Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
is a wireless laptop in the kitchen. i just bought a wirless router and
discovered how much an advantage it is to have tha laptop in the kitchen. i can search for recipes and pick the ones that suit what i have available in the kitchen... anyone else ready to throw away their cookbooks? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chatty Cathy wrote:
> wrote: >> is a wireless laptop in the kitchen. i just bought a wirless router and >> discovered how much an advantage it is to have tha laptop in the >> kitchen. i can search for recipes and pick the ones that suit what i >> have available in the kitchen... anyone else ready to throw away their >> cookbooks? >> > Judging by a recent survey, only 8% of us ![]() > Oops only 8 of us.... -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chatty Cathy wrote:
> Chatty Cathy wrote: > >> wrote: >> >>> is a wireless laptop in the kitchen. i just bought a wirless router and >>> discovered how much an advantage it is to have tha laptop in the >>> kitchen. i can search for recipes and pick the ones that suit what i >>> have available in the kitchen... anyone else ready to throw away their >>> cookbooks? >>> >> Judging by a recent survey, only 8% of us ![]() >> > Oops only 8 of us.... > Im too much of a bibliomanic to even consider a computer over a book. Though after discussing it here with several other collectors of cook books, i don't feel im such a maniac about it after all. My poor, little collection of maybe 500 cook books (including paper backs and pamphlets) is nothing compared to the thousands some people have. --- JL |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
>> Chatty Cathy wrote: >> Oops only 8 of us.... >> > Im too much of a bibliomanic to even consider a computer over a book. > > Though after discussing it here with several other collectors of cook > books, i don't feel im such a maniac about it after all. My poor, > little collection of maybe 500 cook books (including paper backs and > pamphlets) is nothing compared to the thousands some people have. JL, I am not one of the 8 (sorry if my grammar was misleading ![]() I have considered it, but... I also have a lot of cookbooks, photocopies etc. of recipes which would just take me *forever* to capture onto the recipe software I have, so there's really not much point. I do save recipes from r.f.c. and other related on-line sources onto my PC, but I still print these recipes out and take them into the kitchen when needed. Besides, I have come to the conclusion that I am just too "messy" to have a PC in there anyway. -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 23:33:04 +0200, Chatty Cathy
> wrote: >Joseph Littleshoes wrote: > >>> Chatty Cathy wrote: > >>> Oops only 8 of us.... >>> >> Im too much of a bibliomanic to even consider a computer over a book. >> >> Though after discussing it here with several other collectors of cook >> books, i don't feel im such a maniac about it after all. My poor, >> little collection of maybe 500 cook books (including paper backs and >> pamphlets) is nothing compared to the thousands some people have. > >JL, I am not one of the 8 (sorry if my grammar was misleading ![]() > >I have considered it, but... I also have a lot of cookbooks, photocopies >etc. of recipes which would just take me *forever* to capture onto the >recipe software I have, so there's really not much point. I do save >recipes from r.f.c. and other related on-line sources onto my PC, but I >still print these recipes out and take them into the kitchen when >needed. Besides, I have come to the conclusion that I am just too >"messy" to have a PC in there anyway. I am one of those that collects cookbooks.... And a computer will never replace a cookbook ...at least for me. My cookbooks are my friends....old friends...exciting, comfortable, enticing...you name it. And I have over 1000 of them, I think. Haven't counted lately, so not sure. My collection is paltry compared to some I have heard about... I have heard of folks on eGullet that have over 3-4 thousand..... I am slowly unpacking all my cookbooks, mainly cause I am stopping here and there to read one or look through another. I forgot some of the ones I had...so it is like discovering them all over again.... I am not one to just use them for recipes. I am one of those that takes them to read like I would read a novel, and that is one of the main reasons that a computer will never take their place. Christine |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Chatty Cathy wrote: > needed. Besides, I have come to the conclusion that I am just too > "messy" to have a PC in there anyway. nowadays you can get Dell laptops for $3-400. So i am not too bothered about dirtying it up. in any case that is highly unlikely as i just need to look at the screen, not type anything. after i am done cooking the laptop goes back on my office desk ( aka kitchen table )... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chatty Cathy" > wrote in message ... > Chatty Cathy wrote: >> wrote: >>> is a wireless laptop in the kitchen. i just bought a wirless router and >>> discovered how much an advantage it is to have tha laptop in the >>> kitchen. i can search for recipes and pick the ones that suit what i >>> have available in the kitchen... anyone else ready to throw away their >>> cookbooks? >>> >> Judging by a recent survey, only 8% of us ![]() >> > Oops only 8 of us.... > > -- > Cheers > Chatty Cathy -------- Cathy? I think you meant .8 (point 8). LOL -- Cyndi (again) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cyndi wrote:
>>> >> Oops only 8 of us.... >> >> -- >> Cheers >> Chatty Cathy > -------- > > Cathy? I think you meant .8 (point 8). LOL No. I meant 8. We did a "Kitchen computer" survey a few weeks back. Out of 33 votes only 8 said that they had a computer in the kitchen. But if you wanna be mathematically correct that works out to 24%. LOL -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
said...
