View Single Post
  #129 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,misc.rural
Rupert Rupert is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,380
Default skirt-boy: burden of proof not met

On Aug 1, 6:28 pm, Derek > wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:41:23 -0700, Rupert > wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> >Let me get this straight, Ball. I am perfectly happy to sign my full
> >name and photo to all my Internet activity. You, apparently, are a bit
> >uncomfortable with the idea that, within a few days, anyone will be
> >able to type your name into Google and find a record of this debate.

>
> You've provided much more than just that, you spiteful little
> prick, including a link to Lesley's spiteful little page, so take
> it down. If anyone wants to find a record of your arguments
> with him they can go through Google archives and find them
> in the usual way. There's certainly no need to publish his
> whereabouts and a photograph of him alongside your
> arguments, so take it down and stop being spiteful.


Let me just try to get to terms with your point of view. You think
Ball is entitled to behave in the way he behaves on this newsgroup,
and he is also entitled to expect people to graciously help him to do
it under a cloak of anonymity? Although Karen Winter is not entitled
to expect the same privilege? I'm having trouble fathoming the
intricacies of your moral theory.