On Jul 12, 3:30 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
> > On Jul 12, 12:21 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
> >>> On Jul 11, 2:45 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote:
> >>>>> On Jul 10, 4:54 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>>>> Dutch wrote:
> >>>>>>> "Rupert" > wrote
> >>>>>>>> On Jul 10, 12:45 pm, "Dutch" > wrote:
> >>>>>>> [..]
> >>>>>>>>>> You have made it clear that you take the view that I am not entitled
> >>>>>>>>>> to basic courtesy. At present, I choose not to engage with you while
> >>>>>>>>>> you continue to hold this view.
> >>>>>>>>> How convenient, no loss, you don't engage anyway, you evade,
> >>>>>>>> No.
> >>>>>>>>> that is when
> >>>>>>>>> you're not busy being condescending.
> >>>>>>>> Your calling me condescending is utterly absurd. You are much more
> >>>>>>>> condescending than me.
> >>>>>>> I wouldn't know how to start being as condescending as you are. I would
> >>>>>>> never think of saying to someone that I am debating with that I am being
> >>>>>>> generous by helping them with their arguments like you said to rick. I
> >>>>>>> may be blunt, I may insult people when they get on my nerves, but I'm
> >>>>>>> not condescending.
> >>>>>> If you look up "condescension" in the dictionary, you
> >>>>>> see the same smug, simpering picture that you see he
> >>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/2xwqo6
> >>>>> You know, I've been biting my tongue on this one, but I have to
> >>>>> say that I'm a bit surprised that you feel you're in a position to try
> >>>>> to put people down for the way they look.
> >>>> You are the effete, simpering queer you appear.
> >>> So this is an actual claim
> >> The picture speaks for itself.
>
> > Just answer the question
>
> There /is/ no question, skirt-boy: the picture
> portrays a fruity, delicate skirt-boy, and it speaks
> for itself.
>
So you can tell from looking at my photo that I'm homosexual, right?
Go on, say it.
>
>
>
>
> >>>>>>>>> Incidentally there are a number of
> >>>>>>>>> reasonable questions in the quoted part above which I KNOW you have no
> >>>>>>>>> adequate response to.
> >>>>>>>> No, you don't.
> >>>>>>> Yes I do, because I have read enough of your responses to similar
> >>>>>>> questions to know how you will answer. You will brush the questions
> >>>>>>> aside with evasive, dismissive remarks.
> >>>>>>>> You won't know anything about my response until you
> >>>>>>>> agree to act like a decent human being.
> >>>>>>> A pact? You stop being condescending and evasive and I will attempt to
> >>>>>>> be more "polite".
> >>>>>> You've been far more polite with skirt-boy than I have,
> >>>>>> and it hasn't got you anywhere. He's an arrogant
> >>>>>> little bitch.
> >>>>> All the antis here have been unreasonably rude to me.
> >>>> You have asked for it. It is perfectly reasonable.
> >>> It is not reasonable.
> >> It is reasonable. You've asked for it, and your wish
> >> has been granted.
>
> > You're not well.
>
> Quite well, thanks.
>
> You ask for the treatment you receive.
>
Your contemptible behaviour, your ridiculous childishness, your
absurdly distorted views of reality, and your lack of insight into how
lame you appear to others, are what speak for themselves.
> >>>>> Your calling me "condescending" and "arrogant" is utterly farcical.
> >>>> No.
> >>> You think that
> >> We all do.
>
> > You really have no clue about how sensible people
>
> I have more than a 'clue', skirt-boy.
You really don't, Ball. You scarcely have a clue about anything. There
are many, many examples of this. Here's one: you actually think you're
scoring points with all this silly childish nonsense about me being
queer, don't you, as opposed to making a pathetic clown of yourself?
You think, when you talk absurd nonsense about my photo you're
actually scoring some sort of point, as opposed to making me howl with
laughter? That this is how mature people behave, and I'm the one who's
the "immature boy"? You really don't have the slightest clue about
what a complete joke just about everything you say is, do you?