Rupert wrote:
> On Jul 30, 1:55 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>> Rupert wrote:
>>> On Jul 29, 2:39 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 29, 1:53 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>> On Jul 29, 1:11 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 29, 12:59 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 28, 10:59 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 27, 4:20 pm, Rupert > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 27, 5:05 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 27, 4:31 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fatuous shit-4-braincell rupie lisped:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 27, 12:31 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fatuous shit-4-braincell rupie blabbered:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 21, 10:21 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fatuous shit-4-braincell rupie blabbered:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 20, 4:29 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 3:30 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 12:21 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 11, 2:45 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 10, 4:54 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dutch wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Rupert" > wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 10, 12:45 pm, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [..]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have made it clear that you take the view that I am not entitled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to basic courtesy. At present, I choose not to engage with you while
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you continue to hold this view.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How convenient, no loss, you don't engage anyway, you evade,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're not busy being condescending.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your calling me condescending is utterly absurd. You are much more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condescending than me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't know how to start being as condescending as you are. I would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never think of saying to someone that I am debating with that I am being
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generous by helping them with their arguments like you said to rick. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may be blunt, I may insult people when they get on my nerves, but I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not condescending.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you look up "condescension" in the dictionary, you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see the same smug, simpering picture that you see he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/2xwqo6
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You know, I've been biting my tongue on this one, but I have to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say that I'm a bit surprised that you feel you're in a position to try
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to put people down for the way they look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are the effete, simpering queer you appear.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So this is an actual claim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The picture speaks for itself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just answer the question
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There /is/ no question, skirt-boy: the picture
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> portrays a fruity, delicate skirt-boy, and it speaks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for itself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you can tell from looking at my photo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your fruity photo.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you stop beating about the bush
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your photo is extremely fruity.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jolly good. Well,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, you beg to be called a fruit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Er, no.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ERRRRRRRRRR...yes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's focus on this claim clearly, Ball. By publishing my photo on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Internet, I am begging to be called a homosexual. Is that the story?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Incidentally there are a number of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable questions in the quoted part above which I KNOW you have no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adequate response to.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, you don't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes I do, because I have read enough of your responses to similar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> questions to know how you will answer. You will brush the questions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aside with evasive, dismissive remarks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You won't know anything about my response until you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agree to act like a decent human being.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A pact? You stop being condescending and evasive and I will attempt to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be more "polite".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You've been far more polite with skirt-boy than I have,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and it hasn't got you anywhere. He's an arrogant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little bitch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All the antis here have been unreasonably rude to me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have asked for it. It is perfectly reasonable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is not reasonable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is reasonable. You've asked for it, and your wish
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has been granted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're not well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quite well, thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You ask for the treatment you receive.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your contemptible behaviour
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **** off, squirt.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your calling me "condescending" and "arrogant" is utterly farcical.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You think that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We all do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really have no clue about how sensible people
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have more than a 'clue', skirt-boy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do, rupie - much more than a clue, in fact.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have a clue about how amusing that statement is to me?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't find it amusing, skirt-boy. You find it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> infuriating. I can smell your rage.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And true.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good ol'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stupid fruity ****wit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Boring.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure, rupie - sure. That's why you keep coming back isn't it -
>>>>>>>>>>>> because you're bored? Ha ha ha ha ha!
>>>>>>>>>>> It's fairly entertaining most of the time,
>>>>>>>>>> You're a masochist.
>>>>>>>>> You think?
>>>>>>>> We know.
>>>>>>> Who are "we",
>>>>>> Sensible folk. But not you.
>>>>> Sensible folk
>>>> ...but not you.
>>> Tell us more about how sensible people view the world
>> Go back and read my posts.
>
> Oh, I do.

Then you see that I already talk about how sensible
people view the world, and your demand that I tell you
more was disingenuous and, in your typical fashion,
dishonest.