> is a wireless laptop in the kitchen. i just bought a wirless router and > discovered how much an advantage it is to have tha laptop in the > kitchen. i can search for recipes and pick the ones that suit what i > have available in the kitchen... anyone else ready to throw away their > cookbooks? Welcome to the club... save the cookbooks for power outtages. Andy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dean G. wrote on 18 Sep 2006 in rec.food.cooking
> My computer is only a few steps from the kitchen, so I don't plan on > moving or adding one to the kitchen. I'll be keeping (and adding to) my > cookbook collection even though I use the computer more and more. > > Dean G. > I put recipes in recipe software. I also put references to recipes in Cookbooks. Like the Actual book, page number and any notes I might have added. I hate looking and searching in vain for a recipe in the wrong cookbook. After I try a recipe from a book, if I like it, I'll add it to NYC as just the title, with cookbook, page number and any changes or notes I have about it. If I make it more than twice I'll add the whole recipe with notes to software. That way my cookbooks stay cleaner and I find stuff easier. I also add recipes from books I might want to try, but in another software cookbook. NYC and Mastercook allow many cookbooks with many recipes per book. So I have software cookbooks like test, reference, bread, holidays, favorites, desserts, sidedishes, poultry, lamb, slowcooker...etc. Being what is generally called scatterbrained, the search feature of the software allows way easier access to recipes I want to eithwer try or cook; with notes on the recipe that I wouldn't dare deface my paper cookbooks with. -- Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect -Alan |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mr Libido Incognito wrote: > Dean G. wrote on 18 Sep 2006 in rec.food.cooking > > > My computer is only a few steps from the kitchen, so I don't plan on > > moving or adding one to the kitchen. I'll be keeping (and adding to) my > > cookbook collection even though I use the computer more and more. > > > > Dean G. > > > > I put recipes in recipe software. I also put references to recipes in > Cookbooks. Like the Actual book, page number and any notes I might have > added. I hate looking and searching in vain for a recipe in the wrong > cookbook. After I try a recipe from a book, if I like it, I'll add it to > NYC as just the title, with cookbook, page number and any changes or > notes I have about it. If I make it more than twice I'll add the whole > recipe with notes to software. That way my cookbooks stay cleaner and I > find stuff easier. I also add recipes from books I might want to try, but > in another software cookbook. NYC and Mastercook allow many cookbooks > with many recipes per book. So I have software cookbooks like test, > reference, bread, holidays, favorites, desserts, sidedishes, poultry, > lamb, slowcooker...etc. Being what is generally called scatterbrained, > the search feature of the software allows way easier access to recipes I > want to eithwer try or cook; with notes on the recipe that I wouldn't > dare deface my paper cookbooks with. Sounds like a good system, although I don't hold the books in the reverence that some people do. Many a great commentary started as a scribble in the margin of a great book. Besides, my methodology often results in a "scratch-and-sniff" quality overlooked by the publisher. I'll get my coat. Dean G. > > -- > > > Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect > > -Alan |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dean G." > wrote in message oups.com... > > wrote: >> wrote: >> > is a wireless laptop in the kitchen. i just bought a wirless router and >> > discovered how much an advantage it is to have tha laptop in the >> > kitchen. i can search for recipes and pick the ones that suit what i >> > have available in the kitchen... anyone else ready to throw away their >> > cookbooks? >> >> I frequently spill on my cookbooks while cooking. This does not really >> hurt them, adds "character" to my favorite recipe pages, and the spill >> is easy to clean up. I'd have heart failure if I spilled something wet >> on/into my laptop and ruined it. Cookbooks are a lot cheaper to >> replace. And I have a certain sentimental atachment to them. > > My brother put his old computer in the kitchen. No need to the latest > and greatest to run MasterCook. The "desktop" is hidden away from > spills and such, with only the keyboard in any clear and present > danger. Keyboards can be replaced for a pittance, and you can buy > spill-resistant tops for them as well. Otherwise, he has his old > cookbooks in the kitchen as well. > > My computer is only a few steps from the kitchen, so I don't plan on > moving or adding one to the kitchen. I'll be keeping (and adding to) my > cookbook collection even though I use the computer more and more. > > Dean G. ============= I keep (kept - as I'm still unpacking) my cookbooks in the dining room and breakfast nook. If I actually allowed one into the kitchen (I have a fear of damaging them) it was covered with a small piece of plexyglass for protection. -- Cyndi (again) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The best cookbook is the one(s) that you actually use to cook from, and the
