On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:13:07 -0700, Rupert > wrote:

>On Jul 27, 5:42 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>> rupie, you lisping fruit: you assert that (non-human)
>> animals are due equal moral consideration (compared
>> with humans). You haven't established that. Get busy,
>> you lisping utilitarian fruit.
>
>Why don't you have a go at writing some sort of reply to the file
>called "animal rights talk.doc" he
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/discus..._ethics/files/
>
>Tell me exactly what's wrong with it.

Why don't you just try to explain which rights for which animals
right now?