http://local.msn.com/special/results/2003_bbq.asp

"JoeMcc" > wrote in message
...
> http://local.msn.com/special/results/2003_bbq.asp
>
>


Thanks for the link. Nice index, and I know it's just a tag line, but 'it's
all about the sauce' kinda rubbed me wrong.

Jack (Mad Cow Bull Dodga)

JoeMcc wrote:
>
> http://local.msn.com/special/results/2003_bbq.asp


No Memphis?

No Kansas City?!!


What kind of list is that?




Brian Rodenborn

Default User wrote:
> JoeMcc wrote:
>
>>http://local.msn.com/special/results/2003_bbq.asp
>
>
>
> No Memphis?
>
> No Kansas City?!!
>
>
> What kind of list is that?


Well at least it isn't like CNN.COM's list last year that had Tony Romas
in the top 10 best.

"Default User" > wrote in message >
>
> What kind of list is that?
> Brian Rodenborn

It is a list of places that serve meat with bones covered with a really
sweet sauce. I've been to a few of the places listed. Yes, thee are some
that have real ribs, the others are voted on by people that just suck down
Bulls Eye by the gallon.
Ed

http://pages.cthome.net/edhome

It's actually a pretty useful site. If you click on any one of the cities,
it gives you an option for "other cities". Click on that, then you can pick
your state, city, or enter a zipcode of where you are going. It will list
dozens of q joints, their address, and how many miles away from the city it
is. Even the small, woodburners will be there, though most are unrated. I
always try to rate them when I can.

BTW, I enjoy reading MOST everyone's posts (sorry tofu boy), and sorry for
the top post!

MonopTN

"Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote in message
. com...
>
> "Default User" > wrote in message >
> >
> > What kind of list is that?
> > Brian Rodenborn
>
> It is a list of places that serve meat with bones covered with a really
> sweet sauce. I've been to a few of the places listed. Yes, thee are some
> that have real ribs, the others are voted on by people that just suck down
> Bulls Eye by the gallon.
> Ed
>
> http://pages.cthome.net/edhome
>
>
>

MonopTN wrote:

> BTW, I enjoy reading MOST everyone's posts (sorry tofu boy), and sorry for
> the top post!


I'm puzzled. Why didn't you just not top-post?




Brian Rodenborn

It seems more logical to me. If I read a post, then select the reply, I
generally remember what the original post was without having to scroll
through it all again. However, if I have forgotten, I can simply scroll
down and read what was written previously. Logical?

MonopTN


"Default User" > wrote in message
...
> MonopTN wrote:
>
> > BTW, I enjoy reading MOST everyone's posts (sorry tofu boy), and sorry
for
> > the top post!
>
>
> I'm puzzled. Why didn't you just not top-post?
>
>
>
>
> Brian Rodenborn