ones I use are not online. As far as a computer, I guess a lot depends on the configuration of your kitchen. I prefer researching recipes at my desk in my office. Having said that, it would be nice to have my MasterCook files handy in the kitchen, but I don't care to devote space to a PC, even a laptop. -- Wayne Boatwright __________________________________________________ Is it ok to use my AM radio after NOON? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17 Sep 2006 05:53:21 +0200, Wayne Boatwright
<wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> rummaged among random neurons and opined: >The best cookbook is the one(s) that you actually use to cook from, and the >ones I use are not online. > >As far as a computer, I guess a lot depends on the configuration of your >kitchen. I prefer researching recipes at my desk in my office. > >Having said that, it would be nice to have my MasterCook files handy in the >kitchen, but I don't care to devote space to a PC, even a laptop. I have "Now You're Cooking" software on my PC in my home office. When I want to use a recipe, I just print it out and throw it away when I'm done. Keeps the clutter down in the kitchen by not having my laptop in there. Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd AAC(F)BV66.0748.CA "Most vigitaryans I iver see looked enough like their food to be classed as cannybals." Finley Peter Dunne (1900) To reply, replace "spaminator" with "cox" |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Terry Pulliam Burd wrote on 17 Sep 2006 in rec.food.cooking
> I have "Now You're Cooking" software on my PC in my home office. When > I want to use a recipe, I just print it out and throw it away when I'm > done. Keeps the clutter down in the kitchen by not having my laptop in > there. > > Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd > AAC(F)BV66.0748.CA > > "Most vigitaryans I iver see looked enough like their food to be > classed as cannybals." > > Finley Peter Dunne (1900) > > To reply, replace "spaminator" with "cox" > > Same here except I don't have a home office. -- Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect -Alan |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh pshaw, on Sun 17 Sep 2006 03:44:21p, Terry Pulliam Burd meant to say...
> On 17 Sep 2006 05:53:21 +0200, Wayne Boatwright > <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> rummaged among random neurons and > opined: > >>The best cookbook is the one(s) that you actually use to cook from, and >>the ones I use are not online. >> >>As far as a computer, I guess a lot depends on the configuration of your >>kitchen. I prefer researching recipes at my desk in my office. >> >>Having said that, it would be nice to have my MasterCook files handy in >>the kitchen, but I don't care to devote space to a PC, even a laptop. > > I have "Now You're Cooking" software on my PC in my home office. When > I want to use a recipe, I just print it out and throw it away when I'm > done. Keeps the clutter down in the kitchen by not having my laptop in > there. Actually, that's what I do, too, Terry. -- Wayne Boatwright __________________________________________________ Is it ok to use my AM radio after NOON? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Te best cookbook is...the one that fits your cooking and eating style, i.e. one that you will use and refer to often. Mine used to be Fanny Farmer ca 1965 ed. and the old Joy of Cooking. More recently I rarely use a cookbook, but when I do, it's often one of the first two in the Colorado Jr. Women's League series: Colorado Cache and Taste of Colorado. Both have some terrific recipes for entertaining. I also often refer to rfc archives via Google, and the rfc cookbook. I agree with (was it Christine?) who said she reads her cookbooks for entertainment like novels. gloria p |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:33:22 GMT, Puester >
wrote: >I agree with (was it Christine?) who said she reads her cookbooks for >entertainment like novels. Yes, that was me. And that is exactly why it is taking me so darn long to unpack all my cookbooks. I keep coming across an old favorite..or one I had forgotten that I had...and of course I have to sit down and read through it. ![]() Christine |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Puester wrote: > Te best cookbook is...the one that fits your cooking and eating style, > i.e. one that you will use and refer to often. > > Mine used to be Fanny Farmer ca 1965 ed. and the old Joy of Cooking. > More recently I rarely use a cookbook, but when I do, it's often one of > the first two in the Colorado Jr. Women's League series: Colorado Cache > and Taste of Colorado. Both have some terrific recipes for entertaining. > > I also often refer to rfc archives via Google, and the rfc cookbook. > > I agree with (was it Christine?) who said she reads her cookbooks for > entertainment like novels. > > gloria p I feel like a dummy, but what is rfc? bliss |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
