View Single Post
  #996 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,misc.rural
Rudy Canoza[_1_] Rudy Canoza[_1_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 282
Default The myth of food production "efficiency" in the "ar" debate

Rupert wrote:
> On Jul 29, 12:59 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>> Rupert wrote:
>>> On Jul 28, 10:59 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>> On Jul 27, 4:20 pm, Rupert > wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 27, 5:05 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>> On Jul 27, 4:31 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>> fatuous shit-4-braincell rupie lisped:
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 27, 12:31 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> fatuous shit-4-braincell rupie blabbered:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 21, 10:21 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> fatuous shit-4-braincell rupie blabbered:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 20, 4:29 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 3:30 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 12:21 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 11, 2:45 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 10, 4:54 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dutch wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Rupert" > wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 10, 12:45 pm, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [..]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have made it clear that you take the view that I am not entitled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to basic courtesy. At present, I choose not to engage with you while
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you continue to hold this view.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How convenient, no loss, you don't engage anyway, you evade,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're not busy being condescending.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your calling me condescending is utterly absurd. You are much more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condescending than me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't know how to start being as condescending as you are. I would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never think of saying to someone that I am debating with that I am being
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generous by helping them with their arguments like you said to rick. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may be blunt, I may insult people when they get on my nerves, but I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not condescending.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you look up "condescension" in the dictionary, you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see the same smug, simpering picture that you see he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/2xwqo6
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You know, I've been biting my tongue on this one, but I have to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say that I'm a bit surprised that you feel you're in a position to try
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to put people down for the way they look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are the effete, simpering queer you appear.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So this is an actual claim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The picture speaks for itself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just answer the question
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There /is/ no question, skirt-boy: the picture
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> portrays a fruity, delicate skirt-boy, and it speaks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for itself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you can tell from looking at my photo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your fruity photo.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you stop beating about the bush
>>>>>>>>>>>> Your photo is extremely fruity.
>>>>>>>>>>> Jolly good. Well,
>>>>>>>>>> So, you beg to be called a fruit.
>>>>>>>>> Er, no.
>>>>>>>> ERRRRRRRRRR...yes.
>>>>>>> Let's focus on this claim clearly, Ball. By publishing my photo on the
>>>>>>> Internet, I am begging to be called a homosexual. Is that the story?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Incidentally there are a number of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable questions in the quoted part above which I KNOW you have no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adequate response to.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, you don't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes I do, because I have read enough of your responses to similar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> questions to know how you will answer. You will brush the questions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aside with evasive, dismissive remarks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You won't know anything about my response until you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agree to act like a decent human being.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A pact? You stop being condescending and evasive and I will attempt to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be more "polite".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You've been far more polite with skirt-boy than I have,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and it hasn't got you anywhere. He's an arrogant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little bitch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All the antis here have been unreasonably rude to me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have asked for it. It is perfectly reasonable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is not reasonable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is reasonable. You've asked for it, and your wish
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has been granted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're not well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quite well, thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You ask for the treatment you receive.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your contemptible behaviour
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **** off, squirt.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your calling me "condescending" and "arrogant" is utterly farcical.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You think that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We all do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really have no clue about how sensible people
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have more than a 'clue', skirt-boy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do, rupie - much more than a clue, in fact.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have a clue about how amusing that statement is to me?
>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't find it amusing, skirt-boy. You find it
>>>>>>>>>>>> infuriating. I can smell your rage.
>>>>>>>>>>> Classic,
>>>>>>>>>> And true.
>>>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>>> Good ol'
>>>>>> Stupid fruity ****wit.
>>>>> Boring.
>>>> Sure, rupie - sure. That's why you keep coming back isn't it -
>>>> because you're bored? Ha ha ha ha ha!
>>> It's fairly entertaining most of the time,

>> You're a masochist.

>
> You think?


We know.