View Single Post
  #296 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,misc.rural,alt.animals.rights.promotion
pearl[_1_] pearl[_1_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 692
Default skirt-boy: burden of proof not met

"Dutch" > wrote in message news:MdHwi.62131$rX4.45115@pd7urf2no...
> pearl wrote:
> > "Dutch" > wrote
> >
> >> we don't need meat,

> >
> > Noted.

>
> We don't need rice either. Make a note of that while you're at it.


Rice is a staple food for many. You make a note of this:

'Analyses of data from the China studies by his collaborators
and others, Campbell told the epidemiology symposium, is
leading to policy recommendations. He mentioned three:

* The greater the variety of plant-based foods in the diet,
the greater the benefit. Variety insures broader coverage of
known and unknown nutrient needs.

* Provided there is plant food variety, quality and quantity,
a healthful and nutritionally complete diet can be attained
without animal-based food.

* The closer the food is to its native state - with minimal
heating, salting and processing - the greater will be the benefit.

http://www.news.cornell.edu/Chronicl..._Study_II.html