Dave Bugg wrote:
>
> ULL wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 22:37:18 -0700, "Dave Bugg" >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> ULL wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 02:48:54 GMT, "Dave T." >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Brick wrote:
> >>>>> On 16-Sep-2007, "Dave Bugg" > wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Dave T. wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It hit about 180 degrees at the five hour mark. I just wrapped
> >>>>>>> it in foil and put it back in.
> >>>>>> Why did you wrap it in foil?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Dave
> >>>>>> www.davebbq.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I wanted to ask that, but didn't dare. I've seen some others say
> >>>>> the same thing. I've never seen a need to wrap in foil and then
> >>>>> cook some more. I do wrap in foil to let meat rest in the cooler.
> >>>>> But, that is just to keep it from leaking all over everything. I
> >>>>> think it's too hot right out of the pit to wrap it in plastic
> >>>>> wrap.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yeah, I guess it's something that doesn't need to be done. My
> >>>> problem is that I analyze things to death, and it just seemed like
> >>>> the thing to do. I have another butt in the freezer that I want to
> >>>> do before the weather breaks, and I'll leave the foil in the drawer
> >>>> to see what a difference it makes. I will say that I was really
> >>>> pleased with the results I got though. Now the disclaimer is that
> >>>> this being my first, I don't have a basis of comparison, but my
> >>>> tummy is mui happy.
> >>>
> >>> Taht last is the controlling point. Purists be damned, ...snip
> >>
> >> And may the minions of mediocrity raise their voices in agreement.
> >
> > Ah, so "it tastes _good_" is a sign of "mediocrity", eh?
>
> Millions think McDonalds is great tasting food and are satisfied with eating
> it. The 'tastes good' tactic of yours is sooooo 1969, and a sadly lame
> argument. Thank goodness the minions are safe because you are satisfied to
> let folks continue thinking it is great stuff, and not encourage them to a
> higher standard.
>
> > "Purism" is
> > the only way to glory, even if the results are crap, eh? Bullshit.
>
> What is it, 'traditionalism' or 'purism'? And you think traditional bbq is
> crap, eh? Obviously, you are a bit sensitive on the subject. Advocates of
> mediocrity always lay that same silly accusation at the feet of those who
> encourage excellence. I can't figure out if it is because they are too lazy
> to persue excellence, or have consistently failed in their attempts at such.
>
> > "Tradition" is the hobgoblin of tiny minds, especially WRT food. If
> > tradition were the only factor, we'd all still be eating raw meat.
>
> Wow. You do realize how silly you sound trying to push that non-sequitor
> onto a ng dedicated to barbecue, don't you?
>
> > The goal is a tasty meal. Better good food than lesser-quality
> > "traditioal" crap.
>
> And the millions served by McDonalds and Burger King agree with you. Damn
> those purists and traditionalists who insist on a higher standard!!
>
> Thanks for letting everyone know your standard of excellence; it helps when
> those seeking advice know what their advisors think.
>
> --
> Dave
> www.davebbq.com

Hey, while neither McD's or BK is "fine dining", BK is vastly better
than McD's.