Considering human influence on animals
<dh@.> wrote in message ...
> On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 04:15:21 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
>
>><dh@.> wrote in message ...
>>> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:33:47 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>
>>>><dh@.> wrote in message
m...
>>>>> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, the Goober claimed:
>>>>>>dh once again explained:
>>>>>>> "Dutch" wrote:
>>>>>>> >dh pointed out:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> >> I can see and understand the pureness of your selfishness
>>>>>>> >> in regards to livestock, but I don't have to join you in it
>>>>>>> >> ESPECIALLY because I can recognise it for what it is. I certainly
>>>>>>> >> do NOT want to join you in it, and doubt that I possibly could
>>>>>>> >> even if I did want to at this point. After having learned to
>>>>>>> >> appreciate
>>>>>>> >> the fact that many livestock have lives of positive value, I
>>>>>>> >> don't
>>>>>>> >> believe I could possibly ever develop your faith that veganism
>>>>>>> >> is the most ethically supreme possible approach.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >You may as well go talk to someone who actually holds those
>>>>>>> >beliefs,
>>>>>>> >you
>>>>>>> >obviously can't deal with my arguments.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's because your "argument" is based completely on
>>>>>>> a fantasy
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No, ****wit. His argument is based on facts and logic.
>>>>>
>>>>> I challenge either of you to present "them" Goobs.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Your challenges, like your quizzes, are worthless tripe, because you
>>>>utter
>>>>them.
>>>
>>> I challenge either of you to present "them", Bagoo.
>>
>>Too many challenges
>
> Every one of them is
A complete waste of time.
|