View Single Post
  #145 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,misc.rural
Rupert Rupert is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,380
Default skirt-boy: burden of proof not met

On Aug 1, 9:46 pm, Derek > wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 03:57:49 -0700, Rupert > wrote:
> >On Aug 1, 6:28 pm, Derek > wrote:
> >> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:41:23 -0700, Rupert > wrote:

>
> >> [..]

>
> >> >Let me get this straight, Ball. I am perfectly happy to sign my full
> >> >name and photo to all my Internet activity. You, apparently, are a bit
> >> >uncomfortable with the idea that, within a few days, anyone will be
> >> >able to type your name into Google and find a record of this debate.

>
> >> You've provided much more than just that, you spiteful little
> >> prick, including a link to Lesley's spiteful little page, so take
> >> it down. If anyone wants to find a record of your arguments
> >> with him they can go through Google archives and find them
> >> in the usual way. There's certainly no need to publish his
> >> whereabouts and a photograph of him alongside your
> >> arguments, so take it down and stop being spiteful.

>
> >Let me just try to get to terms with your point of view. You think
> >Ball is entitled to behave in the way he behaves on this newsgroup,
> >and he is also entitled to expect people to graciously help him to do
> >it under a cloak of anonymity? Although Karen Winter is not entitled
> >to expect the same privilege?

>
> Unlike Jon, Karen is a potential threat to children, and
> like most other parents I feel compelled to take the right
> course of action against threats like her.
>


Karen's no threat to children. You're in no position to call me a
"spiteful little prick". You really should apologize for that one.

Ball has fantasized about commiting violent acts in public. And come
to think of that I didn't put that one up on my webpage, bit of an
oversight there. Ball is much more likely to be a threat to others
than Karen is.

It doesn't matter whether Ball actually is a danger to society. If he
acts the way he does in public, he's got no cause for complaint when
people decide to make his behaviour a little easier to find out about.
And, frankly, it really wasn't such a big deal. Hardly anyone looks at
my webpage, I don't know what his problem was. It really was quite
amusing the way he got so scared about it. What a pitiful coward.