Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Chocolate (rec.food.chocolate) all topics related to eating and making chocolate such as cooking techniques, recipes, history, folklore & source recommendations. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.chocolate
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I eat every evening, 40g of chocolate bars, with 70,till 85% of cocoa
in them. I try to taste as many chocolate brands, as I can. Now, I have some Lindt85% and some Spanish chocolates, of brand Frescü. I tried to taste them and see the differences, but in the room temperature, which is not high these days,I could not "see", big differences, between them.Not at all bad. Yesterday, because of a therapy I had in my teeth, I should not bite a chocolate, because of hardness. So, I put the two portions from the two, in the Microwave oven, to warm them. After this, I tasted them and I "saw", that there was a big difference between them, ie while the Lindt, was not at all tasty,giving me a taste of rubber, the Frescü bar, was very tasty again. I ask, why is this difference,between the two, in higher temperature, while they are equal in a lower one. |
Posted to rec.food.chocolate
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Theodore wrote:
> I eat every evening, 40g of chocolate bars, with 70,till 85% of cocoa > in them. > I try to taste as many chocolate brands, as I can. > Now, I have some Lindt85% and some Spanish chocolates, of brand > Frescü. > I tried to taste them and see the differences, but in the room > temperature, which is not high these days,I could not "see", big > differences, between them.Not at all bad. > Yesterday, because of a therapy I had in my teeth, I should not bite > a chocolate, because of hardness. > So, I put the two portions from the two, in the Microwave oven, to > warm them. > After this, I tasted them and I "saw", that there was a big > difference between them, ie while the Lindt, was not at all > tasty,giving me a taste of rubber, the Frescü bar, was very tasty > again. > I ask, why is this difference,between the two, in higher temperature, > while they are equal in a lower one. > Because more of the chocolate was melted in your mouth perhaps and so more taste buds were exposed to the chocolate. The Lindt may not have been designed to be exposed to higher temperatures. The Spanish brand was probably expected to be exposed to higher temperature and blended to avoid the bad taste you found. You do know that where and how chocolate or rather the cocao beans are grown has an effect on taste along with the extensive but simple processing the beans must go through to become a product? later bliss -- C O C O A Powered... (at california dot com) -- bobbie sellers - a retired nurse in San Francisco "It is by will alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of cocoa that the thoughts acquire speed, the thighs acquire girth, the girth become a warning. It is by theobromine alone I set my mind in motion." --from Someone else's Dune spoof ripped to my taste. |
Posted to rec.food.chocolate
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Theodore wrote:
> > I ask, why is this difference,between the two, in higher temperature, > while they are equal in a lower one. Most of flavor sensation is smell. The tongue can only sense bitter, sweet, sour, and salty. When you heat chocolate, you are liberating aroma molecules which contribute greatly to flavor sensation. Apparently, one of your chocolates had more to liberate than the other. Or it could have released its molecules in the time frame in which you performed the experiment. The other one may have released its molecules too soon or too late. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
chocolate coconut bars | Chocolate | |||
Double Chocolate Bars | Recipes (moderated) | |||
Homemade Chocolate Bars | General Cooking | |||
REC - Chocolate Cherry Bars | General Cooking | |||
Chocolate pecan bars | General Cooking |