Considering human influence on animals
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007, Goo lied:
>On Jul 2, 9:14 pm, "Dutch" > wrote:
>> <dh@.> wrote in messagenews:a2ai835mv6spncccb7uk3oe2e7fc9c66ii@4ax .com...
>> > On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:53:02 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>
>> >><dh@.> wrote
>> >>> On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 20:34:56 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>
>> >>>><dh@.> wrote
>> >>>>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:22:35 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>
>> >>>>>>You may as well go talk to someone who actually holds those beliefs,
>> >>>>>>you
>> >>>>>>obviously can't deal with my arguments.
>>
>> >>>>> That's because your "argument" is based completely on
>> >>>>> a fantasy written by a founder of the misnomer.
>>
>> >>>>That's an obvious lie and you know it. I was successfully refuting your
>> >>>>LoL
>> >>>>before I knew it had a name, years before Derek posted the link to
>> >>>>Salt's
>> >>>>excellent essay.
>>
>> >>> You would have to present some example(s) of that before I could
>> >>> believe you, meaning almost certainly that I will never be able to.
>>
>> >>>>So was Jonathan.
>>
>> >>>>Why do you think that you can get away with posting obvious lies?
>>
>> >>> It's up to you to provide evidence that I lied, so get busy trying.
>>
>> >>Assuming I went to the trouble of digging up that evidence, what good
>> >>would
>> >>it do?
>>
>> > For you it would provide evidence that you're not lying.
>>
>> I already know I'm not lying. What good would it do me to prove it to you?
>
>****wit knows you're not lying
No Goo.
|