timbrel wrote on 18 Sep 2006 in rec.food.cooking
> > Puester wrote: > > Te best cookbook is...the one that fits your cooking and eating > > style, i.e. one that you will use and refer to often. > > > > Mine used to be Fanny Farmer ca 1965 ed. and the old Joy of Cooking. > > More recently I rarely use a cookbook, but when I do, it's often one > > of the first two in the Colorado Jr. Women's League series: > > Colorado Cache and Taste of Colorado. Both have some terrific > > recipes for entertaining. > > > > I also often refer to rfc archives via Google, and the rfc cookbook. > > > > I agree with (was it Christine?) who said she reads her cookbooks > > for entertainment like novels. > > > > gloria p > > I feel like a dummy, but what is rfc? > > bliss > > RFC? Well Rec.food.cooking of course. The newsgroup in which you posted the query. Feel better now? Don't you hate brain farts...I do. -- Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect -Alan |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh pshaw, on Mon 18 Sep 2006 06:46:38a, timbrel meant to say...
> > Puester wrote: >> Te best cookbook is...the one that fits your cooking and eating style, >> i.e. one that you will use and refer to often. >> >> Mine used to be Fanny Farmer ca 1965 ed. and the old Joy of Cooking. >> More recently I rarely use a cookbook, but when I do, it's often one of >> the first two in the Colorado Jr. Women's League series: Colorado Cache >> and Taste of Colorado. Both have some terrific recipes for entertaining. >> >> I also often refer to rfc archives via Google, and the rfc cookbook. >> >> I agree with (was it Christine?) who said she reads her cookbooks for >> entertainment like novels. >> >> gloria p > > I feel like a dummy, but what is rfc? > > bliss This newsgroup, rec.food.cooking. Most of us here refer to it by "rfc". -- Wayne Boatwright @¿@¬ _____________________ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Terry Pulliam Burd" > wrote in message ... > On 17 Sep 2006 05:53:21 +0200, Wayne Boatwright > <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> rummaged among random neurons and > opined: > > >The best cookbook is the one(s) that you actually use to cook from, and the > >ones I use are not online. > > > >As far as a computer, I guess a lot depends on the configuration of your > >kitchen. I prefer researching recipes at my desk in my office. > > > >Having said that, it would be nice to have my MasterCook files handy in the > >kitchen, but I don't care to devote space to a PC, even a laptop. > > I have "Now You're Cooking" software on my PC in my home office. When > I want to use a recipe, I just print it out and throw it away when I'm > done. Keeps the clutter down in the kitchen by not having my laptop in > there. > > Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd > AAC(F)BV66.0748.CA > > "Most vigitaryans I iver see looked enough like their food to be > classed as cannybals." > > Finley Peter Dunne (1900) > > To reply, replace "spaminator" with "cox" ===== That's a good point; never thought of that plus, as far as using recipe software; tossing it away and keeping down the clutter; recipe clutter is my problem. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16 Sep 2006 12:12:53 -0700, wrote:
>is a wireless laptop in the kitchen. i just bought a wirless router and >discovered how much an advantage it is to have tha laptop in the >kitchen. i can search for recipes and pick the ones that suit what i >have available in the kitchen... anyone else ready to throw away their >cookbooks? Not on your life. There's nothing that's quite the same as a real book in my hands. I love the web, and I think it's massively useful, but I will never willingly give up having actual books to read and savor, especially with lots of great food pictures. serene -- "I can't decide if I feel more like four ten-year-olds or ten four-year-olds." Laurie Anderson , on turning 40. http://serenejournal.livejournal.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Litttle Malice" > wrote in message ... > One time on Usenet, said: > >> is a wireless laptop in the kitchen. i just bought a wirless router and >> discovered how much an advantage it is to have tha laptop in the >> kitchen. i can search for recipes and pick the ones that suit what i >> have available in the kitchen... anyone else ready to throw away their >> cookbooks? > > No, they have recipes that aren't in my computer, and I don't have > time to type them all up. I do like having recipes in my HD, though. > I tend to print them out with my grocery list, then if they don't get > too messed up while I'm cooking, I give them to family/friends... > > -- > "Little Malice" is Jani in WA > ~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~ =============== Same here Jani. I once had planned to scan the indexes of my most used cookbooks so if I could more speedily find a specific recipe but never did do it. One of these days I'll have to consider that idea again. -- Cyndi (again) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh pshaw, on Sat 23 Sep 2006 06:12:26a, Cyndi meant to say...
