclusively on price... not many people are going to >drive all over town just because they can save a few pennies on a few >items... most folks in the US are smart enough to realize that when a >store prices meat a dollar less per pound that the items that go with >that particular meat are priced higher than usual, but not many are >going to drive miles to save 20 cents on onions, mushrooms, potatoes, >canned beans, etc.. most folks in the US value their time much more >than saving a dime on soda pop... and with the high cost of energy >today it never pays to go the drive-by shopping routine. And anyway >all stores have sales, and over time by shopping primarily at any one >stupidmarket the yearly grocery bill tends to even out... so Americans >tend to possess better abilities at logical deduction and more common >sense too... becoming trapped in the picayune aspects of the math is >precisely what the marketing gurus hope for, their goal is to coerce >shoppers into buying volume... the shopper doesn't get nearly the >volume discount the store does. Next time you see a 2fer, 5fer or >10fer sale even if it costs a few cents less, think more about if you >really need that many instead of computing the math.... because if >just one doesn't get used you're a loser. Whenever you buy more >volume and larger sizes than you can possibly use in a reasonable time >you are not only investing your dollars into non interest bearing >commodities but you are losing the use of your capital (actually >transfering it to the store for free), and you have to warehouse all >that bulk on your shelves, in your fridge, in your freezer. which >frees up the store's shelves and saves them money (you become a free >warehouser, but also a goodly portion will often spoil before you can >use it). People tend to prepare larger amounts than they can >reasonably use just because they have the extra volume on hand, >especially with the larger sizes... then the leftovers end up in the >trash and then not only have you saved nothing but if you do the math >you'll discover that you actually come out in a much poorer position >than had you NOT did the math originally that coerced you to buy that >ten pound sack of spuds instead of the five pounds... you innitially >saved 50 cents but three weeks later tossed three pounds into the >composter. You know where you can shove your pence pinching math. I am very fortunate that our regular grocery store charges by the item, even when price at 2 for or 10 for. If the price is 3 for $.99 and the regular price is $.40, I can buy 1 for $.33, I do not have to buy 3 to get the lower price. -- Susan N. "Moral indignation is in most cases two percent moral, 48 percent indignation, and 50 percent envy." Vittorio De Sica, Italian movie director (1901-1974) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
For once, I ignored the price per unit. | General Cooking | |||
Pricing hoo ha! | General Cooking | |||
PL Unit on soon | General Cooking | |||
The Real Unit | General Cooking | |||
Futures pricing | Wine |