|
Posted to talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,misc.rural
|
|
|
skirt-boy: burden of proof not met
dh@. wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:28:26 GMT, Dutch > wrote:
>
>> dh@. wrote:
>>> On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:13:07 -0700, Rupert > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jul 27, 5:42 pm, Goo wrote:
>>>>> rupie, you lisping fruit: you assert that (non-human)
>>>>> animals are due equal moral consideration (compared
>>>>> with humans). You haven't established that. Get busy,
>>>>> you lisping utilitarian fruit.
>>>> Why don't you have a go at writing some sort of reply to the file
>>>> called "animal rights talk.doc" he
>>>>
>>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/discus..._ethics/files/
>>>>
>>>> Tell me exactly what's wrong with it.
>>> Why don't you just try to explain which rights for which animals
>>> right now?
>> Oh boy ****wit, you sure got him cornered there heh heh..
>
> As yet we've seen nobody even make a good attempt at
> answering that one
God you're stupid.
|