> > > > "Litttle Malice" > wrote in message > ... >> One time on Usenet, said: >> >>> is a wireless laptop in the kitchen. i just bought a wirless router and >>> discovered how much an advantage it is to have tha laptop in the >>> kitchen. i can search for recipes and pick the ones that suit what i >>> have available in the kitchen... anyone else ready to throw away their >>> cookbooks? >> >> No, they have recipes that aren't in my computer, and I don't have >> time to type them all up. I do like having recipes in my HD, though. >> I tend to print them out with my grocery list, then if they don't get >> too messed up while I'm cooking, I give them to family/friends... >> >> -- >> "Little Malice" is Jani in WA ~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~ > =============== > > Same here Jani. > > I once had planned to scan the indexes of my most used cookbooks so if I > could more speedily find a specific recipe but never did do it. One of > these days I'll have to consider that idea again. Wow, I actually did that several years ago. Scanned into a software package that allowed me to electronically highlight selected entries. I put them in a small ring binder that I keep in the kitchen. -- Wayne Boatwright __________________________________________________ Useless Invention: Double-sided playing cards. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
"Cyndi" > wrote: > "Litttle Malice" > wrote in message > ... > > One time on Usenet, said: > > > >> is a wireless laptop in the kitchen. i just bought a wirless router and > >> discovered how much an advantage it is to have tha laptop in the > >> kitchen. i can search for recipes and pick the ones that suit what i > >> have available in the kitchen... anyone else ready to throw away their > >> cookbooks? > > > > No, they have recipes that aren't in my computer, and I don't have > > time to type them all up. I do like having recipes in my HD, though. > > I tend to print them out with my grocery list, then if they don't get > > too messed up while I'm cooking, I give them to family/friends... > > > > -- > > "Little Malice" is Jani in WA > > ~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~ > =============== > > Same here Jani. > > I once had planned to scan the indexes of my most used cookbooks so if I > could more speedily find a specific recipe but never did do it. One of > these days I'll have to consider that idea again. I created separate FileMaker databases for cookbook and "clipping" recipes that we've tested over the years. The fields include cookbook, category, name of recipe, page #, comments, and major ingredients. We also have a field called best of, for those recipes that we consider our favorites. So if we can't remember where we found a good recipe for (as an example) lamb tagine, I can use the search function to find it. The recipes I've downloaded onto the Mac over the years have only rarely been used. It's easier for me to go to the cookbook collection and browse. I proudly admit to being a Luddite in this aspect of my life. Cindy -- C.J. Fuller Delete the obvious to email me |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Sep 2006 11:10:17 -0700, "aem" > wrote:
wrote: anyone else ready to throw away their >> cookbooks? > >Not a chance. A good cookbook is a lot more than a collection of >recipes. A good cookbook offers a point of view, information about the >food beyond how to cook it, instructions about techniques, suggestions >for alternatives and variations, and sometimes an accompanying >narrative that places a dish in a broader context. If all you want is >a recipe, fine, go to the web and wade through 15 versions of recipes >with no clues as to why one will work better or worse than another. AMEN!!!!! Christine |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christine Dabney wrote:
