FoodBanter.com

FoodBanter.com (https://www.foodbanter.com/)
-   Barbecue (https://www.foodbanter.com/barbecue/)
-   -   Questions for all (https://www.foodbanter.com/barbecue/404199-re-questions-all.html)

Pico Rico 15-01-2011 05:25 PM

Questions for all
 

>
> Actually, in all fairness, re-reading his post, he did specifically
> mention 3 cuts of meat and ribs weren't one of them. <g>



True, but the question failed to follow fundamental grammatical rules. The
phrasing of that question would never pass muster in a real exam.

But, I don't think it necessitated such a defensive posture on his part.

Who cares?

I like to smoke ham hocks, too. Feel free to attack me for that, O.P.



bbq 15-01-2011 10:37 PM

Questions for all
 
On 1/15/2011 11:25 AM, Pico Rico wrote:
>>
>> Actually, in all fairness, re-reading his post, he did specifically
>> mention 3 cuts of meat and ribs weren't one of them.<g>

>
>
> True, but the question failed to follow fundamental grammatical rules. The
> phrasing of that question would never pass muster in a real exam.
>


I didn't know posting to a NG requires the poster to pretend they are in
a writing exam.

Thanks for the info. I'll have to take a refresher course to
update/improve my writing skills..


BBQ

bbq 15-01-2011 11:40 PM

Questions for all
 
On 1/15/2011 5:15 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:37:33 -0600, bbq wrote:
>
>> I didn't know posting to a NG requires the poster to pretend they are in
>> a writing exam.

>
> Whenever the OP starts calling people "pieces of shit", "assholes",
> and "****wad trolls" for not interpreting his question to his liking
> then he opens himself up criticism from every possible angle.
>
> And that includes the way he phrased the question that caused him to
> get so bent out of shape so easily in the first place. Marty is just
> a blowhard looking for trouble.
>
> Did you notice that now he said wanted opinions on "bone-in/out" as
> his original motive for asking the question, yet that was not a part
> of the original question either? He doesn't even know what he posted
> or why.
>
> -sw



I don't like the name calling. But hell, it's just a ng. It's not
directed towards me, so I ignore it. I realize you and he will never
meet for a beer and/or barbecue..

If someone starts calling me names, call me a wuss, but I will just
ignore it and move on. I have many in my KF. But that's been reserved
for the spammer jerks. Not necessarily the people I just don't care for
the way they communicate, but do sometimes provide some conversation to
the topic..

BBQ



bbq 16-01-2011 12:30 AM

Questions for all
 
On 1/15/2011 5:31 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 17:09:39 -0600, bbq wrote:
>
>> On 1/15/2011 3:24 PM, Skwertz wrote:
>>
>>> ObBBQ: I'm having Pittsburgh-style "Barbecues" this afternoon.
>>> Pictures in ABF later.

>>
>> I think the barbecue ng writing instructor will mark you down for the
>> incorrect use of "Barbecues".

>
> That's what they're called in Pittsburgh. I put the word in quotes
> like that so nobody could cry foul.
>
> -sw



I kinda thought in Pittsburgh, they had different rules. But I didn't
want to "jump to a wrong conclusion" ;-)

BBQ




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter