|
Posted to talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,misc.rural
|
|
|
skirt-boy: burden of proof not met
dh@. wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:13:07 -0700, Rupert > wrote:
>
>> On Jul 27, 5:42 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>> rupie, you lisping fruit: you assert that (non-human)
>>> animals are due equal moral consideration (compared
>>> with humans). You haven't established that. Get busy,
>>> you lisping utilitarian fruit.
>> Why don't you have a go at writing some sort of reply to the file
>> called "animal rights talk.doc" he
>>
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/discus..._ethics/files/
>>
>> Tell me exactly what's wrong with it.
>
> Why don't you just try to explain which rights for which animals
> right now?
Oh boy ****wit, you sure got him cornered there heh heh..
|