Ed,

I have tried to e-mail Bill Wright on the e-mail address on the FAQ webpage
but it has bounced. The reason being that there is a minor error that I feel
should be corrected to keep the FAQ $B!H(Bgospel$B!I(B. This wasn$B!G(Bt picked up by
me, but a friend, whom I had steered to the FAQ and is looking at purchasing
a Charbroil smoker similar to mine, who asked me to rectify his query.
Under the equipment section on Charbroil, the text states that the Charbroil
H2O water smoker. $B!H(BThe body DOES NOT remove from the charcoal pan$B!I(B. This
is correct on their basic model, but their H2O deluxe model DOES allow you
to remove the body.


I know that this probably seems insignificant, but to a 1st timer it could
be quite important.

Don$B!G(Bt know if you want to reword the text or not? Hope this helps in some
minute way.

Regards

Graeme

"Graeme...in London" > wrote in message
...
> Ed,
>
> I have tried to e-mail Bill Wright on the e-mail address on the FAQ
webpage
> but it has bounced.

I just sent you the last address I have for him.


> The reason being that there is a minor error that I feel
> should be corrected to keep the FAQ $B!H(Bgospel$B!I(B. This
wasn$B!G(Bt picked up by
> me, but a friend, whom I had steered to the FAQ and is looking at
purchasing
> a Charbroil smoker similar to mine, who asked me to rectify his query.

> I know that this probably seems insignificant, but to a 1st timer it could
> be quite important.

Equipment changes. Could be an error, could be a change. Either way, good
to have it fixed.

FWIW, today is a celebration the day we no longer talked to the Brits. I
could get in trouble doing this, but in the spirit of BBQ, I'll have a go.
Ed

http://pages.cthome.net/edhome

"Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote in message
. ..
>
> "Graeme...in London" > wrote in message
> ...

>
> FWIW, today is a celebration the day we no longer talked to the Brits. I
> could get in trouble doing this, but in the spirit of BBQ, I'll have a go.
> Ed
>
> http://pages.cthome.net/edhome
>

Hah! I disagree. This isn't a celebration of the day we no longer TALKED
to the Brits. This is a celebration of the day we no longer had to LISTEN
to, and OBEY the Brits ;-).

They always have been and always will be very pleasant to talk to.

Cheers, Graeme!

John in Austin

On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 17:55:39 GMT, "JakBQuik" >
wrote:

>
>"Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> "Graeme...in London" > wrote in message
>> ...
>
>>
>> FWIW, today is a celebration the day we no longer talked to the Brits. I
>> could get in trouble doing this, but in the spirit of BBQ, I'll have a go.
>> Ed
>>
>> http://pages.cthome.net/edhome
>>
>
>Hah! I disagree. This isn't a celebration of the day we no longer TALKED
>to the Brits. This is a celebration of the day we no longer had to LISTEN
>to, and OBEY the Brits ;-).
>
>They always have been and always will be very pleasant to talk to.
>
>Cheers, Graeme!
>
>John in Austin
>
>
Absolutely! Talking with them is wonderful. It's those cute little
accents they have. Makes them sound so smart and sophisticated.
Especially David Niven.

Love them Brits!

Happy Fourth!

-Chef Juke
"EVERYbody Eats When They Come To MY House!"
www.chefjuke.com

"Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote in message
. ..
>
> "Graeme...in London" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Ed,
> >
> > I have tried to e-mail Bill Wright on the e-mail address on the FAQ
> webpage
> > but it has bounced.
>
> I just sent you the last address I have for him.
>
>
> > The reason being that there is a minor error that I feel
> > should be corrected to keep the FAQ $B!H(Bgospel$B!I(B. This
> wasn$B!G(Bt picked up by
> > me, but a friend, whom I had steered to the FAQ and is looking at
> purchasing
> > a Charbroil smoker similar to mine, who asked me to rectify his query.
>
> > I know that this probably seems insignificant, but to a 1st timer it could
> > be quite important.
>
> Equipment changes. Could be an error, could be a change. Either way, good
> to have it fixed.
>
> FWIW, today is a celebration the day we no longer talked to the Brits. I
> could get in trouble doing this, but in the spirit of BBQ, I'll have a go.
> Ed
>
> http://pages.cthome.net/edhome
>
>

Hey Ed, is the FAQ too hallowed ground to organize an update? You and eskwired I
think are the only ones still left who've been here from the beginning so I
assumed you'd know.

Where is David these days anyway?


Tyler

In article >,
Tyler Hopper > wrote:
>
>Hey Ed, is the FAQ too hallowed ground to organize an update? You and eskwired I
>think are the only ones still left who've been here from the beginning so I
>assumed you'd know.
>
>Where is David these days anyway?

He's around lurking from Newton, Massachusetts.


Chuck Demas

--
Eat Healthy | _ _ | Nothing would be done at all,
Stay Fit | @ @ | If a man waited to do it so well,
Die Anyway | v | That no one could find fault with it.
| \___/ | http://world.std.com/~cpd

"Tyler Hopper" > wrote in message
...

