All a "meat-eater" need do is eat some reasonable portion of...
shrubkiller wrote:
> On Sep 20, 2:53 pm, The Voice of Reason > wrote:
>> Laurie wrote:
>>> "Jeßus" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Do you know me? No, you don't.
>>> I know you well enough by your juvenile behavior, and personal insults,
>>> here.
>>> I know you can not support your beliefs with facts, science, or logic.
>>> I know that you cannot think for yourself, for you have not even
>>> attempted to do so.
>>> I know you seriously embarrass yourself in public by generating personal
>>> insults, willfully failing to respond to issues, intellectual dishonesty,
>>> and evasiveness.
>>> I know you understand nothing about human physiology, evolution,
>>> biochemistry, epidemiology, or even 8th grade science.
>>> See; I know you well enough.
>>>> Notice I never said I was against being vegan? Nope, of course not.
>>> Straw Man: I did NOT say that.
>>> I merely presented a rational rebuttal to your nonsensical meatarian
>>> propaganda with science.
>>> I have nothing against your eating what you want; munch on!
>>> But, I will NOT tolerate anyone coming to alt.food.vegan.science and
>>> dumping off-topic, unsupportable, meatarian propaganda.
>>> But, THANKS for the Bear link; I will write a line-by-line rebuttal to
>>> HIS dietary nonsense on my site. See, you HAVE made a substantial and
>>> important contribution, for which we all are grateful.
>>> Laurie
>>> Moderator: alt.food.vegan.SCIENCE
>> alt.food.vegan.SCIENCE is an oxymoron. "Veganism" is an
>> anti-scientific, quasi-political, pseudo-religious, completely
>> bogus agenda promoted by mentally unbalanced food faddists.
>> There is not a vegetarian diet which exists in the real world
>> that could not be improved by the judicious addition of some
>> type of animal product.
>
>
> *THAT* is the most absurd set of statements I've read in a long while.
Of course you mean the statements of Larry the Fruity Food Faddist.
|