> On 18 Sep 2006 11:10:17 -0700, "aem" > wrote: > > wrote: > anyone else ready to throw away their > >> cookbooks? > > > >Not a chance. A good cookbook is a lot more than a collection of > >recipes. A good cookbook offers a point of view, information about the > >food beyond how to cook it, instructions about techniques, suggestions > >for alternatives and variations, and sometimes an accompanying > >narrative that places a dish in a broader context. If all you want is > >a recipe, fine, go to the web and wade through 15 versions of recipes > >with no clues as to why one will work better or worse than another. > > AMEN!!!!! > > Christine I use both. When I have time to read my cookbooks and select interesting things I do that. Particularly the authors I have learned I can rely on like Marcella Hazan, Joan Nathan, Helen Nash, Julie Sahni, Anna Thomas. But if I use a recipe I enter the ingredients in my Now Your Cooking database with a reference to the page. That way when I want to create menus I can use the database and include the things I've liked from the books. I download recipes from reliable sources as well. But the speed of using recipe software has captured me. I'm entertaining 12 at lunch for each day of Rosh Hashonah. I sit and select recipes by type and course, combine them into a menu, create a shopping list and print the ones I need or get out the books that have them. DONE. I have previous menus to refer to and ratings to say which recipes I've already used and liked. Can't beat it. I also use the magazines, Cooking Light, Fine Cooking, Bon Appetit, Gourmet. All have a place in my approach to cooking and menu planning. I wish I was independent of recipes, but I'm not. Nevertheless, I produce a good lunch or dinner from all these sources, if I do say so myself :-) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20 Sep 2006 06:17:53 -0700, "timbrel" > wrote:
>All have a place in my approach to cooking and menu planning. >I wish I was independent of recipes, but I'm not. Nevertheless, I >produce a good lunch or dinner from all these sources, if I do say so >myself :-) I think one of the things that people are missing here is that those of us that really love cookbooks don't use them just for the recipes. Sometimes the recipes are incidental to the rest of the book or are not very good. But it is the book itself that draws us, with the stories it presents, or whatever. Sometimes both the stories and the recipes are extremely good..and we use those recipes in our cooking. For me, it is never totally about the recipes. Christine |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Christine Dabney wrote: > > I think one of the things that people are missing here is that those > of us that really love cookbooks don't use them just for the recipes. > Sometimes the recipes are incidental to the rest of the book or are > not very good. But it is the book itself that draws us, with the > stories it presents, or whatever. Sometimes both the stories and the > recipes are extremely good..and we use those recipes in our cooking. > > For me, it is never totally about the recipes. > > Christine Actually Christine I do get it and I tried to convey that you and I are very different in that way. I rarely read the cookbooks, sometimes I'll pass something in my menu planning and vow to come back to it, but I rarely do. I know that there are many people who view the books the way you do, the group doesn't happen to include me. My fun in cooking is the planning of interesting menus and their execution, not the background to an ethnic cuisine or the history of a recipe or cook. No great harm, the ranks of cookbook authors are increasing daily and my favorite software is now ver. 5.74. I think I started with version 3. Bliss |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() > wrote in message ups.com... > is a wireless laptop in the kitchen. i just bought a wirless router and > discovered how much an advantage it is to have tha laptop in the > kitchen. i can search for recipes and pick the ones that suit what i > have available in the kitchen... anyone else ready to throw away their > cookbooks? >========== No. NEVER!! I love my cookbooks. Heck, I probably (okay, definitely) treat them better than I treat my family. They always make me happy and tell me that I should eat more.... hello! How could one ever get rid of dear friends? I say that even after moving them out of state twice, within two years. Nonononononononononononono. I'd love to have a wireless computer in the kitchen but it would never replace my cookbooks. -- Cyndi (again) Compulsive cookbook addict |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New Cookbook | General Cooking | |||
Low Fat Cookbook | General Cooking | |||
Cookbook Suggestion: was (2009-03-08) NS-RFC: The RFC Cookbook on-line | General Cooking | |||
Got a New Cookbook | General Cooking | |||
A cookbook for not just ANYBODY....... | General Cooking |