pearl wrote:
> "Dutch" > wrote in message news:GPWti.39889$fJ5.24475@pd7urf1no...
>> pearl wrote:
>>> "Dutch" > wrote in message news:XhQti.39249$fJ5.34707@pd7urf1no...
>>>> He just doesn't get it, they *read* those books, they DON'T AGREE with
>>>> the arguments! They could have said, "Mr Regan, you fool, didn't you
>>>> read *my* book? but they all have too much class to put on such a
>>>> childish display.
>>> He 'got' that their arguments reflected ignorance of the literature.
>> They aren't ignorant, they read "The literature",
>
> The showed "*no evidence*" of reading the philosophical literature.

Translation, they disagreed with the idea of "Animal Rights" therefore
they are to be treated like ignorant children.