****wit David Harrison, hopelessly overmatched as
always and chronic time-waster, lied:
> On Thu, 05 Jul 2007, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>
>> On Jul 2, 9:14 pm, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>> <dh@.> wrote in messagenews:a2ai835mv6spncccb7uk3oe2e7fc9c66ii@4ax .com...
>>>> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:53:02 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>>> <dh@.> wrote
>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 20:34:56 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>>>>> <dh@.> wrote
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:22:35 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>>>>>>> You may as well go talk to someone who actually holds those beliefs,
>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>> obviously can't deal with my arguments.
>>>>>>>> That's because your "argument" is based completely on
>>>>>>>> a fantasy written by a founder of the misnomer.
>>>>>>> That's an obvious lie and you know it. I was successfully refuting your
>>>>>>> LoL
>>>>>>> before I knew it had a name, years before Derek posted the link to
>>>>>>> Salt's
>>>>>>> excellent essay.
>>>>>> You would have to present some example(s) of that before I could
>>>>>> believe you, meaning almost certainly that I will never be able to.
>>>>>>> So was Jonathan.
>>>>>>> Why do you think that you can get away with posting obvious lies?
>>>>>> It's up to you to provide evidence that I lied, so get busy trying.
>>>>> Assuming I went to the trouble of digging up that evidence, what good
>>>>> would
>>>>> it do?
>>>> For you it would provide evidence that you're not lying.
>>> I already know I'm not lying. What good would it do me to prove it to you?
>> ****wit knows you're not lying
>
> No Rudy.

Yes, ****wit. He isn't lying, and you know he isn't.
Lying and time-wasting are the only tactics you've had
available to you for seven years.