> Hey Ed, is the FAQ too hallowed ground to organize an update? You and
eskwired I
> think are the only ones still left who've been here from the beginning so
I
> assumed you'd know.
>
> Where is David these days anyway?
>
I agree. Not to flog Kamado or BBQ Guru, but neither is mentioned in the
faq and both have made significant contributions to the art.
For that matter, the ceramic cooker section only mentions BGE and omits
Primo and Grilldome, too.

Jack Curry
-I'll help-

Jack Curry wrote:

> I agree. Not to flog Kamado or BBQ Guru, but neither is mentioned in
> the faq and both have made significant contributions to the art.
> For that matter, the ceramic cooker section only mentions BGE and
> omits Primo and Grilldome, too.

I'm wondering if it might be useful to consider a seperate Barbecue
Equipment FAQ that could act as a supplement or appendix to the original.
Equipment and accessories seem to be far more likely to change frequently,
than the theories, techniques and recipes of the original. Just a thought.

"Dave Bugg" <deebuggatcharterdotnet> wrote in message
...
> Jack Curry wrote:
>
> > I agree. Not to flog Kamado or BBQ Guru, but neither is mentioned in
> > the faq and both have made significant contributions to the art.
> > For that matter, the ceramic cooker section only mentions BGE and
> > omits Primo and Grilldome, too.
>
> I'm wondering if it might be useful to consider a seperate Barbecue
> Equipment FAQ that could act as a supplement or appendix to the original.
> Equipment and accessories seem to be far more likely to change frequently,
> than the theories, techniques and recipes of the original. Just a thought.
>
>
And a good thought at that, Dave. On the other hand, Big Jim's proven
high-temp Q technique seems to have altered our long-standing techniques,
too.
In either case, I'm with Tyler. The FAQ could use a tune-up.

Jack Curry

Jack Curry wrote:

> I agree. Not to flog Kamado or BBQ Guru, but neither is mentioned in
> the faq and both have made significant contributions to the art.
> For that matter, the ceramic cooker section only mentions BGE and
> omits Primo and Grilldome, too.

I'm wondering if it might be useful to consider a seperate Barbecue
Equipment FAQ that could act as a supplement or appendix to the original.
Equipment and accessories seem to be far more likely to change frequently,
than the theories, techniques and recipes of the original. Just a thought.

"Tyler Hopper" > wrote in message
> Hey Ed, is the FAQ too hallowed ground to organize an update? You and
eskwired I
> think are the only ones still left who've been here from the beginning so
I
> assumed you'd know.
>
> Where is David these days anyway?
>
>
> Tyler

Most of the information was the same 100 years ago and will be pertinent 100
years in the future as long as hardwood tree grow. . Equipment, however,
does change. That portion should be updated periodically.

The existing information was compiled by people that either owned or has
some experience with the particular rigs. It would take 10 or 15 people
with different equipment to contribute. Bill Wight did the compilation and
editing. I'll see if I can contact him.

I've not seen Dave in a long time. He pops in occasionally or in RFC.
Ed

http://pages.cthome.net/edhome

On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 02:38:39 GMT, "Edwin Pawlowski" >
wrote:

>
>"Tyler Hopper" > wrote in message
>> Hey Ed, is the FAQ too hallowed ground to organize an update? You and
>eskwired I
>> think are the only ones still left who've been here from the beginning so
>I
>> assumed you'd know.
>>
>> Where is David these days anyway?
>>
>>
>> Tyler
>
>Most of the information was the same 100 years ago and will be pertinent 100
>years in the future as long as hardwood tree grow. . Equipment, however,
>does change. That portion should be updated periodically.
>
>The existing information was compiled by people that either owned or has
>some experience with the particular rigs. It would take 10 or 15 people
>with different equipment to contribute. Bill Wight did the compilation and
>editing. I'll see if I can contact him.
>
>I've not seen Dave in a long time. He pops in occasionally or in RFC.
>Ed

>http://pages.cthome.net/edhome
>
Well I contributed to the rfc cook-book, and I can maybe help out on
the Ceramic [ K] side here. I'll be more usefull in a couple of weeks
when I've been through Kim/David's Q-School with Dr BBQ.

Harry

"Tyler Hopper" > wrote in message
...

> Hey Ed, is the FAQ too hallowed ground to organize an update? You and
eskwired I
> think are the only ones still left who've been here from the beginning so
I
> assumed you'd know.
>
> Where is David these days anyway?
>
I agree. Not to flog Kamado or BBQ Guru, but neither is mentioned in the
faq and both have made significant contributions to the art.
For that matter, the ceramic cooker section only mentions BGE and omits
Primo and Grilldome, too.

Jack Curry
-I'll help-

In article >,
Tyler Hopper > wrote:
>
>Hey Ed, is the FAQ too hallowed ground to organize an update? You and eskwired I
>think are the only ones still left who've been here from the beginning so I
>assumed you'd know.
>
>Where is David these days anyway?

He's around lurking from Newton, Massachusetts.


Chuck Demas

--
Eat Healthy | _ _ | Nothing would be done at all,
Stay Fit | @ @ | If a man waited to do it so well,
Die Anyway | v | That no one could find fault with it.
| \___/ | http://world.std.com/~cpd