On Jul 27, 12:52 pm, shrubkiller > wrote:
> On Jul 27, 1:42 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>
> > rupie, you lisping fruit: you assert that (non-human)
> > animals are due equal moral consideration (compared
> > with humans). You haven't established that. Get busy,
> > you lisping utilitarian fruit.
>
> Why would anyone have to prove something which is SELF EVIDENT?

It is not self-evident. In fact, it is more likely self-evidently
false.